Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-8
A Multi-Topic Bystander Intervention Program for Upper-Level Undergraduate Students: Outcomes in Sexual Violence,Racism,and High-Risk Alcohol Situations
Few bystander intervention trainings programs have evaluated behavioral outcomes in previously trained upper-level undergraduate students. Rigorous study designs are necessary to understand how multi-topic programs influence student outcomes to intervene against sexual violence, racism, and high-risk alcohol situations. A single-session bystander training for emphasizing communication strategies was developed for juniors and seniors on a private, Midwestern college campus. The training addressed sexual violence, racism, and high-risk alcohol situations and was evaluated using a randomized waitlist-control design in student-housing units. Online Qualtrics surveys were completed by 101 student participants (57 in the intervention group and 44 in the control group). Students responded to nine harm scenarios involving sexual violence, racism, and high-risk alcohol situations at baseline and 7 weeks follow-up. Between-group changes in scores were compared to determine the effect of the program on students’ (a) readiness to intervene; (b) confidence to intervene; (c) bystander behaviors among students who witnessed actual or potentially harmful events; and (d) bystander reports of their experiences. Qualitative analysis assessed how the program influenced the use of positive verbal communication strategies. Program effects increased positive bystander experiences when helping someone who had too much to drink and needed assistance. Over time both groups reported increased confidence levels to intervene when someone intoxicated was being isolated with sexual intent. There were no further significant findings in readiness, confidence, behaviors, or other experiences, though some positive nonsignificant trends emerged. The program demonstrated little efficacy. Results suggest opportunities to improve bystander outcomes in low-risk primary prevention situations and racist scenarios, suggesting that targeted intervention of these outcomes may be useful when developing programming with previously-trained students. As universities expand prevention work beyond the first year, lessons learned may help inform multi-year programming across health topics to prevent harm and create healthier college campuses.
AbbottN.CameronL. (2014). What makes a young assertive bystander? The effect of intergroup contact, empathy, cultural openness, and in-group bias on assertive bystander intervention intentions. Journal of Social Issues, 70(1), 167–182.
2.
AboudF. E.JoongA. (2008). Intergroup name-calling and conditions for creating assertive bystanders. In LevyS. R.KillenM. (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood, 249–260. Oxford University Press.
3.
AbramsD.RutlandA.PalmerS. B.PurewalK. (2014). Children’s responses to social atypicality among group members–advantages of a contextualized social developmental account. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 257–261.
4.
AshA.HillR.RisdonS.JunA. (2020). Anti-racism in higher education: A model for change. Race and Pedagogy Journal: Teaching and Learning for Justice, 4(3), 2.
5.
BanyardV. L. (2008). Introduction: Sexual violence: Current perspectives on prevention and intervention. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 36(1–2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852350802022225
6.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.PlanteE. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20159
BoekelooB. O.NovikM. G.BushE. N.O’GradyK. E. (2009). Impact of the “peers as family” dormitory wing-based intervention on college student alcohol use and its secondhand effects. Journal of Drug Education, 39(4), 339–359.
9.
BozemanR. (2015). Bystander confronting of anti-black racism: Effects of belonging affirmation and confrontation training [Master’s Thesis, Loyola University Chicago]. http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/2886
10.
BurnS. M. (2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60(11–12), 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9581-5
CareyK. B.Scott-SheldonL. A.GareyL.ElliottJ. C.CareyM. P. (2016). Alcohol interventions for mandated college students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(7), 619.
13.
CarterR. T.LauM. Y.JohnsonV.KirkinisK. (2017). Racial discrimination and health outcomes among racial/ethnic minorities: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 45(4), 232–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12076
14.
CaseyE. A.CarlsonJ.Fraguela-RiosC.KimballE.NeugutT. B.TolmanR. M.EdlesonJ. L. (2013). Context, challenges, and tensions in global efforts to engage men in the prevention of violence against women: An ecological analysis. Men and Masculinities, 16(2), 228–251.
