This study experimentally examines the effects of perpetrator sex (male or female), relationship context (heterosexual or homosexual), and the type of media framing (episodic or thematic) on endorsement for public health perspectives about intimate partner violence (IPV) and punishment preferences for IPV perpetrators. Participants (N = 750) were randomly assigned to a condition, exposed to a composite news story, and then completed a survey. Manipulation check responses demonstrated a pattern suggesting that participants had difficulty attending to details of IPV in stories where the perpetrator was a woman, or where the violence occurred in a homosexual relationship. Results revealed significant interaction effects for the endorsement of public health perspectives and for perpetrator punishment preferences. Results for the endorsement of public health perspectives showed that thematic framing caused stronger support only when the perpetrator was a heterosexual man. Results for perpetrator punishment preferences revealed a pattern where participants preferred stronger punishments for heterosexual male perpetrators over any other group. Participants did not distinguish in their punishment preferences for male or female homosexual perpetrators, but these were still stronger than their punishment preferences for heterosexual female perpetrators. Theoretical implications are presented with attention to extending research about media portrayals of IPV, and discussion is offered concerning practical considerations for public health support services that address IPV.
ArdK. L.MakadonH. J. (2011). Addressing intimate partner violence in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26(8), 930–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1697-6.
3.
BakerN. L.BuickJ. D.KimS. R.MonizS.NavaK. L. (2013). Lessons from examining same-sex intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 69(3–4), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0218-3.
4.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.PlanteE. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20159.
5.
BullockC.CubertJ. (2002). Coverage of domestic violence fatalities by newspapers in Washington State. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(2), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260502017005001.
6.
CaltonJ. M.CattaneoL. B.GebhardK. T. (2015). Barriers to help seeking for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer survivors of intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(5), 585–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015585318.
7.
CarlyleK. E. (2007). Media representations of intimate partner violence: Exploring the mediational roles of attributions and emotions (Doctoral dissertation). (osu1186342473).
8.
CarlyleK. E.OrrC.SavageM. W.BabinE. A. (2014). News coverage of intimate partner violence: Impact on prosocial responses. Media Psychology, 17(4), 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.931812.
9.
CarlyleK. E.ScarduzioJ. A.SlaterM. D. (2014). Media portrayals of female perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(13), 2394–2417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513520231.
10.
CarlyleK. E.SlaterM. D.ChakroffJ. L. (2008). Newspaper coverage of intimate partner violence: Skewing representations of risk. Journal of Communication, 58(1), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00379.x.
ChoH. (2012). Examining gender differences in the nature and context of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(13), 2665–2684. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626051243639.
13.
ChristieN. (1986). The ideal victim. In FattahE. (Ed.), From crime policy to victim policy: Reorienting the justice system (pp. 17–30). MacMillan Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08305-3_2.
14.
ColemanR.ThorsonE. (2002). The effects of news stories that put crime and violence into context: Testing the public health model of reporting. Journal of Health Communication, 7(5), 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730290001783.
15.
DankM.LachmanP.ZweigJ. M.YahnerJ. (2014). Dating violence experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(5), 846–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9975-8.
16.
DeKeseredyW. S.DragiewiczM. (2007). Understanding the complexities of feminist perspectives on woman abuse. Violence Against Women, 13(8), 874–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207304806.
17.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D. (1998). Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: A critique of the conflict Tactics scale. http://vawnet.org/Assoc_Files_VAWnet/AR_ctscrit.pdf.
18.
DouglasE. M.HinesD. A. (2011). The helpseeking experiences of men who sustain intimate partner violence: An overlooked population and implications for practice. Journal of Family Violence, 26(6), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9382-4.
19.
DouglasE. M.HinesD. A.McCarthyS. C. (2012). Men who sustain female-to-male partner violence: Factors associated with where they seek help and how they rate those resources. Violence and Victims, 27(6), 871–894. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.27.6.871.
20.
DuttonD. G. (2006). Rethinking domestic violence. University of British Columbia Press.
21.
EdwardsK. M.SylaskaK. M. (2013). The perpetration of intimate partner violence among LGBTQ college youth: The role of minority stress. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(11), 1721–1731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9880-6.
GehringK. S., & VaskeJ. C. (2017). Out in the open: The consequences of intimate partner violence for victims in same-sex and opposite-sex relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(23), 3669-3692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515600877.
26.
GrossK. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00622.x.
27.
HambyS. (2009). The gender debate about intimate partner violence: Solutions and dead ends. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 1(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015066.
HarrisK. L.PalazzoloK. E.SavageM. W. (2012). ‘I’m not sexist, but…’: How ideological dilemmas reinforce sexism in talk about intimate partner violence. Discourse & Society, 23(6), 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512455382.
30.
HawkinsK. W.LinvillD. L. (2010). Public health framing of news regarding childhood obesity in the United States. Journal of Health Communication, 25(8), 709–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2010.521913.
31.
JohnsonM. P. (2011). Gender and types of intimate partner violence: A response to an antifeminist literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(4), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.006.
32.
JohnsonH.McConnellA. (2014). Agency and choice: Gendered constructions of victim worthiness in domestic violence court. In KittyJ. M. (Ed.), Within the confines: Women and the law in Canada (pp. 185–223). Canadian Scholar’s Press.
33.
