This research examines how Muslim women and men evaluate a rape incident based on whether the victim wore hijab. While Western research has extensively examined victim’s dress, the impact of religious dress codes like hijab remains unknown. Hijab mainly symbolizes sexual modesty for Muslim women, and its perceived importance is likely influenced by two sociocultural norms dominant in Islamic cultures, namely honor norms and religious fundamentalism. Results from an experimental study with 623 Muslim adults (287 women, 336 men) residing in the United Kingdom found support for our preregistered hypothesis that both women and men blame the victim who did not wear hijab more than the victim who wore hijab. Also as hypothesized, men, compared to women, attributed more blame, were less certain that the incident was rape, and held the perpetrator more criminally liable. Greater endorsement of honor norms was related to higher victim blame, lower certainty of rape judgment, lower criminal liability, and less punishment for the perpetrator. The discussion highlights the importance of a scientific understanding of rape culture in Muslim communities.
AbramsD.VikiG. T.MasserB.BohnerG. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111
2.
Abu-LughodL. (2002). Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others. American Anthropologist, 104(3), 783–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796814561357
3.
Abu-RaiyaH. (2013). The psychology of Islam: Current empirically based knowledge, potential challenges, and directions for future research. In PargamentK. I.ExlineJ. J.JonesJ. W. (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, theory, and research (pp. 681–695). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14045-038
4.
AhmedS. M. (2000). Women and gender is Islam. The Ahfad Journal, 17(2), Article 61.
5.
AltemeyerB.HunsbergerB. (2004). A revised Religious Fundamentalism Scale: The short and sweet of it. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1401_4
6.
BagherianM. B.DezakiZ. H.BahmaniB. (2021). The big role of authority, sanctity, and modern myths about sexual aggression in blaming the rape victims: A study on culture of honor. https://psyarxiv.com/jz6xe/
7.
BieneckS.KrahéB. (2011). Blaming the victim and exonerating the perpetrator in cases of rape and robbery: Is there a double standard?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(9), 1785–1797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510372945
BrownR. P.BaughmanK.CarvalloM. (2018). Culture, masculine honor, and violence toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(4), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217744195
10.
CaffaroF.MulasC.SchmidtS. (2016). The perception of honour-related violence in female and male university students from Morocco, Cameroon and Italy. Sex Roles, 75, 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0576-8
11.
ChakrabortiN.ZempiI. (2012). The veil under attack: Gendered dimensions of Islamophobic victimization. International Review of Victimology, 18(3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758012446983
12.
CohnE. S.DupuisE. C.BrownT. M. (2009). In the eye of the beholder: Do behavior and character affect victim and perpetrator responsibility for acquaintance rape?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(7), 1513–1535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00493.x
FahmyW.SnookB.LutherK.McCardleM. I. (2019). Unveiling the truth: The effect of Muslim garments and face covering on the perceived credibility of a victim’s court testimony. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 51(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000116
15.
Feldman-SummersS.LindnerK. (1976). Perceptions of victims and defendants in criminal assault cases. Correctional Psychologist, 3(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385487600300203
16.
FischerA. H.Rodriguez MosqueraP. M.Van VianenA. E.MansteadA. S. (2004). Gender and culture differences in emotion. Emotion, 4(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.87
17.
Garcia-YesteC.BottonL. D.AlvarezP.CampdepadrosR. (2021). Actions to promote the employment and social inclusion of Muslim women who wear the hijab in Catalonia (Spain). Sustainability, 13(13), Article 6991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13136991
18.
GillR. (2008). Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist times. Subjectivity, 25(1), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.28
19.
GökarıkselB.SecorA. (2010). Islamic-ness in the life of a commodity: Veiling-fashion in Turkey. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(3), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00388.x
20.
GravelinC. R.BiernatM.BucherC. E. (2019). Blaming the victim of acquaintance rape: Individual, situational, and sociocultural factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02422
21.
GrubbA.HarrowerJ. (2008). Attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(5), 396–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.06.006
22.
GulP.SchusterI. (2020). Judgments of marital rape as a function of honor culture, masculine reputation threat, and observer gender: A cross-cultural comparison between Turkey, Germany, and the UK. Aggressive Behavior, 46(4), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21893
23.
HeathE. G.SperryK. (2021). A Religious Paradox: Can priming ideas of god reduce rape victim blame?Sex Roles, 84(3–4), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01163-9
24.
HillsP. J.PlevaM.SeibE.ColeT. (2021). Understanding how university students use perceptions of consent, wantedness, and pleasure in labeling rape. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50, 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01772-1
25.
HirschmannN. J. (1998). Western feminism, Eastern veiling, and the question of free agency. Constellations, 5(3), 345–368.
26.