15.
DaigleL. E.FisherB. S.CullenF. T. (2008). The violent and sexual victimization of college women: Is repeat victimization a problem?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(9), 1296–1313.
16.
ErricksonJ. (2019). Chapter 6 Mixed models, Intermediate Stata (Statistical Modeling) [Workshop Materials]. Material within workshopts and short courses from the Consulting for Statistics, Computing & Analytics Research (CSCAR), University of Michigan. https://errickson.net/stata2/mixed-models.html
17.
FasoneL. (2016). Who notices, who helps and how do they help? Applying the bystander intervention framework to college student drinking [Thesis, School of Public Health, Indiana University].
18.
FinkA. (2005). Evaluation fundamentals: Insights into the outcomes, effectiveness, and quality of health programs. Sage.
19.
HansonL. L. M.NybergA.Mittendorfer-RutzE.BondestamF.MadsenI. E. H. (2020). Work related sexual harassment and risk of suicide and suicide attempts: Prospective cohort study. BMJ, 370, m2984. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2984
HennessyR. (2020). A Mixed Methods Evaluation of an Intersectional Bystander Program Against Sexual Violence Using the Integrated Model of Behavioral Prediction Within a Cluster Randomized Control Trial [Theses and Dissertations, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee]. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/2519
22.
Hennessy GarzaR.ChoY.GrychJ.HlavkaH.WeihardtL.SmithS.AdlerK.OttoK.FlorsheimP. (2021). Comparing bystander intervention against sexual violence, racism, and high-risk alcohol outcomes in college: Recommendations for upper-level undergraduates. Manuscript in Progress.
HoxmeierJ. C.FlayB. R.AcockA. C. (2018). Control, norms, and attitudes: Differences between students who do and do not intervene as bystanders to sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(15), 2379–2401.
25.
HoxmeierJ. C.McMahonS.O’ConnorJ. (2020). Beyond yes or no: Understanding undergraduate students’ responses as bystanders to sexual assault risk situations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(23–24), 5772–5796.
26.
HyersL. L. (2007). Resisting prejudice every day: Exploring women’s assertive responses to anti-Black racism, anti-Semitism, heterosexism, and sexism. Sex Roles, 56(1–2), 1–12.
27.
IconisR. (2014). Understanding alcohol abuse among college students: Contributing factors and strategies for intervention. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 7(3), 243–248.
28.
JakobsenJ. C.GluudC.WetterslevJ.WinkelP. (2017). When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), 162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1
29.
JourilesE. N.KraussA.VuN. L.BanyardV. L.McDonaldR. (2018). Bystander programs addressing sexual violence on college campuses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of program outcomes and delivery methods. Journal of American College Health, 66(6), 457–466.
30.
KarjaneH. M. (2005). Sexual assault on campus: What colleges and universities are doing about it. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
31.
KatzJ.MerrileesC.HoxmeierJ. C.MotisiM. (2017). White female bystanders’ responses to a black woman at risk for incapacitated sexual assault. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(2), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316689367
32.
KatzJ.MooreJ. (2013). Bystander education training for campus sexual assault prevention: An initial meta-analysis. Violence and Victims, 28(6), 1054–1067. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-12-00113
33.
KettreyH. H.MarxR. A. (2019). Does the gendered approach of bystander programs matter in the prevention of sexual assault among adolescents and college students? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(7), 2037–2053.
34.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163.
35.
KriegerN.SmithK.NaishadhamD.HartmanC.BarbeauE. M. (2005). Experiences of discrimination: Validity and reliability of a self-report measure for population health research on racism and health. Social Science & Medicine, 61(7), 1576–1596.
36.
LabhardtD.HoldsworthE.BrownS.HowatD. (2017). You see but you do not observe: A review of bystander intervention and sexual assault on university campuses. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.05.005
37.
LatanéB.DarleyJ. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help?, Century Psychology Series. Appleton-Century Crofts.
