Longitudinal Link Between Bullying Victimization and Bullying Perpetration: A Multilevel Moderation Analysis of Perceived School Climate

Abstract

Existing theories and empirical studies have evidenced the association between bullying victimization and bullying perpetration. However, it is still unclear what factors mitigate or alter this risk linkage between bullying victimization and bullying perpetration to reduce bullying incidents. Guided by the social-ecological theory, this study used a longitudinal design to examine the moderating role of school climate in the association between bullying victimization and bullying perpetration at both the within-person and between-person levels among Chinese adolescents across a 1-year period. Participants included 2,997 Chinese adolescents (M_age = 14.9, 49.7% male) from 5 secondary schools. Results suggested that students who experienced high levels of bullying victimization were also involved in high levels of bullying perpetration over time (i.e., the positive within-person effect of bullying victimization on bullying perpetration). Results also showed that the between-person level of perceived school climate interacted with the within-person level of bullying victimization to predict the within-person level of bullying perpetration (i.e., cross-level effects). More specifically, the magnitude of the positive association between bullying victimization and bullying perpetration at the within-person level was mitigated among students with higher perceptions of school climate at the between-person level. Findings of the study highlighted the causal effect of bullying victimization on bullying perpetration and the buffering role of perceived school climate in the longitudinal association between bullying victimization and perpetration, which was consistent with the risk-buffering model but not the healthy context paradox hypothesis. Furthermore, the findings provided implications for bullying prevention and intervention services by using multitiered systems of support in bullying prevention efforts and highlights the need for promoting positive school climate.

Keywords

perceived school climate bullying victimization bullying perpetration longitudinal association multilevel moderation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew

(1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology , 30(1), 47–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x

Aguinis

Beaty

J. C.

Boik

R. J.

Pierce

C. A.

(2005). Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology , 90(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.94

Arseneault

Bowes

Shakoor

(2010). Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: ‘Much ado about nothing’? Psychological Medicine , 40(5), 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291709991383Pub

Bandura

(1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of Communication , 28(3), 12–29. https://doi.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x

Bear

Yang

Harris

Mantz

Hearn

Boyer

(2016). Technical manual for 2016 Delaware School Survey: Scales of school climate; bullying victimization; student engagement; positive, punitive, and social emotional learning techniques; and the Delaware social and emotional competencies scale . Center for Disabilities Studies.

Birkett

Espelage

D. L.

Koenig

(2009). LGB and questioning students in schools: The moderating effects of homophobic bullying and school climate on negative outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence , 38(7), 989–1000. https://doi.10.1007/s10964-008-9389-1

Champoux

J. E.

Peters

W. S.

(1987). Form, effect size and power in moderated regression analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology , 60(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1987.tb00257.x

Chen

Zhang

Deater-Deckard

(2020). A “defender protective effect” in multiple-role combinations of bullying among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 35(7–8), 1587–1609. https://doi.10.1177/0886260517698278

Cho

(2018). The impact of low self-control and delinquent peer associations on bullying perpetration and victimization among South Korean adolescents: Time-concurrent, time-lagged, and latent growth curve modeling. Journal of School Violence, 17 (4), 500–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2018.1453821

10.

Cho

(2019). Self-control, risky lifestyles, and bullying victimization among Korean youth: Estimating a second-order latent growth model. Journal of Child and Family Studies , 28(8), 2131–2144. https://doi.10.1007/s10826-019-01432-6

11.

Cho

Lee

J. M.

(2018). Explaining physical, verbal, and social bullying among bullies, victims of bullying, and bully-victims: Assessing the integrated approach between social control and lifestyles-routine activities theories. Children and Youth Services Review, 91 , 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.06.018

12.

Chu

X. W.

Fan

C. Y.

Liu

Q. Q.

Zhou

Z. K.

(2018). Stability and change of bullying roles in the traditional and virtual contexts: a three-wave longitudinal study in Chinese early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence , 47(11), 2384–2400. https://doi.10.1007/s10964-018-0908-4

13.

Cohen

McCabe

Michelli

N. M.

Pickeral

(2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record , 111(1), 180–213. http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=15220

14.

Cornell

Shukla

Konold

(2015). Peer victimization and authoritative school climate: A multilevel approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107 (4), 1186–1201. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000038

15.

Doumas

D. M.

Midgett

Johnston

A. D.

(2017). Substance use and bullying victimization among middle and high school students: Is positive school climate a protective factor?. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling , 38(1), 2–15https://doi.org/10.1002/jaoc.12025

16.

