Martin, D.C. , Bartol, K.M., & Kehoe, P.E. (2000). The legal ramifications of performance appraisal: The growing significance. Public Personnel Management, 29, 379-406.
2.
Bernadin, J.H. , Hennessey, H.W., Jr., & Peyrefitte , J. (1995). Age, racial, and gender bias as a function criterion specificity: A test of expert testimony. Human Resources Management Review, 5, 63-77.
3.
Dipboye, R.L. (1985). Some neglected variables in research on discrimination in appraisals. Academy of Management Review, 10, 116-127.
4.
DuBois, C.L.Z., Sackett, P.R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1993). Further exploration of typical and maximum performance criteria: Definitional issues, prediction, and white-black differences. Journal of Applied Psychology , 78, 205-211.
5.
Ford, K.J., Kraiger, K., & Schechtman, S.L. (1986). Study of race effects in objective indices and subjective evaluations of performance: A meta-analysis of performance criteria. Psychological Bulletin,99, 330-337.
6.
Kraiger, K., & Ford, K.J. (1985). A meta-analysis of rater race effects in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 56-65.
7.
Mount, M., Sytsma, M.R., Hazucha, J.F., & Holt, K.E. (1997). Rater-ratee race effects in developmental performance ratings of managers. Personnel Psychology, 50, 51-69.
8.
Oppler, S.H. , Campbell, J.P., Pulakos, E.D., & Borman , W.C. (1992). Three approaches to the investigation of subgroup bias in performance measurement: Review results and conclusions. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 77, 201-217.
9.
Pulakos, E.D. , White, L.A., Oppler, S.H., & Borman , W.C. (1989). Examination of race and sex effects on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 770-780.
Posthuma, R.A. , & Campion, M.A. (2005). When do multiple dimensions of procedural justice predict agreement to publicly endorse your employer in recruitment advertisements? Journal of Occupational & OrganizationalPsychology, 78, 431-452.
16.
Posthuma, R.A. , Maertz, C.P., & Dworkin , J.B. (2007). Procedural justice's relationship with turnover: Explaining past inconsistent findings. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 381-398.
17.
Taylor, M.S. , Tracy, K.B., Renard, M.K., Harrison, J.K., & Carroll , S.J. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice . Administrative Science Quarterly,40, 495-523.
18.
Miller, C.S. , Kaspin, J.A., & Schuster , M.H. (1990). The impact of performance appraisal methods on age discrimination in employment act cases. Personnel Psychology, 43, 555-578.
19.
Folger, R., Konovsky, M.A., & Cropanzano, R. (1992). A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. Research in Organizational Behavior , 14, 129-177.
20.
Dipboye, R.L. , & de Pontbriand , R. (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems . Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 248-251.
21.
Field, H.S., & Holley, W.H. (1982). The relationship of performance appraisal system characteristics to verdicts in selected employment discrimination cases. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 392-406.
22.
Holley, W.H., & Field, H.S. (1977). The law and performance evaluation in education: A review of court cases and implications for use. Journal of Law & Education, 6, 427-448.
23.
Martin, D.C., Bartol, K.M., & Levine, M.J. (1986). The legal ramifications of performance appraisal . Employee Relations Law Journal, 12, 370-396.
24.
Werner, J.M. , & Bolino, M.C. (1997). Explaining U.S. Courts of Appeals decisions involving performance appraisal: Accuracy, fairness and validation. Personnel Psychology, 50, 1-24.
25.
Hennessey, H.W., Jr., & Bernadin , J. (2003). The relationship between performance appraisal criterion specificity and statistical evidence of discrimination. Human Resources Management, 42, 143-158.
26.
Ilgen, D.R. , Barnes-Farrell, J.L., & McKellin , D.B. (1993). Performance appraisal process research in the 1980s: What has contributed to appraisals in use?Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 54, 321-368.
27.
Kleiman, L.S. , & Durham, R.L. (1981). Performance appraisal, promotion and the courts: A critical review. Personnel Psychology , 34, 103-121.
28.
Nathan, B.R., & Cascio, W.F. (1986). Introduction: Technical & legal standards . In R. A. Berk (Ed.), Performance assessment: Methods & applications (pp. 1-50). Baltimore : John Hopkins University Press.
29.
Konrad, A.M. , & Linnehan, F. (1995). Formalized HRM structures: Coordinating equal employment opportunity or concealing organizational practices?Academy of Management Journal, 38, 787-820.
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D.S., & Schmidt , F.L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557-574.
32.
Church, A.H. (1995). From both sides now: Performance appraisals: Political tools or effective measures?Industrial Organizational Psychologist, 33, 57-64.
33.
Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology , 71, 340-342.
34.
Landy, F.J. , Barnes, J.L., & Murphy , K.R. (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 751-754.
35.
Barrett, G.V. , & Kernan, M.C. (1987). Performance appraisal and terminations: A review of court decisions since Brito v. Zia with implications for personnel practices. Personnel Psychology, 40, 489-503.
36.
Cascio, W.F. , & Bernardin, H.J. (1981). Implications of performance appraisal litigation for personnel decisions. Personnel Psychology , 34, 211-226.