The present study investigated the effects of victim characteristics on people's perceptions of a rape incident. Subjects read an account of a rape incident in which the victim was described either as a virgin or as a sexually promiscuous woman. It was predicted that, because of the different attributional perspectives adopted by males and females when explaining a rape incident, the characteristics of the victim would influence the judgments of male subjects but not of female subjects. The results obtained supported this prediction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barnett, N. J. , & Field, H. S. (1978). Character of the defendant and length of sentence in rape and burglary crimes.Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 271-277.
2.
Calhoun, L. G. , Selby, J. W., Cann, A., & Keller, G. T. (1978). The effects of victim physical attractiveness and sex of respondent on social reactions to victims of rape.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 191-192.
3.
Calhoun, L. G. , Selby, J. W., & Waring, L. J. (1976). Social perceptions of the victim's causal role in rape: An exploratory examination of four factors.Human Relations, 29, 517-526.
4.
Cann, A. , Calhoun, L. G., & Selby, J. W. (1979). Attributing responsibility to the victim of rape: Influence of information regarding past sexual experience.Human Relations, 32, 57-67.
5.
Dietz, S. R. , Littman, M., & Bentley, B. J. (1984). Attribution of responsibility for rape: The influence of observer empathy, victim resistance, and victim attractiveness.Sex Roles, 10, 261-280.
6.
Feldman-Summers, S. , & Linder, K. (1976). Perceptions of victims and defendants in criminal assault.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 3, 135-149.
7.
Howells, K. , Shaw, F., Greasley, M., Robertson, J., Gloster, D., & Metcalfe, N. (1984). Perceptions of rape in a British sample: Effects of relationship, victim status, sex, and attitudes to women.British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 35-40.
8.
Howitt, D. (1977). Situational and victim's characteristics in simulated penal judgments.Psychological Reports, 40, 55-58.
9.
Kanekar, S. , & Kolsawalla, M. B. (1980). Responsibility of a rape victim in relation to her respectability, attractiveness, and provocativeness.Journal of Social Psychology, 112, 153-154.
10.
Kanekar, S. , Kolsawalla, M. B., & D'Souza, A. (1981). Attribution of responsibility to a victim of rape.British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 165-170.
11.
Kanekar, S. , Pinto, N.J.P., & Muzamdar, D. (1985). Causal and moral responsibility of victims of rape and robbery.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 622-637.
12.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution.American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
13.
Krahe, B. (1988). Victim and observer characteristics as determinants of responsibility attributions to victims of rape.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 50-58.
14.
Kramer, G. P. , & Kerr, N. L. (1987). Lab-simulation bias in juror judgements. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
15.
Krulewitz, J. E. , & Nash, J. E. (1979). Effects of rape victim resistance, assault outcome, and sex of observer on attributions about rape.Journal of Personality, 47, 557-574.
16.
Krulewitz, J. E. , & Payne, E. J. (1978). Attributions about rape: Effects of rapist force, observer sex, and sex role attitudes.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 291-305.
17.
Scroggs, J. R. (1976). Penalties for rape as a function of victim provocativeness, damage and resistance.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 360-368.
18.
Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101-113.
19.
Smith, R. E. , Keating, J. P., Hester, R. K., & Mitchell, H. E. (1976). Role and justice considerations in the attribution of responsibility to a rape victim.Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 346-357.
20.
Thornton, B. & Ryckman, R. M. (1983). The influence of rape victims' physical attractiveness on observers' attributions of responsibility.Human Relations, 36, 549-562.
21.
Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73-79.
