In order to end and “liberate” themselves from an abusive relationship, female survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) usually face a complex process. Although women may decide to seek help through the criminal justice system, some refuse to participate in legal proceedings against their abusers. While many studies have focused on exploring variables explaining disengagement from legal proceedings, the aim of this article is to study the impact of the process of liberation from an abusive relationship on the likelihood of disengagement (LoD) from legal proceedings. Liberation was measured through the psychosocial separation overall score and the LoD was predicted by a logistic regression model developed in a previous study in Spain. A sample of 80 women involved in legal proceedings for IPV against their ex-partners in Andalusia (Spain) participated in this study. Exploratory analyses were conducted using ANOVA and Chi-square; multiple linear regression analyses were used to study the relationship between psychosocial separation and LoD. Results showed that victims who had higher psychosocial separation from their abusers were less likely to disengage from legal proceedings against the abuser. We discuss the results in terms of practical implications like detection of women’s need for specific psychological support to ease a comprehensive recovery. Training programs for legal professionals and judges in the judicial arena should use the results of this study to increase professionals’ understanding of IPV and survivors’ decision-making processes. This would lead to a decrease in survivors’ secondary victimization, as well as decrease the frustration of legal professionals when victims disengage from legal proceedings.
AndersonD. K., & SaundersD. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner: An empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4(2), 163–191.
2.
BarataP. C. (2007). Abused women’s perspectives on the Criminal Justice System response to domestic violence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 202–215.
3.
BellM. E., PerezS., GoodmanL. A., & DuttonM. A. (2011). Battered women’s perceptions of civil and criminal court helpfulness: The role of court outcome and process. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 71–88.
4.
BennettL. E., GoodmanL. A., & DuttonM. A. (1999). Systemic obstacles to the criminal prosecution of a battering partner: A victim perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(7), 761–772.
5.
BermeaA. M., KhawL., HardestyJ. L., RosenbloomL., & SalernoC. (2017). Mental and active preparation: Examining variations in women’s processes of preparing to leave abusive relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517692332
6.
BernsN. E. (2004). Framing the victim: Domestic violence, media, and social problems. Aldine.
7.
BodelónE. (2014). Violencia Institucional y Violencia de Género [Institutional Violence and Gender Violence]. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez, 48, 131–155.
8.
BoivinR., & LeclercC. (2016). Domestic violence reported to the police: Correlates of victims’ reporting behavior and support to legal proceedings. Violence and Victims, 31(3), 402–415.
9.
Briones-VozmedianoE., La ParraD., & Vives-CasesC. (2015). Barriers and facilitators to effective coverage of intimate partner violence services for immigrant women in Spain. Health Expectations, 18(6), 2994–3006.
BuzawaE. S., BuzawaC. G., & StarkE. D. (2017). Responding to domestic violence. The integration of criminal justice and human services. SAGE Publications.
12.
CalaM. J., GodoyM. S., & RebolloM. A. (2009). Mujeres que recuperan el control de sus vidas: Estrategias y recursos que utilizan para superar una relación de maltrato [Women recovering the control of their lifes: Strategies and resources to overcome an abusive relationship]. In VázquezI. (Ed.), Investigación y género, avance en las distintas áreas de conocimiento: I Congreso Universitario Andaluz Investigación y Género [libro de actas] (pp. 191–209). Faculty of Labor Sciences, University of Seville.
13.
CalaM. J., TrigoE., & SaavedraF. J. (2016). Women’s disengagement from legal proceedings for intimate partner violence: Sociodemographic and psychological variables. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8(1), 35–42.
14.
CampbellJ. C. (2004). Helping women understand their risk in situations of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(12), 1464–1477.
15.
CampbellJ., RoseL., KubJ., & NeddD. (1998). Voices of strength and resistance: A contextual and longitudinal analysis of women’s responses to battering. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13(6), 743–762.
16.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analyses for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17.
CretneyA., & DavisG. (1997). The significance of compellability in the prosecution of domestic assault. British Journal of Criminology, 37(1), 75–89.
18.
DawsonM., & DinovitzerR. (2001). Victim cooperation and the prosecution of domestic violence in a specialized court. Justice Quarterly, 18(3), 593–622.
19.
EpsteinD., & GoodmanL. A. (2013). Domestic violence victims’ experiences in the legal system. In MillerM. K. & BornsteinB. H. (Eds.), Stress, trauma, and wellbeing in the legal system (pp. 45–62). Oxford University Press.
20.
ErezE., & BelknapJ. (1998). In their own words: Battered women’s assessment of the criminal processing system’s responses. Violence and Victims, 13(3), 251–268.
FaulF., ErdfelderE., BuchnerA., & LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.
23.
FlaschP., MurrayC. E., & CroweA. (2017). Overcoming abuse: A phenomenological investigation of the journey to recovery from past intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(22), 3373–3401.
24.
FleuryR. E., SullivanC. M., & BybeeD. I. (2000). When ending the relationship does not end the violence. Women’s experiences of violence by former partners. Violence Against Women, 6(12), 1363–1383.
25.
FordD. A. (1983). Wife battery and criminal justice: A study of victim decision making. Family Relations, 32(4), 463–475.
26.
García-JiménezM., CalaM. J., & TrigoM. E.(under review). A six-variable model to predict the likelihood of dropping charges by survivors of gender violence in Spain.
27.
García-JiménezM., CalaM. J., & TrigoM. E. (2019). Predicting disengagement of judicial proceedings by female victims of intimate partner violence in Spain: A systematic replication with prospective data. Violence Against Women. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219882502
28.
