Unveiling the Gender Symmetry Debate: Exploring Consequences,Instructions,and Forms of Violence in Intimate Partner Violence

Abstract

Official statistics and data from police and judicial systems consistently show that intimate partner violence (IPV) is a worldwide problem predominantly affecting women perpetrated by male partners. Yet, certain behavioral checklists yield similar IPV rates for both genders, sparking the gender symmetry/asymmetry debate. Some possible explanations for this discrepancy reside in (a) considering or not the consequences of violence, (b) possible inadequacies of the instructions given to participants when answering checklists, and (c) considering or not certain behaviors typically asymmetrical (e.g., economic violence). In order to test these three hypotheses, we conducted two studies in the Spanish context using the Partner Victimization Scale (PVS). In Study 1, participants (n = 449) answered a Spanish version of the PVS (with the instructions “Not including horseplay or joking around”) and reported consequences of violence on their self-esteem and health. In Study 2 (n = 172), we experimentally manipulated the instructions given to participants when answering the PVS (including those of Study 1 or not) and also added some items of typically asymmetrical violence. Other measures of consequences of violence were assessed. Results of Study 1 replicated the original PVSs factor structure and showed gender asymmetry (more female than male victimization) in four of five items, and the victimization rates were related to consequences of violence, providing construct validity to this version of the scale. Results of Study 2 underlined the relevance of the instructions and of the addition of certain types of violence in the symmetry/asymmetry rates informed. Additionally, the IPV reported was associated with worse consequences for women than for men. Our findings suggest that the detection of IPV increases when the instructions are clarified, when certain items are added, and when the consequences of IPV are considered.

Keywords

intimate partner violence against women gender symmetry debate Partner Victimization Scale consequences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

(2018). Assessing conflict tactics scale validity by examining intimate partner violence overreporting. Psychology of Violence, 8(2), 207–217. http://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000112

Ansara

D. L.

Hindin

M. J.

(2011). Psychosocial consequences of intimate partner violence for women and men in Canada. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(8), 1628–1645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510370600

Arriaga

X. B.

(2002). Joking violence among highly committed individuals. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(6), 591–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260502017006001

Atienza

F. L.

Pons

Balaguer

García-Merita

(2000). Propiedades Psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida en Adolescentes [Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescents] Psicothema [Psychothema], 12(2), 314–319.

Badenes-Sastre

Lorente Acosta

Herrero Machancoses

Expósito Jiménez

(2023). Spanish adaptation and validation of the World Health Organization’s violence against women instrument. Psicothema, 35(2), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2022.197

Bartlett

B. A.

Iverson

K. M.

Mitchell

K. S.

(2018). Intimate partner violence and disordered eating among male and female veterans. Psychiatry Research, 260, 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.056

Bell

A.-S.

Dinwiddie

Hamby

(2018). Gender patterns in intimate partner violence: Results from 33 campus climate surveys based on the Partner Victimization Scale. Life Paths Appalachian Research Center.

Beusenberg

Orley

J. H.

(1994). A User’s guide to the self reporting questionnaire (SRQ/compiled by Beusenberg

Orley

& J.

). World Health Organization.

Blumenstein

(2015). Exploratory study on intimate partner kidnapping: Is this a prevailing issue in intimate partner relationships? Partner Abuse, 6(4), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.6.4.403

10.

Brislin

R. W.

(1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216. doi: 10.1177/135910457000100301

11.

Bosch-Fiol

Ferrer-Pérez

V. A.

(2019). The pyramid model: A feminist alternative for analyzing violence against women [El Modelo Piramidal: Alternativa feminista para analizar la violencia contra las mujeres]. Revista Estudos Feministas, 27, e54189. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2019v27n254189

12.

Costa

Hatzidimitriadou

Ioannidi-Kapolou

Lindert

Soares

Sundin

Ö.

Toth

Barros

(2015). Intimate partner violence and health-related quality of life in European men and women: Findings from the DOVE study. Quality of Life Research, 24(2), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0766-9

13.

Delegation of the Government against Gender Violence, Ministry of Equality (2020). Macrosurvey of violence against women 2019. https://violenciagenero.igualdad.gob.es/violenciaEnCifras/macroencuesta2015/pdf/Macroencuesta_2019_estudio_investigacion.pdf

14.

