Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious public health problem worldwide. IPV-related perceptions and attitudes are linked to IPV’s actual perpetration and related victimization. There is a typical gender paradigm in IPV, wherein women are victims and men are perpetrators, which influences judgments toward IPV. Some socio-cultural norms or unjust notions of gender are also intertwined with this paradigm and influence perceptions of IPV. This study explored judgments and attributions of IPV in the Chinese context while extensively considering directionality, gender stereotypes, and ambivalent sexism by surveying 887 participants online. Participants read 1 of 12 scenarios and made judgments and attributions of responsibility regarding IPV. The results indicate that hostile sexism is negatively correlated with IPV perception but positively correlated with its justification. The direction of perpetration and gender stereotypicality had some main effects on judgments of IPV, and there were some interactions between these factors. The perception level of IPV involving a traditional male partner was higher when the man was the perpetrator or when his female partner was traditional. In the unidirectional IPV scenarios, the perpetrators were judged as significantly more responsible than the victims, while in the bidirectional IPV scenarios, men were judged as significantly more responsible than women. Moreover, the relationship between gender stereotypicality and responsibility attributions to female partners was significantly moderated by benevolent sexism (BS). Participants with a high level of BS tended to attribute less responsibility to traditional women than non-traditional women in bidirectional IPV scenarios. Future studies on IPV should pay attention to the influence of directionality and gender stereotypes. More efforts ought to be made to reduce IPV and overcome gender role stereotypes and sexism.
AbramskyT.LeesS.StöcklH.HarveyS.KapingaI.RanganathanM.MshanaG.KapigaS. (2019). Women’s income and risk of intimate partner violence: Secondary findings from the MAISHA cluster randomised trial in North-Western Tanzania. BMC Public Health, 19, 1108.
2.
AdamsA. E.BeebleM. L. (2019). Intimate partner violence and psychological well-being: Examining the effect of economic abuse on women’s quality of life. Psychology of Violence, 9(5), 517–525.
3.
AliP. A.NaylorP. B. (2013). Intimate partner violence: A narrative review of the feminist, social and ecological explanations for its causation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(6), 611–619.
4.
AllenC. T.SwanS. C.RaghavanC. (2009). Gender symmetry, sexism, and intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(11), 1816–1834.
5.
AlzoubiF. A.AliR. A. (2021). Jordanian men’s and women’s attitudes toward intimate partner violence and its correlates with family functioning and demographics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), NP2883–NP2907.
6.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651–680.
7.
BasileK. C.AriasI.DesaiS.ThompsonM. P. (2004). The differential association of intimate partner physical, sexual, psychological and stalking violence and post-traumatic stress symptoms in a nationally representative sample of women. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(5), 413–421.
8.
BatesE. A. (2016). Current controversies within intimate partner violence: Overlooking bidirectional violence. Journal of Family Violence, 31(8), 937–940.
9.
BemS. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162.
10.
BreckenridgeJ.YangT.PoonA. W. C. (2019). Is gender important? Victimisation and perpetration of intimate partner violence in mainland China. Health & Social Care in the Community, 27(1), 31–42.
11.
BreidingM.BasileK. C.SmithS. G.BlackM. C.MahendraR. R. (2015). Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements, version 2.0. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
CampbellJ. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359(9314), 1331–1336.
14.
CantoJ. M.Vallejo-MartínM.PerlesF.San MartínJ. (2020). The influence of ideological variables in the denial of violence against women: The role of sexism and social dominance orientation in the Spanish context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 4934.
15.
ChenM.ChanK. L. (2021). Characteristics of intimate partner violence in China: Gender symmetry, mutuality, and associated factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13–14), NP6867–NP6889.
16.
ChenZ.FiskeS. T.LeeT. L. (2009). Ambivalent sexism and power-related gender-role ideology in marriage. Sex Roles, 60(11–12), 765–778.
17.
CheungA. K. L.ChoiS. Y. P. (2016). Non-traditional wives with traditional husbands: Gender ideology and husband-to-wife physical violence in Chinese society. Violence Against Women, 22(14), 1704–1724.
