“I Know Myself Again,Which Makes Me Motivated for Life”: Feasibility and Acceptability of Using Experience Sampling Methods With Trauma-Exposed Sexual Minority Women

Abstract

Intensive longitudinal designs (e.g., experience sampling methods [ESMs]) hold promise for examining the dynamic interplay between daily adversity, coping strategies, and behavioral and mental health issues among marginalized populations. However, few studies have used intensive longitudinal designs with sexual minority women (SMW), an understudied and at-risk population. We assessed feasibility and acceptability of using once-daily, interval-contingent ESM with 161 trauma-exposed SMW (M_age = 29.1, SD = 7.57); 20.5% nonbinary; 32.3% queer; 52.2% people of color; 14.3% with annual incomes ≤$9,999; and 30.4% in Southern United States (U.S.). SMW completed one comprehensive online baseline assessment and once-daily brief online assessments for 14 days. Daily surveys assessed past-24-hour stressors, stress responses, and behavioral and mental health symptoms. At the end of the 14-day ESM period, SMW answered three open-ended questions about participating in this study and about research with SMW. Regarding feasibility, 151 participants (94.0%) initiated the post-baseline ESM study portion and 72 (45.0%) completed all 14 daily surveys. An average of 11.70 (median = 13, SD = 3.31) daily surveys (83.5%) were completed by those who initiated the ESM. ESM completion level varied by race/ethnicity and U.S. region. Qualitative acceptability data revealed several themes, namely that SMW (1) enjoyed participating and felt positively about the ESM experience, (2) felt supported to reflect on impacts of early and ongoing stressors, (3) appreciated the chance to self-reflect and challenge existing thought patterns and coping behaviors, (4) recognized their capacity to tolerate trauma-related distress, (5) recommended that researchers focus on SMW’s diverse stressors and daily experiences, (6) wanted a rationale for providing sensitive information and more space to narrate their experiences, and (7) recognized the need for affirmative treatment and policies. Findings could inform modifications to ESM protocols to improve their feasibility and acceptability among trauma-exposed SMW and promote ongoing utility of this valuable method.

Keywords

experience sampling methods minority stressors trauma sexual minority women behavioral and mental health risks

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acorda

Businelle

Maria

D. S.

(2021). Perceived impacts, acceptability, and recommendations for ecological momentary assessment among youth experiencing homelessness: Qualitative study. JMIR Formative Research, 5(4), e21638. https://doi.org/10.2196/21638

Bolger

Laurenceau

J. P.

(2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.

Brooks

(1981). Minority stress and lesbian women. Lexington Books.

Burton

C. L.

Clark

K. A.

Pachankis

J. E.

(2020). Risk from within: Intraminority gay community stress and sexual risk-taking among sexual minority men. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 54(9), 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaa014

Buu

Yang

Zimmerman

M. A.

Cunningham

R. M.

Walton

M. A.

(2020). Examining measurement reactivity in daily diary data on substance use: Results from a randomized experiment. Addictive Behaviors, 102, 106198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106198

Campbell

Perales

Baxter

(2020). Sexual minority women in longitudinal survey research: Is attrition a problem? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(5), 1443–1461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01669-z

Cardona

N. D.

Madigan

R. J.

Sauer-Zavala

(2022). How minority stress becomes traumatic invalidation: An emotion-focused conceptualization of minority stress in sexual and gender minority people. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 29(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000054

Chun

C. A.

(2016). The expression of posttraumatic stress symptoms in daily life: A review of experience sampling methodology and daily diary studies. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38(3), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9540-3

Cohn

A. M.

Elmasry

Ehlke

S. J.

(2018). Utilization, receptivity and reactivity to interactive voice response daily monitoring in risky drinking smokers who are motivated to quit. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/84972

10.

Downing

J. M.

Rosenthal

(2020). Prevalence of social determinants of health among sexual minority women and men in 2017. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 59(1), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.007

11.

Duncan

D. T.

Kapadia

Kirchner

T. R.

Goedel

W. C.

Brady

W. J.

Halkitis

P. N.

(2017). Acceptability of ecological momentary assessment among young men who have sex with men. Journal of LGBT Youth, 14(4), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2017.1365038

12.

