Childhood bullying is a public health concern. The stability and changes in children’s bullying profiles should provide useful information about specific risk groups and their developmental patterns. The current longitudinal study examined the stability and changes in bullying involvement in children along with the predictive roles of depressive symptoms in bullying subgroup memberships and transitions. A total of 4,321 Chinese children (55.1% male, Mage = 9.93) participated in self-report assessments at three time points with six-month intervals. Bullying subgroups were identified based on physical, relational, and cyberbullying using latent profile analysis. The transitions patterns were modeled using latent transition analysis. Depressive symptoms were added as a covariate in bullying subgroup memberships and transitions. Five bullying subgroups were found at Time 1 and Time 2: traditional bully-victims, traditional victims, (cyber) bully-victims, (cyber) victims, and noninvolved children, whereas four bullying subgroups were found at Time 3: traditional bully-victims, traditional victims, (cyber) bully-victims, and noninvolved children. Findings suggested that (a) childhood bullying involvement showed varying levels of stability, with noninvolved children displaying the most stability and cyberbullying-involved children displaying the least stability; (b) children reporting more severe depressive symptoms manifested a higher risk of bullying involvement; (c) initially noninvolved children showing depressive symptoms were at a higher risk for becoming traditional victims; and (d) children reporting depressive symptoms found it more difficult to escape from bullying than children without depressive symptoms. The findings offer support for both the cumulative continuity and interactional models of development. The findings also highlight the important the role of depressive symptoms in preventing and ameliorating children’s bullying.
AchenbachT. M. (1991). Manual for the youth self-report and 1991 profile. Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
2.
AgnewR. A. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x
3.
BanduraA., & WaltersR. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice-hall.
4.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equation models with latent variables. Wiley.
5.
CaldwellD. M., DaviesS. R., HetrickS. E., PalmerJ. C., CaroP., López-LópezJ. A., GunnellD., KidgerJ., ThomasJ., FrenchC., StockingsE., CampbellR., & WeltonN. J. (2019). School-based interventions to prevent anxiety and depression in children and young people: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(12), 1011-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30403-1
6.
CaspiA., ElderG. H., & BemD. J. (1987). Moving against the world: Life-course patterns of explosive children. Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 308-313. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.2.308
7.
ChanH. C. O., & WongD. S. (2015). Traditional school bullying and cyberbullying in Chinese societies: Prevalence and a review of the whole-school intervention approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 98-108. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.010
8.
CollinsL. M., & LanzaS. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Wiley.
9.
CopelandW. E., WolkeD., AngoldA., & CostelloE. J. (2013). Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(4), 419-426. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.504
10.
DingY., LiD., LiX., XiaoJ., ZhangH., & WangY. (2020). Profiles of adolescent traditional and cyber bullying and victimization: The role of demographic, individual, family, school, and peer factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106439, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106439
11.
ElledgeL. C., CavellT. A., OgleN. T., & NewgentR. A. (2010). School-based mentoring as selective prevention for bullied children: A preliminary test. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 31(3), 171-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-010-0215-7
12.
EttekalI., & LaddG. W. (2017). Developmental continuity and change in physical, verbal, and relational aggression and peer victimization from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 53(9), 1709-1721. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000357
13.
FekkesM., PijpersF. I., & Verloove-VanhorickS. P. (2004). Bullying behavior and associations with psychosomatic complaints and depression in victims. The Journal of Pediatrics, 144(1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.09.025
14.
GalobardesB., ShawM., LawlorD. A., LynchJ. W., & SmithG. D. (2006). Indicators of socioeconomic position (Part 1). Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60(1), 7-12. http://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531
15.
GaraigordobilM., & Martínez-ValderreyV. (2016). Impact of cyberprogram 2.0 on different types of school violence and aggressiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 428. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00428
16.
GlaserK. (1967). Masked depression in children and adolescents. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 21(3), 565-574. https://doi.org/10.1177/10598405050210060201
17.
GoorenE. M., van LierP. A., SteggeH., TerwogtM. M., & KootH. M. (2011). The development of conduct problems and depressive symptoms in early elementary school children: The role of peer rejection. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40(2), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.546045
18.
