The higher moral sensitivity to bullying a student has, the more likely they are to help the victim or inhibit bullying rather than ignore it. Research has mainly focused on particular sensitivity to bullying, and it remains unknown whether sensitivity to everyday moral issues functions similarly. The present study aimed to examine the effect of everyday moral sensitivity (EMS) on bullying bystander behaviors. We included a range of school children (n = 1,655, Grades 3–12, 27.6% girls) in Southwest China. The results show 6.10% have been a victim-only, 0.48% have been a bully-only, 0.85% have been the bullying victim, 92.57% have been neither a bully nor a bullying victim, and 45.86% have observed bullying. Students in lower grades are more likely to be bullied. After controlling for covariates (i.e., gender, grade, and social desirability), EMS is positively associated with positive bystander behaviors. Moreover, empathy and moral disengagement (MD) play a mediating role in the relationship between EMS and positive bystander behaviors. The results reveal two parallel processes of EMS influenced bystander behaviors (i.e., empathy and MD). The findings indicate the possibility of cultivating EMS and highlight the role of morality development in preventing school bullying.
BanduraA. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022014322
2.
BjärehedM.ThornbergR.WänströmL.GiniG. (2020). Mechanisms of moral disengagement and their associations with indirect bullying, direct bullying, and pro-aggressive bystander behavior. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 40(1), 28–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618824745
3.
BryanL. N.Smith-GrantJ.BrenerN.KilmerG.LoA.QueenB.UnderwoodJ. M. (2022). Electronic versus paper and pencil survey administration mode comparison: 2019 youth risk behavior survey. Journal of School Health, 92(8), 804–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13184
4.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354.
5.
DarleyJ. M.LatanéB. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589
6.
EspelageD. L.Van RyzinM. J.HoltM. K. (2018). Trajectories of bully perpetration across early adolescence: Static risk factors, dynamic covariates, and longitudinal outcomes. Psychology of Violence, 8(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000095
7.
FredrickS. S.JenkinsL. N.RayK. (2020). Dimensions of empathy and bystander intervention in bullying in elementary school. Journal of School Psychology, 79, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.03.001
8.
GiniG.PozzoliT.HymelS. (2014). Moral disengagement among children and youth: A meta-analytic review of links to aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21502
9.
GiniG.ThornbergR.PozzoliT. (2020). Individual moral disengagement and bystander behavior in bullying: The role of moral distress and collective moral disengagement. Psychology of Violence, 10(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000223
10.
GrafD.YanagidaT.SpielC. (2019). Through the magnifying glass: Empathy’s differential role in preventing and promoting traditional and cyberbullying. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.007
11.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
12.
JiangS.LiuR. D.DingY.JiangR.FuX.HongW. (2020). Why the victims of bullying are more likely to avoid involvement when witnessing bullying situations: The role of bullying sensitivity and moral disengagement. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(5–6), NP3062–NP3083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520948142
13.
JolliffeD.FarringtonD. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta–analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(5), 441–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016683456
14.
JordanJ. (2007). Taking the first step toward a moral action: A review of moral sensitivity measurement across domains. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168(3), 323–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010
15.
LereyaS. T.CopelandW. E.ZammitS.WolkeD. (2015). Bully/victims: A longitudinal, population-based cohort study of their mental health. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24(12), 1461–1471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-015-0705-5
16.
LiC. F.LvR.LiuJ.ZhongJ. (2011). The adaptation of basic empathy scale among Chinese adolescents. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(2), 163–166.
17.
LovettB. J.JordanA. H. (2010). Levels of moralisation: A new conception of moral sensitivity. Journal of Moral Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057241003754914
18.
Lucas-MolinaB.Pérez-AlbénizA.Fonseca-PedreroE.Giménez-DasíM. (2018). Bullying, defending, and outsider behaviors: The moderating role of social status and gender in their relationship with empathy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(4), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12453
19.
MarkkanenI.VälimaaR.KannasL. (2021). Forms of bullying and associations between school perceptions and being bullied among Finnish secondary school students aged 13 and 15. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 3(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00058-y
20.
MenolascinoN.JenkinsL. N. (2018). Predicting bystander intervention among middle school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(2), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000262
21.