Dunton

G. F.

Dzubur

O’Connor

S. G.

Lopez

N. V.

Margolin

(2019). Within-subject effects of stress on weight-related parenting practices in mothers: An ecological momentary assessment study. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53(5), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay053

13.

Dworkin

E. R.

Kaysen

Bedard-Gilligan

Rhew

I. C.

Lee

C. M.

(2017). Daily-level associations between PTSD and cannabis use among young sexual minority women. Addictive Behaviors, 74, 118–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.06.007

14.

Dyar

Kaysen

Newcomb

M. E.

Mustanski

(2022). Event-level associations among minority stress, coping motives, and substance use among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals. Addictive Behaviors, 134, 107397.

15.

Foa

E. B.

McLean

C. P.

Zang

Zhong

Powers

M. B.

Kauffman

B. Y.

Rauch

Porter

Knowles

(2016). Psychometric properties of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale for DSM–5 (PDS–5). Psychological Assessment, 28(10), 1166–1171. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000258

16.

Gamer

Lemon

Fellows

Singh

(2019). IRR: Various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement (0.84.1) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/irr/irr.pdf

17.

Guillory

Wiant

K. F.

Farrelly

Fiacco

Alam

Hoffman

Crankshaw

Delahanty

Alexander

T. N.

(2018). Recruiting hard-to-reach populations for survey research: Using facebook and instagram advertisements and in-person intercept in LGBT bars and nightclubs to recruit LGBT young adults. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(6), e9461. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9461

18.

Hallgren

K. A.

(2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34.

19.

Heron

K. E.

Lewis

R. J.

Shappie

A. T.

Dawson

C. A.

Amerson

Braitman

A. L.

Winstead

B. A.

Kelley

M. L.

(2019). Rationale and design of a remote web-based daily diary study examining sexual minority stress, relationship factors, and alcohol use in same-sex female couples across the United States: Study protocol of Project Relate. JMIR Research Protocols, 8(2), e11718. https://doi.org/10.2196/11718

20.

Hsieh

H. F.

Shannon

S. E.

(2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

21.

Hufford

M. R.

Shields

A. L.

Shiffman

Paty

Balabanis

(2002). Reactivity to ecological momentary assessment: An example using undergraduate problem drinkers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(3), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.16.3.205

22.

Hughes

T. L.

Johnson

T. P.

Steffen

A. D.

Wilsnack

S. C.

Everett

(2014). Lifetime victimization, hazardous drinking, and depression among heterosexual and sexual minority women. LGBT Health, 1(3), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2014.0014

23.

Hughes

T. L.

Wilsnack

Martin

Matthews

Johnson

(2021). Alcohol use among sexual minority women: Methods used and lessons learned in the 20-year Chicago Health and Life Experiences of Women Study. The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research, 9(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.289

24.

Jackson

S. D.

Mohr

J. J.

Kindahl

A. M.

(2021). Intersectional experiences: A mixed methods experience sampling approach to studying an elusive phenomenon. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000537

25.

Jackson

S. D.

Mohr

J. J.

Sarno

E. L.

Kindahl

A. M.

Jones

I. L.

(2020). Intersectional experiences, stigma-related stress, and psychological health among black LGBQ individuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 88(5), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000489

26.

Jones

Remmerswaal

Verveer

Robinson

Franken

I. H. A.

Wen

C. K. F.

Field

(2019). Compliance with ecological momentary assessment protocols in substance users: A meta-analysis. Addiction, 114(4), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14503

27.

Kennedy

A. C.

Prock

K. A.

(2018). “I still feel like I am not normal”: A review of the role of stigma and stigmatization among female survivors of child sexual abuse, sexual assault, and intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(5), 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016673601

28.

Kounios

Beeman

(2015). The eureka factor: Aha moments, creative insight, and the brain (pp. xii, 274). Random House.

29.

Krueger

E. A.

Fish

J. N.

Hammack

P. L.

Lightfoot

Bishop

M. D.

Russell

S. T.

(2020). Comparing national probability and community-based samples of sexual minority adults: Implications and recommendations for sampling and measurement. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(5), 1463–1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01724-9

30.

Lane

A. R.

Waters

A. J.

Black

A. C.

(2019). Ecological momentary assessment studies of comorbid PTSD and alcohol use: A narrative review. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 10, 100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2019.100205

31.