HockettJ. M.SmithS. J.KlausingC. D.SaucierD. A. (2016). Rape myth consistency and gender differences in perceiving rape victims: A meta-analysis. Violence Against Women, 22(2), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215607359
IwamuraJ. N. (2004). Women in new religions. In PearsonJ. (Ed.), Women and religious traditions (pp. 249–270). Oxford University Press.
31.
JohnsonK. K.JuH. W.WuJ. (2016). Young adults’ inferences surrounding an alleged sexual assault: Alcohol consumption, gender, dress, and appearance schematicity. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 34(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X15624550
32.
Karimi-MalekabadiF.Falahatpishe BaboliM. (2023). Qeirat values and victim blaming in Iran: The mediating effect of culture-specific gender roles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(3–4), 2485–2509. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221101184
33.
KazmiS. M. A.RaufK. (2024). “A No means No”: Rape myth acceptance, victim blaming and hostile sexism as predictors of acceptance towards rape on a date among Pakistani adults. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 35(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2024.2305125
34.
LennonS. J.AdomaitisA. D.KooJ.JohnsonK. K. (2017). Dress and sex: A review of empirical research involving human participants and published in refereed journals. Fashion and Textiles, 4, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-017-0101-5
35.
LeungA. K. Y.CohenD. (2011). Within- and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022151
MahmoodS. (2006). Feminist theory, agency, and the liberatory subject: Some reflections on the Islamic revival in Egypt. Temenos-Nordic Journal for the Study of Religion, 42(1), 31–71. https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.4633
38.
MalayeriS.NaterC.KrahéB.SczesnyS. (2024). Married or on a date: Cultural norms and gender differences in rape perception in an Iranian sample. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 31(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2024.2418102
39.
MaurerT. W.RobinsonD. W. (2008). Effects of attire, alcohol, and gender on perceptions of date rape. Sex Roles, 58(5–6), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9343-9
40.
MernissiF. (1987). Beyond the veil: Male-female dynamics in modern Muslim society (Rev. ed.). Indiana University Press.
41.
MonsonC. M.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.BinderupT. (2000). Does “no” really mean “no” after you say “yes”? Attributions about date and marital rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(11), 1156–1174. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626000015011003
42.
MuehlenkampJ. J.Saris-BaglamaR. N. (2002). Self-objectification and its psychological outcomes for college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00076
43.
MuthenL.MuthenB. (2012). Mplus version 8 user’s guide. Muthen & Muthen.
44.
ÖztemürG.Toplu-DemirtaşE. (2024). Are the paths to victim-blaming paved with hostile sexism, honor system justification, and fragile masculinity? Evidence from men in Turkey. Sexuality & Culture, 28, 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10109-8
45.
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238
46.
PinciottiC. M.OrcuttH. K. (2020). It won’t happen to me: An examination of the effectiveness of defensive attribution in rape victim blaming. Violence Against Women, 26(10), 1059–1079. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219853367
47.
PinciottiC. M.OrcuttH. K. (2021). Understanding gender differences in rape victim blaming: The power of social influence and just world beliefs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1–2), 255–275.
48.
RazaviP.Shaban-AzadH.SrivastavaS. (2023). Gheirat as a complex emotional reaction to relational boundary violations: A mixed-methods investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(1), 179–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000424
SaucierD. A.StrainM. L.HockettJ. M.McManusJ. L. (2015). Stereotypic beliefs about masculine honor are associated with perceptions of rape and women who have been raped. Social Psychology, 46(4), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000240
51.
SlaterD. (2002). Social relationships and identity online and offline. In LievrouwL. S.LivingstoneS. (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 533–546). Sage.
52.
TemkinJ.KrahéB. (2008). Sexual assault and the justice gap: A question of attitude. Hart.
53.
UskulA. K.CrossS. E.GünsoyC. (2023). The role of honour in interpersonal, intrapersonal and intergroup processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(1), Article e12719. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12719
54.
van der BruggenM.GrubbA. (2014). A review of the literature relating to rape victim blaming: An analysis of the impact of observer and victim characteristics on attribution of blame in rape cases. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(5), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.008
VandelloJ. A.CohenD.GrandonR.FraniukR. (2009). Stand by your man: Indirect prescriptions for honorable violence and feminine loyalty in Canada, Chile, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108326194
57.
WerbnerP. (2007). Veiled interventions in pure space: Honour, shame and embodied struggles among Muslims in Britain and France. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075004
58.
WhatleyM. A. (1996). Victim characteristics influencing attributions of responsibility to rape victims: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-1789(95)00011-9
YeldermanL. A.MillerM. K. (2017). Religious fundamentalism, religiosity, and priming: Effects on attitudes, perceptions, and mock jurors’ decisions in an insanity defense case. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2016.1239097
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
