Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research on sexual assault has shown that victim, perpetrator, and participant characteristics can influence evaluations of an assault. However, the studies have not examined a possible main effect or interactions from respectively introducing the victim or perpetrator first in an assault description, and previous studies have used participant samples with little diversity. We conducted two studies with factorial between-groups designs that varied presentation order in addition to victim and perpetrator stereotypicality and then assessed the impacts on participants’ judgments of sexual assault scenarios. We used the online marketplace Prolific to collect large, diverse samples of participants, and in the second study, we collected roughly equal sample sizes of individuals who identified as Black females/males and White females/males. Our results indicate that multiple factors—including victim and perpetrator stereotypicality, presentation order, and participants’ gender identities—significantly influenced judgments of the sexual assault, and there were numerous interactions. The results provide strongest support for a spreading activation model in which each factor can influence a participant’s judgment of the other factors and the overall scenario. As such, the findings may bear on the legal handling of sexual assault cases as well as suggesting how different presentation formats and emphases in media coverage may sway the court of public opinion.

Keywords

rape sexual assault order effect perpetrator stereotypes victim stereotypes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbey

BeShears

Clinton-Sherrod

A. M.

McAustan

(2004) Similarities and differences in women’s sexual assault experiences based on tactics used by the perpetrator. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(4), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00149.x

Abrams

Viki

G. T.

Masser

Bohner

(2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125.

Adolfsson

Strömwall

L. A.

(2017). Situational variables or beliefs? A multifaceted approach to understanding blame attributions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(6), 527–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1290236

Anderson

Quinn

(2009). Gender differences in medical students’ attitudes towards male and female rape victims. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 14(1), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500802241928

Asch

(1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.

Basile

K. C.

Smith

S. G.

Liu

Kresnow

M. J.

Fasula

A. M.

Gilbert

Chen

(2018). Rape-related pregnancy and association with reproductive coercion in the US. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(6), 770–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.028

Bongiorno

McKimmie

B. M.

Masser

B. M.

(2016). The selective use of rape-victim stereotypes to protect culturally similar perpetrators. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316631932

Chaudhury

Bakhla

A. K.

Murthy

P. S.

Jagtap

(2017). Psychological aspects of rape and its consequences. Psychology and Behavioral Science International Journal, 2(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.19080/PBSIJ.2017.02.555586

Crowe

(2019). Sexual assault and testimony: Articulation of/as violence. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 15(2), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872115577917

10.

Davies

Pollard

Archer

(2006). Effects of perpetrator gender and victim sexuality on blame toward male victims of sexual assault. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(3), 275–291.

11.

Droogendyk

Wright

S. C.

(2014). Perceptions of interpersonal versus intergroup violence: The case of sexual assault. PLoS One, 9(11), e112365. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112365

12.

Franiuk

Luca

Robinson

(2019). The effects of victim and perpetrator characteristics on ratings of guilt in a sexual assault case. Violence Against Women, 26(6–7), 614–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002

13.

Franklin

C. A.

Garza

A. D.

(2021). Sexual assault disclosure: The effect of victim race and perpetrator type on empathy, culpability, and service referral for survivors in a hypothetical scenario. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), 2327–2352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518759656

14.

George

W. H.

Martínez

L. J.

(2002). Victim blaming in rape: Effects of victim and perpetrator race, type of rape, and participant racism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(2), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00049

15.

Google LLC. (2020). Google Forms. https://docs.google.com/forms

16.

Grubb

Turner

(2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002

17.

Henry

D. S.

Merrell

L. K.

Blackstone

S. R.

Collazo-Vargas

Mohl

Tolerico

Singley

Moody

(2021). Does perpetrator occupation affect classification of sexual assault? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19-20), NP10255�NP10275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519873331.

18.

Knight

J. L.

Giuliano

T. A.

Sanchez-Ross

M. G.

(2001). Famous or infamous? The influence of celebrity status and race on perceptions of responsibility for rape. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2303_4

19.

Masser

Lee

McKimmie

B. M.

(2010). Bad woman, bad victim? Disentangling the effects of victim stereotypicality, gender stereotypicality and benevolent sexism on acquaintance rape victim blame. Sex Roles, 62(7–8), 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9648-y

20.

McKimmie

B. M.

Masser

B. M.

Bongiorno

(2014). What counts as rape? The effect of offense prototypes, victim stereotypes, and participant gender on how the complainant and defendant are perceived. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(12), 2273–2303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513518843

21.

McMahon

Farmer

G. L.

(2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35(2), 71–81.

22.

Morrison

K. E.

Pedersen

C. L.

(2018). The influence of sexual orientation on attributions of blame toward victims of sexual assault. Journal of Homosexuality, 67(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2018.1534412

23.

Newcombe

P. A.

van den Eynde

Hafner

Jolly

. (2008). Attributions of responsibility for rape: Differences across familiarity of situation, gender, and acceptance of rape myths. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(7), 1736–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00367.x

24.

Pica

Sheahan

Pozzulo

(2017). But he’s a star football player! How social status influences mock jurors’ perceptions in a sexual assault case. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(19–20), 3963–3985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517713715

25.

Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network. (2022). Scope of the problem—Statistics. Retrieved November 28, 2022, from https://www.rainn.org/statistics/scope-problem

26.

Ruva

C. L.

Coy

A. E.

(2020). Your bias is rubbing off on me: The impact of pretrial publicity and jury type on guilt decisions, trial evidence interpretation, and impression formation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000220

27.

Schneider

L. J.

Mori

L. T.

Lambert

P. L.

Wong

A. O.

(2009). The role of gender and ethnicity in perceptions of rape and its aftereffects. Sex Roles, 60(5), 410–421.

28.

Sigurvinsdottir

Ullman

S. E.

(2015). Social reactions, self-blame, and problem drinking in adult sexual assault survivors. Psychology of Violence, 5(2), 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036316

29.

Siefkes-Andrew

A. J.

Alexopoulos

(2019). Framing blame in sexual assault: An analysis of attribution in news stories about sexual assault on college campuses. Violence Against Women, 25(6), 743–762.

30.

Sims

C. M.

Noel

N. E.

Maisto

S. A.

(2007). Rape blame as a function of alcohol presence and resistance type. Addictive Behaviors, 32(12), 2766–2775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516640777

31.

Stuart

S. M.

McKimmie

B. M.

Masser

B. M.

(2019). Rape perpetrators on trial: The effect of sexual assault–related schemas on attributions of blame. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(2), 310–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.04.013

32.

Sullivan

(2019). The primacy effect in impression formation: Some replications and extensions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 432–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618771003

33.

Vrij

Firmin

H. R.

(2001). Beautiful thus innocent? The impact of defendants’ and victims’ physical attractiveness and participants’ rape beliefs on impression formation in alleged rape cases. International Review of Victimology, 8(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/026975800100800301

34.

Yamawaki

(2007). Rape perception and the function of ambivalent sexism and gender-role traditionality. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(4), 406–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506297210

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

Attributions of Sexual Assault: Effects of Victim and Perpetrator Stereotypes,Presentation Order,and Participant Characteristics

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material