Levitt

H. M.

Bamberg

Creswell

J. W.

Frost

D. M.

Josselson

Suárez-Orozco

(2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151

32.

Lewis

R. J.

Dawson

C. A.

Shappie

A. T.

Braitman

A. L.

Heron

K. E.

(2021). Recruiting cisgender female couples for health disparity-focused daily diary research: Challenges, successes, and lessons learned. Psychology & Sexuality, 13(4), 931–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.1942177

33.

Lewis

R. J.

Romano

K. A.

Ehlke

S. J.

Lau-Barraco

Sandoval

C. M.

Glenn

D. J.

Heron

K. E.

(2021). Minority stress and alcohol use in sexual minority women’s daily lives. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 29(5), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000484

34.

Livingston

N. A.

Flentje

Heck

N. C.

Szalda-Petree

Cochran

B. N.

(2017). Ecological momentary assessment of daily discrimination experiences and nicotine, alcohol, and drug use among sexual and gender minority individuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(12), 1131–1143. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000252

35.

Lunn

M. R.

Capriotti

M. R.

Flentje

Bibbins-Domingo

Pletcher

M. J.

Triano

A. J.

Sooksaman

Frazier

Obedin-Maliver

(2019). Using mobile technology to engage sexual and gender minorities in clinical research. PloS One, 14(5), e0216282. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216282

36.

McCabe

Hughes

Beal

Evans-Polce

Kcomt

Engstrom

West

Veliz

Leary

McCabe

Boyd

(2022). Sexual orientation differences in childhood sexual abuse, suicide attempts, and DSM-5 alcohol, tobacco, other drug use, and mental health disorders in the US. Child Abuse & Neglect, 123, 105377 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105377

37.

Mereish

E. H.

Kuerbis

Morgenstern

(2018). A daily diary study of stressful and positive events, alcohol use, and addiction severity among heavy drinking sexual minority men. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 187, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.03.003

38.

Meyer

I. H.

(2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674

39.

Meyer

I. H.

Flores

A. R.

Stemple

Romero

A. P.

Wilson

B. D. M.

Herman

J. L.

(2017). Incarceration rates and traits of sexual minorities in the United States: National Inmate Survey, 2011–2012. American Journal of Public Health, 107(2), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303576

40.

Middleton

Drabble

L. A.

Krug

Karriker-Jaffe

K. J.

Mericle

A. A.

Hughes

T. L.

Iachan

Trocki

K. F.

(2022). Challenges of virtual RDS for recruitment of sexual minority women for a behavioral health study. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 10(2), 466–488. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab039

41.

Morrow

S. L.

(2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250

42.

Naragon-Gainey

Simpson

T. L.

Moore

S. A.

Varra

A. A.

Kaysen

D. L.

(2012). The correspondence of daily and retrospective PTSD reports among female victims of sexual assault. Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 1041–1047. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028518

43.

Northcote

Livingston

(2011). Accuracy of self-reported drinking: Observational verification of ‘last occasion’ drink estimates of young adults. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 46(6), 709–713. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agr138

44.

Perski

Hébert

E. T.

Naughton

Hekler

E. B.

Brown

Businelle

M. S.

(2022). Technology-mediated just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) to reduce harmful substance use: A systematic review. Addiction, 117(5), 1220–1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15687

45.

Porsch

L. M.

Veldhuis

C. B.

Bochicchio

L. A.

Zollweg

S. S.

Hughes

T. L.

(2022). Intimate partner violence among sexual minority women: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221122815

46.

Possemato

Kaier

Wade

Lantinga

L. J.

Maisto

S. A.

Ouimette

(2012). Assessing daily fluctuations in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and substance use with interactive voice response technology: Protocol compliance and reactions. Psychological Services, 9(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027144

47.

R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

48.

Reynolds

B. M.

Robles

T. F.

Repetti

R. L.

(2016). Measurement reactivity and fatigue effects in daily diary research with families. Developmental Psychology, 52(3), 442–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000081

49.

Roberts

A. L.

Austin

S. B.

Corliss

H. L.

Vandermorris

A. K.

Koenen

K. C.

(2010). Pervasive trauma exposure among US sexual orientation minority adults and risk of posttraumatic stress disorder. American Journal of Public Health, 100(12), 2433–2441. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.168971

50.

