Intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) is a significant global public health issue, causing substantial physical, psychological, and sexual harm. Research on the neuropsychological aspects of IPVAW perpetrators, particularly executive cognitive functions, is limited. However, this area of study is critical due to the established link between executive functioning impairment and aggressive behavior. This study explores whether men convicted of IPVAW present different executive function performance compared to men convicted of other crimes and non-convicted men, while also distinguishing between generalist and specialist IPVAW offenders. The sample comprised 234 participants divided into five groups: 55 specialist IPVAW perpetrators, 33 generalist IPVAW perpetrators, 49 non-violent offenders, 33 violent offenders, and 64 non-offenders. Multivariate analysis of covariance analysis was carried out to explore differences between groups, controlling for drug use, loss of consciousness due to brain injury, and years of education. Results showed no differences among the groups in cognitive flexibility, decision-making, and inhibition, except for working memory. All convicted groups exhibited lower working memory performance compared to non-offenders, but no differences were found among the convicted groups. These findings suggest that while working memory may be a crucial factor in both violent and non-violent offenses, general executive deficits are not distinguishing features among different types of offenders. The study underscores the importance of focusing on working memory in interventions to mitigate criminal behavior and suggests further research to differentiate between IPVAW and other offenders to refine prevention and treatment strategies.
AmaouiS.Marín-MoralesA.Martín-PérezC.Pérez-GarcíaM.Verdejo-RománJ.MorawetzC. (2023). Intrinsic neural network dynamics underlying the ability to down-regulate emotions in male perpetrators of intimate partner violence against women. Brain Structure and Function, 228(9), 2025–2040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-023-02696-x
2.
BannonS. M.SalisK. L.Daniel O’LearyK. (2015). Structural brain abnormalities in aggression and violent behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.09.016
3.
BarkusE. (2020). Effects of working memory training on emotion regulation: Transdiagnostic review. PsyCh Journal, 9(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.353
4.
Becerra-GarcíaJ. A. (2015). Neuropsychology of domestic violence: A comparative preliminary study of executive functioning. Medicine, Science and the Law, 55(1), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802414525148
5.
BecharaA.DamasioA. R.DamasioH.AndersonS. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to the human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1–3), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3
6.
BialystokE.CraikF. I. (2022). How does bilingualism modify cognitive function? Attention to the mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(4), 1246–1269. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02057-5
7.
BiglerE. D. (2008). Neuropsychology and clinical neuroscience of persistent post-concussive syndrome. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135561770808017X
8.
BoyleD. J.O’LearyK. D.RosenbaumA.Hassett-WalkerC. (2008). Differentiating between generally and partner-only violent subgroups: Lifetime antisocial behavior, family of origin violence, and impulsivity. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9133-8
9.
BreslowN. E. (1996). Generalized linear models: checking assumptions and strengthening conclusions. Statistica Applicata, 8(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214505000000637
10.
Bueso-IzquierdoN.Hidalgo-RuzzanteN.DaughertyJ. C.Burneo-GarcésC.Pérez-GarcíaM. (2016). Differences in executive function between batterers and other criminals. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 16, 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1219216
11.
BurgessJ. (2020). A brief review of the relationship of executive function assessment and violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 54, 101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101414
12.
CampanholoK. R.BoaI. N. F.HodrojF. C. D. S. A.GuerraG. R. B.MiottoE. C.LuciaM. C. S. D. (2017). Impact of sociodemographic variables on executive functions. Dementia & Neuropsychology, 11, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642016dn11-010010
13.
ChanS. C.RaineA.LeeT. M. C. (2010). Attentional bias towards negative affect stimuli and reactive aggression in male batterers. Psychiatry Research, 176, 246–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.12.013
14.
ClareC. A.VelasquezG.MartorellG. M. M.FernandezD.DinhJ.MontagueA. (2021). Risk factors for male perpetration of intimate partner violence: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 56, 101532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101532
15.
CohenR. A.BrummV.ZawackiT. M.PaulR.RosenbaumA. (2003). Impulsivity and verbal deficits associated with domestic violence. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 760–770. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617703950090
16.
CollisonK. L.LynamD. R. (2023). Personality traits, personality disorders, and aggression: A comparison of intimate partner violence and non-intimate-partner aggression. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 45(2), 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10001-z
17.
CorvoK.JohnsonP. (2013). Sharpening Ockham’s Razor: The role of psychopathology and neuropsychopathology in the perpetration of domestic violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(1), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.017
18.
CruzA. R.de Castro-RodriguesA.BarbosaF. (2020). Executive dysfunction, violence and aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 51, 101380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101380
19.
EastonC. J.SaccoK. A.NeavinsT. M.WuppermanP.GeorgeT. P. (2008). Neurocognitive performance among alcohol dependent men with and without physical violence toward their partners: A preliminary report. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 34(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990701764326
20.
