This study measured implicit and explicit racial bias about women and handguns and addressed important perceptions and stereotypes about gun competence and victimization that vary based on race and gender. We administered a national survey to 1,000 US adults using a new Race–Women–Handguns Implicit Association Test (IAT). Survey weighting was used to generate nationally representative estimates on the prevalence of implicit racial bias about women with handguns. The majority of participants (62.5%) associated Black women with handguns and White women with smartphones (weighted-mean IAT = 0.252; 95% CI [0.227, 0.276]) reflecting an anti-Black bias among US adults that is stereotype consistent associating Black women with handguns and White women with smartphones. The proportion that indicated Black and White women were competent with handguns was low (21.6% and 22.4%, respectively), and the proportion of US adults who indicated Black women are more likely to experience intimate partner violence (range: 19.4%−22.9%) and sexual harassment/assault (range: 11.4%−20.4%) was low compared to the prevalence of both forms of violence US among Black women that may impact the decision to possess a handgun. These findings suggest there is an anti-Black implicit bias about women with handguns (associating Black women with handguns) among US adults and support the need for further research measuring racism in systems and structures that intersect with gun possession.
Al’UqdahS. N.MaxwellC.HillN. (2016). Intimate partner violence in the african american community: Risk, theory, and interventions. Journal of Family Violence, 31(7), 877–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10896-016-9819-X
2.
AmodioD. M.RatnerK. (2011). A memory systems model of implicit social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 143–148.
BertrandM.MullainathanS. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.
5.
BlantonH.JaccardJ.KlickJ.MellersB.MitchellG.TetlockP. E. (2009). Strong claims and weak evidence: Reassessing the predictive validity of the IAT. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014665
6.
BlockR.CrabtreeC.HolbeinJ. B.MonsonJ. Q. (2021). Are Americans less likely to reply to emails from Black people relative to White people?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(52), e2110347118. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.2110347118
7.
BowlegL.Río-GonzálezA. M. delMbabaM.BooneC. A.HoltS. L. (2020). Negative police encounters and police avoidance as pathways to depressive symptoms among US Black men, 2015–2016. American Journal of Public Health, 110, S160–S166. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305460
8.
BrowderL. (2006). Her best shot: Women and guns in America. University of North Carolina Press.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, & National Center for Health Statistics. (2021). Underlying cause of death 1999-2020 on CDC WONDER online database, released in 2021 [Data are from the multiple cause of death files, 1999–2020, as compiled from data provided by the 57 vital statistics jurisdictions through the vital statistics cooperation]. Author. http://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10.html
11.
ChoH. (2012). Racial differences in the prevalence of intimate partner violence against women and associated factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(2), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511416469
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
13.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as university dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 61–149.
EckhardtC. I.SamperR.SuhrL.Holtzworth-MunroeA. (2012). Implicit attitudes toward violence among male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(3), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511421677
16.
EnamoradoT.ImaiK. (2019). Validating self-reported turnout by linking public opinion surveys with administrative records. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(4), 723–748. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz051
17.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902.
18.
GawronskiB. (2019). Six lessons for a cogent science of implicit bias and its criticism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(4), 574–595.
19.
GawronskiB.MorrisonM.PhillsC. E.GaldiS. (2017). Temporal stability of implicit and explicit measures: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(3), 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216684131
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R.BarghJ.BhaskarR.BlairI.BernsteinR.BrewerM.CrowderR.DoobL.FazioR.FiedlerK.Fra-bleD.GilbertD.GlaserJ.HackmanR.HardinC.HughesR.JostJ.JacobyL.. . . WilsonT. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes implicit social cognition: Introduction and overview. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.
22.
GreenwaldA. G.BrendlM.CaiH.CvencekD.DovidioJ. F.FrieseM.HahnA.HehmanE.HofmannW.HughesS.HusseyI.JordanC.KirbyT. A.LaiC. K.LangJ. W. B.LindgrenK. P.MaisonD.OstafinB. D.RaeJ. R.. . . WiersR. W. (2022). Best research practices for using the implicit association test. Behavior Research Methods, 54, 1161–1180. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01624-3
GreenwaldA. G.PoehlmanT. A.UhlmannE. L.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test I: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015575.supp
25.
