This study examined the severity of intimate partner violence (IPV) experienced by men in their ongoing relationships and their help-seeking behavior with the criminal justice system and other professional agencies. This study also examined the extent to which socio-demographic variables predicted formal help seeking among male victims of IPV. Data were drawn from 2009 and 2014 cycles of the Canadian General Social Survey on Victimization with a nationally representative sample of 52,400 respondents. It is estimated that about 655,400 men in Canada reported having experienced physical and/or sexual victimization due to IPV in married/common-law relationships at the time of the surveys between 2004 and 2014. The latent class analysis generated four types of IPV victimization among men. Among male victims of physical and/or sexual IPV, about 64,000 men experienced the most severe type of IPV characterized by chronic and severe physical and psychological violence with a high probability of injuries and negative emotional effects of IPV. Although most of the male victims of IPV did not seek formal help (e.g., did not contact the police and IPV services), the severity of experienced violence was associated with the increased use of formal services. Some structural factors, such as being unemployed and residing with young children, were found to be substantial barriers to contacting formal agencies for help. Our findings highlight the need for the development of gender-inclusive and gender-sensitive public policy and intervention programs that help all victims of IPV regardless of victim gender.
AddisM. E.MahalikJ. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58(1), 5–14.
2.
AnsaraD. L.HindinM. J. (2010a). Exploring gender differences in the patterns of intimate partner violence in Canada: A latent class approach. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 64(10), 849–854.
3.
AnsaraD. L.HindinM. J. (2010b). Formal and informal help seeking associated with women’s and men’s experiences of intimate partner violence in Canada. Social Science & Medicine, 70(7), 1011–1018.
4.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651–680.
5.
BarrettB. J.PierreM. S. (2011). Variations in women’s help seeking in response to intimate partner violence: Findings from a Canadian population-based study. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 47–70.
6.
BasileS. (2005). A measure of court response to requests for protection. Journal of Family Violence, 20(3), 171–179.
7.
BeattieS.HutchinsH. (2015). Shelters for abused women in Canada, 2014. Statistics Canada.
8.
BreidingM. J. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries, 63(8), 1–18.
9.
BrooksC.MartinS.BrodaL.PoudrierJ. (2017). “How many silences are there?” Men’s experience of victimization in intimate partner relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517719905
10.
BurczyckaM. (2016). Trends in self-reported spousal violence in Canada, 2014. In Juristat, Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile (pp. 3–20). Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics.
11.
BuzawaE. S.BuzawaC. G.StarkE. (2017). Responding to domestic violence: The integration of criminal justice and human services (5th ed.). SAGE.
12.
ChoH.WilkeD. J. (2010). Gender differences in the nature of the intimate partner violence and effects of perpetrator arrest on revictimization. Journal of Family Violence, 25(4), 393–400.
13.
CokerA. L.SmithP. H.McKeownR. E.KingM. J. (2000). Frequency and correlates of intimate partner violence by type: Physical, sexual, and psychological battering. American Journal of Public Health, 90(4), 553–559.
14.
ConnellR. W. (2005). Masculinities. Polity Press.
15.
DesmaraisS. L.ReevesK. A.NichollsT. L.TelfordR. P.FiebertM. S. (2012). Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships, Part 1: Rates of male and female victimization. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 140–169.
16.
DobashR. P.DobashR. E.WilsonM.DalyM. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39(1), 71–91.
17.
DouglasE. M.HinesD. A. (2011). The helpseeking experiences of men who sustain intimate partner violence: An overlooked population and implications for practice. Journal of Family Violence, 26(6), 473–485.
18.
DuganL.NaginD. S.RosenfeldR. (1999). Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: The effects of changing domesticity, women’s status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies, 3(3), 187–214.
19.
DuttonD. G. (2010). The gender paradigm and the architecture of antiscience. Partner Abuse, 1(1), 5–25.
20.
DuttonD. G.NichollsT. L. (2005). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1—The conflict of theory and data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(6), 680–714.
21.
EllsbergM.JansenH. A.HeiseL.WattsC. H.Garcia-MorenoC. (2008). Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: An observational study. The Lancet, 371(9619), 1165–1172.
22.
GondolfE. W.FisherE. R. (1988). Battered women as survivors: An alternative to treating learned helplessness. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
23.
HamelJ. (2011). In dubious battle: The politics of mandatory arrest and dominant aggressor laws. Partner Abuse, 2(2), 224–245.
24.
HamelJ.DesmaraisS.NichollsT.Malley-MorrisonK.AaronsonJ. (2009). Domestic violence and child custody: Are family court professionals’ decisions based on erroneous beliefs?Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 1(2), 37–52.
