Rape myths are attitudes that implicitly and explicitly blame victims for their own sexual victimization. Greater adherence to rape myths is linked to several negative outcomes, including the neutralization of gender-based violence and the perpetration of sexual violence. Few studies have considered how previous life experiences and individual-level traits influence the development and greater adherence to rape myths. The current study examines how traits associated with the three-factor model of psychopathy (i.e., egocentric, callous, and antisocial dimensions) and adherence to traditional gender roles mediate the relationship between prior childhood/adolescent victimization and the acceptance of rape myths in a sample of college men and women (N = 789). Path modeling indicates that experiences of psychological victimization (before age 16) increased egocentric psychopathic traits, which then increased the acceptance of rape myths in men. In women, however, sexual victimization (before age 16) increased the acceptance of traditional gender roles, which then influenced the acceptance of rape myths. Additionally, the egocentric facet of psychopathy exerted indirect effects on the acceptance of rape myths through traditional views on gender roles in both men and women. These findings highlight the need to continue to examine egocentric personality traits in relation to the development of rape myths in adolescent and young adult populations. Directions for collegiate programming are discussed.
AbbeyA., Jacques-TiuraA. J., & LeBretonJ. M. (2011). Risk factors for sexual aggression in young men: An expansion of the confluence model. Aggressive Behavior, 37(5), 450–464.
2.
AbbeyA., & McAuslanP. (2004). A longitudinal examination of male college students’ perpetration of sexual assault. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(5), 747.
3.
AronowitzT., LambertC. A., & DavidoffS. (2012). The role of rape myth acceptance in the social norms regarding sexual behavior among college students. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 29(3), 173–182.
4.
BleeckerE. T., & MurnenS. K. (2005). Fraternity membership, the display of degrading sexual images of women, and rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 53, 487–493.
5.
BouffardJ. A., BouffardL. A., & MillerH. A. (2016). Examining the correlates of women’s use of sexual coercion: Proposing an explanatory model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(13), 2360–2382.
6.
BriereJ. (1992). Child abuse trauma: Theory and treatment of the lasting effects. Sage Publications.
7.
BurtM. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.
8.
ByrneB. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
9.
CarmodyD. C., & WashingtonL. M. (2001). Rape myth acceptance among college women: The impact of race and prior victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(5), 424–436.
10.
CookeD. J., & MichieC. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 171–188.
11.
DebowskaA., BoduszekD., DhingraK., KolaS., & Meller-PrunskaA. (2015). The role of psychopathy and exposure to violence in rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(15), 2751–2770.
12.
DebowskaA., BoduszekD., & WillmottD. (2018). Psychosocial correlates of attitudes toward male sexual violence in a sample of financial crime, property crime, general violent, and homicide offenders. Sexual Abuse, 30(6), 705–727.
13.
DeGueS., DiLilloD., & ScaloraM. (2010). Are all perpetrators alike? Comparing risk factors for sexual coercion and aggression. Sexual Abuse, 22(4), 402–426.
14.
ErikssonL., & MazerolleP. (2015). A cycle of violence? Examining family-of-origin violence, attitudes, and intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(6), 945–964.
15.
EwoldtC. E., MonsonC. M., & Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ. (2000). Attributions about rape in a continuum of dissolving marital relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(11), 1175–1182.
16.
FaganJ., & WexlerS. (1988). Explanations of sexual assault among violent delinquents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 3(3–4), 363–385.
17.
FisherB. S., DaigleL. E., & CullenF. T. (2009). Unsafe in the ivory tower: The sexual victimization of college women. Sage Publications.
18.
ForbesG. B., Adams-CurtisL. E., PakalkaA. H., & WhiteK. B. (2006). Dating aggression, sexual coercion, and aggression-supporting attitudes among college men as a function of participation in aggressive high school sports. Violence Against Women, 12(5), 441–455.
19.
FoxB. H., PerezN., CassE., BaglivioM. T., & EppsN. (2015). Trauma changes everything: Examining the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and serious, violent and chronic juvenile offenders. Child Abuse & Neglect, 46, 163–173.
20.
HensleyC., TewksburyR., MillerA., & KoscheskiM. (2002). Criminal justice and non-criminal justice students’ views of US correctional issues. The Justice Professional, 15(4), 303–311.
21.
HareR. D. (1991, 2003). The Hare psychopathy checklist—revised. Multi-Health Systems.
22.
HuL. T., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
23.
IrelandT. O., & SmithC. A. (2009). Living in partner-violent families: Developmental links to antisocial behavior and relationship violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(3), 323–339.
24.
KirkpatrickC., & KaninE. (1957). Male sex aggression on a university campus. American Sociological Review, 22(1), 52–58.
25.
KnightR. A., & Sims-KnightJ. E. (2003). The developmental antecedents of sexual coercion against women: Testing alternative hypotheses with structural equation modeling. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 72–85.
