While research now shows that sexual minority (SM) young adults experience more technology-facilitated abuse (TFA) than their cisgender and heterosexual peers, little scholarship examines how these experiences differ across racial and ethnic lines within the SM community. We draw on an original survey fielded to a nationally representative sample of 2,752 young adults aged 18 to 35 from November 2020 to May 2021. Bivariate analyses were conducted to assess the direct relationship between sexual minority status and TFA victimization and perpetration. Multivariate logistic regression and negative binomial regression were used to assess TFA victimization and perpetration outcomes. SM young adults reported more victimization experiences, higher odds of experiencing in-person abuse along with TFA, higher odds of experiencing physical harm associated with their TFA, and a greater number of TFA perpetrators than their heterosexual/straight peers. SM cisgender females likewise reported higher rates of all four outcomes than cisgender heterosexual/straight females. SM cisgender males reported a greater number of TFA perpetrators than heterosexual cisgender males. No significant effects by interaction of SM status and race/ethnicity were found in the cisgender female or cisgender male stratified models. SM young adults also reported perpetrating violence against more victims than heterosexual/straight young adults. Black, Hispanic, and some other race/multiracial SM young adults all perpetrated TFA on fewer victims than white SM young adults. While few intersectional differences were found, results indicate that SM young adults are at increased risk of TFA and that SM young adults minoritized by race may be at the highest risk of TFA victimization, even as they are less likely to perpetrate TFA.
AdamsonT.LettE.GlickJ.Garrison-DesanyH. M.RestarA. (2022). Experiences of violence and discrimination among LGBTQ+ individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A global cross-sectional analysis. BMJ Global Health, 7(9), Article e009400.
2.
AlexyE. M.BurgessA. W.BakerT.SmoyakS. A. (2005). Perceptions of cyberstalking among college students. Brief Treatment & Crisis Intervention, 5(3), 279–289.
3.
BenderA. K.LauritsenJ. L. (2020). Violent victimization among lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations in the United States: Findings from the National Crime Victimization Survey, 2017–2018. American Journal of Public Health, 111(2), 318–326.
4.
BottinoS. M. B.BottinoC. M. C.ReginaC. G.CorreiaA. V. L.RibeiroW. S. (2015). Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health: Systematic review. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 31(3), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00036114
5.
BuchanM. C.BhawraJ.KatapallyT. R. (2024). Navigating the digital world: Development of an evidence-based digital literacy program and assessment tool for youth. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00293-x
6.
CollinsP. H. (2000). Black feminist thought (2nd ed.). Routledge.
7.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
8.
CyrusK. (2017). Multiple minorities as multiply marginalized: Applying the minority stress theory to LGBTQ people of color. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 21(3), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2017.1320739
9.
DankM.LachmanP.ZweigJ. M.YahnerJ. (2014). Dating violence experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(5), 846–857.
10.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D.KahleL.NolanJ. (2021). Polyvictimization in a college lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer community: The influence of negative peer support. Violence and Gender, 8(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2020.0040
11.
DreßingH.BailerJ.AndersA.WagnerH.GallasC. (2014). Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: Prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(2), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0231
12.
DrouinM.RossJ.TobinE. (2015). Sexting: A new, digital vehicle for intimate partner aggression?Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 197–204.
13.
EllysonA. M.AdhiaA.LyonsV. H.RivaraF. P. (2021). Prevalence, age of initiation, and patterns of co-occurrence of digital dating abuse behaviors nationwide. Children and Youth Services Review, 122, Article 105921.
14.
FahyA.StansfeldS. A.SmukM.SmithN. R.CumminsS.ClarkC. (2016). Longitudinal associations between cyberbullying involvement and adolescent mental health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 59(5), 502–509.
15.
FinkelhorD.OrmrodR. K.TurnerH. A. (2007). Poly-victimization: A neglected component in child victimization. Child Abuse Neglect, 31(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.06.008
16.
FinkelhorD.ShattuckA.TurnerH. A.OrmrodR.HambyS. L. (2014). Polyvictimization in developmental context. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 4(4), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361521.2011.610432
17.
FioletR.BrownC.McKayD.MarsdenS.LeinsK.HarrisB. (2023). Perpetrator perceptions on the emotions and motivations driving technology-facilitated abuse in relationships: A story completion study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(23–24), 11999–12024. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231190340
18.
FloresA. R.StotzerR. L.MeyerI. H.LangtonL. L. (2022). Hate crimes against LGBT people: National Crime Victimization Survey, 2017–2019. PLoS One, 17(12), e0279363. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279363
19.
FlynnA.PowellA.HindesS. (2024). An intersectional analysis of technology-facilitated abuse: Prevalence, experiences and impacts of victimization. The British Journal of Criminology, 64(3), 600–619.
20.
FrostD. M.MeyerI. H. (2023). Minority stress theory: Application, critique, and continued relevance. Current Opinion in Psychology, 51, Article 101579.
21.
Gámez-GuadixM.InceraD. (2021). Homophobia is online: Sexual victimization and risks on the internet and mental health among bisexual, homosexual, pansexual, asexual, and queer adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, Article 106728.
22.
GattamortaK. A.SalernoJ. P.Roman LaporteR. (2022). Family rejection during COVID-19: Effects on sexual and gender minority stress and mental health among LGBTQ university students. LGBTQ+ Family: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 305–318.
23.
GilbarO.CharakR.TrujilloO.CantuJ. I.CavazosV.LaviI. (2022). Meta-analysis of cyber intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization: Different types and their associations with face-to-face IPV among men and women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(3), 1948–1965. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221082087
HarrisJ. C. (2016). Toward a critical multiracial theory in education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(6), 795–813.
