This study aims to test psychometric properties and factor invariance of the Reactive–Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ) for adults across five countries: Serbia (N = 409), Mauritius (N = 400), the United States (N = 389), the Netherlands (N = 372), and China (N = 325). The results supported the two–factor structure across country samples, with a marginal model fit in Mauritius. Results also supported the congruent factor structure of Reactive Aggression scale across countries, while the Proactive Aggression scale can be considered as equal across samples from Serbia, the United States, and China, but not from Mauritius and the Netherland. Among items from the Proactive Aggression scale, those referring to open aggression aimed at obtaining social status and dominance, frightening or harming others, obtained the highest loadings across all samples and could be considered as the good representatives of adult proactive aggression. This is the first study in which cross-cultural validation of the RPQ among adults has been tested and results suggested that there are some cultural differences in expression of proactive aggression.
AngR. P., HuanV. S., LiX., & ChanW. T. (2016). Functions of aggression and delinquency: The moderating role of parent criminality and friends’ gang membership. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(22), 3531–3550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516636066
2.
BanduraA. (1973). Aggression: A social learning theory analysis. Prentice Hall.
3.
BaşA. U., & Yurdabakanİ. (2012). Factor Structure of the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire in Turkish Children and Gender, Grade-Level, and Socioeconomic Status Differences in Reactive and Proactive Aggression. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(3), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911428892
4.
BeckersL., & PetermannF. (2012). Befunde zur Validität des Reaktive-Proaktive-Aggression-Fragebogens für die fünfte bis zehnte Klasse (RPA 5–10) [Findings on the validity of the Reactive-Proactive-Aggression-Questionnaire for the fifth to tenth grade (RPA 5-10)]. Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie, 61(9), 649–661. https://doi.org/10.13109/prkk.2012.61.9.649
5.
BergeronN., & SchneiderB. H. (2005). Explaining cross-national differences in peer-directed aggression: A quantitative synthesis. Aggressive Behavior, 31(2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20049
6.
BerkowitzL. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences and control. McGrawHill.
7.
BrendgenM., VitaroF., BoivinM., DionneG., & PérusseD. (2006). Examining genetic and environmental effects on reactive versus proactive aggression. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1299–1312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1299
8.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.
9.
BrugmanS., CornetL. J. M., SmeijersD., SmeetsK., OostermeijerS., BuitelaarJ. K., VerkesR. J., LobbestaelJ., de KogelC. H, & JansenL. M. C. (2017). Examining the reactive proactive questionnaire in adults in forensic and non-forensic settings: A variable- and person-based approach. Aggressive Behavior, 43(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21671
10.
Cenkseven ÖnderF., AvciR., & ÇolakkadıoğluO. (2016). Validity and Reliability of the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire in Turkish Adolescents. Educational Research and Reviews, 11, 1931–1943. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2937
11.
CimaM., & RaineA. (2009). Distinct characteristics of psychopathy relate to different subtypes of aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 835–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.031
12.
CimaM., RaineA., MeestersC., & PopmaA. (2013). Validation of the Dutch Reactive Proactive Questionnaire (RPQ): Differential Correlates of Reactive and Proactive Aggression from childhood to adulthood. Aggressive Behavior, 39(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21458
DinićB. M., & RaineA. (2019). An Item Response Theory Analysis and Further Validation of the Reactive–Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ): The Serbian Adaptation of the RPQ. Journal of Personality Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1573430
15.
DodgeK. A. (1991). The structure and function of reactive and proactive aggression. In PeplerD. J. & RubinK. H. (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 201–218). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
DodgeK. A., LochmanJ. E., HarnishJ. D., BatesJ. E., & PettitG. S. (1997). Reactive and proactive aggression in school children and psychiatrically impaired chronically assaultive youth. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.106.1.37
17.
EigenhuisA., KamphuisJ. H., & NoordhofA. (2015). Personality differences between the United States and the Netherlands: The influence of violations of measurement invariance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115570671
18.
EulerF., SteinlinC., & StadlerC. (2017). Distinct profiles of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescents: Associations with cognitive and affective empathy. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-016-0141-4
19.
FiteP. J., ColderC. R., LochmanJ. E., & WellsK. C. (2008). Developmental trajectories of proactive and reactive aggression from fifth to ninth grade. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology: The Official Journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53, 37(2), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410801955920
20.
ForbesG., ZhangX., DoroszewiczK., & HaasK. (2009). Relationships between individualism–collectivism, gender, and direct or indirect aggression: A study in China, Poland, and the US. Aggressive Behavior, 35(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20292
21.
FossatiA., RaineA., BorroniS., BizzozeroA., VolpiE., SantaluciaI., & MaffeiC. (2009). A cross-cultural study of the psychometric properties of the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire among Italian nonclinical adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014743
22.
FungA. L. C., LiX., RamírezM. J., LamB. Y-H., MillanaL., & Fares-OteroN. E. (2018). A cross-regional study of the reactive and proactive aggression of youth in Spain, Uruguay, mainland China, and Hong Kong. Social Development, 27, 478–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12305
23.
FungA. L. C., RaineA., & GaoY. (2009). Cross-cultural generalizability of the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(5), 473–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890903088420
24.
HechtL. K., & LatzmanR. D. (2015). Revealing the nuanced associations between facets of trait impulsivity and reactive and proactive aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.021
25.
HooperD., CoughlanJ., & MullenM. (2007). Structural Equation Modeling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1).
26.
JayatillekeB. G., & GunawardenaC. (2016). Cultural perceptions of online learning: Transnational faculty perspectives. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2016-0019
27.