38.
LawsonT. J.McDonoughT. A.BodleJ. H. (2010). Confronting prejudiced comments: Effectiveness of a role-playing exercise. Teaching of Psychology, 37(4), 257–261.
39.
LonswayK. A. (1996). Preventing acquaintance rape through education what do we know. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(2), 229–265.
40.
LopezJ. D. (2005). Race-related stress and sociocultural orientation among latino students during their transition into a predominately white, highly selective institution. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4(4), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192705279594
41.
MäkeläP.MaunuA. (2016). Come on, have a drink: The prevalence and cultural logic of social pressure to drink more. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 23(4), 312–321.
42.
McMahonS.BanyardV. L. (2012). When can I help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 13(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838011426015
43.
McMahonS.PalmerJ. E.BanyardV. L.MurphyM.GidyczC. A. (2017). Measuring bystander behavior in the context of sexual violence prevention: Lessons learned and new directions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(16), 2396–2418. http://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515591979
44.
McMahonS.PostmusJ. L.KoenickR. A. (2011). Conceptualizing the engaging bystander approach to sexual violence prevention on college campuses. Journal of College Student Development, 52(1), 115–130. http://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2011.0002
45.
MoisucA.BrauerM.FonsecaA.ChaurandN.GreitemeyerT. (2018). Individual differences in social control: Who ‘speaks up’ when witnessing uncivil, discriminatory, and immoral behaviours?British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(3), 524–546.
46.
MujalG. N.TaylorM. E.FryJ. L.Gochez-KerrT. H.WeaverN. L. (2021). A systematic review of bystander interventions for the prevention of sexual violence. Trauma Violence & Abuse, 22(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019849587
47.
MulveyK. L.PalmerS. B.AbramsD. (2016). Race-based humor and peer group dynamics in adolescence: Bystander intervention and social exclusion. Child Development, 87(5), 1379–1391.
48.
NationM.CrustoC.WandersmanA.KumpferK. L.SeyboltD.Morrissey-KaneE.DavinoK. (2003). What works in prevention: Principles of effective prevention programs. American Psychologist, 58(6–7), 449.
49.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022). Measuring sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation. The National Academies Press.
50.
NelsonJ. K.DunnK. M.ParadiesY. (2011). Bystander anti-racism: A review of the literature. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 11(1), 263–284.
51.
NesdaleD.LawsonM. J. (2011). Social groups and children’s intergroup attitudes: Can school norms moderate the effects of social group norms?Child Development, 82(5), 1594–1606.
52.
OesterleD. W.OrchowskiL. M.MorenoO.BerkowitzA. (2018). A qualitative analysis of bystander intervention among heavy-drinking college men. Violence Against Women, 24(10), 1207–1231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218781931
53.
ParrishM.RyanS. (1996). Negative reproductive health outcomes among adolescent females following sexual abuse, rape or assault. Journal of Adolescent Health, 18(2), P119. https://doi.org/10.1016/1054-139X(96)81155-4
54.
RankinS. R.ReasonR. D. (2005). Differing perceptions: How students of color and white students perceive campus climate for underrepresented groups. Journal of College Student Development, 46(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2005.0008
TurchikJ. A.HassijaC. M. (2014). Female sexual victimization among college students: Assault severity, health risk behaviors, and sexual functioning. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(13), 2439–2457. http://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513520230
58.
University of Arizona. (2008). Step Up! A prosocial behavior/bystander intervention program for student-athletes. Facilitator Guide. The Arizona Board of Regents for the University of Arizona. http://stepupprogram.org/docs/STEPUP_FacilitatorGuide.pdf
59.
WestB. T.WelchK. B.AndrzejG. T. (2007). Linear mixed models: A practical guide using statistical software. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis group.
60.
WolfeD. A.ScottK.Reitzel-JaffeD.WekerleC.GrasleyC.StraatmanA.-L. (2001). Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 277.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
