Political Orientation and Attitudes Toward Sexual Harassment: The Moderating Role of Gender

Abstract

Sexual harassment (SH) refers to unwelcome behavior that creates a hostile, intimidating, or offensive environment. This behavior can manifest through physical, verbal, or nonverbal actions. The present study analyzes the relationship between political orientation (left-wing, center, and right-wing) and attitudes toward SH with a focus on the moderating role of gender. We examined two types of attitudes: SH myth acceptance, and rejection of sexist remarks, specifically piropos. SH myths are widely held but false beliefs that serve to deny and justify male-perpetrated harassment of women. Piropos are a form of harassment prevalent in Spain, where strangers make unsolicited comments about a woman’s appearance in public spaces. Data were collected at a Spanish university, and multiple regression analyses were performed (N = 303). Participants with left-wing political orientation showed significantly lower SH myth acceptance compared to both right-wing (β = .80, p < .001) and center-oriented participants (β = .51, p < .01). Similarly, left-wing participants showed significantly higher rejection of piropos compared to right-wing (β = −1.26, p < .001) and center-oriented participants (β = −.80, p < .01). Furthermore, the interaction between political orientation and gender revealed that men with right-wing political orientation showed higher SH myth acceptance (β = −.51, p < .05) and lower rejection of piropos (β = .96, p < .05) compared to women of the same political orientation.

Keywords

sexual harassment gender myths political orientation piropos

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, Amended 2010, 2016). https://www.apa.org/ethics/code

Berkowitz

A. D.

Bogen

K. W.

Meza Lopez

R. J.

Mulla

M. M.

Orchowski

L. M.

(2022). The social norms approach as a strategy to prevent violence perpetrated by men and boys: A review of the literature. In Engaging Boys and Men in Sexual Assault Prevention: Theory, Research, and Practice (Issue March). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819202-3.00009-2

Bettencourt

K. E. F.

Vacha-Haase

Byrne

Z. S.

(2011). Older and younger adults’ attitudes toward feminism: The influence of religiosity, political orientation, gender, education, and family. Sex Roles, 64(11–12), 863–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9946-z

Bilotta

Davenport

M. K.

F. Y.

Beier

M. E.

(2019). If we build it, will they come? Lack of incentives as barriers to implementing effective sexual harassment training. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.1

Blahopoulou

Ferrer-Pérez

V. A.

Bosch-Fiol

Ortiz-Bonnin

(2024). Yes, we can make a difference: Evaluating the effectiveness of a brief training intervention for preventing sexual harassment in higher education. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1–19.

Bohner

Eyssel

Pina

Siebler

Viki

G. T.

(2013). Rape myth acceptance: Cognitive, affective and behavioural effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator. In Rape (pp. 17–45). Willan.

Bondestam

Lundqvist

(2020). Sexual harassment in higher education–a systematic review. European Journal of Higher Education, 10(4), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1729833

Bosch-Fiol

Ferrer-Pérez

V. A.

(2012). New map of myths about gender-based violence in the 21st century [Nuevo mapa de los mitos sobre la violencia de género en el siglo XXI]. Psicothema, 24(4), 548–554.

Brown

K. G.

Sitzmann

(2011). Training and employee development for improved performance. In Zedeck

(Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 2. Selecting and Developing Members for the Organization (pp. 469–503). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12170-016

10.

Cabeza Pérez

Alonso Sáenz De Oger

Gómez Fortes

. (2023). Ideology and party positions on gender issues in Spain: Evidence from a novel data set. Politics and Gender, 19, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X23000338

11.

Calogero

R. M.

Tantleff-Dunn

Thompson

J. K.

(Eds.). (2011). Future directions for research and practice. In Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. (pp. 217–237). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12304-010

12.

Canto

J. M.

Álvaro

J.-L.

Da Costa-Silva

Maribondo

Torres

A.-R.

(2020). Influence of right-wing authoritarianism and the values proposed by Schwartz on the perception of psychological abuse as gender violence: An exploratory study [Influencia del autoritarismo de derechas y de los valores propuestos por Schwartz en la percepci]. International Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 69–99.

13.

