Many psychosocial strengths have been studied in the positive psychology and resilience literatures. This presents a challenge for narrowing down the most helpful strengths for resilience, the process of overcoming trauma and adversity to achieve wellbeing. We bring together measures from two common strengths frameworks to see which ones are most closely associated with thriving after adversity. People who visited the values in action (VIA) website to complete the VIA questionnaire were invited to participate in a research study. 6,430 U.S. participants completed the VIA and answered questions on five psychosocial strengths (sense of purpose, psychological endurance, social support, eco-connections, and mindfulness), two types of adversities (interpersonal victimization and institutional betrayal), and three measures of current functioning (subjective wellbeing [SWB], health-related quality of life [HRQOL], and posttraumatic growth). Logistic regression analyses showed that higher levels of sense of purpose, hope, psychological endurance, zest, self-regulation, social support, and gratitude were significantly associated with above-average scores on all three indicators of functioning. Humor, mindfulness, bravery, perspective taking, love, teamwork, curiosity, and humility were associated with at least one positive outcome. Unexpectedly, several strengths were associated with poorer functioning in at least one analysis, including judgment, prudence, perseverance, creativity, appreciation of beauty, spirituality, kindness, teamwork, and social intelligence. In this first national study of institutional betrayal, it had a unique negative impact on SWB and HRQOL, even after accounting for interpersonal polyvictimization. Some strengths are more helpful for overcoming adversity than others. Although there are doubtless other benefits to these psychosocial strengths, some may create unexpected burdens that can hinder resilience. A basic science of healing can help identify the best intervention targets for people who have been exposed to trauma.
AjayiC. E. (2024). Understanding how British Pakistani women speak about resilience through the lens of the resilience portfolio model. Adversity and Resilience Science, 6, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42844-024-00143-2
2.
BanyardV.KelmendiK.YoonS.HambyS. (2025). The role of resilience portfolios in overcoming trauma. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 26(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241309380
3.
BoggissA. L.ConsedineN. S.Brenton-PetersJ. M.HofmanP. L.SerlachiusA. S. (2020). A systematic review of gratitude interventions: Effects on physical health and health behaviors. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 135, Article 110165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110165
4.
BonannoG. A. (2012). Uses and abuses of the resilience construct: Loss, trauma, and health-related adversities. Social Science and Medicine, 74(5), 753–756. https://doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.022
5.
BonoG.EmmonsR. A.McculloughM. E. (2004). Gratitude in practice and the practice of gratitude. In LinleyP. A.JosephS. (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 464–481). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://10.1002/9780470939338
6.
BronkK. C.ManganS. (2016). Strategies for cultivating purpose among adolescents in clinical settings. In Russo-NetzerP.SchulenbergS. E.BatthyanyA. (Eds.), Clinical perspectives on meaning: Positive and existential psychotherapy (pp. 407–421). Springer International Publishing.
7.
BrooksM.TaylorE.HambyS. (2024). Polyvictimization, polystrengths, and their contribution to subjective well-being and posttraumatic growth. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 16(3), 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001489
ChérifL.NiemiecR.WoodV. (2022). Character strengths and inner peace. International Journal of Wellbeing, 12(3), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v12i3.2195
10.
ClarkS. L.AkinB. A.VanchyP.ByersK.DiazA. (2024). Evaluating the early implementation of a resilience intervention addressing secondary traumatic stress in child welfare workers. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 48(4), 496–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2024.2392821
11.
DiessnerR.NiemiecR. M. (2022). Can beauty save the world? Appreciation of beauty predicts proenvironmental behavior and moral elevation better than 23 other character strengths. Ecopsychology, 15(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2022.0047
12.
DoudsK. W.HoutM. (2020). Microaggressions in the United States. Sociological Science, 7, 528–543. http://dx.doi.org/10.15195/v7.a22
13.
FinlayS.RothC.ZimsenT.BridsonT. L.SarnyaiZ.McDermottB. (2022). Adverse childhood experiences and allostatic load: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 136, Article 104605.
14.
GanderF.HofmannJ.ProyerR. T.RuchW. (2020). Character strengths – Stability, change, and relationships with well-being changes. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9690-4
15.
Gonzalez-MendezR.Ramírez-SantanaG.HambyS. (2021). Analyzing Spanish adolescents through the lens of the resilience portfolio model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9–10), 4472–4489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518790600
16.
