This study evaluated the effectiveness of a 6-session (12-hour) empowerment self-defense classroom delivered curriculum (i.e., IMpower) among American Indian girls. Girls (N = 74) in one middle school and two high schools on an Indian Reservation in the Great Plains region of the United States received the intervention and completed a pre-test and a post-test six months following the final program session. The surveys administered assessed hypothesized intermediary (i.e., efficacy to resist a sexual assault, self-defense knowledge), primary (i.e., sexual violence victimization), and secondary (i.e., physical dating violence, sexual harassment) outcomes. Native American girls (N = 181) in five middle schools and three high schools in a nearby city where there was no sexual assault prevention occurring completed surveys assessing sexual violence, physical dating violence, and sexual harassment victimization approximately six months apart, thus serving as a comparison to girls in the treatment condition on primary and secondary outcomes. Girls exposed to the IMpower program reported significant increases over time in efficacy to resist a sexual assault and knowledge of effective resistance strategies. Furthermore, propensity score analyses suggested that girls who received the IMpower program reported significantly fewer types of sexual assault and sexual harassment at follow-up compared to girls in the control condition. However, no effect was found for physical dating violence. These data suggest that empowerment self-defense is a promising approach in preventing sexual assault and sexual harassment among American Indian girls.
BaiocchiM., OmondiB., LangatN., BoothroydD. B., SinclairJ., PaviaL., MulingeM., GithuaO., GoldenN. H., & SarnquistC. (2017). A behavior-based intervention that prevents sexual assault: The results of a matched-pairs, cluster-randomized study in Nairobi, Kenya. Prevention Science, 18(7), 818–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0701-0
3.
BanyardV. L. (2015). Toward the next generation of bystander prevention of sexual and relationship violence: Action coils to engage communities (1st ed.). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23170-9
CokerA. L., BushH. M., BrancatoC. J., ClearE. R., & RecktenwaldE. A. (2019). Bystander program effectiveness to reduce violence acceptance: RCT in high schools. Journal of Family Violence, 34(3), 153–164.
7.
CokerA. L., BushH. M., Cook-CraigP. G., DeGueS. A., ClearE. R., BrancatoC. J., FisherB. S., & RecktenwaldE. A. (2017). RCT testing bystander effectiveness to reduce violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(5), 566–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.020
8.
CokerA. L., Cook-CraigP. G., WilliamsC. M., FisherB. S., ClearE. R., GarciaL. S., & HeggeL. M. (2011). Evaluation of Green Dot: An active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence Against Women, 17(6), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211410264
9.
Cook-CraigP. G., CokerA. L., ClearE. R., GarciaL. S., BushH. M., BrancatoC. J., WilliamsC. M., & FisherB. S. (2014). Challenge and opportunity in evaluating a diffusion-based active bystanding prevention program green dot in high schools. Violence Against Women, 20(10), 1179–1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214551288
10.
DeckerM. R., WoodS. N., NdindaE., YenokyanG., SinclairJ., MaksudN., RossB., OmondiB., & NdiranguM. (2018). Sexual violence among adolescent girls and young women in Malawi: A cluster-randomized controlled implementation trial of empowerment self-defense training. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6220-0
11.
DeGueS., ValleL. A., HoltM. K., MassettiG. M., MatjaskoJ. L., & TharpA. T. (2014). A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(4), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.004
EdwardsK. M., BanyardV. L., ChargeL. L., KollarL. M. M., & FortsonB. (2021). Experiences and correlates of violence Among American Indian and Alaska Native youth: a brief report. Journal of interpersonal violence, 36(23–24), 11808–11821. DOI: 10.1177/0886260520983273.
14.
EdwardsK. M., BanyardV. L., SessaregoS. N., WatermanE. A., MitchellK. J., & ChangH. (2019). Evaluation of a bystander-focused interpersonal violence prevention program with high school students. Prevention Science, 20, 488–498.
15.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. The Guilford Press.
16.
FosheeV. A., BaumanK. E., ArriagaX. B., HelmsR. W., KochG. G., & LinderG. F. (1998). An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 88(1), 45–50.
17.
FosheeV. A., BaumanK. E., EnnettS. T., LinderG. F., BenefieldT. S., & SuchindranC. (2004). Assessing the long-term effects of the Safe Dates program and a booster in preventing and reducing adolescent dating violence victimization and perpetration. American Journal of Public Health, 94(4), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.4.619
18.
FosheeV. A., BaumanK. E., GreeneW. F., KochG. G., LinderG. F., & MacDougallJ. E. (2000). The Safe Dates program: 1-year follow-up results. American Journal of Public Health, 90(10), 1619–1622.
19.
GidyczC. A., LynnS. J., RichC. L., MarioniN. L., LohC., BlackwellL. M., StaffordJ., FiteR., & PashdagJ. (2001). The evaluation of a sexual assault risk reduction program: A multisite investigation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(6), 1073–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.6.1073
20.
GidyczC. A., McNamaraJ. R., & EdwardsK. M. (2006). Women’s risk perception and sexual victimization: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(5), 441–456.