HaltiganJ. D., & VaillancourtT. (2018). The influence of static and dynamic intrapersonal factors on longitudinal patterns of peer victimization through mid-adolescence: A latent transition analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-017-0342-1
19.
JangH., SongJ., & KimR. (2014). Does the offline bully-victimization influence cyberbullying behavior among youths? Application of general strain theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.007
20.
JoseP. E., KljakovicM., ScheibE., & NotterO. (2012). The joint development of traditional bullying and victimization with cyber bullying and victimization in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(2), 301-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00764.x
21.
KeijsersL., & Van RoekelE. (in press). Longitudinal methods in adolescent psychology. Where could we go from here? And should we?In L. B. Hendry & M. Kloep (Eds.), Reframing adolescent research (pp. 70-91). Routledge.
22.
KochelK. P., LaddG. W., & RudolphK. D. (2012). Longitudinal associations among youth depressive symptoms, peer victimization, and low peer acceptance: An interpersonal process perspective. Child Development, 83(2), 637-650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01722.x
23.
KowalskiR. M., GiumettiG. W., SchroederA. N., & LattannerM. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073-1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
24.
LeungP. W., KwongS., TangC., HoT., HungS., LeeC., HongS., ChiuC., & LiuW. (2006). Test-retest reliability and criterion validity of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(9), 970-973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01570.x
25.
LittleR. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198-1202. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290157
26.
LukJ. W., WangJ., & Simons-MortonB. G. (2012). The co-occurrence of substance use and bullying behaviors among US adolescents: Understanding demographic characteristics and social influences. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1351-1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.05.003
27.
MaX. (2001). Bullying and being bullied: To what extent are bullies also victims?American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 351-370. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002351
28.
MarshH. W., ParadaR. H., CravenR. G., & FingerL. (2004). In the looking glass: A reciprocal effects model elucidating the complex nature of bullying, psychological determinants, and the central role of self-concept. In Bullying (pp. 63-106). Academic Press.
29.
MooreP. M., HuebnerE. S., & HillsK. J. (2012). Electronic bullying and victimization and life satisfaction in middle school students. Social Indicators Research, 107, 429-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9856-z
30.
NieQ., YangC., StomskiM., ZhaoZ., TengZ., & GuoC. (2021). Longitudinal link between bullying victimization and bullying perpetration: A multilevel moderation analysis of perceived school climate. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521997940
31.
Nylund-GibsonK., GrimmR., QuirkM., & FurlongM. J. (2014). A latent transition mixture model using the three-step specification. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 439-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915375
32.
OlweusD. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell.
33.
OlweusD., & LimberS. P. (2010). Bullying in school: Evaluation and dissemination of the Olweus bullying prevention program. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(1), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01015.x
34.
PalladinoB. E., NocentiniA., & MenesiniE. (2016). Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of the No Trap! Program in two independent trials. Aggressive Behavior, 42(2), 194-206. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21636
35.
PanY., LiuH., LauP., & LuoF. (2017). A latent transition analysis of bullying and victimization in Chinese primary school students. PLoS One, 12(8), e0182802. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182802
36.
RichardsonD., & HiuC. F. (2018). Developing a global indicator on bullying of school-aged children. In Ending the torment: Tackling bullying from the schoolyard to cyberspace (pp. 101-114). United Nations.
37.
RyooJ. H., WangC., SwearerS. M., HullM., & ShiD. (2018). Longitudinal model building using latent transition anal-ysis: An example using school bullying data. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 675. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00675
38.
ScholteR. H., EngelsR. C., OverbeekG., De KempR. A., & HaselagerG. J. (2007). Stability in bullying and victimization and its association with social adjustment in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(2), 217-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-006-9074-3
39.
SentseM., PrinzieP., & SalmivalliC. (2017). Testing the direction of longitudinal paths between victimization, peer rejection, and different types of internalizing problems in adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45(5), 1013-1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0216-y
40.