Desmarais

S. L.

Reeves

K. A.

Nicholls

T. L.

Telford

R. P.

Fiebert

M. S.

(2012). Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships, Part 1: Rates of male and female victimization. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 140–169. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.140

15.

Diener

Emmons

R. A.

Larsen

R. J.

Griffin

(1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

16.

Dobash

R. P.

Dobash

R. E.

(2004). Women’s violence to men in intimate relationships working on a puzzle. British Journal of Criminology, 44(3), 324–349. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azh026

17.

Echeburúa

Amor

P. J.

Sarasua

Zubizarreta

Holgado-Tello

F. P.

Muñoz

J. M.

(2016). Escala de Gravedad de Síntomas Revisada (EGS-R) del Trastorno de Estrés Postraumático según el DSM-5: Propiedades psicométricas [Posttraumatic stress disorder symptom severity scale-revised (EGS-R) according to DSM-5 criteria: Psychometric properties]. Terapia psicológica [Psychological Therapy], 34(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082016000200004

18.

Fanslow

J. L.

Mellar

B. M.

Gulliver

P. J.

McIntosh

T. K. D.

(2023). Evidence of gender asymmetry in intimate partner violence experience at the population-level. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(15–16), 9159–9188. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231163646

19.

Fernandez-Gonzalez

O’Leary

K. D.

Munoz-Rivas

M. J.

(2013). We are not joking: Need for controls in reports of dating Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(3), 602–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512455518

20.

Ferrer-Pérez

V. A.

Bosch-Fiol

(2019). El Género en el Análisis de la Violencia contra las Mujeres en la Pareja: De la “Ceguera” de Género a la Investigación Específica del Mismo. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 29(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2019a3

21.

Fisher

B. S.

Cullen

F. T.

Turner

M. G.

(2000). The sexual victimization of college women. National Institute of Justice.

22.

Foshee

V. A.

Bauman

K. E.

Linder

Rice

Wilcher

(2007). Typologies of adolescent dating violence: Identifying typologies of adolescent dating violence perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(5), 498–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506298829

23.

Faul

Erfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146

24.

García-Moreno

Jansen

H. A.

Ellsberg

Heise

Watts

(2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. World Health Organization.

25.

Hamby

(2009). The gender debate about intimate partner violence: Solutions and dead ends. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 1(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015066

26.

Hamby

(2014a). Intimate partner and sexual violence research: Scientific progress, scientific challenges, and gender. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(3), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014520723

27.

Hamby

(2014b). Battered women’s protective strategies: Stronger than you know. Oxford University Press.

28.

Hamby

(2016a). Advancing survey science for intimate partner violence: The Partner Victimization Scale and other innovations. Psychology of Violence, 6(2), 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000053

29.

Hamby

(2016b). Self-report measures that do not produce gender parity in intimate partner violence: A multi-study investigation. Psychology of Violence, 6(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038207

30.

Hamby

(2017). A scientific answer to a scientific question: The gender debate on intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015596963

31.

Harding

T. W.

De Arango

Baltazar

Climent

C. E.

Ibrahim

H. H. A.

Ladrido-Ignacio

Wig

N. N.

(1980). Mental disorders in primary health care: A study of their frequency and diagnosis in four developing countries. Psychological Medicine, 10(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700043993

32.

Hattie

(1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 139–164. doi:10.1177/014662168500900204

33.

Heise

(2011). What works to prevent partner violence? An evidence overview. Department for International Development. http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/21062

34.

Johnson

M. P.

(2011). Gender and types of intimate partner violence: A response to an anti-feminist literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(4), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.006

35.

Johnson

(2015). Degendering violence. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 22(3), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv021

36.

Jud

Grafe

Meshkova

Kavemann

Meysen

Hoffmann

Ziegenhain

Fegert

(2022). Prevalence and predictors of affirmations of intimate partner violence in Germany: A first nationwide study on victimization in women and men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(1–2), NP1473–NP1493. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221092066

37.

Karakurt

Smith

Whiting

(2014). Impact of intimate partner violence on women’s mental health. Journal of Family Violence, 29(7), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9633-2

38.

Kuijpers

K. F.

(2019). Partner disagreement on the occurrence of intimate partner violence among a national sample of heterosexual young-adult couples. Violence Against Women, 26(8), 889–909. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219850343

39.

