Heightened awareness about the plight of victimized women has prompted sweeping legislative change over the past decade. Criminal statutes, civil laws, and criminal justice policies pertaining to rape in general, marital rape in particular, and domestic violence have all been altered. This article examines the outcomes of reform, revealing both successes and failures of ameliorative efforts. The problems discerned in the aftermath of reform are discussed as they preclude the full protection of violently victimized women. Conclusions explore the needs for further progress in this area.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ball, S. M. , & D'Arcy, G. (1983). Victims of domestic violence: Preliminary study of battered and non-battered female psychiatric patients. Unpublished study, University of Colorado, School of Medicine.
2.
Barak, G. (1985, April). Beyond criminal justice reform: Feminist connections and the movement against domestic violence. Paper presented at the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Las Vegas, NV.
3.
Bienen, L. (1983). Rape reform legislation in the United States: A look at some practical effects.Victimology, 8, 139-151.
4.
Bowker, L. H. (1983). Beating wife-beating.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
5.
Caringella-MacDonald, S. (1985a). The comparability in sexual and non-sexual assault case treatment: Did statute change meet the objective?Crime & Delinquency, 31, 206-222.
6.
Caringella-MacDonald, S. (1985b). Sexual assault prosecution: An examination of model rape legislation in Michigan. In C. Schweber & C. Feinman (Eds.), Criminal justice, politics and women: The aftermath of legally mandated change (pp. 65-82). New York: Haworth.
7.
Chappell, D. (1982, November). The impact of rape reform legislation. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, Toronto, Ontario.
8.
Clark, T. F. , & Buchner, D. (1982, November). Critical issues in the prosecution of rape: A cross-jurisdictional study of 17 U.S. cities. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, Toronto, Ontario.
9.
Dean, C. W. , & DeBruyn-Kops, M. (1982). The crime and the consequences of rape.Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
10.
Deming, M. B. (1983, March). Rape case processing: Evaluation of legal reform. Paper presented for the National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD.
11.
Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Fain, C. F. (1981). Conjugal violence: Legal and psychosociological remedies.Syracuse Law Review, 32, 497-579.
13.
Field, H. S. , & Bienen, L. B. (1980). Jurors and rape: A study in psychology and law.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
14.
Finkelhor, D. , & Yllo, K. (1985). License to rape: Sexual abuse of wives.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
15.
Holmstrom, L. L. , & Burgess, A. W. (1978). The victim of rape: Institutional reactions.New York: John Wiley.
16.
Klein, D. (1982). The dark side of marriage: Battered wives and the domination of women. In N. H. Rafter & E. A. Stanko (Eds.), Judge, lawyer, victim, thief: Women, gender roles and criminal justice (pp. 85-107). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
17.
Koss, M. , & Harvey, M. (1987). The rape victim: Clinical and community approaches to treatment.Lexington, MA: Stephen Greene.
18.
Lerman, L. G. , Landis, L., & Gosozweig, S. (1983). State legislation on domestic violence. In J. J. Costa (Ed.), Abuse of women: Legislation reporting and prevention (pp. 39-47). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
19.
Loh, W. D. (1981). Q: What has reform of rape legislation wrought? A: Truth in criminal labeling.Journal of Social Issues, 37, 28-52.
20.
MacKinnon, C. A. (1983). Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: Toward feminist jurisprudence.Signs, 8, 635-658.
21.
Maidment, S. (1983). Civil v. criminal: The use of legal remedies in response to domestic violence in England and Wales.Victimology, 8, 172-187.
22.
Maidment, S. (1985). Domestic violence and the law. In N. Johnson (Ed.), Marital violence (pp. 4-26). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
23.
Marsh, J. C. (1983, November). Policy research on sexual assault in the `80's. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, Denver, CO.
24.
Marsh, J. C. , Geist, A., & Caplan, N. (1982). Rape and the limits of law reform.Boston, MA: Auburn.
25.
Martin, D. (1981). Battered wives.San Francisco, CA: Volcano.
26.
Myers, M. A. , & LaFree, G. D. (1982). Sexual assault and the prosecution: a comparison with other crimes.Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 73, 1282-1305.
27.
National Center on Women & Family Law. (1986). Marital rape exemption packet (Items No. 7, 95). New York: Author.
28.
NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund & Cherow-O'Leary, R. (1987). The state-by-state guide to women's legal rights.New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
Osborne, J. A. (1985). Rape law reform: The new cosmetic for Canadian women. In C. Schweber & C. Feiman (Eds.), Criminal justice politics and women: The aftermath of legally mandated change (pp. 49-64). New York: Haworth.
30.
Pagelow, M. D. (1984). Family violence.New York: Praeger.
31.
Polk, K. (1985). Rape reform and criminal justice processing.Crime & Delinquency, 31, 191-205.
32.
Quarm, D. , & Schwartz, M. D. (1985). Domestic violence in criminal court: An examination of new legislation in Ohio. In C. Schweber & C. Feiman (Eds.), Criminal justice politics and women: The aftermath of legally mandated change (pp. 29-46). New York: Haworth.
33.
Russell, D.E.H. (1982). Rape in marriage.New York: Macmillan.
34.
Russell, D.E.H. (1984). Sexual exploitation: Rape, child sexual abuse, and workplace harassment.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
Sasko, H. , & Sesek, D. (1975). Rape reform legislation: Is it the solution?Cleveland State Law Review, 24, 463-503.
36.
Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women's movement.Boston: South End.
37.
Schur, E. M. (1984). Labeling women deviant: Gender, stigma, and social control.New York: Random House.
38.
Schwartz, M. D. , & Clear, T. R. (1980). Toward a new law on rape.Crime & Delinquency, 26, 129-151.
39.
Schwendinger, J. R. , & Schwendinger, H. (1983). Rape and inequality.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40.
Shapo, H. S. (1975). Recent statutory developments in the definitions of forcible rape.Virginia Law Review, 61, 1500-1543.
41.
Shulman, J. (1980). The marital rape exemption in the criminal law.Clearinghouse Review, 14, 538-40.
42.
Stank, E. & Flitcarft, A. (1983). Battering in medical contexts.Office on Domestic Violence, Department of Health and Human Services.
43.
Stanko, E. A. (1985a). Intimate intrusions: Women's experience of male violence.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
44.
Stanko, E. A. (1985b, November). Legal protection: Some thoughts on legal intervention into male violence to women. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, San Diego, CA.
45.
Sonkin, D. J. , Martin, D., & Walker, L.E.A. (1985). The male batterer: A treatment approach.New York: Springer.
46.
Taub, N. (1983). Adult domestic violence: The law's response.Victimology, 8, 152-171.
47.
Tong, R. (1984). Women, sex, and the law.Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld.
48.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1982). Under the rule of thumb: Battered women and the administration of justice.Washington, DC: Author.
49.
Viano, E. (1983). Violence, victimization and social change: A socio-cultural and public policy analysis.Victimology, 8, 54-79.
50.
Walker, L.E.A. (1984a). The battered woman syndrome.New York: Springer.
51.
Walker, L.E.A. (1984b). Women and mental health policy.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
52.
Washburn, B. (1975). Rape law: The need for reform.New Mexico Law Review, 5, 279-309.