GrahamJ. W.CumsilleP. E.ShevockA. E. (2012). Methods for handling missing data. In WeinerI. B. (Ed.), Handbook of psychology(2nd ed.,). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop202004
17.
GrychJ.TaylorE.BanyardV.HambyS. (2020). Applying the dual factor model of mental health to understanding protective factors in adolescence. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 90(4), 458–467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ort0000449
18.
Haahr-PedersenI.ErshadiA. E.HylandP.HansenM.PereraC.SheafG.BramsenR. H.SpitzP.VallièresF. (2020). Polyvictimization and psychopathology among children and adolescents: A systematic review of studies using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire. Child Abuse & Neglect, 107, Article 104589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104589
19.
HambyS.BlountZ.SmithA.JonesL.MitchellK.TaylorE. (2018). Digital poly-victimization: The increasing importance of online crime and harassment to the burden of victimization. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 19(3), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2018.1441357
20.
HambyS.de WetterE.SchultzK.TaylorE.BanyardV. (2024). Resilient responses to victimization and other trauma: Positive emotion regulation and other understudied psychosocial strengths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 40(21–22), 4982–5010. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241299448
21.
HambyS.GrychJ.BanyardV. (2018). Resilience portfolios and poly-strengths: Identifying protective factors associated with thriving after adversity. Psychology of Violence, 8(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000135
22.
HambyS.HerveyG.LandJ.SchultzK. (2023). A qualitative exploration of institutional betrayals in rural communities: An emerging typology. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 24(5), 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2023.2195401
23.
HambyS.MontgomeryK. M.StorerH. L.BanyardV. (2022). “That was the happiest time of my life”: Understanding childhood eco-connections in Appalachian communities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), Article 16661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416661
24.
HambyS.TaylorE.MitchellK.JonesL.NewlinC. (2020a). Health-related quality of life among adolescents as a function of victimization, other adversities, and strengths. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 50, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2019.11.001
25.
HambyS.TaylorE.MitchellK.JonesL.NewlinC. (2020b). Poly-victimization, trauma, and resilience: Exploring strengths that promote thriving after adversity. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 21(3), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2020.1719261
26.
HambyS.TaylorE.SeguraA.WeberM. (2022). A dual-factor model of posttraumatic responses: Which is better, high posttraumatic growth or low symptoms?Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 14(S1), S148–S156. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001122
HamitiE.KelmendiK.RetkoceriS.HambyS. (2024). Resilience in the Kosovo context: A qualitative study of young adults. Emerging Adulthood, 12(5), 710–725https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968241261086
29.
HillP. L.SinN. L.TurianoN. A.BurrowA. L.AlmeidaD. M. (2018). Sense of purpose moderates the associations between daily stressors and daily well-being. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52(8), 724–729. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kax039
30.
HouH.ZhangC.TangJ.WangJ.XuJ.ZhouQ.YanW.GaoX.WangW. (2022). Childhood experiences and psychological distress: Can benevolent childhood experiences counteract the negative effects of adverse childhood experiences?Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.800871
31.
JonesL. M.MontagutA. S.MitchellK. J.TurnerH. A.HambyS.CuevasC. A. (2024). Youth bias-based victimization: Comparing online only, in-person only, and mixed online/in-person incidents. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 6(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-023-00161-1
32.
KelmendiK.MulajI.ZymberiM.KadiriS. (2022). Meaning-making of war experiences: Stories from Kosova. OMEGA – Journal of Death and Dying, 86(1), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222820962251
33.
LeM. T.HoltonS.NguyenH. T.WolfeR.FisherJ. (2015). Poly-victimisation among Vietnamese high school students: Prevalence and demographic correlates. PLoS One, 10(5), Article e0125189. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125189
34.
LiF.LuoS.MuW.LiY.YeL.ZhengX.XuB.DingY.LingP.ZhouM.ChenX. (2021). Effects of sources of social support and resilience on the mental health of different age groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-03012-1
35.
Littman-OvadiaH.DubreuilP.MeyersM. C.FreidlinP. (2021). VIA character strengths: Theory, research and practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.653941
36.