26.
HenryN.BeardG. (2024). Image-based sexual abuse perpetration: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(5), 3981–3998. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241266137
27.
HenryN.PowellA. (2018). Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016650189
28.
HerekG. M. (2009). Sexual stigma and sexual prejudice in the United States: A conceptual framework. In HopeD. A. (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities (pp. 65–111). Springer Science + Business Media.
29.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2021). Digital dating abuse among a national sample of U.S. youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(23–24), 11088–11108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519897344
30.
JangY.KoB. (2023). Online safety for children and youth under the 4Cs framework—A focus on digital policies in Australia, Canada, and the UK. Children, 10(8), Article 1415.
31.
JohnsM. M.LowryR.HaderxhanajL. T.RasberryC. N.RobinL.ScalesL.StoneD.SuarezN. A. (2020). Trends in violence victimization and suicide risk by sexual identity among high school students—Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2015–2019. MMWR Supplements, 69(1), 19.
32.
JohnsM. M.LowryR.HippT. N.RobinL.ShafirS. (2021). Differences in adolescent experiences of polyvictimization and suicide risk by sexual minority status. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(1), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12595
33.
JohnsM. M.LowryR.RasberryC. N.DunvilleR.RobinL.PampatiS.StoneD. M.KollarL. M. M. (2018). Violence victimization, substance use, and suicide risk among sexual minority high school students—United States, 2015–2017. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67(43), 1211.
34.
KimS.KimberM.BoyleM. H.GeorgiadesK. (2019). Sex differences in the association between cyberbullying victimization and mental health, substance use, and suicidal ideation in adolescents. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 64(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743718777397
35.
KosciwJ. G.ClarkC. M.TruongN. L.ZongroneA. D. (2020). The 2019 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth in our Nation’s schools. A report from GLSEN. ERIC.
36.
LitwillerB. J.BrauschA. M. (2013). Cyber bullying and physical bullying in adolescent suicide: The role of violent behavior and substance use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9925-5
37.
Masullo ChenG.PainP.ZhangJ. (2018). #NastyWomen: Reclaiming the Twitterverse from misogyny. In VickeryJ. R.EverbachT. (Eds.), Mediating misogyny (pp. 371–388). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6_19
38.
MeyerI. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674.
39.
MeyerI. H.FrostD. M. (2012). Minority stress and the health of sexual minorities. In PattersonC. J.D’AugelliA. R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and sexual orientation (pp. 252–266). Oxford University Press.
MumfordE. A.MaitraP.SheridanJ.RothmanE.RobertsE.OlsenE. (2023). Technology-facilitated abuse of young adults in the United States: A latent class analysis. Cyberpsychology, 17(3).
42.
PatchinJ. W.HindujaS. (2020). Sextortion among adolescents: Results from a National Survey of U.S. youth. Sexual Abuse, 32(1), 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063218800469
43.
PatelU.RoeschR. (2022). The prevalence of technology-facilitated sexual violence: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(2), 428–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020958057
44.
PowellA.HenryN. (2019). Technology-facilitated sexual violence victimization: Results from an online survey of Australian adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(17), 3637–3665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516672055
45.
PowellA.HenryN.FlynnA.ScottA. J. (2019). Image-based sexual abuse: The extent, nature, and predictors of perpetration in a community sample of Australian residents. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 393–402.
46.
PowellA.ScottA. J.FlynnA.McCookS. (2022). Perpetration of image-based sexual abuse: Extent, nature and correlates in a multi-country sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(23–24), NP22864–NP22889. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211072266
47.
PowellA.ScottA. J.HenryN. (2020). Digital harassment and abuse: Experiences of sexuality and gender minority adults. European Journal of Criminology, 17(2), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370818788006
48.
ReynsB. W.HensonB.FisherB. S. (2012). Stalking in the Twilight zone: Extent of cyberstalking victimization and offending among college students AU. Deviant Behavior, 33(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2010.538364
49.
SterzingP. R.GartnerR. E.GoldbachJ. T.McGeoughB. L.RatliffG. A.JohnsonK. C. (2019). Polyvictimization prevalence rates for sexual and gender minority adolescents: Breaking down the silos of victimization research. Psychology of Violence, 9(4), 419.
50.
TurnerH. A.FinkelhorD.MitchellK.ColburnD. (2024). Prevalence of technology-facilitated abuse among sexual and gender minority youths. JAMA Network Open, 7(2), e2354485–e2354485.
51.
VakhitovaZ.WebsterJ.Alston-KnoxC.ReynaldD.TownsleyM. (2018). Offender–victim relationship and offender motivation in the context of indirect cyber abuse: A mixed-method exploratory analysis. International Review of Victimology, 24(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758017743073
52.
Van OuytselJ.Punyanunt-CarterN. M.WalraveM.PonnetK. (2020). Sexting within young adults’ dating and romantic relationships. Cyberpsychology, 36, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.007
53.
VoglerS.KappelR.MumfordE. (2023). Experiences of technology-facilitated abuse among sexual and gender minorities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(19–20), 11290–11313.
54.
WilloughbyB. L. B.DotyN. D.MalikN. M. (2010). Victimization, family rejection, and outcomes of gay, lesbian, and bisexual young people: The role of negative GLB identity. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 6(4), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428x.2010.511085
55.
WorthenM. G. (2013). An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual women, MtF and FtM transgender individuals. Sex Roles, 68, 703–723.
