The current study developed a moderated mediation model to investigate the relationship between cyberbullying victimization experience and aggressive intervention and its potential mechanism. A total of 1,129 undergraduate students from five universities in China (mean age = 19.57, SD = 1.37; 513 females) completed a series of questionnaires, including the Cyberbullying Victimization Questionnaire, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, subscale of aggressive intervention, and Chinese short version of the Marlow-Crowne Social Desirability Questionnaire. The results showed that cyberbullying victimization experience positively predicted aggressive intervention. Depression partially mediated the association between cyberbullying victimization experience and aggressive intervention. Gender differences and gender interaction also existed in this study. Specifically, males engaged in more aggressive intervention than females; however, the mediating effect of depression was stronger in females, and cyberbullying victimization experience predicted more robust in males than in females. In conclusion, the present study revealed the risk factors for aggressive intervention and that female bystanders with experience of cyberbullying victimization were more likely to attack perpetrators.
AgnewR. (2017). General strain theory. In TeasdaleB.BradleyM. C. (Eds.), Preventing crime and violence (pp. 21–30). Springer Cham.
2.
AmadoriA.RealA. G.BrighiA.RussellS. T. (2025). An intersectional perspective on cyberbullying: Victimization experiences among marginalized youth. Journal of Adolescence, 97(4), 931–940. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12466
3.
AntipinaS. S.MiklyaevaA. V. (2021). Relationship among the tendency to cyber-aggression, aggressiveness, and empathy in adolescence. Social Psychology, 18(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2021.2.6
4.
BrodyN. (2013). Bystander intervention in cyberbullying [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Texas.
5.
BroidyL.AgnewR. (2017). Gender and crime: A General Strain Theory perspective. In KaufmanJ. M. (Ed.), Anomie, strain and subcultural theories of crime (pp. 155–186). Routledge
6.
BubierJ. L.DrabickD. A. (2009). Co-occurring anxiety and disruptive behavior disorders: The roles of anxious symptoms, reactive aggression, and shared risk processes. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(7), 658–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.08.005
7.
BusseyK.FitzpatrickS. (2016). “Cyber witness,” responses to cyberbullying episodes [Paper presentation]. 22nd World Meeting of the International Society for Research on Aggression (ISRA), Sydney, Australia.
8.
BusseyK.LuoA.FitzpatrickS.AllisonK. (2020). Defending victims of cyberbullying: The role of self-efficacy and moral disengagement. Journal of School Psychology, 78, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.11.006
9.
CarloG.RoeschS. C.MelbyJ. (1998). The multiplicative relations of parenting and temperament to prosocial and antisocial behaviors in adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(3), 266–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431698018003003
10.
CaoB.LinW. Y. (2015). How do victims react to cyberbullying on social networking sites? The influence of previous cyberbullying victimization experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 458–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.009
11.
ChenH.ChenC.LiY.FanC. (2024). Development and validation of the defending behavior scale of cyberbullying for adolescents. Behavioral Sciences, 14(10), 967–981. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100967
12.
DeSmetA.BastiaensensS.Van CleemputK.PoelsK.VandeboschH.CardonG.BourdeaudhuijI. E. (2016). Deciding whether to look after them, to like it, or leave it: A multidimensional analysis of predictors of positive and negative bystander behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 398–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.051
13.
DodgeK. A.SchwartzD. (1997). Social information processing mechanisms in aggressive behavior. In StoffD. M.BreilingJ.MaserJ. D. (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 171–180). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
14.
DuttonD. G.KarakantaC. (2013). Depression as a risk marker for aggression: A critical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.12.002
15.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (2012). Social role theory. In Van LangeP. A.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 458–476). SAGE Publications Ltd.
16.
GalánC. A.FeldmanJ. S.McClaineR. N. (2022). Using the social information processing model to understand gender differences in the manifestation and frequency of aggression. Aggression and Violent behavior, 66, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2022.101766
GuoS.ZhangP.LvS.WangR. (2024). Effect of violence exposure on aggressive intervention in Chinese college students: A moderated mediation model. Children and Youth Services Review, 163, 107744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107744
19.
