The Impact of Information From Mental Health Care Providers on Decisions About State Compensation for Violent Crime Victimization

Abstract

In the Netherlands, as in many other countries, victims of intentionally committed violent crimes may apply for state compensation if the offender is unknown or unable to pay for the damages of the crime. This state compensation scheme is run by the Dutch Violent Offences Compensation Fund (VOCF). Lawyers who work for this fund need to evaluate applicants´ eligibility for state compensation on the basis of two criteria: (1) the plausibility of the applicant’s victimization story and (2) the severity of the injury sustained by the applicant. Whether these criteria are fulfilled is largely left to the discretion of the lawyer who evaluates the application. This discretionary power makes the decision-making process prone to biased outcomes. Inspired by previous research, this study investigated whether information from mental health care providers, such as psychiatrists or clinical psychologists, serves as a potential source of bias. Although this type of information may or should sometimes be used to evaluate an applicant’s eligibility for compensation, in most cases it should not affect the outcome of this evaluation because of its potential unreliability. A statistical association between availability of information from mental health care providers and adjudication of state compensation is therefore not to be expected. Analyzing 246 applications submitted to the Dutch VOCF between July 1st 2016 and July 1st 2017, this study tested the empirical validity of this expectation. Results indicated that the availability of information of mental health care providers was associated with adjudication of state compensation. This finding was discussed in view of the literature on heuristic thinking and biased decision making and the study’s limitations.

Keywords

violence victimization state compensation psychological injury mental health care provider information

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Campbell

Long

S. M.

Townsend

S. M.

Kinnison

K. E.

Pulley

E. M.

Adames

S. B.

Wasco

S. M.

(2007). Sexual assault nurse examiners' experiences providing expert witness court testimony. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 3(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-3938.2007.tb00087.x.PMID:17479561

Chiu

Amartey

Wang

Kurdyak

(2018). Ethnic differences in mental health status and service utilization: A population-based study in Ontario, Canada. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 63(7), 481-491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743717741061

Christie

(1986). The ideal victim. In Fattah

E. A.

(Ed.), From crime policy to victim policy (pp. 17–30). Palgrave Macmillan.

Daly

Holder

R. L.

(2019). State payments to victims of violent crime: Discretion and bias in awards for sexual offences. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(5), 1099–1118. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz008

Finucane

M. L.

Alhakami

Slovic

Johnson

S. M.

(2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S

Gabora

N. J.

Spanos

N. P.

Joab

(1993). The effects of complainant age and expert psychological testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 17(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044540

Gigerenzer

(2008). Why heuristics work. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00058.x

Gigerenzer

Gaissmaier

(2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346

Golding

J. M.

Wasarhaley

N. E.

Lynch

K. R.

Lippert

Magyarics

C. L.

(2015). Improving the credibility of child sexual assault victims in court: The impact of a sexual assault nurse examiner. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33(4), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2188

10.

Groenhuijsen

M. S.

(2008). Slachtoffers van misdrijven in het recht en in de victimologie: Verslag van een intellectuele zoektocht [Victims of crime in law and victimology: Report of an intellectual search]. Delikt en Delinkwent, 38(2), 121–145.

11.

Groenhuijsen

M. S.

(2014). The development of international policy in relation to victims of crime. International Review of Victimology, 20(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758013511740

12.

Hastie

Dawes

R. M.

(2009). Rational choice in an uncertain world. The psychology of judgment and decision making (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

13.

Hastie

Penrod

S. D.

Pennington

(2013). Inside the jury. Harvard University Press.

14.

Hickling

E. J.

Blanchard

E. B.

Mundy

Galovski

T. E.

(2002). Detection of malingered MVA related posttraumatic stress disorder: An investigation of the ability to detect professional actors by experienced clinicians, psychological tests and psychophysiological assessment. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1300/J158v02n01_02

15.

Huibers

M. A.

Kunst

M. J. J.

Van Wingerden

S. G. C.

(2019). De beslispraktijk van het Schadefonds Geweldsmisdrijven: Een kwalitatieve studie naar de beoordeling van verzoeken tot tegemoetkoming [Decision practice of the Violent Offences Compensation Fund: A qualitative study into the assessment of requests for compensation]. Recht der Werkelijkheid, 40(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.5553/RdW/138064242019040001004

16.

