The current study sought to examine whether parental phubbing was significantly related to adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration and if moral disengagement mediated this relationship. We further examined whether online disinhibition moderated the direct and indirect relationships between parental phubbing and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration. The participants included 2,407 adolescents from seven middle schools in China who completed the questionnaires regarding their experience with parental phubbing, moral disengagement, cyberbullying perpetration, and online disinhibition. Results indicated that adolescents with a high level of parental phubbing were likely to cyberbully others. Moral disengagement significantly mediated the relationship between parental phubbing and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration. Furthermore, online disinhibition moderated the indirect relationship between parental phubbing and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration. Specifically, the paths from parental phubbing to moral disengagement and from moral disengagement to cyberbullying perpetration became strengthened when adolescents experienced high levels of online disinhibition.
Ante-ContrerasD. (2016). Distracted parenting: How social media affects parent-child attachment[Unpublished master’s thesis]. California State University.
2.
BanduraA., BarbaranelliC., CapraraG. V., & PastorelliC. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.
3.
BaoZ., ZhangW., LaiX., SunW., & WangY. (2015). Parental attachment and Chinese adolescents’ delinquency: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Journal of Adolescence, 44, 37–47.
BogenschneiderK., SmallS. A., & TsayJ. C. (1997). Child, parent, and contextual influences on perceived parenting competence among parents of adolescents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59(2), 345–362.
6.
BusseyK., FitzpatrickS., & RamanA. (2015). The role of moral disengagement and self-efficacy in cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 30–46.
7.
ChenL., HoS. S., & LwinM. O. (2017). A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: From the social cognitive and media effects approach. New Media and Society, 19(8), 1194–1213.
ChotpitayasunondhV., & DouglasK. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9–18.
10.
DavidM. E., & RobertsJ. A. (2017). Phubbed and alone: Phone snubbing, social exclusion, and attachment to social media. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 155–163.
11.
ElsaesserC., RussellB., OhannessianM. C., & PattonD. (2017). Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents’ role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 62–72.
12.
GilbertM. A., & BushmanB. J. (2017). Frustration-aggression hypothesis. In Zeigler-HillVirgil & ShackelfordTodd K. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 1–3). Springer.
13.
GiniG., PozzoliT., & HymelS. (2014). Moral disengagement among children and youth: A meta-analytic review of links to aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 40(1), 56–68.
14.
Goodman-DeaneJ., MieczakowskiA., JohnsonD., GoldhaberT., & ClarksonP. J. (2016). The impact of communication technologies on life and relationship satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 219–229.
15.
GörzigA., & ÓlafssonK. (2013). What makes a bully a cyberbully? Unravelling the characteristics of cyberbullies across twenty-five European countries. Journal of Children and Media, 7(1), 9–27.
16.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
17.
HydeL. W., ShawD. S., & MoilanenK. L. (2010). Developmental precursors of moral disengagement and the role of moral disengagement in the development of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(2), 197–209.
18.
KowalskiR. M., GiumettiG. W., SchroederA. N., & LattannerM. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137.
19.
KurekA., JoseP. E., & StuartJ. (2019). “I did it for the LULZ”: How the dark personality predicts online disinhibition and aggressive online behavior in adolescence. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 31–40.
20.
LeppA., LiJ., BarkleyJ. E., & Salehi-EsfahaniS. (2015). Exploring the relationships between college students’ cell phone use, personality and leisure. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 210–219.
21.
LowryP. B., ZhangJ., WangC., & SiponenM. (2016). Why do adults engage in cyberbullying on social media? An integration of online disinhibition and deindividuation effects with the social structure and social learning model. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 962–986.
22.
McDanielB. T. (2019). Parent distraction with phones, reasons for use, and impacts on parenting and child outcomes: A review of the emerging research. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 72–80.
23.
McDanielB. T., & CoyneS. M. (2016). Technology interference in the parenting of young children: Implications for mothers’ perceptions of coparenting. The Social Science Journal, 53(4), 435–443.
24.
McDanielB. T., & RadeskyJ. S. (2018a). Technoference: Longitudinal associations between parent technology use, parenting stress, and child behavior problems. Pediatric Research, 84(2), 210–218.
25.
