Resilience is essential to wellbeing for survivors of sex trafficking, as they typically face persistent adversity. In order to build knowledge of survivors’ resilience that is grounded in their own lived experience and insights, in this study, two survivor-researchers developed a constructivist grounded theory of resilience during and after sex trafficking through 75 in-depth interviews with 44 survivors. The research question guiding this grounded theory study was, “How do survivors of sex trafficking define, attain and maintain resilience during and after trafficking?” Starting at the fourth interview, the ongoing analysis was presented to participants for discussion, and a draft of the theory was discussed in the last 20 interviews. The theory explicates that resilience is an inherent force from deep within that empowers a person to survive and/or reach for goals through current adversity. Support and resources enhance resilience, but it can manifest in the absence of these. The core component of the theory is making choices to survive or to navigate situations of limited options and oppression to reach for goals; hope, purpose, values and assets facilitate these choices. Participants’ insights suggest that classic resilience factors like social support and future orientation confer resilience because they impact choice-making by: (a) mitigating the emotions and/or cognitions that would constrain the individual’s choices such as hopelessness; (b) enhance the emotions and/or cognitions that foster decision and action such as a passion to help others and (c) provide individuals with what they need to discover, create and/or weigh options in the environment. This survivor study of resilience thus contributes to the knowledge base needed to design interventions that leverage survivors’ existing assets and ally with their preferred options and strategies for addressing adversity and achieving “the life they love to live.”
AbramsL. S.TerryD. (2017). Everyday desistance: The transition to adulthood among formerly incarcerated youth. Rutgers University Press.
2.
BeresfordP.FarrM.HickeyG.KaurM.OclooJ.TemboD.WilliamsO. (Eds.) (2021). The challenges and necessity of co-production. In COVID-19 and co-production in health and social care research, policy, and practice (pp. 3–16). Policy Press.
3.
BonannoG. A.DiminichE. D. (2013). Annual research review: Positive adjustment to adversity–trajectories of minimal–impact resilience and emergent resilience. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(4), 378–401.
4.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
5.
CecchetS. J.ThoburnJ. (2014). The psychological experience of child and adolescent sex trafficking in the United States: Trauma and resilience in survivors. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 6(5), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035763
6.
CharmazK. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
7.
CojacaruC. (2016). My experience is mine to tell: Challenging the abolitionist victimhood framework. Anti-Trafficking Review, 7, 12–38. https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.20121772.
8.
DellN. A.MaynardB. R.BornK. R.WagnerE.AtkinsB.HouseW. (2019). Helping survivors of human trafficking: A systematic review of exit and post-exit interventions. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 20(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017692553
9.
EggermanM.Panter-BrickC. (2010). Suffering, hope, and entrapment: Resilience and cultural values in Afghanistan. Social Science & Medicine, 71(1), 71–83.
10.
EllisB. J.AbramsL. S.MastenA. S.SternbergR. J.TottenhamN.FrankenhuisW. E. (2020). Hidden talents in harsh environments. Development and Psychopathology, 34(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420000887
11.
EspañaM.KarandikarS.McCloskeyR. J.RenoR. (2023). The journey through sex trafficking, motherhood, and building resilience: A qualitative study among women living in Kamathipura red-light area. Journal of Human Trafficking, 9(2), 229–241.
12.
FletcherD.SarkarM. (2015). Psychological resilience: A review and critique of definitions, concepts and theory. In PalmerS.GyllenstenK. (Eds.), Pyschological resilience and wellbeing (pp. 27–48). Sage.
13.
GerassiL. B.NicholsA. J. (2018). Sex trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation: Prevention, advocacy and trauma-informed practice. Springer Publishing Company.
14.
GinesiniG. (2018). Forced migration: Trauma, faith, and resilience. Social Work & Christianity, 45(4), 98–121.
15.
GrahamL. M.MacyR. J.EckhardtA.RizoC. F.JordanB. L. (2019). Measures for evaluating sex trafficking aftercare and support services: A systematic review and resource compilation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 47, 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.04.001
16.
GrychJ.HambyS.BanyardV. (2015).The resilience portfolio model: Understanding healthy adaptation in victims of violence. Psychology of Violence, 5(4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039671
17.
HambyS.GrychJ.BanyardV. (2018). Resilience portfolios and poly-strengths: Identifying protective factors associated with thriving after adversity. Psychology of Violence, 8(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000135
18.