Eliot

Cornell

Gregory

Fan

(2010). Supportive school climate and student willingness to seek help for bullying and threats of violence. Journal of School Psychology , 48(6), 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.07.001

17.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A. G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41 , 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

18.

Fergus

Zimmerman

M. A.

(2005). Adolescent resilience: A framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annual Review of Public Health, 26 , 399–419. https://doi.10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144357

19.

Gaias

L. M.

Lindstrom Johnson

White

R. M.

Pettigrew

Dumka

(2019). Positive school climate as a moderator of violence exposure for Colombian adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology , 63(1–2), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12300

20.

Hoffman

Stawski

R. S.

(2009). Persons as contexts: Evaluating between-person and within-person effects in longitudinal analysis. Research in Human Development , 6(2–3), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600902911189

21.

Hong

J. S.

Espelage

D. L.

(2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17 (4), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.003

22.

Huitsing

Lodder

G. M. A.

Oldenburg

Schacter

H. L.

Salmivalli

Juvonen

Veenstra

(2019). The healthy context paradox: Victims’ adjustment during an anti-bullying intervention. Journal of Child and Family Studies , 28, 2499–2509. https://doi.10.1007/s10826-018-1194-1

23.

Konishi

Miyazaki

Hymel

Waterhouse

(2017). Investigating associations between school climate and bullying in secondary schools: Multilevel contextual effects modeling. School Psychology International , 38(3), 240–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034316688730

24.

Lindell

M. K.

Whitney

D. J.

(2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology , 86(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114

25.

Modecki

K. L.

Minchin

Harbaugh

A. G.

Guerra

N. G.

Runions

K. C.

(2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health , 55(5), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007

26.

Nie

Yang

Teng

Furlong

M. J.

Pan

Guo

Zhang

(2020). Longitudinal association between school climate and depressive symptoms: The mediating role of psychological suzhi. School Psychology, 35 (4), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000374

27.

Olivier

Azarnia

Morin

A. J.

Houle

S. A.

Dubé

Tracey

Maïano

(2020). The moderating role of teacher-student relationships on the association between peer victimization and depression in students with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 98, 103572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103572

28.

Olweus

(1994). Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry , 35(7), 1171–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01229.x

29.

Pabian

Vandebosch

(2016). An investigation of short-term longitudinal associations between social anxiety and victimization and perpetration of traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence , 45(2), 328–339. https://doi.10.1007/s10964-015-0259-3

30.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). SAGE Publications.

31.

Swearer

S. M.

Espelage

D. L.

(2011). Expanding the social-ecological framework of bullying among youth. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in North American Schools (pp. 3–10). Routledge.

32.

Teng

Bear

G. G.

Yang

Nie

Guo

(2020). Moral disengagement and bullying perpetration: A longitudinal study of the moderating effect of school climate. School Psychology, 35 (1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000348

33.

Walters

G. D.

(2020). School-age bullying victimization and perpetration: A meta-analysis of prospective studies and research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse . https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020906513

34.

Walters

G. D.

Espelage

D. L.

(2018). From victim to victimizer: Hostility, anger, and depression as mediators of the bullying victimization-bullying perpetration association. Journal of School Psychology , 68, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.12.003

35.

Walters

G. D.

Espelage

D. L.

(2020). Peer victimization, antisocial cognition, and delinquency in early adolescent schoolchildren: A test of the person-situation interface. Journal of School Violence, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2020.1760107

36.

Wang

M. T.

Degol

J. L.

(2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28 (2), 315–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1

37.

Yang

Bear

G. G.

Chen

F. F.

Zhang

Blank

J. C.

Huang

(2013). Students’ perceptions of school climate in the U.S. and China. School Psychology Quarterly, 28 (1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000002

38.

Yang

Sharkey

J. D.

Reed

L. A.

Chen

Dowdy

(2018). Bullying victimization and student engagement in elementary, middle, and high schools: Moderating role of school climate. School Psychology Quarterly , 33(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000250

39.

Zhang

W. X.

J. F.

Jones

(1999). Modification of the Chinese version Olweus bullying/victimization questionnaire. Psychological Development and Education, 15 (2), 18–22. https://doi.10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.1999.02.002

40.

Zimmerman

M. A.

Ramirez-Valles

Maton

K. I.

(1999). Resilience among urban African American male adolescents: A study of the protective effects of sociopolitical control on their mental health. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27 (6), 733–751. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022205008237

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.49 MB