Controlling Behaviors Victimization and Perceptions of Space for Action Among Married Women and Men in Rural China: The Moderating Effect of Fear

Abstract

Victims of controlling behaviors in intimate relationships experience situations that diminish their space for action. That is, the more victims encounter controlling behaviors by their intimate partners, the less capacity they perceive for adaption to and making choices in daily life. This study explores the relationship between controlling behaviors victimization and space for action among married women and men in China. Most important, this study also examines the role that fear plays in this relationship, which so far has been uncommon. Using data collected from a community sample of 973 married individuals (women and men) with a mean age of 45.53 from a rural area in northern China, this study found a negative correlation between controlling behaviors victimization and space for action. When controlling for the variable of victim’s fear, the relationship between controlling behaviors victimization, and space for action differs by gender. The moderation analysis showed that controlling behaviors victimization was significantly and negatively associated with space for action when the female participants reported feeling fear, whereas the effect was not significant for male participants. These findings provide empirical evidence concerning the effect of controlling behaviors on victims’ freedom in rural China, highlighting a need for greater awareness of this social problem. The findings of this study may also be used to inform the development of programs and policies to improve victims’ safety and well-being in China.

Keywords

controlling behaviors victimization fear space for action rural China

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

A. E.

Sullivan

C. M.

Bybee

Greeson

M. R.

(2008). Development of the scale of economic abuse. Violence Against Women, 14(5), 563–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208315529

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G.

Reno

R. R.

(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. SAGE.

Anderson

K. L.

(2009). Gendering coercive control. Violence Against Women, 15(12), 1444–1457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209346837

Barlow

Johnson

Walklate

Humphreys

(2020). Putting coercive control into practice: Problems and possibilities. The British Journal of Criminology, 60(1), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz041

Beckwith

Lowe

Wall

Stevens

Carson

Kaspiew

MacDonald

J. B.

McEwen

Willoughby

Gahan

(2023). Coercive control literature review: Final report. Australian Institute of Family Studies. https://aifs.gov.au/research/research-reports/coercive-control-literature-review

Bjerregaard

(2002). An empirical study of stalking victimization. In Davis

K. E.

Frieze

I. H.

Maiuro

R. D.

(Eds.), Stalking: Perspectives on victims and perpetrators (pp. 112–137). Springer Publishing Company.

Bledsoe

L. K.

Sar

B. K.

(2011). Intimate partner violence control scale: Development and initial testing. Journal of Family Violence, 26(3), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9351-3

Chen

Gong

Yan

(2018). Probability sampling by connecting space with households using GIS/GPS technologies. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 6(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx032

Cheng

T. C.

C. C.

(2019). Health of women surviving intimate partner violence: Impact of injury and fear. Health & Social Work, 44(2), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlz003

10.

Choi

S. Y. P.

Ting

K. F.

(2008). Wife beating in South Africa: An imbalance theory of resources and power. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(6), 834–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507313951

11.

Clements

Holtzworth-Munroe

(2009). Participation in laboratory research result in emotional distress with one’s partner: Comparing violent and nonviolent couples. Journal of Family Violence, 24(5), 283–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9229-4

12.

Cohen

West

S. G.

Aiken

L. S.

(2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.

13.

Crossman

K. A.

Hardesty

J. L.

(2018). Placing coercive control at the center: What are the processes of coercive control and what makes control coercive?. Psychology of Violence, 8(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000094

14.

Douglas

Harris

B. A.

Dragiewicz

(2019). Technology-facilitated domestic and family violence: Women’s experiences. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(3), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy068

15.

Dutton

M. A.

Goodman

L. A.

(2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52(11–12), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-4196-6

16.

Eswaran

Malhotra

(2011). Domestic violence and women’s autonomy in developing countries: Theory and evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics, 44(4), 1222–1263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01673.x

17.

Graham-Kevan

Archer

(2003). Intimate terrorism and common couple violence. A test of Johnson’s predictions in four British samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(11), 1247–1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260503256656

18.

Graham-Kevan

Archer

(2009). Control tactics and partner violence in heterosexual relationships. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(6), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.007

19.

Graham-Kevan

Powney

D.; Mankind

(2021). Male victims of coercive control: Experiences and impact. UCLAN: Criminal Justice Partnership.

20.

Hamberger

L. K.

Guse

(2005). Typology of reactions to intimate partner violence among men and women arrested for partner violence. Violence and Victims, 20(3), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.20.3.303

21.

Hamberger

L. K.

Larsen

S. E.

Lehrner

(2017). Coercive control in intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.08.003

22.

Hardesty

J. L.

Crossman

K. A.

Haselschwerdt

M. L.

Raffaelli

Ogolsky

B. G.

Johnson

M. P.

(2015). Toward a standard approach to operationalizing coercive control and classifying violence types. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(4), 833–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12201

23.

Hardesty

J. L.

Ogolsky

B. G.

(2020). A socioecological perspective on intimate partner violence research: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12652

24.

Harris

B. A.

Woodlock

(2018). Digital coercive control: Insights from two landmark domestic violence studies. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(3), 530–550. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy052

25.

Hilton

N. Z.

Eke

A. W.

Kim

Ham

(2023). Coercive control in police reports of intimate partner violence: Conceptual definition and association with recidivism. Psychology of Violence, 13(4), 277–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000457

26.

Jaquier

Sullivan

T. P.

(2014). Fear of past abusive partner (s) impacts current posttraumatic stress among women experiencing partner violence. Violence Against Women, 20(2), 208–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214525802

27.

Jejeebhoy

S. J.

Sathar

Z. A.

(2001). Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influence of religion and region. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 687–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2001.00687.x

28.

