Attitudes of three groups of adolescents were measured by means of two versions of Briere's Attitudes to Wife Abuse (AWA) scale. Self-reports of the likelihood of using physical violence in future relationships also were collected by means of four versions of Briere's Likelihood of Battering (LOB) scale. Results suggested that, overall, boys are more tolerant of domestic violence than girls. However, girls recorded a greater likelihood of using physical violence in future relationships than did boys. There was some suggestion that wives (or husbands) were viewed differently from nonmarital partners. Attitude measures indicated that if the attitudes expressed translate into action, in future relationships, women may be better off as partners than as wives, but behavior predicted by girls hinted that husbands might be subjects of higher expectations than nonmarital partners. Meanings of the results are explored, and implications of the findings considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berk, R. A. , Fenstermaker Berk, S., Loseke, D. R., & Rauma, D. (1983). Mutual combat and other family violence myths. In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families: Current family violence research.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Briere, J. (1987). Predicting self-reported likelihood of battering: Attitudes and childhood experiences.Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 61-69.
3.
Brinkerhof, M. B. , & Lupri, E. (1988). Interspousal violence.Canadian Journal of Sociology, 13(4), 407-434.
4.
Cowie, C. , & Lees, S. (1987). Slags or drags. In Feminist Review (Ed.), Sexuality: A reader (pp. 105-122). London: Virago.
5.
Dobash, R. E. , & Dobash, R. P. (1977-1978). Wives: The appropriate victims of marital violence.Victimology, 2(3-4), 426-442.
6.
Dobash, R. E. , & Dobash, R. P. (1980). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy.London: Open Books.
7.
Dobash, R. E. , & Dobash, R. P. (1984). The nature and antecedents of violent events.British Journal of Criminology, 24(3), 269-288.
8.
Dobash, R. E. , & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence and social change.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
9.
Eisikovits, Z. C. , Edleson, J. L., Guttmann, E., & Sela-Amit, M. (1991). Cognitive styles and socialized attitudes of men who batter: Where should we intervene?Family Relations, 40, 72-77.
10.
Evason, E. (1982). Hidden violence: A study of battered women in Northern Ireland.Belfast, Ireland: Farset Cooperative Press.
11.
Feltey, K. M. , Ainslie, J. J., & Geib, A. (1991). Sexual coercion attitudes among high school students: The influence of gender and rape education.Youth and Society, 23(2), 229-250.
12.
Freeman, M.D.A. (1979). Violence in the home.Aldershot: Gower.
13.
Finn, J. (1986). The relationship between sex role attitudes and attitudes supporting marital violence.Sex Roles, 14(5/6), 235-244.
14.
Her Majesty's Stationary Office . (1993). Social trends 23.London: Author.
15.
Holcomb, D. R. , Holcomb, L. C., Sondag, K. A., & Williams, N. (1991). Attitudes about rape: Gender differences among college students.College Student Journal, 25(4), 434-439.
16.
Hudson, B. (1984). Femininity and adolescence. In A. McRobbie & M. Nava (Eds.), Gender and generation (pp. 31-53). London: Macmillan.
17.
Kalmuss, D. S. , & Straus, M. A. (1982). Wife's marital dependency and wife abuse.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 277-286.
18.
Kincaid, P. J. (1982). The omitted reality: Husband-wife violence in Ontario and policy implications for education.Concord, Ontario: Belsten.
19.
Langley, T. , Beatty, G., Yost, E., & O'Neal, E. C. (1991). How behavioral cues in a date rape scenario influence judgements regarding victim and perpetrator.Forensic Reports, 4(3), 355-358.
20.
Muehlenhard, C. L. , Friedman, D. E., & Thomas, C. M. (1985). Is rape justifiable? The effects of dating activity, who initiated, who paid, and men's attitudes toward women.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(3), 297-309.
21.
Pagelow, M. D. (1981). Woman-battering: Victims and their experiences.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
Proite, R. , Dannells, M., & Benton, S. (1993). Gender, sex-role stereotypes, and the attribution of responsibility for date and acquaintance rape.Journal of College Student Development, 34(6), 411-417.
23.
Scritchfield, S. A. , & Masker, J. (1989). Gender traditionality and perceptions of date rape.Association paper, American Sociological Association.
24.
Smith, L.J.F. (1989). Domestic violence: An overview of the literature (A Home Office Research and Planning Unit report). London: HMSO.
25.
Smith, M. D. (1990). Sociodemographic risk factors in wife abuse: Results from a survey of Toronto women.Canadian Journal of Sociology, 15(1), 39-58.
26.
Steinmetz, S. K. (1977). The cycle of violence.New York: Praeger.
27.
Stets, J. E. , & Straus, M. A. (1989). The marriage license as a hitting license: A comparison of assaults in dating, cohabiting, and married couples. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships (pp. 33-52). New York: Praeger.
28.
Straus, M. A. , Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1981). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes v. actions: The relationship of verbal and overt responses to attitude objects. In N. Warren & M. Jahoda (Eds.), Attitudes (pp. 167-194). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
30.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour.Hampshire, UK: Gower.
31.
Yllö, K. , & Straus, M. A. (1981). Interpersonal violence among married and co-habiting couples.Family Relations, 30, 339-347.
