Although family factors are associated with cyberbullying, few studies have investigated the relationship between family incivility and cyberbullying perpetration. The current study aimed to examine the associations between family incivility and cyberbullying perpetration among college students, and further investigate the underlying moderated mediation mechanism. Study 1 was a cross-sectional survey among 640 Chinese undergraduate students (Mage = 20.29 years, SD = 1.38). Demographics, family incivility, cyberbullying perpetration, and negative affect were assessed. The results supported the idea that negative affect plays a role in mediating the relationship between family incivility and cyberbullying perpetration. Study 2 used a two-wave longitudinal design, aiming to examine both the mediating role of negative affect and the moderating role of dispositional mindfulness (represented through five facets—observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonjudging, and nonreacting—each of which were analyzed separately). The data were collected from 200 Chinese undergraduate and graduate students (Mage = 22.18, SD = 2.56). Negative affect was also found to play a mediation effect in this study. Furthermore, the results found that acting with awareness and nonjudging weakened the relationship between family incivility and negative affect, whereas observing exacerbated it. Moreover, nonjudging exacerbated the relationship between negative affect and cyberbullying perpetration. The present findings indicate that negative affect may play a role in explaining the association between family incivility and cyberbullying perpetration. Furthermore, acting with awareness and nonjudging could buffer the relationship between family incivility and cyberbullying perpetration via negative affect, which provides a new insight for the prevention of and intervention on cyberbullying perpetration.
AllenJ. J.AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2018). The general aggression model. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/12346-001.
2.
AnderssonL. M.PearsonC. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.2202131
3.
BaekH.RobertsA. M.SeepersadR.SwartzK. (2019). Examining negative emotions as mediators between exposures to family violence and bullying: A gendered perspective. Journal of School Violence, 18(3), 440–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2018.1519441
4.
BaerRASmithGTHopkinsJKrietemeyerJToneyL (2006). Using self -report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504
5.
BaiQ.BaiS.HuangY.HsuehF.-H.WangP. (2020). Family incivility and cyberbullying in adolescence: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106315.
BerkowitzL (1990). On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. American Psychologist, 45(4), 494–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.494
8.
BrownDBBravoAJRoosCRPearsonMR (2015). Five facets of mindfulness and psychological health: Evaluating a psychological model of the mechanisms of mindfulness. Mindfulness, 6(5), 1021–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0349-4
9.
BrownK. W.RyanR. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.
10.
BushmanB. J.AndersonC. A. (2002). Violent video games and hostile expectations: A test of the general aggression model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1679–1686. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237649
11.
ÇelikS.AtakH.ErguzenA. (2012). The effect of personality on cyberbullying among university students in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 49(12), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0407-3
12.
ChenY.-F.KatzJ. E. (2009). Extending family to school life: College students' use of the mobile phone. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(2), 179–191. htttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.09.002
ChuiW. H.WengX.KhiataniP. V. (2022). Associations among bullying victimization, family dysfunction, negative affect, and bullying perpetration in Macanese adolescents. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 66(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20983741.
15.
DavisT. J.MorrisM.DrakeM. M. (2016). The moderation effect of mindfulness on the relationship between adult attachment and wellbeing. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.080.
16.
DengY.-Q.LiuX.-H.RodriguezM. A.XiaC.-Y. (2011). The five facet mindfulness questionnaire: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version. Mindfulness, 2(2), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-011-0050-9
17.
EmirtekinE.BaltaS.KircaburunK.GriffithsM. D. (2019). Childhood emotional abuse and cyberbullying perpetration among adolescents: The mediating role of trait mindfulness. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18(6), 1548–1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-0055-5
18.
Erdur-BakerÖ. (2010) Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media and Society, 12(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10. 1177/1461444809341260
19.
FinkelEJHallAN (2018). The I3 model: A metatheoretical framework for understanding aggression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.013.
20.
FoulkTWoolumAErezA (2016). Catching rudeness is like catching a cold: The contagion effects of low-intensity negative behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000037
21.
FreudenthalerLTurbaJDTranUS (2017). Emotion regulation mediates the associations of mindfulness on symptoms of depression and anxiety in the general population. Mindfulness, 8(5), 1339–1344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0709-y
22.
GarofaloC.VelottiP. (2017). Negative emotionality and aggression in violent offenders: The moderating role of emotion dysregulation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 51, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.05.015.