18.
CollC. V. N.EwerlingF.García-MorenoC.HellwigF.BarrosA. J. D. (2020). Intimate partner violence in 46 low-income and middle-income countries: An appraisal of the most vulnerable groups of women using national health surveys. BMJ Global Health, 5(1), e002208.
19.
CorvoK.JohnsonP. J. (2003). Vilification of the “batterer”: How blame shapes domestic violence policy and interventions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8(3), 259–281.
20.
CurtisD. S.EpsteinN. B.WheelerB. (2017). Relationship satisfaction mediates the link between partner aggression and relationship dissolution: The importance of considering severity. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(8), 1187–1208.
21.
DevenishB.HooleyM.MellorD. (2019). Justification of wife beating in adolescents: Associated beliefs and behaviors. Violence Against Women, 25(2), 167–187.
22.
ErmerA. E.RoachA. L.ColemanM.GanongL. (2022). Attitudes about forgiveness and leaving a relationship: The context of relationship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(13–14), NP11964–NP11990.
23.
ForbesG. B.JobeR. L.WhiteK. B.BloeschE.Adams-CurtisL. E. (2005). Perceptions of dating violence following a sexualor nonsexual betrayal of trust: Effects of gender, sexism, acceptance of rape myths, and vengeance motivation. Sex Roles, 52(3–4), 165–173.
24.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512.
25.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1999). The ambivalence toward men inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(3), 519–536.
26.
GraciaE.TomásJ. M. (2014). Correlates of victim-blaming attitudes regarding partner violence against women among the Spanish general population. Violence Against Women, 20(1), 26–41.
27.
HalberstamJ. (2012). Global female masculinities. Sexualities, 15(3–4), 336–354.
28.
HallC. M. (2019). Merging efforts: The intersections of domestic violence intervention, men, and masculinities. Men and Masculinities, 22(1), 104–112.
29.
HarrisR. J.FirestoneJ. M.VegaW. A. (2005). The interaction of country of origin, acculturation, and gender role ideology on wife abuse. Social Science Quarterly, 86(2), 463–483.
30.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
31.
HerreroJ.RodríguezF. J.TorresA. (2017). Acceptability of partner violence in 51 societies: The role of sexism and attitudes toward violence in social relationships. Violence Against Women, 23(3), 351–367.
32.
HineB. A. (2019). “It can’t be that bad, I mean, he’s a guy”: Exploring judgements towards domestic violence scenarios varying on perpetrator and victim gender, and abuse type. In BatesE. A.TaylorJ. C. (Eds.), Intimate partner violence: New perspectives in research and practice (pp. 43–57). Taylor Francis.
33.
HineB.NokuL.BatesE. A.JayesK. (2022). But, who is the victim here? Exploring judgments toward hypothetical bidirectional domestic violence scenarios. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(7–8), NP5495–NP5516.
34.
HouJ.YuL.TingS. R.SzeY. T.FangX. (2011). The status and characteristics of couple violence in China. Journal of Family Violence, 26(2), 81–92.
35.
HuR.XueJ.LinK.SunI. Y.WuY.WangX. (2021). The patterns and influencing factors of help-seeking decisions among women survivors of intimate partner violence in China. Journal of Family Violence, 36(6), 669–681.
36.
HuR.JiaX.LinK.SunI. Y.XiyingW. (2021). Bidirectional intimate partner violence among Chinese women: Patterns and risk factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(21–22), NP12252–NP12278.
37.
JewkesR.LevinJ.Penn-KekanaL. (2002). Risk factors for domestic violence: Findings from a South African cross-sectional study. Social Science & Medicine, 55(9), 1603–1617.
38.
JohnsonM. P. (2006). Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1003–1018.
39.
KarakurtG.KoçE.ÇetinsayaE. E.AyluçtarhanZ.BolenS. (2019). Meta-analysis and systematic review for the treatment of perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 220–230.
40.