25.
HinesD. A.BrownJ.DunningE. (2007). Characteristics of callers to the domestic abuse helpline for men. Journal of Family Violence, 22(2), 63–72.
26.
HinesD. A.DouglasE. M. (2010). A closer look at men who sustain intimate terrorism by women. Partner Abuse, 1(3), 286–313.
27.
HinesD. A.DouglasE. M. (2011). The reported availability of U.S. domestic violence services to victims who vary by age, sexual orientation, and gender. Partner Abuse, 2(1), 3–30.
28.
HinesD. A.DouglasE. M. (2019). An empirical test of Johnson’s typology of intimate partner violence in two samples of men. Partner Abuse, 10(2), 180–198.
29.
JasinskiJ.BlumensteinL.MorganR. (2014). Testing Johnson’s typology: Is there gender symmetry in intimate terrorism. Violence and Victims, 29(1), 73–88.
30.
JohnsonM. P. (2006). Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1003–1018.
31.
JohnsonM. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance and situational couple violence. Northwestern University Press.
32.
JohnsonM. P.LeoneJ. M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26(3), 322–349.
33.
LienM. I.LorentzenJ. (2019). Men’s experiences of violence in intimate relationships. Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
LysovaA. (2016). Embracing the complexity of partner violence from a violent events perspective. Journal of Family Violence, 31(8), 1005–1008.
35.
LysovaA.DimE.DuttonD. (2019). Prevalence and consequences of intimate partner violence in Canada as measured by the national victimization survey. Partner Abuse, 10(2), 199–221.
36.
LysovaA.HansonK.DixonL.DouglasE.HinesD.CeliE. (2020). Internal and external barriers to help seeking: Voices of men who experienced abuse in the intimate relationships. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20919710
37.
LysovaA.HansonK.HinesD.DixonL.DouglasE.CeliE. (in press). A qualitative study of the male victims’ experiences of the criminal justice response to intimate partner abuse in four English-speaking countries. Criminal Justice and Behaviour.
38.
MachadoA.SantosA.Graham-KevanN.MatosM. (2017). Exploring help seeking experiences of male victims of female perpetrators of IPV. Journal of Family Violence, 32(5), 513–523.
MansfieldA. K.AddisM. E.MahalikJ. R. (2003). “Why won’t he go to the doctor?” The psychology of men’s help seeking. International Journal of Men’s Health, 2, 93–110.
41.
McCarrickJ.Davis-McCabeC.Hirst-WinthropS. (2016). Men’s experiences of the criminal justice system following female perpetrated intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 31(2), 203–213.
42.
MelanderL. A.NoelH.TylerK. A. (2010). Bidirectional, unidirectional, and nonviolence: A comparison of the predictors among partnered young adults. Violence and Victims, 25, 617–630.
43.
MeleM.RobertsJ. C.WolferL. (2011). Men who seek protection orders against female intimate partners. Partner Abuse, 2(1), 61–75.
44.
MorganW.WellsM. (2016). “It’s deemed unmanly”: Men’s experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV). The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 27(3), 404–418.
45.
MullerH.DesmaraisS.HamelJ. (2009). Do judicial responses to restraining order requests discriminate against male victims of domestic abuse?. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 625–637.
46.
MuthénB.MuthénL. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(6), 882–891.
47.
OverstreetN. M.QuinnD. M. (2013). The intimate partner violence stigmatization model and barriers to help seeking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(1), 109–122.
48.
PierottiR. S. (2013). Increasing rejection of intimate partner violence: Evidence of global cultural diffusion. American Sociological Review, 78(2), 240–265.
49.
Statistics Canada. (2016). General Social Survey, 2014: Microdata user guide.
50.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316.
51.
TenkorangE. Y.SedziafaA. P.OwusuA. Y. (2017). Does type and severity of violence affect the help seeking behaviors of victims of intimate partner violence in Nigeria?Journal of Family Issues, 38(14), 2026–2046.
52.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6(2), 142–161.
53.
TsuiV. (2014). Male victims of intimate partner abuse: Use and helpfulness of services. Social Work, 59(2), 121–130.
54.
TsuiV.CheungM.LeungP. (2010). Help-seeking among male victims of partner abuse: Men’s hard times. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(6), 769–780.
VogelD. L.Heimerdinger-EdwardsS. R.HammerJ. H.HubbardA. (2011). “Boys don’t cry”: Examination of the links between endorsement of masculine norms, self-stigma, and help seeking attitudes for men from diverse backgrounds. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(3), 368–382.
57.
WalkerL. E. (2006). Battered woman syndrome: Empirical findings. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087(1), 142–157.
