Researchers have identified the need to develop instruments to measure domestic violence that include both physical and psychological abuse. Drawing from feminist theory, the Abusive Behavior Inventory (ABI) was developed to address a range of abusive behaviors. A validation study included a sample of 100 men and 78 women divided into groups of abusers/abused and nonabusers/nonabused. The study included the evaluation of three types of validity: criterion related, construct, and factorial. Significant differences in scores on the ABI were found between the abuser and nonabuser groups. These differences provide evidence to support the scale's validity in each of these areas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bloom, M. , & Fisher, J. (1982). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
Bowker, L. H. , Arbitell, M., & McFerron, J. (1988). On the relationship between wife beating and child abuse. In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 158-174). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Coleman, K. H. , Weinman, M. L., & Hsi, B. P. (1980). Factors affecting conjugal violence.Journal of Psychology, 105, 197-202.
4.
Dobash, R. E. , & Dobash, R. P. (1988). Research as social action: The struggle for battered women. In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 51-74). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Edleson, J. L. , & Brygger, M. P. (1986). Gender differences in reporting battering incidences.Family Relations, 35, 377-382.
6.
Feazell, C. S. , Mayers, R. S., & Deschner, J. (1984). Services for men who batter: Implications for programs and policies.Family Relations, 33, 217-223.
7.
Finn, J. (1986). The relationship between sex role attitudes and attitudes supporting marital violence.Sex Roles, 14, 235-244.
8.
Frieze, I. H. , & Browne, A. (1989). Violence in marriage. In L. Ohlin & M. Tonry (Eds.), Family violence, Vol. II. Crime and justice: A review of the research.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Gondolf, E. W. (1987). Evaluating programs for men who batter: Problems and prospects.Journal of Family Violence, 2, 95-108.
10.
Graham, D.L.R. , Rawlings, E., & Rimini, N. (1988). Survivors of terror: Battered women, hostages and the Stockholm syndrome. In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 217-233). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Greenblatt, C. S. (1985). Don't hit your wife... unless: Preliminary finding on normative support for the use of physical force by husbands.Victimology, 10, 221-241.
12.
Hudson, W. W. (1982). The clinical measurement package.Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
13.
Hudson, W. W. , & McIntosh, S. R. (1981). The assessment of spouse abuse: Two quantifiable dimensions.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 873-884.
14.
Pence, E. , & Paymar M. (1985). Power and control: Tactics of men who batter.Duluth, MN: Domestic Abuse Intervention Project.
15.
Ptacek, J. (1988). Why do men batter their wives? In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 133-157). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Rosenbaum, A. (1988). Methodological issues in marital violence research.Journal of Family Violence, 3, 91-104.
17.
Rosenbaum, A. , & O'Leary, K. D. (1981). Marital violence characteristics in abusive couples.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 63-71.
18.
Rubin, A. , & Babbie, B. (1989). Research methods for social work.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
19.
Saunders, D. G. (1988). Wife abuse, husband abuse, or mutual combat? A feminist perspective on the empirical findings. In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 90-113). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women's movement.Boston: South End Press.
21.
Shepard, M. (1987, July). Intervention with men who batter: An evaluation of a domestic abuse program. Paper presented at the Third National Family Violence Research Conference, Durham, NH.
22.
Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scale.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 74-85.
23.
Straus, M. , Gelles, R., & Steinmetz, S. (1980). Behind closed doors.New York: Anchor.
24.
Szinovacz, M. (1983). Using couple data as a methodological tool: The case of marital violence.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 633-644.
25.
Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners.Violence and Victims, 4, 159-177.
26.
Yllö, K. (1988). Political and methodological debates in wife abuse research. In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 28-50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
