Religious beliefs play a significant role in the lives of victims of domestic violence. Victims find strength in their faith and would rather endure the violence at all costs to keep a family or a marriage together, than to compromise their faith by leaving. This 10 –year study explored the climate of support for victims of domestic violence among Christian clergy and church members between 2005 and 2015. Using a convenience sample, surveys were sent out to congregations in the Upper Midwest in 2005 and 2015. The survey included demographics; two items measuring perception of domestic violence in the congregation and community; six Likert Scale items regarding agreement with statements concerning leaving an abusive marriage; four “Yes–No” items regarding the impact of faith in leaving, support of the congregation, community resources, and clergy as counselors. The clergy’s survey had the same questions plus open-ended questions about their skills in counseling victims, their congregation’s support for victims, community resources, and beliefs that could impact a victim’s choice in leaving. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, simple frequencies, and bivariate correlations. Narrative data were analyzed using content analysis. The results of this study indicated that change is slow. Members want their clergy to become more educated in counseling and in speaking about domestic violence from the pulpit. Clergy felt comfortable in making referrals for professional counseling, while the majority of members would prefer counseling with their pastor if they were in a violent relationship. Both clergy and members want to create a safe and supportive environment for victims/survivors of violent relationships. Findings from this study exemplify the need for pastors to remove the silence about domestic violence in their congregations and address the misunderstood social religious beliefs that may bind a victim to the violence.
BerryD. B. (2000). The domestic violence sourcebook: [everything you need to know] (3rd ed.). Lowell House.
4.
BeyerleinK., & HippJ. (2006). From pews to participation: The effect of congregation activity and context on bridging civic engagement. Social Problems, 53(1), 97–117.
5.
BussertJ. M. K. (1986). Battered women: From a theology of suffering to an ethic of empowerment. Division for Mission in North America, Lutheran Church in America.
6.
CampbellJ. C., & SoekenK. L. (1999). Forced sex and intimate partner violence: Effects on women’s risk and women’s health. Violence Against Women, 5(9), 1017–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801299005009003
7.
CaresA., & CusickG. (2012). Risks and opportunities of faith and culture: The case of abused Jewish women. Journal of Family Violence, 27(5), 427–435.
8.
CaterÅ. (2014). Children’s description of participation process in interventions for children exposed to intimate partner violence. Child, Adolescent Social Work Journal, 31, 455–473.
CessarioR. (2016). Charity, mortal sin and parish life. Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture, 19(4), 86–100.
12.
CloughA., DraughonJ. E., Njie-CarrV., RollinsC., & GlassN. (2014). “Having housing made everything else possible”: Affordable, safe and stable housing for women survivors of violence. Qualitative Social Work, 13(5), 671–688.
13.
FinstuenA. (2011). [Review of the book Evangelical vs. Liberal: The clash of Christian cultures in the Pacific Northwest, by J. Wellman]. Lutheran Quarterly, 25(2), 220–225.
14.
FlinckA., PaavilainenE., & Åstedt-KurkiP. (2005). Survival of intimate partner violence as experienced by women. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(3), 383–393.
15.
HambyS., FinkelhorD., TurnerH., & OrmrodR. (2010). The overlap of witnessing partner violence with child maltreatment and other victimizations in a nationally representative survey of youth. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34(10), 734–741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.03.001
Houston-KolnikJ., & ToddN. (2016). Examining the presence of congregational programs focused on violence against women. American Journal of Community Psychology, 57, 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12055
20.
JakobssonA., von BorgstedeC., KrantzG., & SpakF. (2013). Possibilities and hindrances for prevention of intimate partner violence: Perceptions among professionals and decision makers in a Swedish medium-sized town. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20(3), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-012-9238-1.
McMullinS., Nason-ClarkN., Fisher-TownsendB., & HoltmannC. (2015). When violence hits the religious home: Raising awareness about domestic violence in seminaries and amongst religious leaders. Pastoral Care and Counseling, 69(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1542305015586776
MurrayS. (2008). Why doesn’t she just leave?: Belonging, disruption and domestic violence. Women’s Studies International Forum, 31(1), 65–72.
30.
NashS. (2006). The changing of gods: Abused Christian wives and their hermeneutic revision of gender, power, and spousal conduct. Qualitative Sociology, 29, 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9018-9
31.
NashS., & HesterbergL. (2009). Biblical framings to spousal violence in the narratives of abused Christian women. Violence Against Women, 15(3), 340–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208330437
32.
NashS., FaulknerC., & AbellR. (2013). Abused conservative Christian wives: Treatment considerations for practitioners. Counseling and Values, 58(2), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-007X.2013.00034.x
33.
Nason-ClarkN. (1995). Conservative Protestants and violence against women: Exploring the rhetoric and the response. Religion and the Social Order, 5, 123–124.
34.
Nason-ClarkN. (2004). When terror strikes at home: The interface between religion and domestic violence. Journal of Scientific Study of Religion, 43(3), 303–310.
35.
Nason-ClarkN. (2009). Christianity and the experience of domestic violence: What does faith have to do with it?Social Work and Christianity, 36(4), 303–310.
NordtvedtM., & ChapmanL. (2011). Health promotion in faith-based institutions and communities. American Journal of Health Promotion, 25(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.25.4.tahp
39.
O’LearyK. D. (2015). Psychological abuse: A variable deserving critical attention in domestic violence. In Roland D. Maiuro (Ed.),Perspectives on verbal and psychological abuse (pp. 23–42). Springer Publishing.
40.
PargamentK., & MatonK. (2000). Religion in American life: A community psychology perspective. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.),Handbook of community psychology (pp. 495–522). Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers.
PutnamR., & CampbellD. (2010). American grace: How religion divides and unites us. Simon & Schuster.
44.
RotundaR., WilliamsonG., & PenfoldM. (2004). Clergy response to domestic violence: A preliminary survey of clergy members, victims, and batterers. Pastoral Psychology, 52(4), 353–365.
45.
ShankB. W. (2007). The call to justice: Social work in catholic higher education. Social Work & Christianity, 34(1), 2–17.
46.
SkoppN., MankeB., McDonaldR., & JourilesE. (2005). Siblings in domestically violent families: Experiences of interparent conflict and adjustment problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 324–333.
UsdinS., ScheepersE., GoldsteinS., & JaphetG. (2005). Achieving social change on gender-based violence: A report on the impact evaluation of Soul City’s fourth series. Social Science & Medicine, 61(11), 2434–2445.
49.
Van HightowerN., & GortonJ. (2002). A case study of community-based responses to rural woman battering. Violence Against Women, 8(7), 845–872.
50.
WalkerL. (1999). Psychology and domestic violence around the world. American Psychologist, 54(1), 21–29.
51.
WerberL., MendelP., & PitkinK. (2014). Social entrepreneurship in religious congregations’ efforts to address health needs. American Journal of Health Promotion, 28(4), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.110516-QUAL-200·
52.
ZustB. (2006). Meaning of INSIGHT participation among women who have experienced intimate partner violence. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 27(7), 775–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840600781170
