This study hypothesized that battered women compared with nonbattered women use more violence, receive lower levels of social support, and experience higher levels of self-blame. Also hypothesized is that these three variables are interrelated. A sample of 95 women constituted 3 groups: battered women, nonbattered women in counseling, and nonbattered, noncounseled women. The women completed the Conflict Tactics Scales, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, and a 61-item self-blame scale. Results supported all of the major hypotheses and revealed that female-to-male violence in battered women is negatively related with level of perceived social support and positively linked with level of self-blame. The latter correlation rested primarily on the association between nonphysical CTS abuse items and self-blame measures. These findings help provide further specificity about battered women's perceived lack of social support and help to clarify reported inconsistencies about self-blame.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, B. , & Brewin, C. R. (1990). Attributions of blame for marital violence: A study of antecedents and consequences.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 757-767.
2.
Barnett, O. W. , Haney-Martindale, D. J., Modzelewski, C. A., & Sheltra, E. M. (1991, April). Reasons why battered women feel self-blame. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, San Francisco.
3.
Bowker, L. H. (1993). A battered woman's problems are social, not psychological. In R.J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 154-165). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Browne, A. (1993). Violence against women by male partners.American Psychologist, 48, 1077-1087.
5.
Byrne, C. A. , Arias, I., & Lyons, C. M. (1993, March). Attributions for partner behavior in violent and nonviolent couples. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Atlanta.
6.
Cascardi, M. , & O'Leary, K. D. (1992). Depressive symptomatology, self-esteem, and self-blame in battered women.Journal of Family Violence, 7, 249-259.
7.
Draper, P. (1992). Room to maneuver:!Kung women cope. In D. A. Counts, J. K. Brown, & J. C. Campbell (Eds.), Sanctions and sanctuary: Cultural perspectives on the beating of wives (pp. 43-62). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
8.
Dutton, D. G. , & Hemphill, K. J. (1992). Patterns of socially desirable responding among perpetrators and victims of wife assault.Violence and Victims, 7, 29-39.
9.
Ewing, C. P. , & Aubrey, M. (1987). Battered women and public opinion: Some realities about myths.Journal of Family Violence, 2, 257-264.
10.
Feld, S. L. , & Straus, M. A. (1989). Escalation and desistance of assault: Concepts and definitions.Criminology, 27, 141-161.
11.
Gelles, R. J. , & Harrop, J. W. (1989). Violence, battering, and psychological distress among women.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 400-420.
12.
Gondolf, E. W. (1988). The effect of batterer counseling on shelter outcome.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 275-289.
13.
Hamberger, L. K. , & Arnold, J. (1991). The impact of mandatory arrest on domestic violence perpetrator counseling services.Family Violence Bulletin, 6, 11-12.
14.
Hendricks-Matthews, M. (1982). The battered woman: Is she ready for help?Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 63, 131-137.
15.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1988). Causal attribution in marital violence: Theoretical and methodological issues.Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 331-344.
16.
Hotaling, G. T. , & Straus, M. A. (1990). Intrafamily violence and crime and violence outside the family. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 431-470). New Brunswick, CT: Transaction Books.
17.
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1985). Criminal vs. noncriminal victimization: Victims' reactions.Victimology: An International Journal, 10, 498-511.
18.
Landenburger, K. (1989). A process of entrapment in and recovery from an abusive relationship.Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 10, 209-227.
19.
McCubbin, H. I. , Larsen, A. S., & Olson, D. H. (1982). F-Copes: Family coping strategies. In D. H. Olson (Ed.), Family inventories (pp.101-118). St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
McLeer, S. V. , & Anwar, R. (1989). A study of battered women presenting in an emergency department.American Journal of Public Health, 79, 65-66.
21.
Miller, D. T. , & Porter, C. A. (1983). Self-blame in victims of violence.Journal of Social Issues, 39, 139-152.
22.
Mills, T. (1985). The assault on the self: Stages in coping with battering husbands.Qualitative Sociology, 8, 103-123.
23.
Mitchell, R. E. , & Hodson, C. A. (1983). Coping with domestic violence: Social support and psychological health among battered women.American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 629-654.
24.
Nurius, P. S. , Furrey, J., & Berliner, L. (1992). Coping capacity among women with abusive partners.Violence and Victims, 7, 229-243.
25.
O'Leary, K. D. , Curley, A., Rosenbaum, A., & Clarke, C. (1985). Assertion training for abused wives: A potentially hazardous treatment.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11, 319-322.
26.
Overholser, J. C. , & Moll, S. H. (1990). Who's to blame: Attributions regarding causality in spouse abuse.Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8, 107-120.
27.
Painter, S. L. , & Dutton, D. G. (1985). Patterns of emotional bonding in battered women: Traumatic bonding.International Journal of Women's Studies, 57, 101-110.
28.
Prange, R. C. (1985). Battered women and why they return to the abusive situation: A study of attribution-style, multiple-dimensional locus of control and social-psychological factors. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 4026B (University Microfilms No. 8522840).
29.
Saltzman, L. E. , Mercy, J. A., Rosenberg, M. L., Elsea, W. R., Napper, G., Sikes, R. K., & Waxweiler, R. J. (1990). Magnitude and patterns of family and intimate assault in Atlanta, Georgia, 1984, Violence and Victims, 5, 3-17.
30.
Saunders, D. G. (1988). Wife abuse, husband abuse, or mutual combat? A feminist perspective on the empirical findings. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 99-113). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Serra, P. (1993). Physical violence in the couple relationship: A contribution toward the analysis of context.Family Process, 32, 21-33.
32.
Smolen, R. C. , Speigel, D. A., & Martin, C. J. (1986). Patterns of marital interaction associated with marital dissatisfaction and depression.Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 17, 261-266.
33.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and aggression: The Conflict Tactics Scale (CT).Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
34.
Straus, M. A. (1993). Physical assaults by wives—A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles & D. J. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 67-87). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
Strube, M. J. , & Barbour, L. S. (1983). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Economic dependence and psychological commitment.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 785-793.
36.
Syers-McNairy, M. (1990). Women who leave violent relationships: Getting on with life. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 2159A (University Microfilms No. 9033230).
37.
Thoits, P. A. (1982). Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical problems in studying practical implications.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 813-832.
38.
Trimpey, M. L. (1989). Self-esteem and anxiety: Key issues in an abused women's support group.Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 10, 297-308.
39.
Walker, L. E. (1977). Battered women and learned helplessness.Victimology: An International Journal, 2, 525-534.
40.
Walker, L. E. (1984). The battered woman syndrome.New York: Springer.
41.
Wilson, K. , Vercella, R., Brems, C., Benning, D., & Refro, N. (1992). Levels of learned helplessness in abused women.Women & Therapy, 13(4), 53-67.
42.
Zimet, G. D. , Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support.Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30-41.