HambyS.TaylorE.MitchellK.JonesL.NewlinC. (2020). Poly-victimization, trauma, and resilience: Exploring strengths that promote thriving after adversity. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 21(3), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2020.171926
Ijadi-MaghsoodiR.BathE.CookM.TextorL.BarnertE. (2018). Systematic review of facilitators of, barriers to, and recommendations for healthcare services for child survivors of human trafficking globally. Child Abuse & Neglect, 76(2018), 334–341.
21.
JonesS. C. T.NeblettE. W. (2016). Racial-ethnic protective factors and mechanisms in psychosocial prevention and intervention programs for Black youth. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 19(2), 134–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-016-0201-
22.
KnightL.PlossA.BenavidesJ.YoonS. (2023). A qualitative study of risk and protective factors for resilience in survivors of sex trafficking. Violence Against Women, 29(15–16), 3302–3324.
23.
KnightL.XinY.MengoC. (2022). A scoping review of resilience in survivors of human trafficking. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(4), 1048–1062.
24.
KnightL.YoonS. (2024). “You come up from the ashes, and you’re like a phoenix.” Survivors of sex trafficking define resilience. Qualitative Social Work, 23(3), 424–441.
25.
KristiansenM.Bloch-PoulsenJ. (2013). Participation and power. International Journal of Action Research, 9(1), 5–14.
26.
LiebenbergL.MooreJ. C. (2018). A social ecological measure of resilience for adults: The RRC-ARM. Social Indicators Research, 136(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-0161523-y
27.
LutharS. S.CicchettiD.BeckerB. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562.
MastenA. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238.
30.
MastenA. S. (2014). Global perspectives on resilience in children and youth. Child Development, 85(1), 6–20.
31.
MatthewL.BarronI. (2023). Ritual abuse survivors’ perspectives on research participation: An exploratory mixed methods online study. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 32(5), 637–653.
32.
MendenhallE.KimA. W. (2021). Rethinking idioms of distress and resilience in anthropology and global mental health. In DyerA. R.KohrtB. A.CandilisP. J. (Eds.), Global mental health ethics (pp. 157–170). Springer International Publishing.
33.
OkechD.ChoiY. J.ElkinsJ.BurnsA. C. (2018). Seventeen years of human trafficking research in social work: A review of the literature. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 15(2), 102–121. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.ohio-state.edu/10.1080
34.
PangalloA.ZibarrasL.LewisR.FlaxmanP. (2015). Resilience through the lens of interactionism: A systematic review. Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 1–20.
35.
Panter-BrickC.HadfieldK.DajaniR.EggermanM.AgerA.UngarM. (2018). Resilience in context: A brief and culturally grounded measure for Syrian refuses and Jordanian host-community adolescents. Child Development, 89(5), 1803–1820.
36.
PrebleK. M.TwisM.KollmeyerS.GreenwoodD. (2023). Defiance and strength: A qualitative study of sex trafficking survivor–advocate coping strategies. Violence and Victims, 35(5), 701–720.
37.
SmithB.WilliamsO.BoneL., & The Moving Social Work Co-production Collective. (2023). Co-production: A resource to guide co-producing research in the sport, exercise, and health sciences. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 15(2), 159–187.
38.
SouthwickS. M.BonannoG. A.MastenA. S.Panter-BrickC.YehudaR. (2014). Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: Interdisciplinary perspectives. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5(1), 25338.
39.
UngarM. (2013). Resilience, trauma, context and culture. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 14(3), 255–266.
40.
US Department of State. (2020). Trafficking in persons report. Office of the Under Secretary for Global Affairs.
41.
WilliamsL. M. (2010). Harm and resilience among prostituted teens: Broadening our understanding of victimisation and survival. Social Policy & Society, 9(2), 243.
42.
WindleG. (2020). Resilience in later life: Responding to criticisms and applying new knowledge to the experience of dementia. In WisterA.CoscoT. D. (Eds.), Resilience and aging: Emerging science and future possibilities (pp. 31–52). Springer.
43.
WorsleyL.HjemdalO. (2020). The psychometric of the adult resilience doughnut model, a solution focused, ecological model of resilience. Journal of Solution Focused Practices, 4(2), 3.
44.
ZimmermanC.WattsC. (2003). WHO ethical and safety recommendations for interviewing trafficked women (LC/NLM classification: HQ 281). World Health Organization.
