The violence scale of the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) is a widely used instrument in the field of spousal violence research. However, a number of criticisms have been raised about measuring spousal violence with the CTS, including questioning the item content and the reliability and construct validity of the violence scale. This article discusses certain aspects of these issues and illustrates several points with data analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barling, J. , O'Leary, K. D., Jouriles, E. N., Vivian, D., & MacEwen, K. E. (1987). Factor similarity of the Conflict Tactics Scales across samples, spouses, and sites: Issues and implications.Journal of Family Violence, 2, 37-54.
2.
Bentler, P. M. , & Wu, E.J.C. (1993). EQS/Windows user's guide (Version 4). Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software.
3.
Biddle, J. R. (1993). The use of self-report questionnaires in the assessment of couples with marital & psychiatric problems.Brockton, MA: Brockton/West Roxbury Veterans Administration Medical Center.
4.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables.New York: John Wiley.
5.
Browning, J. , & Dutton, D. (1986). Assessment of wife assault with the Conflict Tactics Scale: Using couple data to quantify the differential reporting effect.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 375-379.
6.
Collins, L. M. , Fidler, P. L., Wugalter, S. E., & Long, J. D. (1993). Goodness-of-fit testing for latent class models.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 375-389.
7.
Dobash, R. E. , & Dobash, R. P. (1978). Wives: The “appropriate” victims of marital violence.Victimology, 1, 416-441.
8.
Edelson, J. L. , & Brygger, M. P. (1986). Gender differences in reporting of battering incidences.Family Relations, 35, 377-382.
9.
Hambleton, R. K. , Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Hornung, C. A. , McCullough, B. C., & Sugimoto, T. (1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 675-672.
11.
Hox, J. J. (1994). Applied multilevel analysis.Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties.
12.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Ed.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Jouriles, E. N. , & O'Leary, K. D. (1985). Interspousal reliability of reports of marital violence.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 419-421.
14.
Kenny, D. A. (1991). A general model of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception.Psychological Review, 98, 155-163.
15.
Leigh, B. C. , & Stall, R. (1993). Substance use and risky sexual behavior for exposure to HIV: Issues in methodology, interpretation, and prevention.American Psychologist, 48, 1035-1045.
16.
McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Miller, B. A. (1990). The interrelationships between alcohol and drugs and family violence.National Institute on Drug Abuse: Research Monograph Series, 103, 177-207.
18.
Mislevy, R. J. , & Bock, R. D. (1990). BILOG 3 (2nd ed.). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc.
19.
Nunnally, J. C. , & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
O'Leary, K. D. , & Arias, I. (1989). Assessing agreement of reports of spouse abuse. In G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. T. Kirkpatrick, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Family abuse and its consequences: New directions in research (pp. 218-227). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
O'Leary, K. D. , Barling, J., Arias, I., Rosenbaum, A., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1989). Prevalence and stability of physical aggression between spouses: A longitudinal analysis.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 263-268.
22.
Pan, H. S. , Neidig, P. H., & O'Leary, K. D. (1994). Male-female and aggressor-victim differences in the factor structure of the modified Conflict Tactics Scale.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 366-382.
23.
Pedhazur, E. J. , & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Raudenbush, S. W. , Brennan, R. T., & Barnett, R. C. (1995). A multivariate hierarchical model for studying psychological change within married couples.Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 161-174.
25.
Riggs, D. S. , Murphy, C. M., & O'Leary, K. D. (1989). Intentional falsification in reports of interpartner aggression.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 220-232.
26.
Satorra, A. , & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi square statistics in covariance structure analysis, American Statistical Association, 1988 Proceedings of the Business and Economic Sections (pp. 308-313). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
27.
Straus, M. A. (1974). Leveling, civility, and violence in the family.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 13-29.
28.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the Conflict Tactics (CT) scales.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
29.
Straus, M. A. (1990a). The conflict tactics scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8, 145 families (Chapter 4). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
30.
Straus, M. A. (1990b). New scoring methods for violence and new norms for the conflict tactics scales. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (Appendix B). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
31.
Straus, M. A. , & Gelles, R. J. (1990). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
32.
Szinovacz, M. E. (1983). Using couple data as a methodological tool: The case of marital violence.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 633-644.
33.
Urquiza, A. , Schafer, J., Trocki, K. T., & Goodlin-Jones, B. (under review). Conflict Tactics Scale: Rates of response with multiple methods of administration.
34.
West, S. G. , Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