EcheburúaE.Fernández-MontalvoJ.de CorralP.López-GoñiJ. J. (2009). Assessing risk markers in intimate partner femicide and severe violence: A new assessment instrument. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(6), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508319370
21.
FoxJ.WeisbergS. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). SAGE.
22.
FoxJ. M.ReillyJ. L.KossonD. S.BrownA.HanlonR. E.BrookM. (2022). Differentiating perpetrators of intimate partner violence from other violent offenders using a statistical learning model: The role of cognition and life history variables. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(3–4), 1106–1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520918567
23.
GodfreyD. A.KehoeC. M.Bastardas-AlberoA.BabcockJ. C. (2020). Empathy mediates the relations between working memory and perpetration of intimate partner violence and aggression. Behavioral Sciences, 10(3), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10030063
24.
GranvaldV.MarciszkoC. (2016). Relations between key executive functions and aggression in childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 22, 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2015.1018152
25.
HanlonR. E.BrookM.DemeryJ. A.CunninghamM. D. (2016). Domestic homicide: Neuropsychological profiles of murderers who kill family members and intimate partners. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 61, S163–S170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12908
26.
HechtL. K.LatzmanR. D. (2018). Exploring the differential associations between components of executive functioning and reactive and proactive aggression. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 40, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2017.1314450
27.
HerreroJ.TorresA.Fernández-SuárezA.Rodríguez-DíazF. J. (2016). Generalists versus specialists: Toward a typology of batterers in prison. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2015.09.002
28.
HerreroO.EscorialS.ColomR. (2010). Basic executive processes in incarcerated offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(2), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.09.009
29.
Holtzworth-MunroeA.MeehanJ. C.HerronK.RehmanU.StuartG. L. (2000). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(6), 1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.6.1000
30.
HorneK.HenshallK.GoldenC. (2020). Intimate partner violence and deficits in executive function. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 54, 101412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101412
31.
HumenikA. M.GroundsZ. K.MayerH. M.DolanS. L. (2020). A systematic review of executive cognitive function in intimate partner violent offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 54, 101407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101407
32.
HuntA. W.TurnerG. R.PolatajkoH.BottariC.DawsonD. R. (2013). Executive function, self-regulation and attribution in acquired brain injury: A scoping review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23, 914–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2013.835739
33.
JaroszA. F.WileyJ. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1167
34.
KadeS. A.du ToitS. A.DanielsonC. T.SchweizerS.MorrisonA. S.OngD. C.PrasadA.HolderL. J.HanJ.TorokM.WongQ. J. J. (2024). Aberrant cognitive empathy in individuals with elevated social anxiety and regulation with emotional working memory training. Cognition and Emotion, 38(4), 605–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2314981
35.
KocklerT. R.StanfordM. S. (2008). Using a clinically aggressive sample to examine the association between impulsivity, executive functioning, and verbal learning and memory. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.10.006
36.
KuinN.MasthoffE.KramerM.ScherderE. (2015). The role of risky decision-making in aggression: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.018
37.
LishakV.ScottK. L.DysonA.MilovanovA. (2019). General criminality as a marker of heterogeneity in domestically violent men: Differences in trauma history, psychopathology, neurocognitive functioning, and psychophysiology. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17–18), 9623–9648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519858065
38.
LoinazI.EcheburúaE.Ortiz-TalloM.AmorP. J. (2012). Propiedades psicométricas de la Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS-2) en una muestra española de agresores de pareja. Psicothema, 24(1), 142–148.
39.
MagueleM. S.TaylorM.KhuzwayoN. (2020). Evidence of sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. BMJ Open, 10(12), e040641. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040641
40.
MaloneyM. A.EckhardtC. I.OesterleD. W. (2023). Emotion regulation and intimate partner violence perpetration: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 100, 102238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102238
41.
Marín-MoralesA.Bueso-IzquierdoN.Hidalgo-RuzzanteN.Pérez-GarcíaM.Catena-MartínezA.Verdejo-RománJ. (2022). “Would You Allow Your Wife to Dress in a Miniskirt to the Party”?: Batterers do not activate default mode network during moral decisions about intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(3–4), 1463–1488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520926494
42.
McQuadeJ. D.Murray-CloseD.ShoulbergE. K.HozaB. (2013). Working memory and social functioning in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(3), 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.03.002
43.
MeijersJ.HarteJ. M.JonkerF. A.MeynenG. (2015). Prison brain? Executive dysfunction in prisoners. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00043
44.
Ministry of Equality. (2024). Statistics on gender-based violence in Spain. Government of Spain.
45.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowerterA.WagerT. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
46.
OgilvieJ. M.StewartA. L.ChanR. C. K.ShumD. H. K. (2011). Neuropsychological measures of executive function and antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 49, 1063–1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00252.x
47.
PanD. N.HoidD.WangX. B.JiaZ.LiX. (2022). When expanding training from working memory to emotional working memory: Not only improving explicit emotion regulation but also implicit negative control for anxious individuals. Psychological Medicine, 52(4), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720002275
48.
