Preventing sexual violence is a public health priority given its high prevalence and negative impact on young people’s well-being. This study aims to qualitatively explore the elements that young adults in Spain perceive as influencing their willingness to intervene as bystanders in situations of sexual violence against women. Between 2019 and 2020, we conducted a qualitative study based on 20 semi-structured interviews and four focus group discussions in Spain within the framework of the European project PositivMasc. A total of 49 young men and women participated. We followed Braun and Clarke’s proposal of reflexive thematic analysis. The results of this study describe five elements that are perceived as influencing the willingness to intervene when a situation of sexual violence is witnessed by a bystander: being in a non-party, everyday context; having trust in socio-community assets; holding beliefs that challenge rape culture; emotional distance from the aggressors; and emotional closeness to the victims. The findings are useful when designing new interventions and strengthening existing ones. They can also help in the design of awareness campaigns, strategies, and policies that empower potential bystanders with tools, knowledge, and social support to speak up and act against sexual violence.
AhmedS. (2016). Living a feminist life. Duke University Press.
2.
BanyardV. L. (2008). Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: The case of interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 23(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.83
3.
BennettS.BanyardV. L.EdwardsK. M. (2017). The impact of the bystander’s relationship with the victim and the perpetrator on intent to help in situations involving sexual violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(5), 682–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515586373
4.
BloomB. E.JosephR.UlibarriM. D.ReedE.UlloaE. C. (2024). Factors associated with engaging in bystander intervention behavior among college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 39(7–8), 1731–1759. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231212170
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV.HayfieldN.DaveyL.JenkinsonE. (2022). Doing reflexive thematic analysis. In Bager-CharlesonS.McBeathA. (Eds.), Supporting research in counselling and psychotherapy: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research (pp. 19–38). Springer International Publishing.
8.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Contra nuestra voluntad: Hombres, mujeres y violación [Against our will: men, women and rape]. Planeta.
9.
BurnS. M. (2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60(11), 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9581-5
10.
CaseyE. A.OhlerK. (2012). Being a positive bystander: Male antiviolence allies’ experiences of “stepping up”. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511416479
11.
CasperD.WitteT.StanfieldM. (2018). “A person I cared about was involved”: Exploring bystander motivation to help in incidents of potential sexual assault and dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36, 088626051879123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518791232
12.
Cerdán-TorregrosaA.NardiniK.Vives-CasesC. (2023). “I reject it, but that’s what normally happens”: Grey zones of gender-based violence and gender roles in young people. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(11–12), 7656–7677. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221147070
13.
ConnellN.WilsonC. (1974). Rape: The first sourcebook for women. New American Library.
14.
ConnellR. (1987). Gender and power. Allen & Unwin.
15.
DarleyJ. M.LatanéB. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589
16.
DeatrickJ. A.FauxS. A. (1991). Conducting qualitative studies with children and adolescents. In MorseJ. (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 203–223). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349015
EdwardsC.BoltonR.SalazarM.Vives-CasesC.DaoudN. (2024). Young people’s constructions of gender norms and attitudes towards violence against women: A critical review of qualitative empirical literature. Journal of Gender Studies, 33(1), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2022.2119374
20.
FentonR.McCartanK.MottH.RumneyP. (2016). A review of evidence for bystander intervention to prevent sexual and domestic violence in universities. Public Health England.
21.
FlechaR. (2021). Second-order sexual harassment: Violence against the silence breakers who support the victims. Violence Against Women, 27(11), 1980–1999. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220975495
HenninkM. M. (2013). Focus group discussions. Oxford University Press.
24.
HermanD. (1994). The rape culture. In FreemanJ. (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (pp. 20–44). Mayfield.
25.
HoxmeierJ. C.O’ConnorJ.McMahonS. (2019). “She wasn’t resisting”: Students’ barriers to prosocial intervention as bystanders to sexual assault risk situations. Violence Against Women, 25(4), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218790697
26.
JourilesE. N.KraussA.VuN. L.BanyardV. L.McDonaldR. (2018). Bystander programs addressing sexual violence on college campuses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of program outcomes and delivery methods. Journal of American College Health, 66(6), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1431906
27.
KatzJ.NguyenL. (2016). Bystander responses to risk for rape perpetrated by a friend, acquaintance, or stranger. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 25, 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2016.1185755
28.
KatzJ.PazienzaR.OlinR.RichH. (2015). That’s what friends are for: Bystander responses to friends or strangers at risk for party rape victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(16), 2775–2792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514554290
29.
KayaA.LeT.BradyJ.IwamotoD. (2019). Men who intervene to prevent sexual assault: A grounded theory study on the role of masculinity in bystander intervention. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21, 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000249
30.
KettreyH. H.MarxR. A. (2019). The effects of bystander programs on the prevention of sexual assault across the college years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(2), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0927-1
31.
KimmelM. (2009). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. Harper Collins.
32.
KruegerR. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. SAGE Publications.
LatanéB.DarleyJ. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help?Appleton-Century Crofts.
35.
LevineM.CassidyC.BrazierG.ReicherS. (2006). Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1452–1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.x
36.
LiL.ShenX.ZengG.HuangH.ChenZ.YangJ.WangX.JiangM.YangS.ZhangQ.LiH. (2023). Sexual violence against women remains problematic and highly prevalent around the world. BMC Women’s Health, 23(1), 196. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02338-8
37.
MainwaringC.GabbertF.ScottA. J. (2023). A systematic review exploring variables related to bystander intervention in sexual violence contexts. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(3), 1727–1742. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221079660
38.
MartínezM. S. V.VallesM. S. (1997). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social: Reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional [Qualitative techniques in social research: Methodological reflections and professional practice]. Síntesis.
39.
MartiniM.De PiccoliN. (2020). Predicting bystander intention to intervene: The role of gender-specific system justification and rape myth acceptance for men and women. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 326. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00326
40.
McMahonS. (2010). Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health, 59(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.483715
MujalG. N.TaylorM. E.FryJ. L.Gochez-KerrT. H.WeaverN. L. (2021). A systematic review of bystander interventions for the prevention of sexual violence. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 22(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019849587
43.
ParkS.WooH.KimS.-H. (2024). A systematic review and meta-analysis of bystander’s barriers to intervene in gender-based violence and the role of failed prior attempts. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(3), 1998–2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231204887
SalazarM.DaoudN.EdwardsC.ScanlonM.Vives-CasesC. (2020). PositivMasc: Masculinities and violence against women among young people. Identifying discourses and developing strategies for change, a mixed-method study protocol. BMJ Open, 10(9), Article e038797. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038797
46.
TinklerJ. E.BeckerS.ClaytonK. A. (2018). “Kind of natural, kind of wrong”: Young people’s beliefs about the morality, legality, and normalcy of sexual aggression in public drinking settings. Law & Social Inquiry, 43(1), 28–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12235
Vives-CasesC.Castellanos-TorresE.Sanz-BarberoB. (2024). Violencia sexual y jóvenes: «no es algo con lo que naces, sino con lo que aprendes» [Sexual violence and young people: “It’s not something you’re born with, but something you learn]. Gaceta Sanitaria, 38, Article 102371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2024.102371
49.
WeissK. G. (2009). “Boys will be boys’ and other gendered accounts: An exploration of victims” excuses and justifications for unwanted sexual contact and coercion. Violence Against Women, 15(7), 810–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209333611