KesslerR. C.MolnarB. E.FeurerI. D.AppelbaumM. (2001). Patterns and mental health predictors of domestic violence in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 24(4–5), 487–508.
41.
KimmelM. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1332–1363.
42.
KrugE. G.DahlbergL. L.MercyJ. A.ZwiA. B.LozanoR. (2002). World report on violence and health. World Health Organization.
43.
Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ. (2010). Controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States. Sex Roles, 62(3–4), 179–193.
44.
Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.MisraT. A.SelwynC.RohlingM. L. (2012). Rates of bidirectional versus unidirectional intimate partner violence across sample, sexual orientations, and race/ethnicities: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 199–230.
45.
LaskeyP.BatesE. A.TaylorJ. C. (2019). A systematic literature review of intimate partner violence victimisation: An inclusive review across gender and sexuality. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 47, 1–11.
46.
LeonardK. E.WintersJ. J.Kearns-BodkinJ.HomishG. G.KubiakA. J. (2014). Dyadic patterns of intimate partner violence in early marriage. Psychology of Violence, 4(4), 384–398.
47.
LiJ. C.WuY.SunI. Y. (2013). Who should play a major role in responding to intimate partner violence? A comparison of Chinese and American college students’ preferences. International Social Work, 56(6), 743–760.
48.
LiL.SunI. Y.ButtonD. M. (2020). Tolerance for intimate partner violence: A comparative study of Chinese and American college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(21–22), 4533–4557.
49.
LiangB.GoodmanL.Tummala-NarraP.WeintraubS. (2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1–2), 71–84.
50.
MartaM.KajulaL. J.YamanisT. J.BalvanzP.Kilonzo MremaN.MamanS. (2018). Perpetration and victimization of intimate partner violence among young men and women in Dar es salaam, Tanzania. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(16), 2486–2511.
51.
McPhailB. A.BuschN. B.KulkarniS.RiceS. (2007). An integrative feminist model: The evolving feminist perspective on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 13(8), 817–841.
52.
MelanderL. A.NoelH.TylerK. A. (2010). Bidirectional, unidirectional, and nonviolence: A comparison of the predictors among partnered young adults. Violence and Victims, 25(5), 617–630.
53.
MeltonH. C.BelknapJ. (2003). He hits, she hits: Assessing gender differences and similarities in officially reported intimate partner violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(3), 328–348.
54.
MessingerA. M.SessaregoS. N.EdwardsK. M.BanyardV. L. (2021). Bidirectional IPV among adolescent sexual minorities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11–12), NP5643–NP5662.
55.
NatalM. (2022). Intimate partner violence experiences among Puerto Rican mothers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(5–6), NP2626–NP2651.
56.
OverallN. C.SibleyC. G.TanR. (2011). The costs and benefits of sexism: Resistance to influence during relationship conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 271–290.
57.
PostmusJ. L.NikolovaK.LinH.JohnsonL. (2022). Women’s economic abuse experiences: Results from the UN multi-country study on men and violence in Asia and the Pacific. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(15–16), NP13115–NP13142.
58.
PriceE. L.ByersE. S.BelliveauN.BonnerR.CaronB.DoironD.GreenoughJ.Guerette-BreauA.HicksL.LandryA.LavoieB.Layden-OretoM.LegereL.LemieuxS.LiretteM.-B.MailletG.McMullinC.MooreR. (1999). The attitudes towards dating violence scales: Development and initial validation. Journal of Family Violence, 14(4), 351–375.
59.
PuD. F.RodriguezC. M.DimperioM. D. (2022). Factors distinguishing reciprocal versus nonreciprocal intimate partner violence across time and reporter. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(15–16), NP13654–NP13684.
60.
PunK. D.TjomslandT. R.InfantiJ. J.DarjE. (2020). ‘Violence exists to show manhood’: Nepali men’s views on domestic violence – A qualitative study. Global Health Action, 13(1), 1788260.
61.
RidingsL. E.BeasleyL. O.SomB.Espeleta HannahC.SilovskyJ. F. (2021). The role of social support on depression among vulnerable caregivers reporting bidirectional physical violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), NP2800–NP2822.