McDanielB. T., & RadeskyJ. S. (2018b). Technoference: Parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems. Child Development, 89(1), 100–109.
26.
McDanielB. T., GalovanA. M., CravensJ. D., & DrouinM. (2018). “Technoference” and implications for mothers’ and fathers’ couple and coparenting relationship quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 303–313.
27.
MeterD. J., & BaumanS. (2018). Moral disengagement about cyberbullying and parental monitoring: Effects on traditional bullying and victimization via cyberbullying involvement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(3), 303–326.
28.
MillerR. B., MasonT. M., CanlasJ. M., WangD., NelsonD. A., & HartC. H. (2013). Marital satisfaction and depressive symptoms in China. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(4), 677–682.
29.
OduorE., NeustaedterC., OdomW., TangA., MoallemN., & ToryM., & IraniP. (2016, June 04–08). The frustrations and benefits of mobile device usage in the home when co-present with family members[Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Brisbane, Australia.
30.
OrueI., & CalveteE. (2016). Psychopathic traits and moral disengagement interact to predict bullying and cyberbullying among adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516660302
31.
RobertsJ. A., & DavidM. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141.
32.
RobsonC., & WitenbergR. T. (2013). The influence of moral disengagement, morally based self-esteem, age, and gender on traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 12(2), 211–231.
33.
SlonjeR., & SmithP. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 147–154.
34.
StockdaleL. A., CoyneS. M., & Padilla-WalkerL. M. (2018). Parent and child technoference and socioemotional behavioral outcomes: A nationally representative study of 10- to 20-year-old adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 219–226.
UdrisR. (2014). Cyberbullying among high school students in Japan: Development and validation of the online disinhibition scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 253–261.
37.
WachsS., & WrightM. F. (2018). Associations between bystanders and perpetrators of online hate: The moderating role of toxic online disinhibition. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15092030
38.
WachsS., & WrightM. F. (2019). The moderation of online disinhibition and sex on the relationship between online hate victimization and perpetration. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(5), 300–306.
39.
WachsS., WrightM. F., & VazsonyiA. T. (2019). Understanding the overlap between cyberbullying and cyberhate perpetration: Moderating effects of toxic online disinhibition. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 29(3), 179–188.
40.
WangX., GaoL., YangJ., ZhaoF., & WangP. (2020). Parental phubbing and adolescents’ depressive symptoms: Self-esteem and perceived social support as moderators. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-10019-01185-x
41.
WangX., LeiL., LiuD., & HuH. (2016). Moderating effects of moral reasoning and gender on the relation between moral disengagement and cyberbullying in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 244–249.
42.
WangX., XieX., WangY., WangP., & LeiL. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 12–17.
43.
WangX., YangJ., WangP., & LeiL. (2019). Childhood maltreatment, moral disengagement, and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration: Fathers’ and mothers’ moral disengagement as moderators. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 48–57.
44.
WangX., YangL., GaoL., YangJ., LeiL., & WangC. (2017). Childhood maltreatment and Chinese adolescents’ bullying and defending: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Child Abuse & Neglect, 69, 134–144.
45.
WangX., ZhaoF., YangJ., & LeiL. (2019). School climate and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and friends’ moral identity. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519860089
46.
WrightM. F. (2014). Predictors of anonymous cyber aggression: The role of adolescents’ beliefs about anonymity, aggression, and the permanency of digital content. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(7), 431–438.
47.
WrightM. F., AoyamaI., KambleS., LiZ., SoudiS., & LeiL., & ShuC. (2015). Peer attachment and cyber aggression involvement among Chinese, Indian, and Japanese adolescents. Societies, 5(2), 339–353.
48.
WrightM. F., HarperB. D., & WachsS. (2019). The associations between cyberbullying and callous-unemotional traits among adolescents: The moderating effect of online disinhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 140, 41–45.
49.
YangX., WangZ., HuanC., & LiuD. (2018). Cyberbullying among Chinese adolescents: The role of interparental conflict, moral disengagement, and moral identity. Children and Youth Services Review, 86, 256–263.
50.
ZhangX., ChuX., & FangC. (2019). Peer victimization and cyberbullying: A mediating moderation model. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27(1), 148–152.