Cassese

E. C.

Holman

M. R.

(2019). Playing the woman card: Ambivalent sexism in the 2016 US presidential race. Political Psychology, 40(1), 55–74.

14.

Chan

D. K. S.

Lam

C. B.

Chow

S. Y.

Cheung

S. F.

(2008). Examining the job-related, psychological, and physical outcomes of workplace sexual harassment: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 362–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00451.x

15.

Cheung

H. K.

Goldberg

C. B.

King

E. B.

Magley

V. J.

(2018). Are they true to the cause? Beliefs about organizational and unit commitment to sexual harassment awareness training. Group and Organization Management, 43(4), 531–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601117726677

16.

Conroy

(2019). Are Americans more divided on# MeToo issues?. FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved from https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/are-americans-more-divided-on-metoo-issues/

17.

Cuero

(2021). Gender violence [Violencia de género]. In Expósito

M. C.

Moya

(Eds.), Revista Médica de Panamá—ISSN 2412-642X (p. 1). Pirámide. https://doi.org/10.37980/im.journal.rmdp.20211812

18.

Davis

S. N.

Greenstein

T. N.

(2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-SOC-070308-115920

19.

Delegación del Gobierno contra la Violencia de Género. (2019). Macroencuesta de violencia contra la mujer 2019. https://violenciagenero.igualdad.gob.es/

20.

Dziech

B. W.

Hawkins

M. W.

(2018). Sexual harassment in higher education: Reflections and new perspectives. In Sexual harassment in higher education: Reflections and new perspectives (p. 214). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429447365

21.

Erikson

R. S.

Tedin

K. L.

(2003). American public opinion: Its origins, content, and impact. Longman.

22.

Expósito

Herrera

Valor-Segura

Herrera

M. C.

Lozano

L. M.

(2014). Spanish adaptation of the Illinois sexual harassment myth acceptance. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17(2), E40. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.42

23.

Ferrer-Pérez

V. A.

Bosch-Fiol

Ferreiro-Basurto

Delgado-Alvarez

Sánchez-Prada

(2020). Comparing implicit and explicit attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02147

24.

Ferrer-Pérez

V. A.

Delgado-Alvarez

Sánchez-Prada

Bosch-Fiol

Ferreiro-Basurto

(2021). Street sexual harassment: Experiences and attitudes among young Spanish people. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), Article 10375.

25.

Fitzgerald

(1993). Sexual harassment: Violence against women in the workplace. American Psychologist, 48(10), 1070–1076. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.10.1070

26.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

Drasgow

Hulin

C. L.

Gelfand

M. J.

Magley

V. J.

(1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.578

27.

Fitzgerald

(2020). Unseen: The sexual harassment of low-income women in America. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 39(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-08-2019-0232/FULL/XML

28.

Fredrickson

B. L.

Roberts

T. A.

(1997). Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x

29.

Gelfand

M. J.

Fitzgerald

Drasgow

(1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A Confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1006/JVBE.1995.1033

30.

Gothreau

C. M.

Warren

Schneider

(2022). Looking the other way: how ideology influences perceptions of sexual harassment. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 5(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16445951244136

31.

Guizzo

Cadinu

(2021). Women, not objects: Testing a sensitizing web campaign against female sexual objectification to temper sexual harassment and hostile sexism. Media Psychology, 24(4), 509–537.

32.

Hansen

M. A.

Dolan

(2020). Voter sex, party, and gender-salient issues: Attitudes about sexual harassment and Brett Kavanaugh in the 2018 elections. American Politics Research, 48(5), 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X20939502

33.

Hayes

A. F.

(2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf

34.

Hayes

A. F.

(2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd Ed.). The Guilford Press.

35.

Herrera Hernandez

Oswald

D. L

. (2022). Who supports #MeToo and the Kavanaugh confirmation? Exploring tolerance for sexual harassment among young adults. Journal of Social Issues, 79, 1370–1388. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12531

36.

Herrera

McCarthy

(2023). Street harassment interpretations: An exploration of the intersection of gender and race/ethnicity, and mediator variables. Violence Against Women, 29(3–4), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221094067

37.

Herrera

del

Herrera

Expósito

(2018). To confront versus not to confront: Women’s perception of sexual harassment. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2017.04.002

38.