Kahneman

(2011). Thinking, fast and slow (1st ed.). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

17.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3

18.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

19.

King

(2015). Mock jurors' decision making in compensating psychological injuries in tort law [Doctoral dissertation Chestnut Hill College]. Author.

20.

Krauss

D. A.

Sales

B. D.

(2001). The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(2), 267–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.2.267

21.

Kunst

M. J. J.

Koster

N. N.

(2017). Psychological distress following crime victimization: An exploratory study from an agency perspective. Stress & Health, 33(4), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2725414

22.

Kunst

M. J. J.

Van de Wiel

(2016). Evaluating the reliability of expert evidence in compensation procedures: Are diagnosticians influenced by the narrative fallacy when assessing the psychological injuries of trauma victims? Psychological Injury and Law, 9(3), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-016-9263-5

23.

Kunst

M. J. J.

Winkel

F. W.

(2015). PTSD symptom reporting and persistent malingering in recipients of state compensation for violent crime victimization: an exploratory study. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 26(3), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2015.1004636

24.

Kunst

M. J. J.

Schiltkamp

(2019). Sympathy for the applicant: Investigating its role in decisions about state compensation for violent crime victimization. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 27(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2019.1664278

25.

Macmillan

(2001). Violence and the life course: The consequences of victimization for personal and social development. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.1

26.

Pickel

K. L.

Gentry

R. H.

(2017). Mock jurors’ expectations regarding the psychological harm experienced by rape victims as a function of rape prototypicality. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(3), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2016.1239101

27.

Rosenfeld

Sands

S. A.

Gorp

W. G. V.

(2000). Have we forgotten the base rate problem? Methodological issues in the detection of distortion. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15(4), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/15.4.349

28.

Simon

H. A.

(1957). Models of man. Wiley.

29.

Simon

H. A.

(1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69(4), 493–513.

30.

Snijders

B. E. P.

Gommer

A. M.

Haagsma

J. A.

Panneman

M. J.

Polinder

van Beeck

E. F.

(2016). Ziektelast en kosten van letsel door geweld [Disease burden and costs of violence-related injuries]. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu.

31.

Spears

J. W.

Spohn

C. C.

(1997) The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors' charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Justice Quarterly, 14(3), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829700093451

32.

Sommers

M. S.

(2007). Defining patterns of genital injury from sexual assault: A review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8(3), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838007303194

33.

Swanston

H. Y.

Parkinson

P. N.

Shrimpton

O’toole

B. I.

Oates

R. K.

(2001). Statutory compensation for victims of child sexual assault: Examining the efficacy of a discretionary system. International Review of Victimology, 8(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/026975800100800103

34.

Taleb

N. N.

(2007). The Black Swan: The impact of the highly improbable. Random House and Penguin.

35.

Vallano

J. P.

Winter

R. J.

Charman

S. D.

(2013). Is this injury reasonable? Do psychological injury expectations affect mock jurors' legal decisions in a sexual harassment case? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(6), 834–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2012.744626

36.

Van Dijk

. (2009). Free the victim: A critique of the western conception of victimhood. International Review of Victimology, 16(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/026975800901600101

37.

Van Leiden

Scholten

Ferwerda

. (2016). Kenmerken van de doelgroep van het Schadefonds Geweldsmisdrijven en strategieën voor een beter doelgroepbereik [Characteristics of the Dutch Violent Offences Compensation Fund’s target group and strategies for a better target group reach]. Bureau Beke.

38.

Vrij

Granhag

P. A.

Porter

(2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(3), 89–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610390861

39.

Wasarhaley

N. E.

Simcic

T. A.

Golding

J. M.

(2012). Mock juror perception of sexual assault nurse examiner testimony. Violence and Victims, 27(4), 500–511. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.27.4.500

40.

Winter

R. J.

Vallano

J. P.

(2012). The impact of psychological injuries on sexual harassment determinations. Psychological Injury and Law, 5(3–4), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-012-9135-6

41.

Wispé

(1991). The psychology of sympathy. Plenum.