KellyJ.PaytonE. (2019). A content analysis of local media framing of intimate partner violence. Violence and Gender, 6(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2018.0019.
34.
KimmelM. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1332–1363. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780102237407.
35.
KuypersJ. A. (2010). Framing analysis from a rhetorical perspective. In D’AngeloP.KuypersJ. A. (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis (pp. 302–327). Routledge.
36.
Langenderfer-MagruderL.WhitfieldD. L.WallsN. E.KattariS. K.RamosD. (2016). Experiences of intimate partner violence and subsequent police reporting among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer adults in Colorado: Comparing rates of cisgender and transgender victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(5), 855–871. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514556767.
37.
LosekeD. (1983). Thinking about social problems (2nd ed.). Walter de Gruyter Inc.
38.
McHughM. C.LivingstonN. A.FordA. (2005). A postmodern approach to women’s use of violence: Developing multiple and complex conceptualizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(3), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00226.x.
39.
MessingerA. M. (2011). Invisible victims: Same-sex IPV in the national violence against women survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(11), 2228–2243. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605.
40.
MeyerE., & PostL. (2013). An analysis of media reporting on intimate partner violence and homicide. Media Report to Women, 41(3), 12-21.
41.
MinakerJ. C. (2001). Evaluating criminal justice responses to intimate abuse through the lens of women’s needs. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 13, 74-106.
42.
MorganJ.PolitoffV. (2012). Victorian print media coverage of violence against women: Summary report. University of Melbourne & Victorian Health Promotion Foundation. (VicHealth).
43.
National Coalition Against Domestic Violence Statistics (NCADV). (2019). Domestic violence national statistics. www.ncadv.org.
PalazzoloK. E.RobertoA. J. (2011). Media representations of intimate partner violence and punishment preferences: Exploring the role of attributions and emotions. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2010.536843.
46.
PorterJ.WilliamsL. M. (2011). Intimate violence among underrepresented groups on a college campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(16), 3210–3224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510393011.
47.
ReuterT. R.NewcombM. E.WhittonS. W.MustanskiB. (2016). Intimate partner violence victimization in LGBTQ young adults: Demographic differences and associations with health behaviors. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000031.
48.
RhatiganD. L.StewartC.MooreT. M. (2011). Effects of gender and confrontation and attributions of female-perpetrated intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 64(11), 875–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9951-2.
49.
SavageM. W.ScarduzioJ. A.Lockwood HarrisK.CarlyleK. E.SheffS. E. (2017). News stories of intimate partner violence: An experimental examination of participant sex, perpetrator sex, and violence severity on seriousness, sympathy, and punishment preferences. Health Communication, 32(6), 768–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1217453.
50.
ScarduzioJ. A.CarlyleK. E.HarrisK. L.SavageM. W. (2017). “Maybe she was provoked”: Exploring gender stereotypes about male and female perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 23(1), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216636240.
51.
ScheerJ. R.PoteatV. P. (2021). Trauma-informed care and health among LGBTQ intimate partner violence survivors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13–14), 6670–6692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518820688.
52.
SmithA. L.BondC. E. W.JeffriesS. (2019). Media discourses of intimate partner violence in Queensland newspapers. Journal of Sociology, 55(3), 571–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783319837612.
SpencerE. A.LimperosA. M. (2020). ESPN’s coverage of intimate partner violence in the national football league. Communication & Sport, 8(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479518817759.
55.
StalansL. J.LurigioA. J. (1995). Public preferences for the court’s handling of domestic violence situations. Crime and Delinquency, 41(4), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128795041004002.
56.
StrausM. A. (1990). The National Family Violence Surveys. In StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8145 families (pp. 3–16). Transaction Publishers.
57.
StrausM. A. (2004). Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women, 10(7), 790–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204265552.
58.
SuretteR. (2007). Media, crime, and criminal justice: Images, realities and policies (3rd ed.). Thomson.
59.
SwanS. C.SnowD. L. (2006). The development of a theory of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1026–1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206293330.
60.
SylaskaK. M.WaltersA. S. (2014). Testing the extent of the gender trap: College students’ perceptions of and reactions to intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 70(3-4), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0344-1.
61.
TadlockB. L. (2014). Issue framing and transgender politics: An examination of interest group websites and media coverage. In TaylorJ. K.SnowD. P.Haider-Markel (Eds.), Transgender rights and politics: Groups, issue framing, and policy adoption (pp. 25–48). University of Michigan Press.
62.
TaylorR. (2009). Slain and slandered: A content analysis of the portrayal of femicide in crime news. Homicide Studies, 13(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767908326679.
63.
TaylorC. A.SorensonS. B. (2005). Community-based norms about intimate partner violence: Putting attributions of fault and responsibility into context. Sex Roles, 53(7-8), 573–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-7143-7.
64.
TsuiV. (2014). Male victims of intimate partner abuse: Use and helpfulness of services. Social Work, 59(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swu007.
65.
TsuiV.CheungM.LeungP. (2010). Help‐seeking among male victims of partner abuse: Men's hard times. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(6), 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20394.
66.
WaltersM. L.ChenJ.BreidingM. J. (2013). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
67.
WhiteK. R.DuttonD. G. (2013). Perceptions of female perpetrators. In RussellB. L. (Ed.), Perceptions of female offenders: How stereotypes and social norms affect criminal justice responses (pp. 101–116). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5871-5_7.
