Drawing on insights from moral psychology, we examine the influence of moral intuitions on Americans’ divergent reactions to reports of sexual assault and harassment. We hypothesize that Americans whose moral intuitions emphasize care and protection of the vulnerable will show a greater willingness to believe reports of sexual assault and harassment, while those whose moral intuitions emphasize social order and cohesion will show greater skepticism toward such reports. Using data from a nationally representative sample of USA adults (N =1050), we find strong support for both hypotheses. We also find that the influence of moral intuitions on reactions to reports of sexual assault and harassment is partially mediated by respondents’ willingness to attribute responsibility to victims of sex crimes. Our results hold when females and males are examined separately. The study provides compelling evidence that a moral intuitionist approach is useful for understanding Americans’ divergent reactions to reports of sexual assault and harassment.
AndersonK. B.CooperH.OkamuraL. (1997). Individual differences and attitudes toward rape: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(3), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167297233008.
2.
Benavides EspinozaC.CunninghamG. B. (2010). Observers’ reporting of sexual harassment: The influence of harassment type, organizational culture, and political orientation. Public Organization Review, 10, 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-009-0109-4.
3.
BergmanM. E.LanghoutR. D.PalmieriP. A.CortinaL. M.FitzgeraldL. F. (2002). The (un)reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.230.
4.
Bokat-LindelS. (2020). Are democrats canceling #MeToo for Biden?”New York Times.
5.
BreenR.KarlsonK. B.HolmA. (2013). Total, direct, and indirect effects in logit and probit models. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(2), 164–191. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0049124113494572.
6.
BrownS. E. V.BattleJ. S. (2019). Ostracizing targets of workplace sexual harassment before and after the #MeToo movement. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 39(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-09-2018-0162.
7.
EnnsP. K.RamirezM. D. (2018). Privatizing punishment: Testing theories of public support for private prison and immigration detention facilities. Criminology, 56(3), 546–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12178.
8.
FisherJ. E.MasonR. L. (1981). The analysis of multicollinear data in criminology. In FoxJ. A. (Ed.), Methods in Quantitative Criminology. Academic Press.
9.
Gallup (2019). U.S. men less concerned than in 2017 about sexual harassment. Gallup.
10.
GilovichT. (1991). How we know what isn’t so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. The Free Press.
11.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141.
12.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847.
13.
HaidtJ. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books.
KlingA. (2019). The three languages of politics: Talking across the political divides. CATO Institute.
16.
KolevaS. P.GrahamJ.IyerR.DittoP. H.HaidtJ. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006.
17.
KunstJ. R.BaileyA.PrendergastC.GundersenA. (2019). Sexism, rape myths and feminist identification explain gender differences in attitudes toward the #Metoo social media campaign in two countries. Media Psychology, 22(5), 818–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1532300.
18.
LeeH.PickettJ. T.BurtonA. L.CullenF. T.JonsonC. L., & BurtonV. S.Jr. (2020). Attributions as anchors: How the public explains school shootings and why it matters. Justice Quarterly, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2020.1769710.
19.
LehmannP. S.PickettJ. T. (2017). Experience versus expectation: Economic insecurity, the great recession, and support for the death penalty. Justice Quarterly, 34(5), 873–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1226939.
Mac DonaldH. (2018). The diversity delusion. St. Martin’s Press.
22.
MilesiP.SüssenbachP.BohnerG.MegíasJ. L. (2019). The interplay of modern myths about sexual aggression and moral foundations in the blaming of rape victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2622.
23.
National Violence Resource Center (2015). Statistics about sexual violence. National Sexual Violence Resource Center.
24.
NiemiL.YoungL. (2016). When and why we see victims as responsible: The impact of ideology on attitudes toward victims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(9), 1227–1242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216653933.
25.
Pew Research Center (2018). Sexual harassment at work in the era of #MeToo. Pew Research Center.
26.
RaihaniN. (2017). Safety in numbers. New Scientist, 236(3149), 24–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(17)32115-2.
27.
RotundoM.NguyenD.-H.SackettP. R. (2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 914–922. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.914.
28.
RussellB. L.TriggK. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50(7), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023075.32252.fd.
29.
SilverJ. R., & SilverE. (2017). Why are conservatives more punitive than liberals? A moral foundations approach. Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 258-272. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soaa078.
30.
SilverJ. R.SilverE. (2021). The nature and role of morality in offending: A moral foundations approach. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 343–380. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022427820960201.
31.
SilverE.SilverJ. R.SigfusdottirI. D. (2021). Moral intuitions and suicide risk: Results from a national sample of Icelandic youth*. Social Forces, 99(4), 1799–1826. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soaa078.
32.
StudzinskaA. M.HiltonD. (2017). Minimization of male suffering: Social perception of victims and perpetrators of opposite-sex sexual coercion. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0226-0.
33.
SullivanA. (2018). It’s time to resist the excesses of #MeToo. New York Magazine.
34.
van der BruggenM.GrubbA. (2014). A review of the literature relating to rape victim blaming: An analysis of the impact of observer and victim characteristics on attribution of blame in rape cases. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(5), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.008.
35.
VaughnT. J.HolleranL. B.SilverJ. R. (2019). Applying moral foundations theory to the explanation of capital jurors’ sentencing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 36(7), 1176–1205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1537400.