MancoN.HambyS. (2021). A meta-analytic review of interventions that promote meaning in life. American Journal of Health Promotion, 35(6), 866–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117121995736
MitchellK. J.BanyardV.YbarraM. (2023). Overlap between exposure to suicidal behavior and indirect interpersonal violence: Evidence for a more integrated approach to violence research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(15–16), 9189–9214. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231163238
39.
MoisanC.HébertM.FernetM.BlaisM.AmédéeL. M. (2019). Resilience portfolios and poly-strengths: Identifying strengths associated with wellbeing after adversity. International Journal of Child and Adolescent Resilience, 6(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.7202/1069073ar
40.
NiemiecR. M. (2013). VIA character strengths: Research and practice (the first 10 years). In KnoopH. H.Delle FaveA. (Eds.), Well-Being and cultures: Perspectives from positive psychology (pp. 11–29). Springer Netherlands.
41.
PanzeriA.BertaminiM.ButterS.LevitaL.Gibson-MillerJ.VidottoG.BentallR. P.BennettK. M. (2021). Factors impacting resilience as a result of exposure to COVID-19: The ecological resilience model. PLoS One, 16(8), Article e0256041. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256041
42.
PereiraF.SpitzbergB. H.MatosM. (2016). Cyber-harassment victimization in Portugal: Prevalence, fear and help-seeking among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.039
43.
PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association.
44.
PiercyS.HambyS. (2025). A scoping review of resilience among intensive care nurses: Exploring strengths that mitigate secondary trauma. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0002017
45.
SabinaC.MariscalE. S.WeberM.MedranoA. S.FloresY.AgordeE. K.ElliotJ. M.Valencia GonzalezV.RestrepoM. T. (2025). Factors enhancing resilience among youth exposed to macro-level violence in Spanish-speaking countries in Latin America. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 26(2), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241309375
46.
SaltE.CroffordL. J.SegerstromS. (2017). The mediating and moderating effect of volunteering on pain and depression, life purpose, well-being, and physical activity. Pain Management Nursing, 18(4), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2017.04.004
47.
SmithB. W.DalenJ.WigginsK.TooleyE.ChristopherP.BernardJ. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972
48.
SmithC. P.FreydJ. J. (2014). Institutional betrayal. American Psychologist, 69(6), 575–587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037564
49.
SpencerC. M.KeilholtzB. M.PalmerM.VailS. L. (2024). Mental and physical health correlates for emotional intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221137686
50.
SuR.TayL.DienerE. (2014). The development and validation of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 6(3), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12027
51.
TedeschiR. G.CalhounL. G. (1996). The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02103658
VaishnaviS.ConnorK.DavidsonJ. R. T. (2007). An abbreviated version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the CD-RISC2: Psychometric properties and applications in psychopharmacological trials. Psychiatry Research, 152(2), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2007.01.006
54.
WaehrerG. M.MillerT. R.Silverio MarquesS. C.OhD. L.Burke HarrisN. (2020). Disease burden of adverse childhood experiences across 14 states. PLoS One, 15(1), Article e0226134. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226134
55.
WagnerL.GanderF.ProyerR. T.RuchW. (2020). Character strengths and PERMA: Investigating the relationships of character strengths with a multidimensional framework of well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15(2), 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9695-z
56.
Weziak-BialowolskaD.BialowolskiP.NiemiecR. M. (2023). Character strengths and health-related quality of life in a large international sample: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 103, Article 104338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104338
57.
WhittenburyK.ClarkS.BrooksM.MurphyT.TurnerM.FawcettH. (2025). A scoping review of strengths-based assets and resources for helping professionals exposed to secondary trauma. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 26(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241309371
58.
WuC.LiuY.MaS.JingG.ZhouW.QuL.WangZ.ChengM.WuY. (2021). The mediating roles of coping styles and resilience in the relationship between perceived social support and posttraumatic growth among primary caregivers of schizophrenic patients: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1), Article 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03058-9
59.
YoonS.TomlinsonC.BenavidesJ.ChangY.StanekC.WangX.IshiekweneM.MariscalE.DuronJ.HowellK. (2025). Resilience and strengths among minoritized racial and ethnic groups of children in the United States exposed to trauma, violence, and maltreatment: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 26(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241309382
60.
ZhangY.LiJ.HuX. (2022). The effectiveness of dignity therapy on hope, quality of life, anxiety, and depression in cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 132, Article 104273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104273
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
