Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-6
Perception of the Presumption of Innocence in the Context of Media Depictions of Violence: The Role of Participant’s Gender,Type of Crime,and Defendant’s Socioeconomic Status
The #MeToo movement has provoked a worldwide discussion about sexual violence. Some critics of the movement argue that it violates the presumption of innocence. In the current study, we investigated the determinants of the perception of the presumption of innocence in the context of media depictions of violence. We took into account previous studies that suggest that people view more favorably defendants in rape trials than they do men accused of other crimes and that people view more favorably defendants with a high socioeconomic status than they do those with a low socioeconomic status. The current study investigated whether the perception of the presumption of innocence is related to the type of crime (sexual vs. nonsexual assault) or to the socioeconomic status of the defendant (a famous writer vs. a maintenance worker). We conducted a vignette-based study with a sample of Polish people (N = 158). The type of crime did not influence the perception of the presumption of innocence; however, women who participated in the study endorsed the presumption of innocence to a greater extent when the defendant had a high socioeconomic status. The theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed.
AckersonL. K.SubramanianS. V. (2008). State gender inequality, socioeconomic status and intimate partner violence (IPV) in India: A multilevel analysis. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 43(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2008.tb00091.x
2.
AlaggiaR.WangS. (2020). “I never told anyone until the #MeToo movement”: What can we learn from sexual abuse and sexual assault disclosures made through social media?Child Abuse & Neglect, 103, 104312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104312
AosvedA. C.LongP. J. (2006). Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance. Sex Roles, 55(7), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4
BeshersS.DiVitaM. (2021). Changes in rape myth acceptance among undergraduates: 2010 to 2017. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19–20), 9371– 9392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519867153
7.
BieneckS.KrahéB. (2011). Blaming the victim and exonerating the perpetrator in cases of rape and robbery: Is there a double standard?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(9), 1785–1797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510372945
8.
BlackK. A.GoldD. J. (2008). Gender differences and socioeconomic status biases in judgments about blame in date rape scenarios. Violence and Victims, 23(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.115
ChapleauK. M.OswaldD. L. (2014). A system justification view of sexual violence: Legitimizing gender inequality and reduced moral outrage are connected to greater rape myth acceptance. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 15(2), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2014.867573
12.
DershowitzA. (2019). Guilt by accusation: The challenge of proving innocence in the age of #MeToo. Hot Books Publishing.
13.
Dirilen-GumusO. (2011). Differences in system justification with respect to gender, political conservatism, socio-economic status and religious fundamentalism. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2607–2611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.510
14.
DonaldsonC.HandrenL.LacA. (2017). Applying multilevel modeling to understand individual and cross-cultural variations in attitudes toward homosexual people across 28 European countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116672488
15.
EisingC. M.VoelkleM. C.RohnerS. L.MaerckerA.ThomaM. V. (2021). Lifetime post-traumatic stress disorder in older individuals with a history of institutional upbringing in childhood: The role of social acknowledgement and stressful life events. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12(1), 1915578. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1915578
16.
European Commission. (2016). Special Eurobarometer 449—November 2016 “Gender- based violence.” European Union.
FelsonR.PalmoreC. (2018). Biases in blaming victims of rape and other crime. Psychology of Violence, 8(3), 390–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000168
20.
FieldC. A.CaetanoR. (2004). Ethnic differences in intimate partner violence in the U.S. general population: The role of alcohol use and socioeconomic status. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5(4), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838004269488
21.
FraniukR.SeefeltJ. L.CepressS. L.VandelloJ. A. (2008a). Prevalence and effects of rape myths in print journalism: The Kobe Bryant case. Violence Against Women, 14(3), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207313971
22.
FraniukR.SeefeltJ. L.VandelloJ. A. (2008b). Prevalence of rape myths in headlines and their effects on attitudes toward rape. Sex Roles, 58(11), 790–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9372-4
23.
GergerH.KleyH.BohnerG.SieblerF. (2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33(5), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20195
GoldsmithR. E.FeyginaI.JostJ. T. (2013). The gender gap in environmental attitudes: A system justification perspective. In AlstonM.WhittenburyK. (Eds.), Research, action and policy: Addressing the gendered impacts of climate change (pp. 159–171). Springer Netherlands.
26.
GravelinC. R.BiernatM.BucherC. E. (2019). Blaming the victim of acquaintance rape: Individual, situational, and sociocultural factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02422
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
29.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
30.