Kelly

(2003). The wrong debate: Reflections on why force is not the key issue with respect to trafficking in women for sexual exploitation. Feminist Review, 73(1), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400086

29.

Kelly

Sharp-Jeffs

Klein

(2014). Finding the costs of freedom: How women and children rebuild their lives after domestic violence. Project Report. Solace Womens Aid, London. https://www.endviolenceagainstwomen.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Costs_of_Freedom_Report_-_SWA.pdf

30.

Lehmann

Simmons

C. A.

Pillai

V. K.

(2012). The validation of the checklist of controlling behaviors (CCB) assessing coercive control in abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 18(8), 913–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212456522

31.

Lundgren

(1998). The hand that strikes and comforts: Gender construction and the tension between body and symbol. In Dobash

R. E.

Dobash

R. P.

(Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 169–196).SAGE.

32.

Mertler

C. A.

Reinhart

R. V.

(2016). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation. Taylor & Francis.

33.

Messing

Bagwell-Gray

Brown

M. L.

Kappas

Durfee

(2020). Intersections of stalking and technology-based abuse: Emerging definitions, conceptualization, and measurement. Journal of Family Violence, 35(7), 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00114-7

34.

Morris

(2009). Gendered dynamics of abuse and violence in families: Considering the abusive household gender regime. Child Abuse Review, 8, 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1098

35.

Olson

E. C.

Kerker

B. D.

McVeigh

K. H.

Stayton

Van Wye

Thorpe

(2008). Profiling risk of fear of an intimate partner among men and women. Preventive Medicine, 47(5), 559–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.08.005

36.

Pence

Paymar

(1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. Spring.

37.

Ross

J. M.

(2011). Personality and situational correlates of self-reported reasons for intimate partner violence among women versus men referred for batterers’ intervention. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.1004

38.

Russell

Kraus

S. W.

Chapleau

K. M.

Oswald

(2019). Perceptions of blame in intimate partner violence: The role of the perpetrator’s ability to arouse fear of injury in the victim. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(5), 1089–1097. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516646999

39.

Sanz-Barbero

Otero-García

Vives-Cases

(2018). Factors associated with women’s reporting of intimate partner violence in Spain. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(15), 2402–2419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515625512

40.

Sharp-Jeffs

Kelly

Klein

(2018). Long journeys toward freedom: The relationship between coercive control and space for action—Measurement and emerging evidence. Violence Against Women, 24(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216686199

41.

Sheridan

Lyndon

A. E.

(2012). The influence of prior relationship, gender, and fear on the consequences of stalking victimization. Sex Roles, 66, 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9889-9

42.

Signorelli

Taft

Gartland

Hooker

McKee

MacMillan

Brown

Hegarty

(2022). How valid is the question of fear of a partner in identifying intimate partner abuse? A cross-sectional analysis of four studies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(5–6), 2535–2556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520934439

43.

Sleath

Walker

Tramontano

(2018). Factor Structure and Validation of the Controlling Behaviors Scale-Revised and Revised Conflict Tactics Scale. Journal of Family Issues, 39(7), 1880–1903. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X17729721

44.

Stark

(2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.

45.

Stark

Hester

(2019). Coercive control: Update and review. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218816191

46.

Straus

M. A.

Douglas

E. M.

(2004). A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality. Violence and Victims, 19(5), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.19.5.507.63686

47.

McDonnell

Cheshmehzangi

Ahmad

Chen

Šegalo

Cai

(2022). What “Family Affair?” domestic violence awareness in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 795841. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.795841

48.

Sullivan

T. P.

Weiss

N. H.

Woerner

Wyatt

Carey

(2021). Criminal orders of protection for domestic violence: Associated revictimization, mental health, and well-being among victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(21–22), 10198–10219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519883865

49.

Tiwari

Fong

D. Y. T.

Chan

K. L.

Yan

E. C. W.

Lam

G. L. L.

Tang

D. H. M.

Graham-Kevan

(2015). Evaluating the Chinese revised controlling behaviors scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(2), 314–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514534778

50.

Tolmie

Smith

Wilson

(2024). Understanding intimate partner violence: why coercive control requires a social and systemic entrapment framework. Violence Against Women, 30(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231205585

51.

Vaz

Pratley

Alkire

(2016). Measuring women’s autonomy in Chadusing the relative autonomy index. Feminist Economics, 22(1), 264–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1108991

52.

Walker

Lyall

Silva

Craigie

Mayshak

Costa

Hyder

Bentley

(2020). Male victims of female-perpetrated intimate partner violence, help-seeking, and reporting behaviors: A qualitative study. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000222

53.

Walklate

Fitz-Gibbon

Reeves

Meyer

McGowan

(2022). In control, out of control or losing control? Making sense of men’s reported experiences of coercive control through the lens of hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Criminology, 55(4), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076221127452

54.

Williamson

Morgan

Hester

(2018). Male victims: Control, coercion and fear?. In Lombard

(Ed.), The Routledge handbook of gender and violence (pp. 53–66). ProQuest Ebook Central. Routledge.

55.

Rao

Ding

Zhang

(2016). Left-behind women: Gender exclusion and inequality in rural-urban migration in China. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(4), 910–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1157584

56.

Yilmaz

(2018). Female autonomy, social norms and intimate partner violence against women in Turkey. The Journal of Development Studies, 54(8), 1321–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2017.1414185

57.

Zhao

Zhang

Wretman

C. J.

Radtke

S. R.

Rizo

C. F.

Kim

Macy

R. J.

(2024). Exploring perceived legal and organizational support and attitudes on the decision to mediate or arrest in domestic violence cases: A study among community and criminal justice professionals in China. Violence Against Women, 30(14), 3558–3580. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231182411

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB