Violence can be a result of drifting away from conventional society to subcultures of delinquency. Little is known about the role of subcultures in developing violence in tertiary educational institutions. A qualitative study was conducted to explore the role of subculture in provoking violence among the youth of a vocational training institution in Sri Lanka’s Central Province. Six focus group discussions with 54 students (31 females and 23 males) and 07 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with staff members were conducted until data saturation was reached. Data analysis was conducted using the thematic analysis method. Three themes emerged from data concerning the role of subculture in provoking violence. They were (a) Acceptance, (b) Pressure, and (c) Power. Subculture-associated violence was accepted by the participants, including victims. Students perceived it as their responsibility to continue forms of violence associated with subculture, such as ragging, and passed their traumatic experiences on to their juniors. Students reported pressure from seniors to conform to the subculture, which affected their psychological well-being and academic activities. Reporting violence in the subculture was suppressed by senior students, hindering the violence prevention efforts. Findings revealed power in terms of seniority, gender, and sense of belongingness. Senior students claimed more power in terms of control, and using violence to maintain status and respect as seniors was prominent among students. Violence was closely associated with masculinity, and male students perceived more power than female students in their day-to-day activities and decision-making. Students from local areas of residence felt a sense of belongingness and perceived more power compared to other students from faraway places. Findings showed that the subculture in the college played a significant role in provoking violent behaviour among students. The evidence from this study contributes to youth educational institutions to view violence through a subcultural lens and take necessary actions.
BernburgJ. G.ThorlindssonT. (1999). Adolescent violence, social control, and the subculture of delinuency: Factors related to violent behavior and nonviolent delinquency. Youth and Society, 30(4), 445–460.
6.
BernburgJ. G.ThorlindssonT. (2005). Violent values, conduct norms, and youth aggression: A multilevel study in Iceland. Sociological Quarterly, 46(3), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00022.x
7.
BlueH. C.GriffithE. E. H. (1995). Sociocultural and therapeutic perspectives on violence. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 18(3), 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0193-953x(18)30041-8
BrezinaT.AgnewR.CullenF. T.WrightJ. P. (2004). The code of the street: A quantitative assessment of Elijah Anderson’s subculture of violence thesis and its contribution to youth violence research. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(4), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204004267780
11.
BuoncompagniG. (2019). Beyond the “subculture of connection”: Youth violence and criminal gangs on social networks. International Journal of Communication and Media Science, 6(1), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.14445/2349641x/ijcms-v6i1p104
CollinsR. (2009). Violence: A micro-sociological theory. Princeton University Press.
14.
DamayanthiM. K. N.SamarasingheG. G. D. L.BandaraM. A. C.HitihamuH. M. S. J.PereraS. (2013). Youth in development : Sri Lanka (Research Report No. 161). Hector Kobbekaduwa Agrarian Research and Training Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
15.
DurrantR. (2018). Sociocultural theories of violence. In ShackelfordT.Weekes-ShackelfordV. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_1822
FelsonR. B.LiskaA. E.SouthS. J.McNultyT. L. (1994). The subculture of violence and delinquency: Individual vs. school context effects. Social Forces, 73(1), 155–173.
18.
Fernández-PlanellsA.Sánchez-GarcíaJ.OliverM.FeixaC. (2020). Researching transnational gangs as agents of mediation in the digital era. In MeldeC.WeermanF. (Eds.), Gangs in the era of internet and social media (pp. 43–59). Springer.
19.
FernandoA. D.KarunasekeraW. (2009). Juvenile victimization in a group of young Sri Lankan adults. The Ceylon Medical Journal, 54(3), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v54i3.1200
20.
GamageS. (2017). Psychological, sociological, and political dimensions of ragging in Sri Lankan universities. Social Affairs: A Journal for the Social Sciences, 1(7), 13–21.
21.
HaganJ. (1991). Destiny and drift: Subcultural preferences, status attainments, and the risks and rewards of youth. American Sociological Review, 56(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096080
22.
HaganJ.FosterH. (2001). Youth violence and the end of adolescence. American Sociological Review, 66(6), 874–899. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088877
HeimerK. (1997). Socioeconomic status, subcultural definitions, and violent delinquency. Social Forces, 75(3), 799–833. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/75.3.799
26.
HughesL. A.BotchkovarE. V.AntonaccioO.TimmerA. (2021). Schools, subcultural values, and the risk of youth violence: The influence of the code of the street among students in three U.S. Cities. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(2), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01521-0
27.
Irwin-rogersK.PinkneyC. (2017). Social media as a catalyst and trigger for youth violence. Catch 22 in partnership with University College Birmingham.
28.
KrohnM. D.SkinnerW. F.MasseyJ. L.AkersR. L. (1985). Social learning theory and adolescent cigarette smoking: A longitudinal study. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 24(4), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/800775
29.
LatzerB. (2016). The rise and fall of violent crime in America. Encounter.
LennonS.JohnsonK. K. P.RuddN. (2017). Social psychology of dress. Bloomsbury.
32.
MatzaD. (1964). Delinquency and “Drift.”John Wiley.
33.
MayedaD. T.PaskoL. (2012). Youth violence and hegemonic masculinity among Pacific Islander and Asian American adolescents. Critical Criminology, 20(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-011-9132-1
NisbettR. E.CohenD. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Westview Press.
36.
OuseyG. C.WilcoxP. (2005). Subcultural values and violent delinquency: A multilevel analysis in middle schools. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 3(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204004270942
37.
QuinnJ. F.ForsythC. J. (2013). Red light districts on blue screens: A typology for understanding the evolution of deviant communities on the Internet. Deviant Behavior, 34(7), 579–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2012.748629
38.
RaoM.SonpaS.SenA.SheshadriS.AgarwalH.PadaliaD. (2015). Psycho-social study of ragging in selected educational institutions in India. Centre of Social Medicine & Community Health, School of Social Sciences, JNU.
39.
Reddy-BestK. L. (2020). Dress, appearance, and diversity in U.S. society. Iowa State University Digital Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31274/isudp.2020.9
40.
RosenmannA.SafirM. P. (2006). Forced online: Push factors of Internet sexuality: A preliminary study of online paraphilic empowerment. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(3), 71–92.
SpencerJ. (1990). Collective violence and everyday practice in Sri Lanka. In Modern Asian Studies (Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 603–623). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00010489
ThorlindssonT.BjarnasonT. (1998). Modeling durkheim on the micro level: A study of youth suicidality. American Sociological Review, 63(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657479
45.
TuranovicJ. J.PrattT. C.KuligT. C.CullenF. T. (2020). Individual, institutional, and community sources of school violence: A meta-analysis. National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/254633.pdf
46.
United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. (2004). National Survey on Emerging Issues among Adolescents in Sri Lanka. Ministry of Health.
UrbanikM.RoksR.StorrodM.DensleyJ. (2020). Ethical and methodological issues in gang ethnography in the digital age: Lessons from four studies in an emerging field. In MeldeC.WeermanF. (Eds.), Gangs in the Era of Internet and Social Media (pp. 21–41). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47214-6_2
WalbyS. (2009). Globalization and inequalities: Complexity and contested modernities. SAGE Publications.
52.
WangK.ChenY.ZhangJ.OudekerkB. A. (2020). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2019. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
53.
WarrM. (1993). Parents, peers, and delinquency. Social Forces, 72(1), 247–264.
54.
WickramasingheA.EssénB.ZiaeiS.SurenthirakumaranR.AxemoP. (2022). Ragging, a form of university violence in Sri Lanka-prevalence, self-perceived health consequences, help-seeking behavior and associated factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 8383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148383
55.
Wijekoon BandaT. M. (1995). Navakavadaya pilibanda samaja vidaythmaka vimarshanayak. Sociological Association of Ruhuna University.
56.
WolfgangM.FerracutiF. (1967). The subculture of violence: Towards an integrated theory of criminology. Tavistock.
