Women’s Social Mobility and Attitudinal Acceptance of Wife Abuse: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Bengali,Santal,and Garo Ethnic Communities in Rural Bangladesh

Abstract

Previous studies exploring the influential factors associated with attitudinal acceptance of wife abuse (AAWA) did not widely focus on the relation between women’s social mobility (WSM) and different dimensions of AAWA in rural Bangladesh. This current study examined the association between WSM and different dimensions of AAWA in the context of socio-cultural differences among the Bengali, the Santal, and the Garo ethnic communities in rural Bangladesh. Adopting a cross-sectional design, 1,929 married men and women were randomly included in the study from 8 Bengali, 8 Santal, and 8 Garo villages where 50.2% were women and 49.8% were men. Of the sample, 33.2% Garo, 33.2% Santal, and 33.6% Bengali participants were included in this study. Data revealed that 45.5% of women had low social mobility and the prevalence of different dimensions of AAWA was high and varied among the study communities. We used descriptive statistics, chi-square, and binary logistic regression analysis to estimate the association. The multivariate binary logistic regression analysis results revealed that the likelihood of attitudinal acceptance of overall abuse, psychological abuse, physical abuse, abuse on disobeying family obligation, and abuse on challenging male authority were significantly lower for the respondents who belonged to families where women enjoyed high mobility compared to those who belonged to families where WSM was low. This study also showed that the Bengali and the Santal participants were more likely to accept different dimensions of AAWA compared to the Garos. This study suggests that WSM should be considered in policy-making and implementing interventions to reduce the different dimensions of AAWA in rural Bangladesh.

Keywords

mobility attitude acceptance of wife abuse abuse rural Bangladesh

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asian Development Bank. (2019). Basic statistics 2019 statistics and data innovation Unit, Asian Development Bank.

Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics and Statistics and Informative Divisions. (2016). Report on violence against women (VAW) survey 2015. Ministry of Planning, People’s Republic of Bangladesh.

Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics and Statistics and Informative Divisions. (2020). Bangladesh statistics-2019. Ministry of Planning, People’s Republic of Bangladesh

Banglapedia (The National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh). (2012). The santals (2nd ed.). Bangladesh Asiatic Society.

Ben-David

Schneider

(2005). Rape perceptions, gender role attitudes, and victim-perpetrator acquaintance. Sex Roles, 53, 385–399

Biswas

Kishore Rahman

Kabir

Raihan

(2017). Women’s opinion on the justification of physical spousal violence: A quantitative approach to model the most vulnerable households in Bangladesh. PloS One, 12(11), e0187884.

Burling

(1997). The strong women of Modhupur. The University Press Limited.

Chowdhury

F. D.

(2009). Theorising patriarchy: The Bangladesh Context. Asian Journal of Social Science, 37, 599–622.

Dattalo

(2008). Determining sample size: Balancing power, precision, and practicality. Oxford University Press.

10.

Dey

S. R.

Rupa

I. J.

Habib

T. Z.

Karim

(2021). Are liberal men not abusive toward their wives? Evidence from rural Bangladesh. Journal of Community Psychology, 49(5), 1315–1333.

11.

Dobash

R. E.

Dobash

(1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. Free Press.

12.

Doku

D. T.

Asante

K. O.

(2015). Women’s approval of domestic physical violence against wives: analysis of the Ghana demographic and health survey. BMC Women’s Health, 15, 120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0276-0

13.

Ellsberg

Heise

Pef-a

Agurto

Winkvist

(2001). Researching domestic violence against women: Methodological and ethical considerations. Studies in Family Planning, 32(1), 1–16. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2696292

14.

Ellsberg

Heise

(2005). Researching violence against women: A practical guide for researchers and activists. World Health Organization.

15.

Flood

Pease

(2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma Violence & Abuse, 10(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334131

16.

Freeman

(Ed.). (1989). Women: A feminist perspective (4th ed.). Mayfield Publishing Company.

17.

Gangoli

(2017) Understanding patriarchy, past and present: Critical reflections on Gerda Lerner (1987), The Creation of Patriarchy, Oxford University Press. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1(1), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868017X14907152523430

18.

Garcia-Moreno

Jansen

H. A. F.

Ellsberg

Heise

Watts

C. H.

(2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet, 368(9543), 1260–1269.

19.

Hair

J. F.

Black

W. C.

Babin

B. J.

Anderson

R. E.

(2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson Education, Inc.

20.

Hossain

M. M.

Abdulla

Rahman

Khan

H. T. A.

(2022). Prevalence and determinants of wife-beating in Bangladesh: Evidence from a nationwide survey. BMC Psychiatry, 22(1), 9.

21.

Hunnicutt

(2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting “patriarchy” as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15(5), 553–573.

22.

Islam

T. M.

Tareque

M. I.

Tiedt

A. D.

Hoque

(2014). The intergenerational transmission of intimate partner violence in Bangladesh. Global Health Action, 7, 23591. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23591

23.

Islam

Karim

(2013). Men’s views on gender and sexuality in a Bangladesh village. Quarterly of Community Health Education, 32(4), 339–354.

24.

Jalil

M. A.

Oakkas

M. A.

(2012). The family structure and cultural practices of Garo community in Bangladesh: An overview. Himalayan Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 5, 95–110.