23.
GillionsA.CheangR.DuarteR. (2019). The effect of mindfulness practice on aggression and violence levels in adults: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 48, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.012.
24.
Gutiérrez-CoboM. J.MegíasA.Gómez-LealR.CabelloR.Fernández-BerrocalP. (2018). The role of emotional intelligence and negative affect as protective and risk factors of aggressive behavior: A moderated mediation model. Aggressive Behavior, 44(6), 638–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21788
25.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd Ed). http://www.guilfold.com/p/hayes3
26.
HuangJ. L.BowlingN. A.LiuM.LiY. (2015). Detecting insufficient effort responding with an infrequency scale: Evaluating validity and participant reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9357-6
27.
JensenACMcHaleSMPondAM (2018). Parents’ social comparisons of siblings and youth problem behavior: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(10), 2088–2099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0865-y
28.
KelleyK (2007). Methods for the behavioral, educational, and social sciences: An R package. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 979–984. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192993
29.
KimY.KimY. (2019). Incivility on facebook and political polarization: The mediating role of seeking further comments and negative emotion. Computers in Human Behavior, 99(5), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.022
30.
KowalskiRMGiumettiGWSchroederANLattannerMR (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
31.
LimSTaiK (2014). Family incivility and job performance: A moderated mediation model of psychological distress and core self-evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034486
32.
LiJ.SidibeA. M.ShenX.HeskethT. (2019). Incidence, risk factors and psychosomatic symptoms for traditional bullying and cyberbullying in Chinese adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 107, 104511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104511.
33.
LiuC.WangL.LiuZ.LiY.YuanG. (2020). Mindfulness and cyberbullying among Chinese adolescents: the mediating roles of perceived social support and empathy. Violence and Victims, 35(6), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1891/VV-D-19-00104.
34.
LiuP.XiaoC.HeJ.WangX.LiA. (2020). Experienced workplace incivility, anger, guilt, and family satisfaction: The double-edged effect of narcissism. Personality and Individual Difference, 154, 109642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109642.
35.
MarchiondoL. A.FisherG. G.CortinaL. M.MatthewsR. A. (2020). Disrespect at work, distress at home: a longitudinal investigation of incivility spillover and crossover among older workers. Work, Aging and Retirement, 6(3), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaa007.
36.
MarksADSobanskiDJHineDW (2010). Do dispositional rumination and/or mindfulness moderate the relationship between life hassles and psychological dysfunction in adolescents?Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 44(9), 831–838. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048674.2010.487478
37.
Martínez-MonteagudoM. C.DelgadoB.InglésC. J.García-FernándezJ. M. (2019). Cyberbullying in the university setting. Relationship with family environment and emotional intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.002.
38.
MartínezI.MurguiS.GarciaO. F.GarciaF. (2019). Parenting in the digital era: Protective and risk parenting styles for traditional bullying and cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.036.
39.
NaeemM.WengQ.AliA.HameedZ. (2020). Linking family incivility to workplace incivility: Mediating role of negative emotions and moderating role of self‐efficacy for emotional regulation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12391
40.
NavarroR.YuberoS.LarrañagaE. (Eds), (2016). Cyberbullying across the globe: Gender, family, and mental health. Springer.
41.
PearsonMR.BrownDBBravoAJBravoA.J. (2015). Mindfulness and emotional outcomes: Identifying subgroups of college students using latent profile analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.009.
42.
PeppingC. A.O’DonovanA.DavisP. J. (2013). The positive effects of mindfulness on self-esteem. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(5), 376–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.807353
43.
PetersJREisenlohr-MoulTASmartLM (2016). Dispositional mindfulness and rejection sensitivity: The critical role of nonjudgment. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.029.
44.
PoonK.-T.JiangY.TengF. (2020). Putting oneself in someone’s shoes: The effect of observing ostracism on physical pain, social pain, negative emotion, and self-regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110217.
45.
PreacherKJKelleyK (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658
QiuL.ZhengX.WangY. (2008). Revision of the positive affect and negative affect scale. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 14(3), 249–254.
48.
Royuela-ColomerE.CalveteE.Gámez-GuadixM.OrueI. (2018). The protective role of dispositional mindfulness against the perpetuation of cyberbullying victimization and perpetration among adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(11), 703–710. http://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0685
49.