García-JiménezM., CalaM. J., TrigoM. E., & BarberáE. (2020). Indicators of liberation from gender-based intimate partner violence related to the moment of dropping the charges in Spain. Psicothema, 32(1), 40–46.
29.
García-JiménezM., CalaM. J., TrigoM. E., De La MataM. L. (2019). Women’s disengagement from legal proceedings for intimate partner violence in Southern Spain: Variables related to legal proceedings. Crime & Delinquency, 65(13), 1873–1895.
30.
García-JiménezM., & TrigoM. E. (2019). A statistical model to predict dropping charges by survivors of gender violence in Spain. In SanmarcoJ. & AriasE. (Eds.), 2019Annual Conference of the European Association of Psychology and Law Abstract Book (pp. 85–86). Santiago de Compostela.
31.
García-MorenoC., PallittoC., DevriesK., StöcklH., WattsC., & AbrahamsN. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564625
32.
GauthierS. (2010). The perceptions of judicial and psychosocial interveners of the consequences of dropped charges in domestic violence cases. Violence Against Women, 16(12), 1375–1395.
33.
GoicoleaI., Briones-VozmedianoE., OhmanA., EdinK., MinvielleF., & Vives-CasesC. (2013). Mapping and exploring health systems’ response to intimate partner violence in Spain. BMC Public Health, 13, 1162.
34.
GondolfE. W., & FisherE. R. (1988). Battered women as survivors: An alternative to treating learned helplessness. Lexington Books.
35.
GoodmanL. A., BennettL. E., & DuttonM. A. (1999). Obstacles to victim’s cooperation with the criminal prosecution of their abusers: The role of social support. Violence and Victims, 14(4), 427–444.
36.
GoodmarkL. (2008). When is a battered woman not a battered woman? When she fights back. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 20(1), 75–129.
GreesonM. R., & CampbellR. (2011). Rape survivors’ agency within the legal and medical systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(4), 582–595.
40.
HareS. C. (2010). Intimate partner violence: Victims’ opinions about going to trial. Journal of Family Violence, 25(8), 765–776.
41.
HoyleC., & SandersA. (2000). Police Response to Domestic Violence: From Victim Choice to Victim Empowerment? British Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 14–36.
42.
KasturiranganA., KrishnanS., & RigerS. (2004). The impact of culture and minority status on women’s experience of domestic violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5(4), 318–332.
43.
KhawL., & HardestyJ. L. (2015). Perceptions of boundary ambiguity in the process of leaving an abusive partner. Family Process, 54, 327–343.
44.
KingsnorthR. F., & MacintoshR. C. (2004). Domestic violence: Predictors of victim support for official action. Justice Quarterly, 21(2), 301–328.
45.
LaceyK. K., SaundersD. G., & Zhang.L. (2011). A comparison of women of color and non-Hispanic White women on factors related to leaving a violent relationship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1036–1055.
46.
LaingL. (2017). Secondary Victimization: Domestic Violence Survivors Navigating the Family Law System. Violence Against Women, 23(11), 1314–1335.
47.
LandenburgerK. (1989). A process of entrapment in and recovery from an abusive relationship. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 10(3–4), 209–227.
48.
LandenburgerK. M. (1998). The dynamics of leaving and recovering from an abusive relationship. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 27, 700–706.
49.
MalechaA., McFarlaneJ., GistJ., WatsonK., BattenE., HallI., & SmithS. (2003). Applying for and dropping a protection order: A study with 150 women. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14, 486–504.
50.
MannellJ., JacksonS., & UmutoniA. (2016). Women’s responses to intimate partner violence in Rwanda: Rethinking agency in constrained social contexts. Global Public Health, 11(1–2), 65–81.
51.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.
52.
Merritt-GrayM., & WuestJ. (1995). Counteracting abuse and breaking free: The process of leaving revealed through women’s voices. Health Care for Women International, 16(5), 399–412.
53.
MessingJ. T. (2014). Evidence-based prosecution of intimate partner violence in the post-Crawford Era: A single-city study of the factors leading to prosecution. Crime & Delinquency, 60(2), 238–260.
54.
MessingJ. T., MohrR., & DurfeeA. (2015). Intimate partner violence and women’s experiences of grief. Child & Family Social Work, 20(1), 30–39.
55.
RobinsonA. L., & CookD. (2006). Understanding victim retraction in cases of domestic violence: Specialist courts, government policy, and victim-centered justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 9(2), 189–213.
56.
Roca-CortésN., PorrúaC., YepesM., MartínezM., CodinaN., FernándezA., RuizS., & CremadesM. (2015). Recovery of women in a situation of male chauvinist intimate partner violence. Description and instrumentation. Ajuntament de Barcelona.
57.
SatyenL., RogicA. C., & SupolM. (2019). Intimate partner violence and help-seeking behaviour: A systematic review of cross-cultural differences. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 21(4), 879–892.
58.
ShearsonK. M. (2017). Seeking help from police for intimate partner violence: Applying a relationship phase framework to the exploration of victims’ evolving needs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517744185
59.
SleathE., & SmithL. L. (2017). Understanding the factors that predict victim retraction in police reported allegations of intimate partner violence. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 140–149.
60.
VázquezJ. J., RivasE., SuarezA. C., & PanaderoS. (2018). Retraction of complaints among female victims of intimate partner violence living in poverty in Nicaragua. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(10), 3151–3167.
61.
Vives-CasesC., Espinar-RuizE., Castellanos-TorresE., & CoeA.-B. (2017). Multiple struggles in fighting violence against women: Implications among Romani women leaders in Spain. Global Health Action, 10(Suppl. 2), 1317084.
