Social abuse represents a distinct form of intimate partner violence characterized by intentional violations of a victim’s social rights and inherent need to belong. This is achieved by tactics such as severing, interfering with, and surveilling the victim’s social connections as well as limiting their social participation. Such abuse often results in victims experiencing social isolation, potentially causing adverse mental health outcomes and failure to seek help. This study aimed to develop and validate the Social Abuse Scale (SAS) to measure social abuse in intimate partner relationships. After generating the preliminary items, content validity testing was performed. Ten international experts reviewed the items and assessed their relevance. Additionally, 17 interview participants assessed the items for clarity and ease of response. Thereafter, the SAS was administered to 251 individuals, either currently in or who had an intimate relationship in the previous year. The final SAS comprised 30 items unified under a single-factor structure, which accounted for approximately 69.77% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the model’s satisfactory fit. The instrument showed excellent internal consistency, as evidenced by Cronbach’s alpha and a McDonald’s omega value of .986. The SAS can be employed to investigate the prevalence of social abuse, its underlying mechanisms, and its impacts, and it can also assist in further development and evaluation of programs aimed at its prevention.
BoatengG. O.NeilandsT. B.FrongilloE. A.Melgar-QuiñonezH. R.YoungS. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
3.
BreidingM.BasileK. C.SmithS. G.BlackM. C.MahendraR. R. (2015). Intimate partner violence surveillance: uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Version 2.0. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
4.
CadelyH. S. E.PittmanJ. F.PettitG. S.LansfordJ. E.BatesJ. E.DodgeK. A.Holtzworth-MunroeA. (2020). Temporal associations between psychological and physical intimate partner violence: A cross-lag analysis. Partner Abuse, 11(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.11.1.22
De VellisR. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed., Vol. 26). SAGE Publications.
7.
DichterM. E.ThomasK. A.Crits-ChristophP.OgdenS. N.RhodesK. V. (2018). Coercive control in intimate partner violence: Relationship with women’s experience of violence, use of violence, and danger. Psychology of Violence, 8(5), 596–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000158
8.
DokkedahlS. B.KirubakaranR.Bech-HansenD.KristensenT. R.ElklitA. (2022). The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health: A systematic review with meta-analyses. Systematic Reviews, 11, 163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02025-z
9.
Dos SantosC. A.MouraM. A. V.SouzaI. E.deO.QueirozA. B. A.SouzaM. H. D. N.PennaL. H. G.FigueiredoE. M. C.& GonçalvesD.daS. (2022). Social support networks for women in situation of intimate partner violence. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 75, e20210830. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0830
10.
Garcia-MorenoC.JansenH. A.EllsbergM.HeiseL.WattsC. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet, 368(9543), 1260–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8
11.
Graham-KevanN.ArcherJ. (2003). Physical aggression and control in heterosexual relationships: The effect of sampling. Violence and Victims, 18(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.2003.18.2.181
12.
HairJ. F.BabinB. J.BlackW. C.AndersonR. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
13.
HambyS. L. (1996). The Dominance Scale: Preliminary psychometric properties. Violence and Victims, 11(3), 199–211.
14.
HeiseL.PallittoC.García-MorenoC.ClarkC. J. (2019). Measuring psychological abuse by intimate partners: Constructing a cross-cultural indicator for the sustainable development goals. SSM - Population Health, 9, 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100377
15.
HenryN.VasilS.FlynnA.KellardK.MortreuxC. (2021). Technology-facilitated domestic violence against immigrant and refugee women: A qualitative study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(13–14), NP12634–NP12660. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211001465
16.
JacksonD. B.LynchK. R.TestaA. (2020). Intimate partner violence, firearms, and sleep disturbances: The influence of coercive control and partner firearm ownership. Sleep Health, 6(6), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2020.04.013
17.
KimS.ParkS.ChampionJ. D. (2022). Intimate partner femicide in South Korea: An integrative review of the literature. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 18(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1097/jfn.0000000000000353
18.
KwonJ.ParkS. (2019). Experiencing coercive control in female victims of dating violence. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 49(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2019.49.1.46
19.
LeeE. H. (2023). Application and cases of structural equation modeling in nursing research. Research Seminar, 2023, 3–58.
20.
LehmannP.SimmonsC. A.PillaiV. K. (2012). The validation of the Checklist of Controlling Behaviors (CCB): Assessing coercive control in abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 18(8), 913–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212456522
MurphyC. M.HooverS. A. (1999). Measuring emotional abuse in dating relationships as a multifactorial construct. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 39–53.
23.
MuzaffarB. (2016). The development and validation of a scale to measure training culture: The TC scale. Journal of Culture, Society and Development, 23, 49–58.
24.
NizarJ.AliM. W.AmranT. A. T.AliasH.ChikZ. (2019). Assessment model for construct occupational accident using confirmatory factor analysis. E3S Web of Conferences, 90, 03004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199003004
ParkS.JeonJ. (2022). Social abuse in intimate partner relationships: A hybrid concept analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(5), 1599–1609. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211013140
27.
ParkS.KimS. H. (2024). Composite experiences of intimate partner violence in women: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Victims & Offenders, 19(6), 1208–1225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2024.2322956
28.
ParkS.KoY. (2021). Victims of intimate partner violence in South Korea: Experiences in seeking help based on support selection. Violence Against Women, 27(3–4), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220905638
29.
PatafioB.MillerP.WalkerA.CoomberK.CurtisA.KarantzasG.MayshakR.TaylorN.HyderS. (2022). Coercive controlling behaviors and reporting physical intimate partner violence in Australian women: An exploration. Violence Against Women, 28(2), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220985932
30.
PolicastroC.FinnM. A. (2021). Coercive control in intimate relationships: Differences across age and sex. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(3–4), 1520–1543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517743548
31.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
32.
Porrúa-GarcíaC.Rodríguez-CarballeiraÁ.EscartínJ.Gómez-BenitoJ.AlmendrosC.Martín-PeñaJ. (2016). Development and validation of the scale of psychological abuse in intimate partner violence (EAPA-P). Psicothema, 28(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2015.197
33.
RabinR. F.JenningsJ. M.CampbellJ. C.Bair-MerrittM. H. (2009). Intimate partner violence screening tools. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(5), 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.024
34.
RizzoC. J.Esposito-SmythersC.SpiritoA.ThompsonA. (2010). Psychiatric and cognitive functioning in adolescent inpatients with histories of dating violence victimization. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 19(5), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2010.495034
35.
SabriB.BolyardR.McFadgionA. L.StockmanJ. K.LuceaM. B.CallwoodG. B.CoverstonC. R.CampbellJ. C. (2013). Intimate partner violence, depression, PTSD, and use of mental health resources among ethnically diverse black women. Social Work in Health Care, 52(4), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2012.745461
36.
SalisK. L.SalwenJ.O’LearyK. D. (2014). The predictive utility of psychological aggression for intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 5(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.5.1.83
37.
SonM. S.ChoJ. Y. (2016). Dating violence victims support measures. Korean Women’s Hot Line.
38.
StoffL. W.BatesL. M.SchulerS. R.RennerL. M.EricksonD. J.OsypukT. L. (2021). Intimate partner violence and social connection among married women in rural Bangladesh. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 75(12), 1202–1207. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-214843
39.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001
40.
TolmanR. M. (1999). The validation of the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 25–37.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