SauerS.WalachH.SchmidtS.HinterbergerT.LynchS.BüssingA.KohlsN. (2013). Assessment of mindfulness: Review on state of the art. Mindfulness, 4(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0122-5
50.
ScavoneAKadziolkaMJMillerCJ (2020). State and trait mindfulness as predictors of skin conductance response to stress. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 45(3), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-020-09467-y
51.
SilvaD.NunesJ.FerreiraT.Pissarra da CostaA. (2017). Cyberbullying and suicidal ideation: Relationship with mood states and consumption of psychoactive substances. European Psychiatry, 41(S1), S400–S401. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.468
52.
SlotterE. B.FinkelE. J. (2011). I³ theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in aggression. In MikulincerM.ShaverP.R. (Eds), Human aggression and violence: Causes, manifestations, and consequences. American Psychological Association.
53.
SmithPKMahdaviJCarvalhoMFisherSRussellSTippettN (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
54.
TarrafR. C.MclarnonM. J. W.FineganJ. E. (2019). Dispositional mindfulness buffers against incivility outcomes: A moderated mediation model. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.035.
55.
TaylorSGKluemperDH (2012). Linking perceptions of role stress and incivility to workplace aggression: The moderating role of personality. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(3), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/a002821
56.
WangWXieXWangXLeiLHuQJiangS (2019). Cyberbullying and depression among Chinese college students: A moderated mediation model of social anxiety and neuroticism. Journal of Affective Disorders, 256, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.061.
57.
WatsonDClarkLATellegenA (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
58.
WeiH.LiuM. (2020). Loving your parents and treating others well: The effect of filial piety on cyberbullying perpetration and its functional mechanism among Chinese graduate students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520978182.
59.
WenZFanX (2015). Monotonicity of effect sizes: Questioning kappa-squared as mediation effect size measure. Psychological Methods, 20(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000029
60.
WongR. Y. M.CheungC. M. K.XiaoB. (2018). Does gender matter in cyberbullying perpetration? An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.022.
61.
WrightM.AoyamaI.KambleS.LiZ.SoudiS.LeiL.ShuC. (2015). Peer attachment and cyber aggression involvement among Chinese, Indian, and Japanese adolescents. Societies, 5(2), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5020339
62.
WuNHouYZengQCaiHYouJ (2021). Bullying experiences and nonsuicidal self-injury among Chinese adolescents: A longitudinal moderated mediation model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(4), 753–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01380-1
63.
XuW.WangY.FuZ. (2018). The moderating role of dispositional mindfulness and locus of control in the impact of perceived stress on negative emotions in daily life. Journal of Psychological Science, 41(3), 749–754. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20180336
64.
YbarraMLMitchellKJ (2004). Youth engaging in online harassment: Associations with caregiver–child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. Journal of Adolescence, 27(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.007
65.
YbarraMLMitchellKJ (2007). Prevalence and frequency of internet harassment instigation: Implications for adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.03.005
66.
YuanGLiuZ (2019). Longitudinal cross-lagged analyses between cyberbullying perpetration, mindfulness and depression among Chinese high school students. Journal of Health Psychology, 26(11), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105319890395
67.
ZhangJ.DengX.HuangL.ZengH.WangL.WenP. (2019). Profile of trait mindfulness and its association with emotional regulation for early adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.008.
68.
ZhangC.-Q.SiG.DuanY.LyuY.KeatleyD. A.ChanD. K. C. (2016). The effects of mindfulness training on beginners’ skill acquisition in dart throwing: A randomized controlled trial. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 22, 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.09.005.
69.
ZhaoY.St-LouisA.VallerandR. J. (2015). On the validation of the passion scale in Chinese. Psychology of Well-Being, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13612-015-0031-1
70.
ZhengS.SunS.HuangC.ZouZ. (2020). Authenticity and subjective well-being: The mediating role of mindfulness. Journal of Research in Personality, 84, 103900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103900.
71.
ZhouZ.-K.LiuQ.-Q.NiuG.-F.SunX.-J.FanC.-Y. (2017). Bullying victimization and depression in Chinese children: A moderated mediation model of resilience and mindfulness. Personality & Individual Differences, 104, 137–142. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.040.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
