Predictors of Adolescent Intimate Partner Sexual Violence Victimization: Patterns of Intersectional Social Positions in a Statewide,School-based Sample

Abstract

Intimate partner sexual violence (IPSV) is a substantial public health issue faced by youth, with disparities along lines of race, gender, and sexual orientation. Using an intersectional framework, the current study describes the prevalence of self-reported IPSV victimization across intersecting social positions among adolescents. High school students who completed the 2019 Minnesota Student Survey were asked whether they had ever experienced IPSV. Using exhaustive Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detection (eCHAID), responses were modeled using five indicators: racial/ethnic identity, transgender/genderqueer/genderfluid identity, sex assigned at birth, sexual orientation, and school location. The prevalence of IPSV victimization within each end group identified by the eCHAID varied from 2.6% to 32.0%. The highest prevalence of IPSV among all students was observed in subgroups defined by multiple marginalized social positions; for example, 32.0% among lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, pansexual, or questioning (LGBQ+) students of color who were transgender, genderqueer, genderfluid or unsure of their gender, and assigned male at birth; 22.8% among LGBQ+ students assigned female at birth and enrolled in a Greater Minnesota (outside of the Twin Cities) school; and 22.2% among Native+ or missing race LGBQ+ students assigned female at birth and enrolled in a metropolitan school. Within the eCHAID decision tree, several subsamples of students were split into two more subsamples with a twofold or greater statistically significant difference in IPSV victimization prevalence between them. Findings from this study highlight notable disparities in the prevalence of IPSV victimization among Minnesota youth and demonstrate the importance of detailing the distribution of interpersonal violence outcomes across youth with multiple marginalized identities. Findings suggest that disparities reported along one categorical axis only may miss important nuances in how risk for IPSV is distributed. Population health researchers should utilize methods that allow for the explication of complex intersections that characterize individuals’ social positions in estimating the prevalence of sexual violence.

Keywords

dating violence domestic violence adolescent victims sexual assault prevention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bauer

G. R.

(2014). Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: Challenges and the potential to advance health equity. Social Science & Medicine, 110, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.022

Bauer

G. R.

Churchill

S. M.

Mahendran

Walwyn

Lizotte

Villa-Rueda

A. A.

(2021). Intersectionality in quantitative research: A systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM—Population Health, 14, 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798

Bowleg

(2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality-an important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267–1273. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750

Breiding

M. J.

Smith

S. G.

Basile

K. C.

Walters

M. L.

Chen

Merrick

M. T.

(2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries, 63(8), 1–18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25188037

Brown

L. X. Z.

(2021, August 5). Lydia X. Z. Brown plenary [Presentation]. National Sexual Assault Conference. http://www.nationalsexualassaultconference.org/2021/08/04/lydia-x-z-brown-plenary/

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). The evidence project overview. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/evidence_project_overview2013-a.pdf

Collins

P. H.

(1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.

Collins

P. H.

(2017). On violence, intersectionality and transversal politics. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(9), 1460–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1317827

Collins

P. H.

da Silva

E. C. G.

Ergun

Furseth

Bond

K. D.

Martínez-Palacios

(2021). Intersectionality as critical social theory. Contemporary Political Theory, 20, 690–725. https://doi.org/10.1057%2Fs41296-021-00490-0

10.

Conron

Lombardi

Reisner

(2014). Identifying transgender and other gender minority respondents on population-based surveys: Approaches. In Herman

J. L.

(Ed.), Best practices for asking questions to identify transgender and other gender minority respondents on population-based surveys (pp. 9–18). The Williams Institute. http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Survey-Measures-Trans-GenIUSS-Sep-2014.pdf

11.

Cook Heffron

Serrata

J. V.

Alvarado Hurtado

M. G.

(2018). Latina immigrant women and children’s well-being and access to services after detention. Esperanza United. https://scholar.smu.edu/latino-policy/6/

12.

Crenshaw

(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics [1989]. In Bartlett

K. T.

Kennedy

(Eds.), Feminist legal theory: Readings in law and gender. (pp. 57–80). Routledge.

13.

Crenshaw

(1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

14.

Davis

(1981). Women, race, and class. Random House.

15.

Deer

(2015). The beginning and end of rape: Confronting sexual violence in Native America. University of Minnesota Press.

16.

Gewirtz-Meydan

Finkelhor

(2020). Sexual abuse and assault in a large national sample of children and adolescents. Child Maltreatment, 25(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559519873975

17.

Ghasemi

Majdzadeh

Rajabi

Vedadhir

Negarandeh

Jamshidi

Takian

Faraji

(2021). Applying intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions: A scoping review. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1407. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11449-6

18.

Green

M. A.

Evans

C. R.

Subramanian

S. V.

(2017). Can intersectionality theory enrich population health research? Social Science & Medicine, 178, 214–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.029

19.

Hankivsky

Grace

Hunting

Giesbrecht

Fridkin

Rudrum

Ferlatte

Clark

(2014). An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework: Critical reflections on a methodology for advancing equity. International Journal for Equity in Health, 13, 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-014-0119-x

20.

James

Herman

J. L.

Rankin

S. R.

Keisling

Mottet

Anafi

M. A.

(2016). The report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. National Center for Transgender Equality. https://www.ustranssurvey.org/2015-reports/#2015report

21.

Kass

G. V.

(1980). An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 29(2), 119–127.

22.