GreenwaldA. G.PoehlmanT. A.UhlmannE. L.BanajiM. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0015575
26.
HallW. J.ChapmanM. V.LeeK. M.MerinoY. M.ThomasT. W.PayneB. K.EngE.DayS. H.Coyne-BeasleyT. (2015). Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 105, e60–e76. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302903
27.
HamptonR. L.LatailladeJ. J.DaceyA.MarghiJ. R. (2008). Evaluating domestic violence interventions for black women. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 16(3), 330–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770801925759
28.
HayesM.FortunatoD.HibbingM. V. (2021). Race-gender bias in white Americans’ preferences for gun availability. Journal of Public Policy, 41(4), 818–834. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X20000288
29.
HeeringaS. G.WestB. T.BerglundP. A. (2010). Applied survey data analysis (1st ed.). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
30.
HoekstraM.SloanC. W. (2020). Does race matter for police use of force? Evidence from 911 calls (Working Paper No. 26774). National Bureau of Economic Research.
JohnsonD. J.ChopikW. J. (2019). Geographic variation in the Black-violence stereotype. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(3), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617753522
33.
Kravitz-WirtzN.BrunsA.AubelA. J.ZhangX.BuggsS. A.Kravitz-WirtzN.AubelA. J.BuggsS. A.BrunsA.ZhangX. (2022). Inequities in community exposure to deadly gun violence by race/ethnicity, poverty, and neighborhood disadvantage among youth in large US cities. Journal of Urban Health, 99, 610–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11524-022-00656-0
34.
MaD. S.CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavioral Research, 47, 1122–1135.
35.
MeissnerF.GrigutschL. A.KoranyiN.MüllerF.RothermundK. (2019). Predicting behavior with implicit measures: Disillusioning findings, reasonable explanations, and sophisticated solutions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2483. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2019.02483
36.
Mon-LopezD.Tejero-GonzalezC. M.de la RubiaA.CalvoJ. L. (2020). Pistol and rifle performance: Gender and relative age effect analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041365
37.
Moss-RacusinC. A.DovidioJ. F.BrescollV. L.GrahamM. J.HandelsmanJ. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1211286109
38.
NosekB. A.SmythF. L.HansenJ. J.DevosT.LindnerN. M.RanganathK. A.SmithC. T.OlsonK. R.ChughD.GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 36–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701489053
39.
NunesK.HermannC.RatcliffeK. (2013). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward rape are associated with sexual aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(13), 2657–2675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513487995
40.
OhD. W.BuckE. A.TodorovA. (2019). Revealing hidden gender biases in competence impressions of faces. Psychological Science, 30(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618813092
41.
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J. (2010). Divergent social worlds: Neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. Russell Sage Foundation.
SadlerM.DevosT. (2020). Ethnic diversity matters: Putting implicit associations between weapons and ethnicity in context. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 23(2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218796933
47.
Sanchez-PradaA.Delgado-AlvarezC.Bosch-FiolE.Ferrer-PerezV. A. (2021). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women: An exploratory study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9–10), 4256–4276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518789903
48.
ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.GonsalkoraleK.HugenbergK.AllenT. J.GroomC. J. (2008). The self-regulation of automatic associations and behavioral impulses. Psychological Review, 115, 314–335.
49.
SmithE.DeCosterJ. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 108–131.
50.
SomoA.SadlerM.DevosT. (2020). Implicit black-weapon associations weakened over time in increasingly multiethnic metropolitan areas. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 21, 520–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12228
TajimaE. A. (2021). First, do no harm: From diversity and inclusion to equity and anti-racism in interpersonal violence research and scholarship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11–12), 4953–4987. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211012999
53.
WallinM. A.HollidayC. N.ZeoliA. M. (2022). The association of federal and state-level Firearm restriction policies with intimate partner homicide: A re-analysis by race of the victim. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(17–18), NP16509–NP16533. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211021988
54.
WilliamsD. R.MohammedS. A.WilliamsD. R.MohammedS. A. (2009). Discrimination and racial disparities in health: Evidence and needed research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 32, 20–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-008-9185-0
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