21.
GidyczC. A., OrchowskiL. M., & BerkowitzA. (2011). An evaluation of a social norms and bystander intervention to prevent sexual aggression among college men. Violence Against Women, 17, 720–742.
22.
GidyczC. A., OrchowskiL. M., ProbstD. R., EdwardsK. M., MurphyM., & TansillE. (2015). Concurrent administration of sexual assault prevention and risk reduction programming: Outcomes for women. Violence Against Women, 21(6), 780–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215576579
23.
GidyczC. A., RichC. L., OrchowskiL. M., KingC. R., & MillerA. K. (2006). The evaluation of a sexual assault self-defense and risk-reduction program for college women: A prospective study. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 173–186. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00280.x
24.
GidyczC. A., WynsbergheA. van., & EdwardsK. M. (2008). Prediction of women’s utilization of resistance strategies in a sexual assault situation: A prospective study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(5), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507313531
25.
HambyS. L., & GrychJ. (2013). The web of violence: Exploring connections among different forms of interpersonal violence and abuse. Springer Science+Business Media.
26.
HarderV. S., StuartE. A., & AnthonyJ. C. (2010). Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 234.
27.
HiranoK., & ImbensG. W. (2001). Estimation of causal effects using propensity score weighting: An application to data on right heart catheterization. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2(3–4), 259–278.
28.
LanzaS. T., MooreJ. E., & ButeraN. M. (2013). Drawing causal inferences using propensity scores: A practical guide for community psychologists. Americanjournal of community psychology, 52(3-4), 380–392.
MillerE., TancrediD. J., McCauleyH. L., DeckerM. R., VirataM. C. D., AndersonH. A., StetkevichN., BrownE. W., MoideenF., & SilvermanJ. G. (2012). “Coaching Boys into Men:” A cluster-randomized controlled trial of a dating violence prevention program. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(5), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.01.018
31.
MouilsoE. R., CalhounK. S., & GidyczC. A. (2011). Effects of participation in a sexual assault risk reduction program on psychological distress following revictimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(4), 769–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510365862
32.
NiolonP. H., Vivolo-KantorA. M., TracyA. J., LatzmanN. E., LittleT. D., DeGueS., LangK. M., EstefanL. F., GhazarianS. R., & McIntoshW. L. K. (2019). An RCT of dating matters: Effects on teen dating violence and relationship behaviors. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(1), 13–23.
33.
OrchowskiL. M., EdwardsK. M., HollanderJ. A., BanyardV. L., SennC. Y., & GidyczC. A. (2018). Integrating sexual assault resistance, bystander, and men’s social norms strategies to prevent sexual violence on college campuses: A call to action. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(4), 811–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018789153
34.
RobinR. W., ChesterB., & RasumssenJ. (1998). Intimate violence in a Southwestern American Indian tribal community. Cultural Diversity and Mental Health, 4(4), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.4.4.335
35.
RosayA. B. (2016). Violence against American Indian and Alaska Native women and men: 2010 findings from the National intimate partner and sexual violence survey. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/249736.pdf
36.
RosenbaumP. R., & RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.
37.
RutmanS., ParkA., CastorM., TaualiiM., & ForqueraR. (2008). Urban American Indian and Alaska Native youth: Youth Risk Behavior Survey 1997–2003. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 12(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0351-3
SennC. Y., EliasziwM., BarataP. C., ThurstonW. E., Newby-ClarkI. R., RadtkeH. L., & HobdenK. L. (2015). Efficacy of a sexual assault resistance program for university women. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(24), 2326–2335. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1411131
40.
SennC. Y., SaundersK., & GeeS. (2008). Walking the tightrope: Providing sexual assault resistance education for University women without victim blame. In S. Arcand & D. Damant (Eds.),Violences faites aux femmes in the collection: Problemes sociaux et interventions sociales (pp. 353–372). University of Quebec Press.
41.
SessaregoS. N., SillerL., & EdwardsK. M. (2019). Patterns of violence victimization and perpetration among adolescents using latent class analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519862272
42.
SillerL., EdwardsK. M., Leader ChargeL., BordeauxS., Leader ChargeD., & HerringtonR. (under review). “I learned that I am worth defending”: A qualitative evaluation of the IMpower Program on an Indian reservation.
43.
StuartE. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science: A Review Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 25(1), 1.
44.
TurchikJ. A., ProbstD. R., ChauM., NigoffA., & GidyczC. A. (2007). Factors predicting the type of tactics used to resist sexual assault: A prospective study of college women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(4), 605–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.605
45.
WarneD., DulackiK., SpurlockM., MeathT., DavisM. M., WrightB., & McConnellK. J. (2017). Adverse childhood experiences (ace) among American Indians in South Dakota and associations with mental health conditions, alcohol use, and smoking. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 28(4), 1559–1577. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2017.0133
46.
WilkinsN., TsaoB., HertzM., DavisR., & KlevensJ. (2014). Connecting the dots: An overview of the links among multiple forms of violence. C. f. D. C. a. P. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/connecting_the_dots-a.pdf
