Stalking Behaviors Presented by Ex-Intimate Stalkers: A Victim’s Perspective

Abstract

Stalking can be defined as a pattern of repeated, unwanted behaviors by one person to another. These behaviors may take the form of communicative intrusion, third-party contact, and physical or sexual assault. The individual stalking behaviors experienced by victims have been found to differ in every case, specifically dependent on their stalker–victim relationship. Recent tragedies have shown that the police force generally underestimates the risk of ex-intimate stalking and harassment behaviors. This study aims to identify patterns of stalking behaviors from a victim’s perspective, specifically, whether there are any patterns of behavior among the ex-intimate stalkers, in comparison with acquaintance or stranger stalkers. Information from the accounts of individuals who had reported unwanted experiences as a result of one of three stalker–victim relationships (ex-intimate, acquaintance, or stranger) was extracted from the National Stalking Helpline database. Analyses were conducted on a sample of 1,626 victims’ reports. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple logistic regressions were conducted to establish any common patterns of behavior among the subgroups of stalkers and to ascertain which behaviors increased the odds of being categorized as an ex-intimate stalker. Results indicated that ex-intimate stalkers presented considerably more behaviors than acquaintance or stranger stalkers; some of which included third-party contact, criminal damage, physical assault, and sexual assault. Results also indicated that ex-intimate stalkers presented more severe behaviors than the other subgroups. The majority of stalking behaviors were found to produce a statistically significant predictive contribution to being classed as an ex-intimate stalker. The findings in this study highlight that common misconception surrounding ex-intimate stalking still exists at every level of the Criminal Justice System. Results and implications for future research are discussed.

Keywords

stalking domestic violence prevention violence harassment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chan

H. C.

Sheridan

(2020a). Coping with stalking and harassment victimization: Exploring the coping approaches of young male and female adults in Hong Kong. Legal and Criminological Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12168

Chan

H. C.

Sheridan

(2020b). Who are the stalking victims? Exploring the victimization experiences and psychosocial characteristics of young male and female adults in Hong Kong. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519889938

Coleman

F. L.

(1997). Stalking behavior and the cycle of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626097012003007

Douglas

K. S.

Dutton

D. G.

(2001). Assessing the link between stalking and domestic violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 519–546. https://doi.org/10.106/S1359-1789(00)00018-5

Farnham

F. R.

James

D. V.

Cantrell

(2000). Association between violence, psychosis, and relationship to victim in stalkers. The Lancet, 355(9199), P199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04706-6

Hall

D. M.

(1998). The victims of stalking. In The psychology of stalking (pp. 113–137). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012490560-3/50025-6

Harmon

R. B.

Rosner

Owens

(1998). Sex and violence in a forensic population of obsessional harassers. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4(1–2), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.4.1-2.236

James

D. V.

MacKenzie

R. D.

(2018). Stalking and harassment. In Ireland

J. L.

Birch

Ireland

C. A.

(Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of human aggression: Current issues and perspectives (pp. 170-182). Routledge.

Logan

T.K.

Leukefeld

Walker

(2000). Stalking as a variant of intimate violence: implications from a young adult sample. Violence and Victims, 15(1), 91-111.

10.

Lowney

K. S.

Best

(2017). Stalking strangers and lovers: Changing media typifications of a new crime problem. In Best

(Ed.), Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems (pp. 33–58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351310284-5

11.

McEwan

T. E.

Shea

D. E.

Nazarewicz

Senkans

(2017). Reassessing the link between stalking and intimate partner abuse. Partner Abuse, 8(3), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.8.3.223

12.

Metropolitan Police Service. (1997). The Protection from Harassment Act 1997: A guide (Version 2.0). New Scotland Yard.

13.

Mohandie

Meloy

J. R.

McGowan

M. G.

Williams

(2006). The RECON typology of stalking: Reliability and validity based upon a large sample of North American stalkers. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51(1), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00030.x

14.

Mullen

P. E.

Pathé

Purcell

(2000). Stalkers and their victims. Cambridge University Press.

15.

Mullen

P. E.

Pathé

Purcell

Stuart

G. W.

(1999). Study of stalkers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1244–1249. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.156.8.1244

16.

Norris

S. M.

Huss

M. T.

Palarea

R. E.

(2011). A pattern of violence: Analyzing the relationship between intimate partner violence and stalking. Violence and Victims, 26(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.26.1.103

17.

Office for National Statistics. (2016). Compendium: Intimate personal violence and partner abuse.

18.

Rosenfeld

Harmon

(2002). Factors associated with violence in stalking and obsessional harassment cases. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 29(6), 671–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385402237998

19.

Scott

A. J.

Nixon

Sheridan

(2013). The influence of prior relationship on perceptions of stalking: A comparison of laypersons, nonspecialist police officers, and specialist police officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(12), 1434–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813494183

20.

Scott

A. J.

Sheridan

(2011). “Reasonable” perceptions of stalking: The influence of conduct severity and the perpetrator–target relationship. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17(4), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160903203961

21.

Senkans

McEwan

T. E.

Ogloff

J. R.

(2017). Assessing the link between intimate partner violence and post relationship stalking: A gender-inclusive study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517734859

22.

Serious Crime Act. (2015). Serious Crime Act 2015. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/9/contents

23.

Sheridan

Boon

(2002). Stalker typologies: Implications for law enforcement. In Stalking and psychosexual obsession: Psychological perspectives for prevention, policing and treatment (pp. 63–82). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713037.ch5

24.

Sheridan

Davies

G. M.

(2001). Violence and the prior victim–stalker relationship. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 11(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.375

25.

Sheridan

Gillett

Davies

(2000). “Stalking”–Seeking the victim’s perspective. Psychology, Crime & Law, 6(4), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160008409807

26.

Spitzberg

B. H.

(2002). The tactical topography of stalking victimization and management. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3(4), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838002237330

27.

Stark

(2009). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. Oxford University Press.

28.

Tjaden

Thoennes

(1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the national violence against women survey. National Institute of Justice, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

29.

Viñas-Racionero

Raghavan

Soria-Verde

M. Á.

Prat-Santaolaria

(2017). The association between stalking and violence in a sample of Spanish partner violence cases. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(5), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15598165

30.

Zona

M. A.

Sharma

K. K.

Lane

(1993). A comparative study of erotomanic and obsessional subjects in a forensic sample. Journal of Forensic Science, 38(4), 894–903. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS13486J