NguyenA. J.BradshawC.TownsendL.BassJ. (2020). Prevalence and correlates of bullying victimization in four low-resource countries. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(19–20), 3767–3790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517709799
22.
NickersonA. B.Mele-TaylorD. (2014). Empathetic responsiveness, group norms, and prosocial affiliations in bullying roles. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000052
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
25.
ParrisL.JungertT.ThornbergR.VarjasK.MeyersJ.GrunewaldS.ShribergD. (2020). Bullying bystander behaviors: The role of coping effectiveness and the moderating effect of gender. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12564
26.
PellegriniA. D.BartiniM. (2000). A longitudinal study of bullying, victimization, and peer affiliation during the transition from primary school to middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 699–725. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163486
27.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
28.
PornariC. D.WoodJ. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20336
29.
PöyhönenV.JuvonenJ.SalmivalliC. (2012). Standing up for the victim, siding with the bully or standing by? Bystander responses in bullying situations. Social Development, 21(4), 722–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00662.x
30.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). Spss and sas procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
31.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
32.
RestJ. R. (1982). A psychologist looks at the teaching of ethics. The Hastings Center Report, 12(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/3560621
33.
RobertsonD.SnareyJ.OusleyO.HarenskiK.BowmanF. D.GilkeyR.KiltsC. (2007). The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care. Neuropsychologia, 45(4), 755–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.014
34.
RolandE.IdsøeT. (2001). Aggression and bullying. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 27(6), 446–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.1029
35.
RunionsK. C.ShawT.BusseyK.ThornbergR.SalmivalliC.CrossD. S. (2019). Moral disengagement of pure bullies and bully/victims: Shared and distinct mechanisms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(9), 1835–1848.
36.
SaarentoS.BoultonA. J.SalmivalliC. (2015). Reducing bullying and victimization: Student-and classroom-level mechanisms of change. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9841-x
SchacterH. L.JuvonenJ. (2015). The effects of school-level victimization on self-blame: Evidence for contextualized social cognitions. Developmental Psychology, 51(6), 841–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000016
39.
SchäferM.KornS.BrodbeckF. C.WolkeD.SchulzH. (2005). Bullying roles in changing contexts: The stability of victim and bully roles from primary to secondary school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(4), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250544000107
40.
ShelleyD.CraigW. M. (2010). Attributions and coping styles in reducing victimization. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573509357067
41.
SijtsemaJ. J.VeenstraR.LindenbergS.SalmivalliC. (2009). Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20282
42.
SparksJ. R. (2015). A social cognitive explanation of situational and individual effects on moral sensitivity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12274
43.
TanrikuluI.CampbellM. (2015). Correlates of traditional bullying and cyberbullying perpetration among Australian students. Children and Youth Services Review, 55, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.06.001
44.
ThornbergR.JungertT. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement, and defender self–efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003
45.
ThornbergR.JungertT. (2014). School bullying and the mechanisms of moral disengagement. Aggressive Behavior, 40(2), 99–108.
Troop-GordonW.FroschC. A.ToturaC. M. W.BaileyA. N.JacksonJ. D.DvorakR. D. (2019). Predicting the development of pro-bullying bystander behavior: A short-term longitudinal analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 77, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.10.004
48.
XieZ.ManW.LiuC.FuX. (2023). A PRISMA-based systematic review of measurements for school bullying. Adolescent Research Review, 8, 219–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-022-00194-5
49.
ZhangW.XiangY. (2021). Reliability, validity, and invariance of the moral sensitivity questionnaire in the China general social survey. Current Psychology, 41, 8646–8659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01246-6
50.
ZhaoF. G.HeZ.YuanS. L.HuangX. T. (2021). Constructing the school bullying victims questionnaire. Psychological Exploration, 41(1), 64–68.
51.
ZhouH.LongL. R. (2004). Statistical remedies for common method biases. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(6), 942–950.
52.
ZhouY.ZhengH.LiangY.WangJ.HanR.LiuZ. (2020). Joint developmental trajectories of bullying and victimization from childhood to adolescence: A parallel–process latent class growth analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37, 3–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520933054
53.
ZychI.TtofiM. M.FarringtonD. P. (2019). Empathy and callous–unemotional traits in different bullying roles: A systematic review and meta–analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016683456
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