Herrera

Expósito

(2014). Stop Harassment! Men’s reactions to victims’ confrontation. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 6(2), 45–52.

39.

Hershcovis

M. S.

Vranjes

Berdahl

J. L.

Cortina

L. M.

(2021). Integrative conceptual review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(12), 1834–1847. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000861

40.

Hooghe

(2017). Discipline-specific differences in political attitudes among university students. Results of a campus-wide survey among Belgian university students. [Diferencias en las actitudes políticas de estudiantes universitarios de acuerdo a las disciplinas académicas. Resultados de una encuesta aplicada en una universidad belga]. Revista de La Educacion Superior, 46(181), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2016.10.004

41.

Igartua

J.-J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2021). Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: Concepts, computations, and some common confusions. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 24, 49. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2021.46

42.

Jost

J. T.

Federico

C. M.

Napier

J. L.

(2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.PSYCH.60.110707.163600

43.

Jost

J. T.

Glaser

Kruglanski

A. W.

Sulloway

F. J.

(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339

44.

Kazmi

S. M. A.

Tarar

A. H.

Nasir

Iftikhar

(2023). Victim blaming, prior history to sexual victimization, support for sexually assaulted friends, and rape myths acceptance as predictors of attitudes towards rape victims in the general population of Pakistan. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 13(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-023-00340-7

45.

Klein

L. B.

Martin

S. L.

(2021). Sexual harassment of college and university students: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 22, (4), 777–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019881731

46.

Koss

M. P.

Goodman

L. A.

Browne

Fitzgerald

L. F.

Keita

G. P.

Russo

N. F.

(1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. American Psychological Association.

47.

Lancaster

T. D.

(2017). The Spanish general elections of 2015 and 2016: A new stage in democratic politics? West European Politics, 40(4), 919–937.

48.

Latcheva

(2017). Sexual harassment in the European union: A pervasive but still hidden form of gender-based violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(12), 1821–1852. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517698948

49.

Lonsway

K. A.

Cortina

L. M.

Magley

V. J.

(2008). Sexual harassment mythology: Definition, conceptualization, and measurement. Sex Roles, 58(9–10), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9367-1

50.

Manoussaki

Veitch

(2015). Ambivalent sexism, right wing authoritarianism and rape myth acceptance in Scotland. International Journal of Gender & Women’s Studies, 3(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.15640/IJGWS.V3N1A9

51.

Marcos-Marne

(2021). A Tale of Populism? The determinants of voting for left-wing populist parties in Spain1. Political Studies, 69(4), 1053–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720950215

52.

Marques-Fagundes

A. L.

Megías

J. L.

García-García

D. M.

Petkanopoulou

(2015). Ambivalent sexism and egalitarian ideology in perception of psychological abuse and (in)vulnerability to violence. [Sexismo ambivalente e ideología igualitaria en la percepción del maltrato psicológico y la (in)vulnerabilidad a la violencia]. Revista de Psicologia Social, 30(1), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2014.991519

53.

McClain

Kammer-Kerwick

Wood

Temple

J. R.

Busch-Armendariz

(2021). Sexual harassment among medical students: Prevalence, prediction, and correlated outcomes. Workplace Health and Safety, 69(6), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079920969402

54.

McDonald

(2012). Workplace sexual harassment 30 years on: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00300.x

55.

McLaughlin

Uggen

Blackstone

(2017). The economic and career effects of sexual harassment on working women. Gender & Society, 31(3), 333–358.

56.

Moya-Garófano

(2016). Cosificación de las mujeres: Análisis de las consecuencias psicosociales de los piropos [PhD Thesis]. University of Granada.

57.

Moya-Garófano

Moya

Megías

J. L.

Rodríguez-Bailón

(2020). Social perception of women according to their reactions to a stranger harassment situation (piropo). Sex Roles, 83(3), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01103-2

58.

Moya-Garófano

Moya

Megías

J. L.

Rodríguez-Bailón

(2022). Ambivalent sexism and women’s reactions to stranger harassment: The case of piropos in Spain. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 46(4), 454–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843221115339

59.

Mudde

Rovira Kaltwasser

(2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/GOV.2012.11

60.