Roth

A. M.

Felsher

Reed

Goldshear

J. L.

Truong

Garfein

R. S.

Simmons

(2017). Potential benefits of using ecological momentary assessment to study high-risk polydrug use. MHealth, 3, 46. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2017.10.01

51.

Rudolph

A. E.

Young

A. M.

Havens

J. R.

(2020). Privacy, confidentiality, and safety considerations for conducting geographic momentary assessment studies among persons who use drugs and men who have sex with men. Journal of Urban Health, 97(2), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0315-x

52.

Salim

S. R.

McConnell

A. A.

Messman

(2022). Sexual victimization outcomes and adjustment among bisexual women: A review of the quantitative literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211073837

53.

Salway

T. J.

Morgan

Ferlatte

Hawkins

Lachowsky

N. J.

Gilbert

(2019). A systematic review of characteristics of nonprobability community venue samples of sexual minority individuals and associated methods for assessing selection bias. LGBT Health, 6(5), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2018.0241

54.

Saunders

J. B.

Aasland

O. G.

Babor

T. F.

De la Fuente

J. R.

Grant

(1993). Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88(6), 791–804.

55.

Scheer

J. R.

Antebi-Gruszka

Sullivan

T. P.

(2021). Physical and sexual victimization class membership and alcohol use correlates among sexual minority and heterosexual female youth. Psychology of Violence, 11(5), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000380

56.

Scheer

J. R.

Pachankis

Bränström

(2020). Gender-based structural stigma and intimate partner violence across 28 countries: A population-based study of women across sexual orientation, immigration status, and socioeconomic status. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(11–12), NP8941–NP8964. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520976212

57.

Shiffman

(2009). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in studies of substance use. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017074

58.

Simpson

T. L.

Kivlahan

D. R.

Bush

K. R.

McFall

M. E.

(2005). Telephone self-monitoring among alcohol use disorder patients in early recovery: A randomized study of feasibility and measurement reactivity. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 79(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.02.001

59.

Staniszewska

Crowe

Badenoch

Edwards

Savage

Norman

(2010). The PRIME project: Developing a patient evidence-base. Health Expectations, 13(3), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00590.

60.

Sullivan

T. P.

Khondkaryan

Dos Santos

N. P.

Peters

E. N.

(2011). Applying experience sampling methods to partner violence research: Safety and feasibility in a 90-day study of community women. Violence against Women, 17(2), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210397756

61.

Turner

C. M.

Arayasirikul

Trujillo

Lê

Wilson

E. C.

(2019). Social inequity and structural barriers to completion of ecological momentary assessments for young men who have sex with men and trans women living with HIV in San Francisco. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 7(5), e13241. https://doi.org/10.2196/13241

62.

Umberson

Thomeer

M. B.

Kroeger

R. A.

Lodge

A. C.

(2015). Challenges and opportunities for research on same-sex relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12155

63.

Valentine

Peitzmeier

King

O’Cleirigh

Marquez

Presley

Potter

(2017). Disparities in exposure to intimate partner violence among transgender/gender nonconforming and sexual minority primary care patients. LGBT Health, 4(4), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2016.0113

64.

Waterman

E. A.

Edwards

K. M.

Dardis

C. M.

Kelley

E. L.

Sessarego

(2021). Assessing intimate partner violence via daily diary surveys: Feasibility, reporting, and acceptability. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19–20), 9121–9142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519865964

65.

Westermeyer

Shiroma

Thuras

Kattar

Johnson

Crosby

R. D.

(2015). Daily versus monthly reporting of post-traumatic symptoms: A study of reliability across time and instruments. Psychiatry Research, 227(2), 309–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.03.017

66.

Whiting

J. B.

Pickens

J. C.

Sagers

A. L.

PettyJohn

Davies

(2021). Trauma, social media, and #WhyIDidntReport: An analysis of twitter posts about reluctance to report sexual assault. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 47(3), 749–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12470

67.

Wray

T. B.

Merrill

J. E.

Monti

P. M.

(2014). Using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to assess situation-level predictors of alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 36(1), 19–27.

68.

Yang

Linas

Kirk

Bollinger

Chang

Chander

Siconolfi

Braxton

Rudolph

Latkin

(2015). Feasibility and acceptability of smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment of alcohol use among African American men who have sex with men in Baltimore. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 3(2), e4344. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4344

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

0.19 MB