This study examines to what extent job evaluation systems align with public views on fair pay. Using a Participatory Value Evaluation, over 3,700 Dutch citizens distributed extra salary among various jobs and explained their choices. The arguments were compared to criteria used in job evaluation systems. The dimensions prioritized by participants, such as required education, job complexity, and working conditions, are already well represented in current formal job evaluation systems. However, participants also stressed aspects often absent from such systems, including a job’s societal contribution and labour market scarcity. While job evaluation systems remain broadly consistent with public reasoning, we recommend initiating broader public and institutional discussions on the evolving values that underpin fair compensation.
AbidinN. Z.PangilF.OthmanS. Z. (2020). Pay inequity and employee outcomes: The mediating role of perceived organizational justice.International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(6), 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i6/7353
2.
AdamsJ. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040968
3.
ArmstrongM. (2018). Armstrong’s job evaluation handbook: A guide to achieving pay fairness and transperancy in pay and reward. Kogan Page Publishers.
4.
BatruchA.JettenJ.Van de WerfhorstH. G.DarnonC.ButeraF. (2022). Belief in school meritocracy and the legitimation of social and income inequality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(5), 632–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221111017
ChicaM. T. (2008). Promoting equity: Gender neutral job evaluation for equal pay: A step-by-step guide. International Labour Office (ILO).
8.
de RuiterA.TuitC.MouterN. (2025). Beyond face validity: Assessment of a participatory value evaluation for an institutionalized transport conflict. Transport Policy, 171, 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.05.024
9.
FalkA.KosseF.PingerP. (2018). Mentoring and school performance: Evidence from a randomized field experiment.The Review of Economic Studies, 85(3), 1800–1832. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdx046
10.
FigartD. M. (2000). Equal pay for equal work: The rol of job evaluation in an evolving social norm. Journal of Economic Issues, 34(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2000.11506241
11.
GrimshawD.RuberyJ. (2007). Undervaluing women’s work. Manchester: University of Manchester.
HsiehH.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
14.
Le GarrecG. (2018). Fairness, social norms and the cultural demand for redistribution. Social Choice and Welfare, 50(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1080-6
15.
MarcinkowskiL.ButnaruA.RabrenovicA. (2024). Salary systems in public administration and their reforms. SIGMA Papers, (No. 63). https://doi.org/10.1787/8f08a005-en
16.
MichaeliD. T.MichaeliJ. C.AlbersS.MichaeliT. (2024). The healthcare workforce shortage of nurses and physicians: Practice, theory, evidence and ways forward. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 25(4), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544241286083
17.
MilkovichG.T.NewmanJ.M.GerhartB (2023). Compansation (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
18.
MouterN.JaraK. T.HernándezJ. I.KroesenM.de VriesM.GeijsenT.KroeseF.UitersE.de BruinM. (2022). Stepping into the shoes of the policy maker: Results of a participatory value evaluation for the Dutch long term COVID-19 strategy. Social Science & Medicine, 314(115430), 115430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115430
19.
MulderijL. S.HernándezJ. I.MouterN.VerkooijenK. T.WagemakersA. (2021). Citizen preferences regarding the public funding of projects promoting healthy body weight among people with a low income. Social Science & Medicine, 280, 114015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114015
20.
NewlandsG. L. C.LutzC. (2024). Mapping the prestige and social value of occupations in the digital economy. Journal of Business Research, 180, 114716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.busres.2024.114716
SchellerE. M.HarrisonW. (2018). Ignorance is bliss, or is it? The effects of pay transparancy, informational justice and distributive justice on pay satisfaction and affective commitment. Compensation & Benefits Review, 50(2), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886368719833215
25.
ScottD. (2018). Pay communications and fairness: An employee perspective. Compensation and Benefits Review, 50(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886368718809774
26.
SymeonidisV.GubermanA.CooperR. (2025). Addressing teacher shortages in an international context: Implications for the quality and status of teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 48(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2025.2447968
Van de GlindI.MulderR.AkkermanA.Van der BiezenM.BootsmaJ.FinnemaE.Van de VenG.MouterN.van RooijJ. (2025). Mapping the literature on job evaluation: A scoping review. Compensation and Benefits Review, 57(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/08863687241279592
29.
Van OorschotW. (2000). Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy & Politics, 28(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1332/0305573002500811
30.
WilsonJ. M.MIles-JohnsonT. (2024). The police staffing crisis: Evidence-based approaches for building, balancing, and optimizing effective workforces. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 18(paae044), paae044. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paae044
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
