Are Benefits of Participation Higher Than Risks? An Exploration of Reactions to Participation in Research on Intimate Partner Stalking Among College Young Adults

Abstract

Ethical guidelines dictate that research studies should present more benefit than harm to participants, thus, it is important to study participants’ reactions to participation, particularly in the context of potentially traumatic topics. While several studies have indicated that positive evaluations of research typically outweigh perceived harms among survivors of physical, sexual, or psychological intimate partner violence, few studies have assessed survivors of intimate partner stalking (IPS) or unwanted pursuit behaviors (UPBs). Among 602 undergraduates (78% women), the present study examined reactions to research participation in a study on IPS/UPBs. Results indicated that, among victims and non-victims of IPS, positive global evaluations and perceived benefits outweighed negative emotional reactions and perceived drawbacks to participation. While some participants (7.5%) reported emotional reactions to participation, most, on average, evaluated the study positively (94.4%), many reported benefits (45.5%), and just one (0.2%) reported drawbacks. Emotional reactions were positively correlated with both drawbacks and benefits of participation. Frequency of UPBs/IPS and IPV were positively correlated with emotional reactions to participation; however, when included in a model with psychological distress (i.e., post-traumatic stress disorder and depressive symptoms), symptom frequencies were more strongly related to reactions to research than victimization variables. In all, research on IPS/UPBs appears to be evaluated generally positively and can likely be undertaken safely when using safeguards to inform participants and debrief them following participation.

Keywords

intimate partner stalking UPBs intimate partner violence ethics reactions to research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andresen

E. M.

Malmgren

J. A.

Carter

W. B.

Patrick

D. L.

(1994). Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(18)30622-6

Augustyn

M. B.

Rennison

C. M.

Pinchevsky

G. M.

Magnuson

A. B.

(2020). Intimate partner stalking among college students: Examining situational contexts related to police notification. Journal of Family Violence, 35(7), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00115-6

Black

M. C.

Kresnow

M. J.

Simon

T. R.

Arias

Shelley

(2006). Telephone survey respondents’ reactions to questions regarding interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 21, 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.010

Breiding

M. J.

(2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002), 63(8), 1–18.

Burke

S. C.

Wallen

Vail-Smith

Knox

(2011). Using technology to control intimate partners: An exploratory study of college undergraduates. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1162–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.010

Dardis

C. M.

Strauss

C. V.

Gidycz

C. A.

(2019). The psychological toll of unwanted pursuit behaviors and intimate partner violence on undergraduate women: A dominance analysis. Psychology of Violence, 9(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000189

Demers

Ward

Walsh

Banyard

Cohn

Edwards

Moynihan

(2017). Disclosure on campus: Students’ decisions to tell others about intimate partner violence, stalking, and unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma, 27(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1382631

Edwards

K. M.

Gidycz

C. A.

Desai

A. D.

(2012). Men’s reactions to participating in interpersonal violence research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(18), 3683–3700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512447576

Edwards

K. M.

Kearns

M. C.

Calhoun

K. S.

Gidycz

C. A.

(2009). College women’s reactions to sexual assault research participation: Is it distressing? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(2), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01492.x

10.

Edwards

K. M.

Neal

A. M.

Dardis

C. M.

Kelley

E. L.

Gidycz

C. A.

Ellis

(2017). College students’ reactions to participating in relational trauma research: A mixed methodological study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(21), 3346–3369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515599158

11.

Edwards

K. M.

Sylaska

K. M.

Gidycz

C. A.

(2014). Women’s reactions to participating in dating violence research: A mixed methodological study. Psychology of Violence, 4(2), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034339

12.

Hesse

C. A.

Strauss

Shorey

R. C.

Stuart

G. L.

Cornelius

T. L.

(2021). Examination of the transient changes in affect resulting from participation in research addressing intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9–10), n5014–n5032. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518795172

13.

Langhinrichsen-Rohling

Palarea

(2006). Measuring intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization: A compendium of assessment tools. In Thompson

M. P.

Basile

K. C.

Hertz

M. F.

Sitterle

(Eds.), Unwanted pursuit behavior inventory-offender (1st ed., pp. 148–149). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.

14.

Meade

A. W.

Craig

S. B.

(2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085

15.

Newman

Walker

E. A.

Gefland

(1999). Assessing the ethical costs and benefits of trauma-focused research. General Hospital Psychiatry, 21(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0163-8343(99)00011-0

16.

Shorey

R. C.

Cornelius

T. L.

Bell

K. M.

(2011). Reactions to participating in dating violence research: Are our questions distressing participants? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(14), 2890–2907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510390956

17.

Shorey

R. C.

Febres

Brasfield

Zucosky

Cornelius

T. L.

Stuart

G. L.

(2013). Reactions to dating violence research: Do difficulties with distress tolerance increase negative reactions? Journal of Family Violence, 28(5), 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9519-8

18.

Straus

M. A.

Hamby

S. L.

Boney-McCoy

Sugarman

D. B.

(1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001

19.

Tedeschi

R. G.

Calhoun

L. G.

(2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01

20.

Valpied

Cini

O’Doherty

Taket

Hegarty

(2014). Sometimes cathartic. Sometimes quite raw”: Benefit and harm in an intimate partner violence trial. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(6), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.09.005

21.

Weathers

F. W.

Litz

B. T.

Keane

T. M.

Palmieri

P. A.

Marx

B. P.

Schnurr

P. P.

(2013). The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). National Center for PTSD.