Friedemann, V. , & Morgan, M. (1985). Interviewing sexual abuse victims using anatomical dolls: The professional's guidebook.Eugene, OR: Shamrock.
2.
Goodwin, J. (1982). The use of drawings in incest cases. In J. Goodwin (Ed.), Sexual abuse: Incest victims and their families.Littleton, MA: John Wright.
3.
Hughes v. Arkansas, 732 S.W.2d 829 (1987).
4.
In re Amber B. v. Ron B., 236 Cal Rptr 623 (1987).
5.
In re J. H., 505 N.E. 2d 1360 (1987).
6.
In the Interest of ME & LE, 715 S.W.2d 572 (1986).
7.
In the Matter of E. M., 520 N.Y.S.2d 327 (1987).
8.
In the Matter of X v. Syme, 714 P. 2d 13 (1986).
9.
Kehinde v. Commonwealth, 338 S.E.2d 356 (1986).
10.
Krikorian v. Barry, 242 Cal. Rptr 312 (1987).
11.
Melton, G. B. (Ed.). (1987). Reforming the law: Impact of child development research.New York: Guilford.
12.
Myers, J.E.B. (1986). Hearsay statements by the child abuse victim.Baylor Law Review, 38, 775-916.
13.
Naitove, C. E. (1982). Arts therapy with sexually abused children. In S. M. Sgroi (Ed.), Handbook of clinical intervention in child sexual abuse.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
14.
People v. Rich, 520 N.Y.S. 2d 911 (1987).
15.
Pinkney v. Clay County, 635 F. Supp. 1079 (D. Minn.) (1986).
16.
Rinesmith v. Williams, 376 N.W. 2d 139 (1985).
17.
State v. D. R., 518 A. 2d 1122 (1986).
18.
State v. Eggert, 358 N.W.2d 156 (1984).
19.
State v. Logue, 372 N.W.2d 151, (1985).
20.
State v. Mayfield, 633 P. 2d 438 (1987).
21.
State v. Mueller, 344 N.W.2d 262, (1983).
22.
White, S. , Strom, G., & Santilli, G. (1985). A protocol for interviewing with sexually correct anatomical dolls. Unpublished manuscript, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland.
23.
Yates, A. (1985). Drawings by child victims of incest.Child Abuse and Neglect, 9, 183-190.
24.
Yates, A. , & Terr, L. (1988a). Debate forum: Anatomically correct dolls: Should they be used as a basis for expert testimony?Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 254-257.
25.
Yates, A. , & Terr, L. (1988b). Debate forum: Issue continued: Anatomically correct dolls: Should they be used as a basis for expert testimony?Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 387-388.