PiqueroA. R.TheobaldD.FarringtonD. P. (2013). The overlap between offending trajectories, criminal violence, and intimate partner violence. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(3), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12472655
49.
Romero-MartínezÁ.LilaM.GraciaE.Martín-FernándezM.Moya-AlbiolL. (2021). Generally antisocial batterers with high neuropsychological deficits present lower treatment compliance and higher recidivism. Psychology of Violence, 11(3), 318. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/vio0000296
50.
Romero-MartínezÁ.LilaM.Moya-AlbiolL. (2019). The importance of impulsivity and attention switching deficits in perpetrators convicted for intimate partner violence. Aggressive Behavior, 45, 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21802
51.
Romero-MartínezÁ.LilaM.Sariñana-GonzálezP.González-BonoE.Moya-AlbiolL. (2013). High testosterone levels and sensitivity to acute stress in perpetrators of domestic violence with low cognitive flexibility and impairments in their emotional decoding process: A preliminary study. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21490
52.
Romero-MartínezÁ.LilaM.Vitoria-EstruchS.Moya-AlbiolL. (2018). Can attention and working memory impairments of intimate partner perpetrators explain their risky decision making?. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11–12), 6492–6507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518814263
53.
Romero-MartínezÁ.Sarrate-CostaC.Moya-AlbiolL. (2023). A meta-analysis of cognitive functioning in intimate partner violence perpetrators. Neuropsychology Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09628-w
54.
RoitmanP.GiladM.AnkriY. L.ShalevA. Y. (2013). Head injury and loss of consciousness raise the likelihood of developing and maintaining PTSD symptoms. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26(6), 727–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.21862
55.
SatyenL.RogicA. C.SupolM. (2019). Intimate partner violence and help-seeking behaviour: A systematic review of cross-cultural differences. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 21, 879–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-0803-9
56.
SeisdedosN.CorralS.CorderoA.de la CruzM. V.HernándezM. V.PereñaJ. (1999). WAIS-III: Escala de Inteligencia de Wechsler para Adultos-III. TEA Ediciones.
57.
ShiraevE. B.LevyD. A. (2020). Cross-cultural psychology: Critical thinking and contemporary applications. Routledge.
StrobachT.SalminenT.KarbachJ.SchubertT. (2014). Practice-related optimization and transfer of executive functions: A general review and a specific realization of their mechanisms in dual tasks. Psychological Research, 78(6), 836–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0563-7
60.
TevaI.Hidalgo-RuzzanteN.Pérez-GarcíaM.Bueso-IzquierdoN. (2021). Characteristics of childhood family violence experiences in Spanish batterers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(23–24), 11212–11235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519898436
61.
TevaI.Marín-MoralesA.Bueso-IzquierdoN.Pérez-GarcíaM.Hidalgo-RuzzanteN. (2023). Personality characteristics in specialist and generalist intimate partner violence perpetrators. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 30(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2778
62.
TonnaerF.CimaM.ArntzA. (2016). Executive (dys)functioning and impulsivity as possible vulnerability factors for aggression in forensic patients. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 204, 280–286. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000485.
63.
TornayF. J.MilánE. G. (2001). A more complete task-set reconfiguration in random than in predictable task switch. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 54(3), 785–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755984
64.
Ubillos-LandaS.Goiburu-MorenoE.Puente-MartínezA.Pizarro-RuizJ. P.Echeburúa-OdriozolaE. (2017). Assessment of distorted thoughts about women and violence of Basque-speaking secondary school students. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English Ed.), 22(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.16124
65.
Verdejo-GarcíaA.Pérez-GarcíaM. (2007). Ecological assessment of executive functions in substance dependent individuals. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.02.010
66.
Vitoria-EstruchS.Romero-MartínezA.LilaM.Moya-AlbiolL. (2018). Differential cognitive profiles of intimate partner violence perpetrators based on alcohol consumption. Alcohol, 70, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.01.006
67.
WallingS. M.MeehanJ. C.MarshallA. D.Holtzworth-MunroeA.TaftC. T. (2012). The relationship of intimate partner aggression to head injury, executive functioning, and intelligence. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(3), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00226.x
68.
WatkinsE. R.RobertsH. (2020). Reflecting on rumination: Consequences, causes, mechanisms and treatment of rumination. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 127, 103573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2020.103573
69.
WeberT.BoumanY. H. (2020). Intimate partner violence: Variations in perpetrators and treatment allocation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(3–4), 1012–1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517692994
WestbyM. D.FerraroF. R. (1999). Frontal lobe deficits in domestic violence offenders. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 125, 71.
72.
World Health Organization. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. World Health Organization.
73.
XiuL.ZhouR.JiangY. (2016). Working memory training improves emotion regulation ability: Evidence from HRV. Physiology & Behavior, 155, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.12.004
74.
YangZ.HongS.LiuF.SuY. (2020). A meta-analysis of the relationship between empathy and executive function. PsyCh Journal, 9(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.311
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