26.
KossM. P. (1989). Hidden rape: Sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of students in higher education. In BurgessA. W. (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault II (pp. 3–25). Garland.
27.
KossM. P., & DineroT. E. (1988). Predictors of sexual aggression among a national sample of male college students. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 528(1), 133–147.
28.
KrebsC. P., LindquistC. H., WarnerT. D., FisherB. S., & MartinS. L. (2009). College women’s experiences with physically forced, alcohol-or other drug-enabled, and drug-facilitated sexual assault before and since entering college. Journal of American College Health, 57(6), 639–649.
29.
LambertE. G. (2004). Assessing the crime and punishment views of criminal justice majors: How different are they from other majors? Criminal Justice Studies, 17(3), 245–257.
30.
LeisticoA. M. R., SalekinR. T., DeCosterJ., & RogersR. (2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the Hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32(1), 28–45.
31.
LevensonM. R., KiehlK. A., & FitzpatrickC. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 151–158.
32.
LilienfeldS. O., PydychA. L., LynnS. J., LatzmanR. D., & WaldmanI. D. (2017July). 50 differences that make a difference: A compendium of frequently confused term pairs in psychology. Frontiers in Education, 2(37), 1–4.
33.
LisakD., & MillerP. M. (2002). Repeat rape and multiple offending among undetected rapists. Violence and Victims, 17(1), 73–84.
34.
LoeberR., BurkeJ. D., & PardiniD. A. (2009). Development and etiology of disruptive and delinquent behavior. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 291–310.
35.
MackeyD. A., & CourtrightK. E. (2000). Assessing punitiveness among college students: A comparison of criminal justice majors with other majors. Criminal Justice Studies, 12(4), 423–441.
36.
MalamuthN. M., SockloskiR. J., KossM. P., & TanakaJ. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 670–681.
37.
MarxB. P., GrossA. M., & AdamsH. E. (1999). The effect of alcohol on the responses of sexually coercive and noncoercive men to an experimental rape analogue. Sexual Abuse, 11(2), 131–145.
38.
MouilsoE. R., & CalhounK. S. (2013). The role of rape myth acceptance and psychopathy in sexual assault perpetration. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 22(2), 159–174.
39.
MuthénL. K., & MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide(8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
40.
PayneD. L., LonswayK. A., & FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68.
41.
PemmentJ. (2013). Psychopathy versus sociopathy: Why the distinction has become crucial. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(5), 458–461.
42.
RaphaelJ., RennisonC. M., & JonesN. (2019). Twenty-five years of research and advocacy on violence against women: What have we accomplished, and where do we go from here? A conversation. Violence Against Women, 25(16), 2024–2046.
43.
RussellT. D., DoanC. M., & KingA. R. (2017). Sexually violent women: The PID-5, everyday sadism, and adversarial sexual attitudes predict female sexual aggression and coercion against male victims. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 242–249.
44.
RussellK. J., & HandC. J. (2017). Rape myth acceptance, victim blame attribution and just world beliefs: A rapid evidence assessment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 153–160.
45.
SellbomM. (2011). Elaborating on the construct validity of the Levenson Self-report Psychopathy Scale in incarcerated and non-incarcerated samples. Law and Human Behavior, 35(6), 440–451.
46.
SetoM. C., & LalumièreM. L. (2010). What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 526.
47.
SmithS. G., ZhangX., BasileK. C., MerrickM. T., WangJ., KresnowM., & ChenJ. (2018). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2015 Data brief—Updated release. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
48.
TempleJ. R., ShoreyR. C., TortoleroS. R., WolfeD. A., & StuartG. L. (2013). Importance of gender and attitudes about violence in the relationship between exposure to interparental violence and the perpetration of teen dating violence.Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(5), 343–352.
49.
WalshA., & WuH. H. (2008). Differentiating antisocial personality disorder, psychopathy, and sociopathy: Evolutionary, genetic, neurological, and sociological considerations. Criminal Justice Studies, 21(2), 135–152.
50.
WattsA. L., BowesS. M., LatzmanR. D., & LilienfeldS. O. (2017). Psychopathic traits predict harsh attitudes toward rape victims among undergraduates. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 1–5.
51.
WheelerJ. G., GeorgeW. H., & DahlB. J. (2002). Sexually aggressive college males: Empathy as a moderator in the “Confluence Model” of sexual aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(5), 759–775.
52.
WhiteJ. W., & SmithP. H. (2004). Sexual assault perpetration and reperpetration: From adolescence to young adulthood. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31(2), 182–202.
53.
WidomC. S. (1989). The cycle of violence. Science, 244(4901), 160–166.
54.
YappE. J., & QuayleE. (2018). A systematic review of the association between rape myth acceptance and male-on-female sexual violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 41, 1–19.