Lehrner

Allen

N. E.

(2014). Construct validity of the Conflict Tactics Scales: A mixed-method investigation of women’s intimate partner violence. Psychology of Violence, 4(4), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037404

40.

Lövestad

Krantz

(2012). Men’s and women’s exposure and perpetration of partner violence: An epidemiological study from Sweden. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 945. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-945

41.

Martín-Albo

Núñez

J. L.

Navarro

J. G.

Grijalvo

(2007). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Translation and validation in university students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/-

42.

Myhill

(2015). Measuring coercive control: What can we learn from national population surveys? Violence Against Women, 21(3), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214568032

43.

Pate

Simonič

(2021). Intimate partner violence and physical health problems in women. Slovenian Medical Journal, 90(7–8), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.6016/ZdravVestn.3041

44.

Public Health Agency of Canada. (2016, September). The Chief Public Health Officer’s report on the state of public health in Canada 2016—A focus on family violence in Canada. Public Health Agency of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/publichealth/services/publications/chief-public-health-officer-reports-statepublic-health-canada/2016-focus-family-violence-canada.html

45.

Rodríguez-Menés

Safranoff

(2012). Violence against women in intimate relations: A contrast of five theories. European Journal of Criminology, 9(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370812453410

46.

Romito

Grassi

(2007). Does violence affect one gender more than the other? The mental health impact of violence among male and female university students. Social Science & Medicine, 65(6), 1222–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.017

47.

Rosenberg

(1989). Society and the adolescent self-image (Rev. ed.). Wesleyan University Press.

48.

Rosenthal

M. N.

(2018). Close quarters: college women’s experiences of campus sexual violence [Doctoral dissertation. University of Oregon].

49.

Sargent

K. S.

Yule

Bridges

Jouriles

E. N.

Grych

J. H.

(2020). Do instructions intended to reduce false positives improve the measurement of physical partner violence victimization among adolescents and young adults? Psychology of Violence, 10(2), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000246

50.

Schraiber

L. B.

D’Oliveira

A. F. P. L.

França Junior

, & Grupo de Estudos em População Sexualidade e Aids. (2008). [Intimate partner sexual violence among men and women in urban Brazil, 2005]. Revista De Saude Publica, 42(Suppl 1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102008000800015

51.

Scott-Storey

O’Donnell

Ford-Gilboe

Varcoe

Wathen

Malcolm

Vincent

(2023). What about the men? A critical review of men’s experiences of intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(2), 858–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211043827

52.

Straus

M. A.

(1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/351733

53.

Straus

M. A.

(2008). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.10.004

54.

Straus

M. A.

(2011). Gender symmetry and mutuality in perpetration of clinical-level partner violence: Empirical evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(4), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.010

55.

Straus

M. A.

(2016). Gender-violence, dyadic-violence, and dyadic concordance types: A conceptual and methodological alternative to Hamby (2016) that incorporates both the gendered and dyadic interaction aspects of violence to enhance research and the safety of women. APA PsycNET, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039616

56.

Straus

M. A.

Gelles

R. J.

Steinmetz

S. K.

(1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Doubleday.

57.

Straus

M. A.

Hamby

S. L.

Boney-McCoy

Sugarman

D. B.

(1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001

58.

United Nations. (2006). In-depth study on all forms of violence against women (A/61/122/Add.1). United Nations.

59.

Walby

Allen

(2004). Domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey. Home Office.

60.

Walby

Towers

(2017). Measuring violence to end violence: Mainstreaming gender. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868017X14913081639155

61.

Woerner

(2017). Women’s readiness to engage in risky sexual behavior: the effects of interpersonal violence victimization and social rejection [Doctoral dissertation. Wayne State University].

62.

World Health Organization. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240022256

63.

Zapata-Calvente

A.L.

Megías

J. L.

(2017). Social perception of intimate partner violence according to the motivations and sex of the aggressor and the ideology and sex of the observers. International Journal of Social Psychology, 32(2), 301–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2017.1297355

64.

Zharima

Singh

Closson

Beksinska

Zulu

Jesson

Pakhomova

Dong

Dietrich

Kaida

Basham

C. A.

(2024). Economic hardship and perpetration of intimate partner violence by young men in South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021–2022): A cross-sectional study. Injury Epidemiology, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00483-8