Mujal

G. N.

Taylor

M. E.

Fry

J. L.

Gochez-Kerr

T. H.

Weaver

N. L.

(2021). A systematic review of bystander interventions for the prevention of sexual violence. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 22(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019849587

61.

Muñoz Valera

M. T.

Pereira Iglesias

Alonso Martínez

. (2023). Social perception of workplace sexual harassment in the healthcare system. [Percepción social del acoso sexual laboral en el ámbito sanitario]. Revista Española de Salud Pública, 97, e202303023.

62.

National Sexual Violence Research Center. (2015). 10 principles for effective prevention messaging. https://nsvrc.org/sites/default/files/publications_bulletin_10-principles-for-effective-prevention-messaging.pdf

63.

Navarro-Guzmán

Ferrer-Pérez

V. A.

Bosch-Fiol

(2016). Sexual Harassment in the University Setting: Analysis of a Measurement Scale. [El acoso sexual en el ámbito universitario: Análisis de una escala de medida]. Universitas Psychologica, 15(2), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy.15-2.asau

64.

Odic

Wojcik

E. H.

(2020). The publication gender gap in psychology. American Psychologist, 75(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000480

65.

Orchowski

Bogen

K. W.

Berkowitz

(2021). False reporting of sexual victimization: Prevalence, definitions, and public perceptions. In Geffner

White

J. W.

Hamberger

L. K.

Rosenbaum

Vaughan-Eden

Vieth

V. I.

(Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal violence and abuse across the lifespan: A project of the national partnership to end interpersonal violence across the lifespan (NPEIV), pp. 3691–3713. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89999-2_193

66.

Organic Law 15/1999, of December 13, on the Protection of Personal Data. [Ley Orgánica 15/1999, de 13 de diciembre, de Protección de Datos de Carácter Personal] (BOE-A-1999-23750). Boletín Oficial del Estado. https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1999-23750

67.

Organic Law 10/2022, of September 6, on the Comprehensive Guarantee of Sexual Freedom (BOE-A-2022-14630). [Ley Orgánica 10/2022, de 6 de septiembre, de garantía integral de la libertad sexual] (BOE-A-2022-14630). Boletín Oficial del Estado. https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2022/09/07/pdfs/BOE-A-2022-14630.pdf

68.

Perry

E. L.

Kulik

C. T.

Field

M. P.

(2009). Sexual harassment training: Recommendations to address gaps between the practitioner and research literatures. Human Resource Management, 48(5), 817–837. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20316

69.

Rodriguez-Rodriguez

Heras-González

(2020). A study of the protocols for action on sexual harassment in public universities-proposals for improvement. Social Sciences, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/SOCSCI9080128

70.

Roehling

M. V.

Huang

(2018). Sexual harassment training effectiveness: An interdisciplinary review and call for research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2257

71.

Rotundo

Nguyen

D. H.

Sackett

P. R.

(2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 914–922. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.914

72.

Russell

B. L.

Trigg

K. Y.

(2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50(7–8), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sers.0000023075.32252.fd

73.

Simón

2019. “Vox en la brecha (de género).” El País, January 21, sec. Opinion. https://elpais.com/elpais/2019/01/20/opinion/1548007306_339168.html

74.

Tetlock

P. E.

(2000). Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the politics of the beholder? Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 293–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667073

75.

Thakur

M. B.

Paul

(2017). Sexual harassment in academic institutions: A conceptual review. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 12(1), 33–40.

76.

van der Linden

Panagopoulos

. (2019). The O’Reilly factor: An ideological bias in judgments about sexual harassment. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 198–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2018.11.022

77.

Wade

J. C.

Brittan-Powell

(2001). Men’s attitudes toward race and gender equity: The importance of masculinity ideology, gender-related traits, and reference group identity dependence. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 2(1), 42.

78.

Williams

J. H.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

Drasgow

(1999). The effects of organizational practices on sexual harassment and individual outcomes in the military. Military Psychology, 11(3), 303–328.

79.

Wood

Hoefer

Kammer-Kerwick

Parra-Cardona

J. R.

Busch-Armendariz

(2021). Sexual Harassment at Institutions of Higher Education: Prevalence, Risk, and Extent. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9–10), 4520–4544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518791228