The use of anatomical dolls by investigators of suspected child sexual abuse has become a hotly debated issue among mental health and legal professionals. A review of clinical practices and of research findings is presented, which may be helpful informing opinions about the utility of the dolls in such evaluations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
August, R. , & Forman, B. (1986, May). Differences between sexually and nonsexually abused children in their behavioral responses to anatomically correct dolls. In C. Walker (Chair), Use of anatomically correct dolls in evaluation of child sexual abuse.Symposium conducted at the Fourth National Conference on Sexual Victimization of Children, New Orleans, LA.
2.
Boat, B. , & Everson, M. (1986). Using anatomical dolls: Guidelines for interviewing young children in sexual abuse investigations.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
3.
Boat, B. , & Everson, M. (1988). Use of anatomical dolls among professionals in sexual abuse evaluations.Child Abuse and Neglect, 12, 171-179.
4.
Conerly, S. (1986). Assessment of suspected child sexual abuse. In K. MacFarlane & J. Waterman (Eds.), Sexual abuse of young children: Evaluation and treatment (pp. 30-51). New York: Guilford.
5.
Friedemann, V. , & Morgan, M. (1985). Interviewing sexual abuse victims using anatomical dolls: The professional's guidebook.Eugene, OR: Shamrock.
6.
Gabriel, R. M. (1985). Anatomically correct dolls in the diagnosis of sexual abuse of children.Journal of the Melanie Klein Society, 3, 40-51.
7.
Goodman, G. , & Aman, C., (1987, April). Children's use of anatomically correct dolls to report an event. In M. Steward (Chair), Evaluation of suspected child abuse: Developmental, clinical, and legal perspectives on the use of anatomically correct dolls. Symposium conducted at the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore, MD.
8.
Green, A. (1986). True and false allegations of sexual abuse in child custody disputes.Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 25, 449-456.
9.
Harnest, J. , & Chavern, H. E. (1985, November). A survey of the use of anatomically correct dolls in sex education, investigation, therapy and courtroom testimony. Paper presented at the Seventh World Congress of Sexology, New Delhi, India.
10.
In re Amber B. & Teela B. v. Ron B., 236 Ca. Rptr. 623 (1987).
11.
Jampole, L. , & Weber, M. (1987). An assessment of the behavior of sexually abused and nonsexually abused children with anatomically correct dolls.Child Abuse and Neglect, 11, 187-192.
12.
Jones, D.P.H. , & McQuiston, M., (1985). Interviewing the sexually abused child.Denver: Kempe Center.
13.
MacFarlane, K. , & Krebs, S. (1986). Techniques of interviewing and evidence gathering. In K. MacFarlane & J. Waterman (Eds.), Sexual abuse of young children: Evaluation and treatment (pp. 67-100). New York: Guilford.
14.
Myers, J.E.B. (1986). Hearsay statements by the child abuse victim.Baylor Law Review, 38, 779-916.
15.
Schetky, D. (Chair). (1988). Guidelines for evaluation of child and adolescent sexual abuse.American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry's Committee on Rights and Legal Matters.Washington, DC: American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
16.
Sgroi, S. M. , Porter, F. S., & Blick, L. C. (1982). Validation of child sexual abuse. In S. M. Sgroi (Ed.), Handbook of clinical intervention in child sexual abuse (pp. 39-80). Lexington, MA: Heath.
17.
Sivan, A. B. , Schor, D. P., Koeppl, G. K., & Noble, L. D. (1988). Interaction of normal children with anatomical dolls.Child Abuse and Neglect, 12, 295-304.
18.
White, S. , & Quinn, K. M. (in press). Investigatory independence in child sexual abuse evaluations: Conceptual considerations.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
19.
White, S. , Santilli, G., & Quinn, K. M. (1988). Child evaluator's roles in child sexual abuse assessments. In E. B. Nicholson & J. Bulkley (Eds.), Sexual abuse allegations in custody and visitation cases.Washington: American Bar Association.
20.
White, S. , Strom, G., Santilli, G., & Halpin, B. (1986). Interviewing young children with anatomically correct dolls.Child Abuse and Neglect, 10, 519-529.
21.
White, S. , Strom, G., Santilli, G., & Quinn, K. M. (1987). Clinical guidelines for interviewing young children with anatomically correct dolls. Unpublished manuscript, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
22.
Yates, A. , & Terr, L. (1988a). Debate forum: Anatomically correct dolls: Should they be used as a basis for expert testimony?Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 254-257.
23.
Yates, A. , & Terr, L. (1988b). Debate forum: Issue continued: Anatomically correct dolls: Should they be used as a basis for expert testimony?Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 387-388.