SmithP. K. (2012). Cyberbullying and cyber aggression. In S. R. Jimerson, A. B. Nickerson, M. J. Mayer, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety: International research and practice (pp. 93-103). Routledge.
41.
SpriggsA. L., IannottiR. J., NanselT. R., & HaynieD. L. (2007). Adolescent bullying involvement and perceived family, peer and school relations: Commonalities and differences across race/ethnicity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(3), 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.04.009
42.
TengZ., BearG. G., YangC., NieQ., & GuoC. (2020). Moral disengagement and bullying perpetration: A longitudinal study of the moderating effect of school climate. School Psychology, 35(1), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000348
43.
TippettN., & WolkeD. (2014). Socioeconomic status and bullying: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), e48-e59. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301960
44.
Van den EijndenR., VermulstA., RooijA., ScholteR., & MheenD. (2014). The bidirectional relationships between online victimization and psychosocial problems in adolescents: A comparison with real-life victimization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(5), 790-802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0003-9
45.
VandeboschH. (2019). Cyberbullying prevention, detection and intervention. In Narratives in research and interventions on cyberbullying among young people (pp. 29-44). Springer.
46.
WaltersG. D., & EspelageD. L. (2018). From victim to victimizer: Hostility, anger, and depression as mediators of the bullying victimization-bullying perpetration association. Journal of School Psychology, 68(23), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.12.003
47.
WickramaK. K., LeeT. K., O’NealC. W., & LorenzF. O. (2016). Higher-order growth curves and mixture modeling with Mplus: A practical guide. Routledge.
48.
WillifordA., BoultonA. J., & JensonJ. M. (2014). Transitions between subclasses of bullying and victimization when entering middle school. Aggressive Behavior, 40(1), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21503
49.
WillifordA. P., BrissonD., BenderK. A., JensonJ. M., & Forrest-BankS. (2011). Patterns of aggressive behavior and peer victimization from childhood to early adolescence: A latent class analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(6), 644-655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9583-9
50.
WillifordA., & ZinnA. (2018). Classroom-level differences in child-level bullying experiences: Implications for prevention and intervention in school settings. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 9(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1086/696210
51.
WolkeD., LereyaS. T., FisherH. L., LewisG., & ZammitS. (2014). Bullying in elementary school and psychotic expe-riences at 18 years: A longitudinal, population-based cohort study. Psychological Medicine, 44(10), 2199-2211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713002912
World Health Organization. (2018). Adolescents: Health risks and solutions. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescents-health-risks-and-solution
54.
XiangJ., LiaoM., & ZhuM. (2020). Assessment if junior elementary pupils’ depression tendency via house-tree-person test. China Journal of Health Psychology, 28(7), 1057-1061. http://doi.org/10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2020.07.023
55.
YangS., StewartR., KimJ., KimS., ShinI., DeweyM. E., MaskeyS., & YoonJ. (2013). Differences in predictors of traditional and cyber-bullying: A 2-year longitudinal study in Korean school children. European Child & Ado-lescent Psychiatry, 22(5), 309-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-012-0374-6
56.
ZhangD., HuebnerE. S., & TianL. (2020). Longitudinal associations among neuroticism, depression, and cyberbullying in early adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106475
57.
ZhangW., ChenL., JiL., ZhangL., & WangS. (2009). Physical and relational victimization, and children’s emotional adjustment in middle childhood. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41(5), 167-189. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2009.00433
58.
ZhaoL., LaiL., LinY., ZhaoC., & RenZ. (2018). The effect and moderators of school-based anti-bullying programs: Meta-analysis and GRADE evidence. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(12), 2113-2128. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.02113
59.
ZychI., Ortega-RuizR., & Del ReyR. (2015). Systematic review of theoretical studies on bullying and cyberbullying: Facts, knowledge, prevention, and intervention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 1-21. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.10.001
60.
ZychI., TtofiM. M., LlorentV. J., FarringtonD. P., RibeaudD., & EisnerM. P. (2020). A longitudinal study on stability and transitions among bullying roles. Child Development, 91(2), 527-545. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13195
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