Mahendran

(2020). Evaluating quantitative methods for intercategorical-intersectionality research: A simulation study [Master thesis, University of Western Ontario]. ETDs: Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/6913

23.

Martin

Rider

G. N.

Johnston-Goodstar

Menanteau

Palmer

McMorris

B. J.

(2021). Prevalence of trading sex among high school students in Minnesota: Demographics, relevant adverse experiences, and health-related statuses. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(5), 1011–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.08.021

24.

Minnesota Department of Education. (2019). Minnesota Student Survey overview and online interactive reports. https://education.mn.gov/mde/dse/health/mss/

25.

Minnesota Department of Health. (2018). Minnesota Student Survey question development: Supplemental report [Unpublished manuscript]. Violence Prevention Programs Unit, Minnesota Department of Health.

26.

Niolon

P. H.

Kearns

Dills

Rambo

Irving

Armstead

Gilbert

(2017). Preventing intimate partner violence across the lifespan: A technical package of programs, policies, and practices. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/ipv-technicalpackages.pdf

27.

Nixon

S. A.

(2019). The coin model of privilege and critical allyship: Implications for health. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1637. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7884-9

28.

Orr

Shebl

F. M.

Heimer

Khoshnood

Barbour

Khouri

Aaraj

Mokhbat

J. E.

Crawford

F. W.

(2021). Violence and discrimination against men who have sex with men in Lebanon: The role of international displacement and migration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(21–22), 10267–10284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519884684

29.

Peitzmeier

S. M.

Malik

Kattari

S. K.

Marrow

Stephenson

Agénor

Reisner

S. L.

(2020). Intimate partner violence in transgender populations: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and correlates. American Journal of Public Health, 110(9), e1–e14. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305774

30.

Phillips

S. P.

Vafaei

Rodrigues

Ilinca

Zolyomi

Fors

(2020). Systematic review of methods used to study the intersecting impact of sex and social locations on health outcomes. SSM—Population Health, 12, 100705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100705

31.

Prevention Institute & National Sexual Violence Resource Center (2021). A health equity approach to preventing sexual violence. https://www.nsvrc.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/health_equity_approach_to_preventing_sv_final508_0.pdf

32.

Rahman

Du Mont

O’Campo

Einstein

(2020a). Currently married women’s present experiences of male intimate partner physical violence in Bangladesh: An intercategorical intersectional approach. Global Public Health, 15(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2019.1649447

33.

Rahman

Du Mont

O’Campo

Einstein

(2020b). Intersectional community correlates of married women’s experiences of male intimate partner physical violence in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 74(2), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-212295

34.

Ritchie

A. J.

(2019). Expanding our frame: Deepening our demands for safety and healing for Black survivors of sexual violence. National Black Women’s Justice Institute. https://incite-national.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/ritchie-Expanding-Our-Frame-Deepening-our-Demands-for-Safety-and-Healing-for-Black-Survivors-of-Sexual-Violence.pdf

35.

Roberts

Tamene

Orta

O. R.

(2018). The intersectionality of racial and gender discrimination among teens exposed to dating violence. Ethnicity & Disease, 28(Suppl 1), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.28.S1.253

36.

Rogers

S. A.

Rogers

B. A.

(2021). Expanding Our view: Demographic, behavioral, and contextual factors in college sexual victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(23–24), Np13094–Np13120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520905076

37.

Shaw

L. R.

Chan

McMahon

B. T.

(2011). Intersectionality and disability harassment: The interactive effects of disability, race, age, and gender. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 55(2), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355211431167

38.

Shirali

G. A.

Noroozi

M. V.

Malehi

A. S.

(2018). Predicting the outcome of occupational accidents by Cart and Chaid methods at a steel factory in Iran. Journal of Public Health Research, 7(2), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2018.1361

39.

Sieben

Renner

L. M.

Lust

Vang

Nguyen

R. H. N.

(2020). Adverse childhood experiences among Asian/Pacific Islander sexual minority college students. Journal of Family Violence, 35(3), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00095-7

40.

Smith

(2005). Conquest: Sexual violence and American Indian genocide. Duke University Press.

41.

Smith

S. G.

Chen

Basile

K. C.

Gilbert

L. K.

Merrick

M. T.

Patel

Walling

Jain

(2017). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010–2012 state report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS-StateReportBook.pdf

42.

Steele

S. M.

Everett

B. G.

Hughes

T. L.

(2020). Influence of perceived femininity, masculinity, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on intimate partner violence among sexual-minority women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(1–2), 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516683176

43.

Trask

(1999). From a native daughter: Colonialism and sovereignty in Hawaii. Latitude 20.

44.

Walls

N. E.

Atteberry-Ash

Kattari

S. K.

Peitzmeier

Kattari

Langenderfer-Magruder

(2019). Gender identity, sexual orientation, mental health, and bullying as predictors of partner violence in a representative sample of youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.08.011

45.

Walters

M. L.

Chen

Breiding

M. J.

(2013). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_sofindings.pdf

46.

Wesp

L. M.

Malcoe

L. H.

Elliott

Poteat

(2019). Intersectionality research for transgender health justice: A theory-driven conceptual framework for structural analysis of transgender health inequities. Transgender Health, 4(1), 287–296. http://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2019.0039

47.

Wiens

Raguet

Roesler

(2019). Students reporting sexual violence victimization on the Minnesota Student Survey, 1992–2016. Minnesota Department of Health. https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/svp/documents/MSS_sexualviolencedatabrief2016.pdf