JohnsonT. P., & de VijverF. V. (2003). Social desirability in cross-cultural research. In HarknessJ. A., van de VijverF. H. R. & MohlerP. Ph. (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods. Wiley.
28.
KlineR. B. (2016). Methodology in the social sciences.Principles and practice of structural equation modeling(4th ed). Guilford Press.
29.
LiX., & FungA. L. (2015). Reactive and proactive aggression in mainland Chinese secondary school students. Journal of Social Work, 15, 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017314548119
30.
LiuJ. H., RaineA., VenablesP. H., DalaisC., & MednickS. A. (2003). Malnutrition at age 3 years and lower cognitive ability at age 11 years: Independence from psychosocial adversity. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 157(6), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.157.6.593
Lorenzo-SevaU., & ten BergeJ. M. F. (2006). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57
33.
MerkW., de CastroB. O., KoopsW., & MatthysW. (2005). The distinction between reactive and proactive aggression: Utility for theory, diagnosis and treatment?European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2(2), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620444000300
34.
PechorroP., Ayala-NunesL., KahnR., & NunesC. (2018). The Reactive–Proactive Aggression Questionnaire: Measurement Invariance and Reliability Among a School Sample of Portuguese Youths. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 49(4), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-017-0772-6
35.
PechorroP., RayJ. V., RaineA., MorocoJ., & GonçalvesR. A. (2017). The Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire: Validation among a Portuguese sample of incarcerated juvenile delinquents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(13), 1995–2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515590784
36.
PerencL., & RadochonskiM. (2014). Psychopathic traits and reactive-proactive aggression in a large community sample of Polish adolescents. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 45(4), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-013-0432-4
RaineA., DodgeK., LoeberR., Gatzke-KoppL., LynamD., ReynoldsC., Stouthamer-LoeberM., & LiuJ. (2006). The Reactive–Proactive Aggression Questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20115
39.
RaineA., LiuJ. H., VenablesP. H., MednickS. A., & DalaisC. (2010). Cohort Profile: The Mauritius Child Health Project. International Journal of Epidemiology, 39(6), 1441–1451. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyp341
40.
RaineA., & UhS. (2019). The selfishness questionnaire: Egocentric, Adaptive, and pathological forms of selfishness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(5), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1455692
41.
RamirezJ. M., AndreuJ. M., FujiharaT., MusazadehZ., & SainiS. (2007). Justification of aggression in several Asian and European Countries with different religious and cultural background. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(1), 9–15.
42.
RevelleW. (2019). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. R package version 1.9.12. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
43.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
44.
RucevicS., & DuvnjakI. (2010). Relationship between reactive and proactive aggression, parental and peer attachments, and adolescent self-esteem. Psihologijske Teme, 19, 103–121.
45.
SchlüterT., SchliwaE. S., MayV. D., LammertzS. E., & VernalekenI. (2017). A competitively designed version of the point subtraction aggression paradigm is related to proactive aggressive and psychopathic traits in males. Psychiatry Research, 256, 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.054
46.
SeveranceL., Bui-WrzosinskaL., GelfandM. J., LyonsS., NowakA., BorkowskiW., SoomroN., SoomroN., RafaeliA., TreisterD. E., LinC.-C., & YamaguchiS. (2013). “The psychological structure of aggression across cultures:” Corrigendum. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 835–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1873
47.
SmeetsK. C., OostermeijerS., LappenschaarM., CohnM., van der MeerJ. M. J., PopmaA., JansenL. M. C., RommelseN. N. J., ScheepersF. E., & BuitelaarJ. K. (2017). Are proactive and reactive aggression meaningful distinctions in adolescents? A variable- and person-based approach. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0149-5
48.
SmeijersD. (2017). Severe Aggressive Behavior. Towards understanding some of the underlying characteristics and treatment responsivity. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12181.42728
49.
TabachnickB. G., & FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics(6th ed.). Upper Pearson.
50.
TriandisH. C. (2018). Attributes of individualism and collectivism. In NisbettR. E. (Ed.), Individualism and Collectivism (pp. 43–80). Routledge.
51.
TuckerL. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (Personnel Research Section Report No. 984). Department of the Army.
52.
TuvbladC., DhamijaD., BernstenL., RaineA., & LiuJ. (2015). Cross-cultural Validation of the Reactive-Proactive Agression Questionnaire (RPQ) Using Four Large Samples from the US, Hong Kong and China. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38(1), 48–55.
53.
TuvbladC., RaineA., ZhengM., & BakerL. A. (2009). Genetic and environmental stability differs in reactive and proactive aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 35(6), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20319
54.
van DongenJ. D. M., DrislaneL. E., NijmanH., Soe-AgnieS. E., & van MarleH. J. C. (2017). Further Evidence for Reliability and Validity of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure in a Forensic Sample and a Community Sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9567-5
55.
VitaroF., BrendgenM., & BarkerE. (2006). Subtypes of aggressive behaviors: A developmental perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406059968
56.
VitaroF., GendreauP. L., TremblayR. E., & OlignyP. (1998). Reactive and proactive aggression differentially predict later conduct problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(3), 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021963097002102
57.
WalkerS., & RichardsonD. R. (1998). Aggression strategies among older adults: Delivered but not seen. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3(3), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(96)00029-8
58.
WangM-C., GaoY., DengJ., LaiH., DengQ., & ArmourC. (2017). The factor structure and construct validity of the inventory of callous-unemotional traits in Chinese undergraduate students. PLoS ONE, 12(12), e0189003. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