GuyA.LeeK.WolkeD. (2017). Differences in the early stages of social information processing for adolescents involved in bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 43(6), 578–587.
20.
HighA. C.YoungR. (2018). Supportive communication from bystanders of cyberbullying: Indirect effects and interactions between source and message characteristics. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(1), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1412085
21.
HuY.BaiY.PanY.LiS. (2021). Cyberbullying victimization and depression among adolescents: A meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 305, Article 114198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114198
22.
JenkinsL. N.NickersonA. B. (2019). Bystander intervention in bullying: Role of social skills and gender. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(2), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431617735652
23.
JeyagobiS.MunusamyS.KamaluddinM. R.Ahmad BadayaiA. R.KumarJ. (2022). Factors influencing negative cyber-bystander behavior: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article 965017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.965017
24.
JolliffeD.FarringtonD. P. (2011). Is low empathy related to bullying after controlling for individual and social background variables?. Journal of Adolescence, 34(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.02.001
25.
KreftI. G. (1996). Are multilevel techniques necessary? An overview, including simulation studies. Unpublished manuscript, California State University, Los Angeles.
26.
LeducK.NagarM. P.CaivanoO.TalwarV. (2024). When is it helpful to get involved? Adolescents’ perceptions of constructive and aggressive bystander support from friends, acquaintances, and public figures in cyberbullying. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(9), 1142–1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21091142
27.
LevineM.TaylorP. J.BestR. (2011). Third parties, violence, and conflict resolution the role of group size and collective action in the micro regulation of violence. Psychological Science, 22(3), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611398495
28.
LiD.XuX. P.LiuJ. S.DaiY.ChenX. Y. (2021). Cybervictimization and adjustment in late childhood: Moderating effects of social sensitivity. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 73, 101258–101266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101258
29.
LiY. J. (2016). Victimization and suicide in adolescents: Mediating effect of depression and its gender difference. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24(2), 282–286. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2016.02.022
30.
LiZ.HongxiaW.JingyuG.LiL. (2024). Cyberbullying victimization and depression among college students: The moderating roles of psychological capital and peer support. Journal of Psychological Science, 47(4), 981–989. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240427
31.
LiuQ.ColeD. A. (2021). Aggressive outbursts among adults with major depressive disorder: Results from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiological Surveys. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 135, 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.01.040
32.
LuoA.BusseyK. (2019). The selectivity of moral disengagement in defenders of cyberbullying: Contextual moral disengagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.038
33.
LuoM. M.HaoM.LiX. H.LiaoJ.WuC. M.WangQ. (2024). Prevalence of depressive tendencies among college students and the influence of attributional styles on depressive tendencies in the post-pandemic era. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, Article 1326582. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1326582
34.
MarcianoL.SchulzP. J.CameriniA. L. (2020). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization in youth: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz031
35.
Martínez-MonteagudoM. C.DelgadoB.Díaz-HerreroÁ.García-FernándezJ. M. (2020). Relationship between suicidal thinking, anxiety, depression and stress in university students who are victims of cyberbullying. Psychiatry Research, 286, Article 112856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112856
MathieuJ. E.AguinisH.CulpepperS. A.ChenG. (2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 951–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029358
38.
MauryaC.MuhammadT.DhillonP.MauryaP. (2022). The effects of cyberbullying victimization on depression and suicidal ideation among adolescents and young adults: A three-year cohort study from India. BMC Psychiatry, 22(1), Article 599. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04238-x
39.
MoxeyN.BusseyK. (2020). Styles of bystander intervention in cyberbullying incidents. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 2(1), 6–15.
40.
NeumayerF.JantzerV.LerchS.ReschF.KaessM. (2023). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying victimization independently predict changes in problematic internet gaming in a longitudinal sample. Journal of Adolescent Health, 73(2), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.03.013
41.
OzkanT.RocqueM.PosickC. (2019). Reconsidering the link between depression and crime: A longitudinal assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(7), 961–979. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818799811
42.