25.

Jesmin

(2015). Married women’s justification of intimate partner violence: Examining community norms and individual level risk factors. Violence and Victims, 30(6), 984–1003.

26.

Jesmin

(2017). Social determinants of married women’s attitudinal acceptance of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(21), 3226–3244.

27.

Kamal

(2022). Migration, patriarchy and ‘modern’ Islam: Views from left behind wives in rural northern Bangladesh. Contemporary South Asia, 30(1), 112–123.

28.

Karim

(2006). Gendered social institutions and the management of underground irrigation water resources in a Bangladeshi village. Gender, Technology and Development, 10(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/097185240501000102

29.

Karim

Swahnberg

(2018). Does female authority prevent male marital violence? Evidence from rural Bangladesh. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11–12), 5055–5074.

30.

Karim

Habib

T. Z.

Arefin

Rahman

Swahnberg

(2020). Differences in the acceptance of wife abuse among ethnic minority Garo and Santal and mainstream Bengali communities in rural Bangladesh. PloS One, 15(7), e0236733.

31.

Karim

Rahman

Habib

T. Z.

Swahnberg

(2021). Gender differences in marital violence: A cross-ethnic study among Bengali, Garo, and Santal communities in rural Bangladesh. PloS One, 16(5), e0251574.

32.

Karim

Rahman

Habib

T. Z.

Arefin

Swahnberg

(2021). Does childhood experience of family victimization influence adulthood refusal of wife abuse? Evidence from rural Bangladesh. PloS One, 16(6), e0252600.

33.

Karim

Swahnberg

(2021). Development of the social acceptance of wife abuse scale in rural Bangladesh. Partner Abuse, 12(2), 1–21.

34.

Maxim

P. S.

(1999). Quantitative research methods in the social sciences. Oxford University Press.

35.

Murshid

N. S.

Murshid

(2015). Intergenerational transmission of marital violence: Results from a nationally representative sample of men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515604413

36.

Pettitt

L. A.

Biswas

R. K.

Bhowmik

(2024). Women’s attitudes toward intimate partner violence in low- and middle-income countries of Southern Asia. American Journal of Health Promotion, 38(1), 12–18.

37.

Rani

Bonu

(2008). Attitudes towards wife-beating: A cross country study in Asia. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1371–1397.

38.

Rashid

Kader

Perera

N. K. P.

Sharma

(2014). Wife beating: A population-based study in Bangladesh. Violence and Gender, 1(4), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2014.0015

39.

Sambisa

Angeles

Lance

P. M.

Naved

R. T.

Curtis

S. L.

(2010). Physical and sexual abuse of wives in Urban Bangladesh: Husbands’ reports. Studies in Family Planning, 41(3), 165–178.

40.

Sardinha

Catalán

H. E. N.

(2018). Attitudes towards domestic violence in 49 low- and middle-income countries: A gendered analysis of prevalence and country-level correlates. PloS One, 13(10), e0206101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206101

41.

Sayem

A. M.

Begum

H. A.

Moneesha

S. S.

(2012). Attitudes towards justifying intimate partner violence among married women in Bangladesh. Journal of Biosocial Science, 44(6), 641–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932012000223

42.

Schuler

S. R.

Islam

(2008). Women’s acceptance of intimate partner violence within marriage in rural Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 39, 49–58.

43.

Schuler

S. R.

Yount

K. M.

Lenzi

(2012). Justification of wife beating in rural Bangladesh: A qualitative analysis of gender differences in responses to survey questions. Violence Against Women, 18(10), 1177–1191.

44.

SPSS Inc. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics 23. SPSS: An IBM Company.

45.

Stöckl

March

Pallitto

Garcia-Moreno

(2014). Intimate partner violence among adolescents and young women: prevalence and associated factors in nine countries: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 14, 751.

46.

Sultana

(2010). Patriarchy and women’s subordination: A theoretical analysis. The Arts Faculty Journal, 4, 1–8.

47.

Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good research practice. Swedish Research Council.

48.

United Nations Development Program. (2020). Human Development Report 2021-2022. United Nations Development Programme, New York. ISBN: 9789211264517.

49.

Waltermaurer

, (2012). Public justification of intimate partner violence: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(3), 167–175.

50.

Yllö

K. A.

(1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In Gelles

R. J.

Loseke

D. R.

(Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 47–62). Sage.

51.

York

M. R.

(2011). The influence of patriarchy and traditional gender role attitudes on violence against women. In York

M. R.

(Ed.), Gender attitudes and violence against women (pp. 13–28). LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.

52.

Yount

K. M.

Halim

Schuler

S. R.

Head

(2013). A survey experiment of women’s attitudes about intimate partner violence against women in rural Bangladesh. Demography, 50(1), 333–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0143-7

53.

Yount

K. M.

James-Hawkins

Cheong

Y. F.

Naved

R. T.

(2016). Men’s perpetration of partner violence in Bangladesh: Community gender norms and violence in childhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19(1), 117–130.

54.

Yount

K. M.

Roof

K. A.

(2018). Multilevel influences on men’s partner violence justification, control over family decisions, and partner violence perpetration in Bangladesh. Psychology of Violence, 8(3), 367–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/vio0000171.