This article argues that although it is important to study child abuse, it is also important to study and understand ordinary, everyday, subabusive violence against children. Five reasons for studying this issue are discussed; pervasiveness of subabuse, questioning the “natural” protectiveness of human parenting, possible relationship with child abuse, learning and interference of children's learning, and humanitarian concerns. Research in this area is difficult to carry out. New research strategies are needed, and researchers are urged to explore this area.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bolton, F. G. (1988). “Normal” violence in the adult-child relationship: A diathesis-stress approach to child maltreatment within the family. In G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. T. Kirkpatric, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Family abuse and its consequences: New directions in research (pp. 61-76). London: Sage.
2.
Bryan, J. W. , & Freed, F. W. (1982). Corporal punishment: Normative data and sociological and psychological correlates in a community population.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 11, 77-87.
3.
Feshbach, N. D. (1980). Physical punishment: The fraternal twin of child abuse. In R. Barnen (Ed.), Children and violence: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Violence.Stockholm, Sweden: Akademi Litteratur.
4.
Gelles, R. J. , & Straus, M. A. (1987). Is violence toward children increasing? A comparison of 1975 and 1985 national survey rates. In R. J. Gelles (Ed.), Family violence (pp. 78-88). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Gil, D. G. (1974). A socio-cultural perspective on physical child abuse. In J. E. Leavitt (Ed.), The battered child: Selected readings (pp. 164-169). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
6.
Glenn, M. C. (1984). Campaigns against corporal punishment: Prisoners, sailors, women, and children in Antebellum America.Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
Graziano, A. M. (1989). The disinhibition hypothesis and the escalation of violence: Learning to be a monster. Paper presented at the conference on Law and the Legitimation of Violence, State University of New York at Buffalo.
8.
Graziano, A. M. , & Mills, J. (1992). Treatment for abused children: When is a partial solution acceptable?Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 217-228.
9.
Graziano, A. M. , & Namaste, K. A. (1990). Parental use of physical force in child discipline: A survey of 679 college students.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5(4), 449-463.
10.
Greven, P. (1991). Spare the child: The religious roots of punishment and the psychological impact of physical abuse.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
11.
Hyman, I. (1990). Reading, writing, and the hickory stick.Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
12.
Kelder, L. R. , McNamara, J. R., Carlson, B., & Lynn, S. J. (1991). Perceptions of physical punishment: The relation to childhood and adolescent experiences.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6(4), 432-445.
13.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior.New York: Macmillan.
14.
Straus, M. A. (1983). Ordinary violence, child abuse, and wife beating: What do they have in common? In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
Straus, M. (1991). Discipline and deviance: Physical punishment of children and violence and other crime in adulthood.Social Problems, 38, 133-154.
16.
Wauchope, B. , & Straus, M. A. (1990). Physical punishment and physical abuse of American children: Incidence rates by age, gender, and occupational class. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