ParksM. J.OsgoodD. W.FelsonR. B.WellsS.GrahamK. (2013). Third party involvement in barroom conflicts. Aggressive Behavior, 39(4), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21475
43.
PedersonC. A.FiteP. J.BortolatoM. (2018). The role of functions of aggression in associations between behavioral inhibition and activation and mental health outcomes. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 27(8), 811–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1370053
44.
PeprahP.OduroM. S.OkweiR.AduC.Asiamah-AsareB. Y.Agyemang-DuahW. (2023). Cyberbullying victimization and suicidal ideation among in-school adolescents in three countries: Implications for prevention and intervention. BMC Psychiatry, 23(1), 944–955. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05268-9
45.
PodsakoffP. M.OrganD. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
46.
RadloffL.S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
47.
Schultze-KrumbholzA.HessM.PfetschJ.ScheithauerH. (2018). Who is involved in cyberbullying? Latent class analysis of cyberbullying roles and their associations with aggression, self-esteem, and empathy. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12(4), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2018-4-2
48.
ShahidM. S.YousafR.MunirH. (2024). Social media addiction, depression and aggression in young adults. Journal of Professional & Applied Psychology, 5(2), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.52053/jpap.v5i2.1297
SongJ.OhI. (2018). Factors influencing bystanders’ behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.008
51.
SteinvikH. R.DuffyA. L.Zimmer-GembeckM. J. (2024). Bystanders’ responses to witnessing cyberbullying: The role of empathic distress, empathic anger, and compassion. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 6(4), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-023-00164-y
52.
TengY. J. (2015). Relationship between personalities, social support, and cyberbullying bystander’s behavior [Master dissertation]. Huazhong Normal University.
53.
TianL. M.PanY.DongX. Y.KongL. (2020). Relationship between the use of different social networking sites and depression among college students: A chain mediation model. Psychological Development and Education, 36(6), 743–752. https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.06.13
54.
Valdés-CuervoA. A.Alcántar-NieblasC. C.Parra-PérezL. G.Torres-AcuñaG. M.Álvarez-MonteroF. J.Reyes-SosaH. (2021). Unique and interactive effects of guilt and sympathy on bystander aggressive defender intervention in cyberbullying: The mediation of self-regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, Article 106842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106842
55.
Van CleemputK.VandeboschH.PabianS. (2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “helping”, “joining in”, and “doing nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40(5), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21534
56.
VargheseM. E.PistoleM. C. (2017). College student cyberbullying: Self-esteem, depression, loneliness, and attachment. Journal of College Counseling, 20(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocc.12055
57.
WangQ. Q.FanC. Y.ChuX. W. (2020). The relationship between adolescent cyber victimization and cyberbullying: A moderated mediation model. Psychological Development and Education, 36(2), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.02.11
58.
WangS.KimK. J. (2021). Effects of victimization experience, gender, and empathic distress on bystanders’ intervening behavior in cyberbullying. The Social Science Journal, 61(4), 853–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1861826
59.
WeiJ.HanH. F.ZhangC. Y.SunL. J.ZhangJ. F. (2015). Reliability and validity of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale in middle school students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4, 19–23+33. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.04.004
60.
WigunaT.IsmailR. I.SekartiniR.RahardjoN. S. W.KaligisF.PrabowoA. L.HendarmoR. (2018). The gender discrepancy in high-risk behavior outcomes in adolescents who have experienced cyberbullying in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 37, 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2018.08.021
61.
ZhangJ.WuZ. Y.FangG.LiJ.HanB. X.ChenZ. Y. (2010). Development of the Chinese age norms of CES-D in urban area. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2,139–143.
62.
ZhangL.MeiaiC. H. E. N.BenxianY. A. O.ZhangY. (2021). Aggression and non-suicidal self-injury among depressed youths: The mediating effect of resilience. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 50(2), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i2.5342
63.
ZhaoY.ChuX.RongK. (2023). Cyberbullying experience and bystander behavior in cyberbullying incidents: The serial mediating roles of perceived incident severity and empathy. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, Article 107484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107484