62.
RuwerdeAzambujaM. P.NogueiraC. (2008). An introduction to violence against women as a human rights and public health problem. Saude e Sociedade, 17(3), 101–112.
63.
SalterM. (2015). ‘Real men don't hit women’: Constructing masculinity in the prevention of violence against women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 49(4), 463–479.
64.
SaundersD. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem? A review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8(12), 1424–1448.
65.
SayemA. M.BegumH. A.MoneeshaS. S. (2012). Attitudes towards justifying intimate partner violence among married women in Bangladesh. Journal of Biosocial Sciences, 44(6), 641–660.
66.
SearsK. P. (2021). Cultural beliefs related to intimate partner violence help-seeking among African college women. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 30(7), 972–989.
67.
SeelauS. M.SeelauE. P. (2005). Gender-role stereotypes and perceptions of heterosexual, gay and lesbian domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 20(6), 363–371.
68.
Sharp-JeffsN. (2021). Understanding the economics of abuse: An assessment of the economic abuse definition within the domestic abuse bill. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 5(1), 163–173.
69.
ShiX.ZhengY. (2020). Perception and tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of feminist identity, sexism, and gender roles in a sample of Chinese working women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 44(2), 217–233.
70.
SikweyiyaY.Addo-LarteyA. A.AlangeaD. O.Dako-GyekeP.ChirwaE. D.Coker-AppiahD.AdanuR. M. K.JewkesR. (2020). Patriarchy and gender-inequitable attitudes as drivers of intimate partner violence against women in the central region of Ghana. BMC Public Health, 20, 682.
71.
StrausM. A. (2008). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(3), 252–275.
72.
SunmolaA. M.MayungboO. A.AsheforG. A.MorakinyoL. A. (2020). Does relation between women’s justification of wife beating and intimate partner violence differ in context of husband’s controlling attitudes in Nigeria?Journal of Family Issues, 41(1), 85–108.
73.
TarziaL.ForsdikeK.FederG.HegartyK. (2020). Interventions in health settings for male perpetrators or victims of intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(1), 123–137.
74.
TowlerA.EiversA.FreyR. (2020). Warning signs of partner abuse in intimate relationships: Gender differences in young adults’ perceptions of seriousness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(7–8), 1779–1802.
75.
TraboldN.McMahonJ.AlsobrooksS.WhitneyS.MittalM. (2020). A systematic review of intimate partner violence interventions: State of the field and implications for practitioners. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(2), 311–325.
76.
Treves-KaganS.PetermanA.GottfredsonN. C.Villaveces Andrés MoraccoK. E.MamanS. (2022). Equality in the home and in the community: A multilevel longitudinal analysis of intimate partner violence on the Ecuadorian-Colombian border. Journal of Family Violence, 37(1), 1–14.
77.
UlloaE. C.HammettJ. F. (2016). The effect of gender and perpetrator–victim role on mental health outcomes and risk behaviors associated with intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(7), 1184–1207.
78.
WalkerA.LyallK.SilvaD.CraigieG.MayshakR.CostaB.HyderS.BentleyA. (2020). Male victims of female-perpetrated intimate partner violence, help-seeking, and reporting behaviors: A qualitative study. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(2), 213–223.
79.
WalkerL. E. A. (2006). Battered woman syndrome: Empirical findings. Annals of New York Academy of Science, 1087, 142–157.
80.
WangL. (2019). Education, perception factors, and prevention of intimate partner violence: Empirical research on Chinese university students’ perceptions and attitudes concerning intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(8), 1611–1632.
81.
WangL. (2020). Education, gender, residence, and attitude toward intimate partner violence: An empirical study. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 29(7), 808–825.
82.
World Health Organization. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018.
83.
YamawakiN.OstensonJ.BrownC. R. (2009). The functions of gender role traditionality, ambivalent sexism, injury, and frequency of assault on domestic violence perception: A study between Japanese and American college students. Violence Against Women, 15(9), 1126–1142.