JostJ. T.PelhamB. W.SheldonO.Ni SullivanB. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.127
KendeA.NyúlB.LantosN. A.HadaricsM.PetlitskiD.KehlJ.ShnabelN. (2020). A needs-based support for #MeToo: Power and morality needs shape women’s and men’s support of the campaign. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00593
33.
KnightJ. L.GiulianoT. A.Sanchez-RossM. G. (2001). Famous or infamous? The influence of celebrity status and race on perceptions of responsibility for rape. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2303_4
34.
KunstJ. R.BaileyA.PrendergastC.GundersenA. (2019). Sexism, rape myths and feminist identification explain gender differences in attitudes toward the #MeToo social media campaign in two countries. Media Psychology, 22(5), 818–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1532300
LessardM. (2017). Les dénonciations publiques d’agressions sexuelles : du mauvais usage de la présomption d’innocence. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 29(2), 401–430. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.29.2.401
37.
LevyR.MattssonM. (2022). The effects of social movements: Evidence from #MeToo (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 3496903). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3496903
38.
LisakD.GardinierL.NicksaS. C.CoteA. M. (2010). False allegations of sexual assault: An analysis of ten years of reported cases. Violence Against Women, 16(12), 1318–1334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210387747
39.
ŁyśA.Bargiel-MatusiewiczK.KrasuskiT.StudzińskaA. (2023). Psychometric properties of the polish updated Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Current Psychology, 42, 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01249-3
40.
ŁyśA.StudzińskaA.Bargiel-MatusiewiczK. (2021). Beliefs on sexual violence in the context of system justification theory: The role of hostile sexism and beliefs in biological origins of gender differences. Social Justice Research, 34, 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-021-00373-0
41.
MaerckerA.HeckerT. (2016). Broadening perspectives on trauma and recovery: A socio-interpersonal view of PTSD. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 7(1), 297–325. https://doi:10.3402/ejpt.v7.29303
42.
MallettR. K.HuntsingerJ. R.SwimJ. K. (2011). The role of system-justification motivation, group status and system threat in directing support for hate crimes legislation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 384–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.014
MazzellaR.FeingoldA. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(15), 1315–1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01552.x
45.
McMahonS.FarmerG. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71
MuellerJ.MoergeliH.MaerckerA. (2008). Disclosure and social acknowledgement as predictors of recovery from posttraumatic stress: A longitudinal study in crime victims. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 53(3), 160–168. https://doi:10.1177/070674370805300306
48.
NyúlB.KendeA.EngyelM.SzabóM. (2018). Perception of a perpetrator as a successful person predicts decreased moral judgment of a rape case and labeling it as rape. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2555. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02555
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238
52.
ReichC. M.PegelG. A.JohnsonA. B. (2021). Are survivors of sexual assault blamed more than victims of other crimes?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(19–20), NP18394–NP18416. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211037423
53.
ReichelD. (2017). Determinants of intimate partner violence in Europe: The role of socioeconomic status, inequality, and partner behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(12), 1853–1873. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517698951
SpencerB. (2016). The impact of class and sexuality-based stereotyping on rape blame. Sexualization, Media, & Society, 2(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374623816643282
StåhlT.EekD.KazemiA. (2010). Rape victim blaming as system justification: The role of gender and activation of complementary stereotypes. Social Justice Research, 23(4), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0117-0
58.
SzekeresH.ShumanE.SaguyT. (2020). Views of sexual assault following #MeToo: The role of gender and individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110203
59.
TanoosA. (2017). Shielding the presumption of innocence from pretrial media coverage. Indiana Law Review, 50(3), 997–1022. https://doi.org/10.18060/4806.1159
60.
UllmanS. E.FilipasH. H.TownsendS. M.StarzynskiL. L. (2006). The role of victim-offender relationship in women’s sexual assault experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(6), 798–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506288590
61.
Waterhouse-WatsonD. (2016). News media on trial: Towards a feminist ethics of reporting footballer sexual assault trials. Feminist Media Studies, 16(6), 952–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1162827
62.
WilsonR. F.KlevensJ.WilliamsD.XuL. (2020). Infant homicides within the context of safe haven laws—United States, 2008–2017. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(39), 1385–1390. https://.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6939a1
YamawakiN.DarbyR.QueirozA. (2007). The moderating role of ambivalent sexism: The influence of power status on perception of rape victim and rapist. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 41–56. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.1.41-56
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
