This study explored how perceptions of intimate partner abuse severity and perpetrator responsibility differed based upon gender of the perpetrator/victim, participants’ gender, the type of abuse (physical vs. psychological), and the medium of abuse (in person vs. texting). Participants were undergraduates (N = 593, aged 18–27), including 457 women and 136 men from two colleges in the Northeastern United States, who completed surveys for course credit. Results demonstrated that participants perceived abuse perpetrated by a male as more severe than abuse by a female, and physical abuse as more severe than psychological abuse. Furthermore, an interaction between perpetrator gender and abuse type indicated that abuse by males was viewed as more severe regardless of whether it occurred in person or electronically. In addition, participants attributed more responsibility to males and those who committed physical abuse. These findings are discussed in light of limitations and implications for future research.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.
2.
BastowS. A.CahillK. F.PhelanJ. E.LongshoreK.McGillicuddy-DeLisiA. (2007). Perceptions of relational and physical aggression among college students: Effects of gender of perpetrator, target, and perceiver. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00333.x
3.
BaymN. K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Polity Press.
4.
BeyersJ. M.LeonardJ. M.MaysV. K.RosénL. A. (2000). Gender differences in the perception of courtship abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(5), 451–466.
5.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WalterM. L.MerrickM. T.… StevensM. R. (2011). National intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6.
BreidingM. J. (2015). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011. American Journal of Public Health, 105(4), E11–E12.
7.
CapezzaN. M.ArriagaX. B. (2008). Factors associated with acceptance of psychological aggression against women. Violence Against Women, 14, 612–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208319004
8.
CapezzaN. M.D’IntinoL. A.FlynnM. A.ArriagaX. B. (2017). Perceptions of psychological abuse: The role of perpetrator gender, victim’s response, and sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517741215
9.
CokerA. L.DavisK. E.AriasI.DesaiS.SandersonM.BrandtH. M.SmithP. H. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23, 260–268. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00514-7
10.
CoyneS. M.StockdaleL.BusbyD.IversonB.GrantD. M. (2011). “I luv u:)!”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 60(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00639.x
11.
CronbachL. J.MeehlP. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
12.
DardisC. M.EdwardsK. M.KelleyE. L.GidyczC. A. (2015). Perceptions of dating violence and associated correlates: A study of college young adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 3245–3271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515597439
13.
David-FerdonC.HertzM. F. (2007). Electronic media, violence, and adolescents: An emerging public health problem. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S1–S5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.020
14.
DeHartD. D.FollingstadD. R.FieldsA. M. (2010). Does context matter in determining psychological abuse? Effects of pattern, harm, relationship, and norms. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9307-7
15.
DennisonS. M.ThompsonC. M. (2011). Intimate partner violence: The effect of gender and contextual factors on community perceptions of harm, and suggested victim and criminal justice responses. Violence and Victims, 26, 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.26.3.347
16.
DillonG.HussainR.LoxtonD.RahmanS. (2013). Mental and physical health and intimate partner violence against women: A review of the literature. International Journal of Family Medicine, 2013, Article 313909. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/313909
17.
DrauckerC. B.MartsolfD. S. (2010). The role of electronic communication technology in adolescent dating violence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 23(3), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6171.2010.00235.x
18.
DuerksenK. N.WoodinE. M. (2019). Cyber dating abuse victimization: Links with psychosocial functioning. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519872982
19.
HambyS.JacksonA. (2010). Size does matter: The effects of gender on perceptions of dating violence. Sex Roles, 63, 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9816-0
20.
HammockG. S.RichardsonD. S.WilliamsC.JanitA. S. (2015). Perceptions of psychological and physical aggression between heterosexual partners. Journal of Family Violence, 30, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9645-y
21.
HarrisR. J.CookC. A. (1994). Attributions about spouse abuse: It matters who the batterers and victims are. Sex Roles, 30(7–8), 553–565.
HayesA. F. (2013). Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. In Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Publications.
24.
HutchinsonK. M. (2012). Predictors of college students’ dating violence perceptions and help-seeking recommendations [Doctoral dissertation]. http://www.ohiolink.edu/etd
25.
KohutA.WikeR.HorowitzJ. M.SimmonsK.PoushterJ.BarkerC.… GrossE. M. (2011). Global digital communication: Texting, social networking popular worldwide. Pew Global Attitudes Project, Pew Research Center.
26.
LawrenceE.YoonJ.LangerA.RoE. (2009). Is psychological aggression as detrimental as physical aggression? The independent effects of psychological aggression on depression and anxiety symptoms. Violence and Victims, 24(1), 20–35.
27.
LittleB.TerranceC. (2010). Perceptions of domestic violence in lesbian relationship: Stereotypes and gender role expectations. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360903543170
28.
MarganskiA.MelanderL. (2018). Intimate partner violence victimization in the cyber and real world: Examining the extent of cyber aggression experiences and its association with in-person dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 1071–1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515614283
29.
MelanderL. A. (2010). College students’ perceptions of intimate partner cyber harassment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0221
30.
MitchellK. J.FinkelhorD.WolakJ.YbarraM. L.TurnerH. (2011). Youth internet victimization in a broader victimization context. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.06.009
31.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1978). Psychometric testing. McGraw-Hill.
32.
Owarish-GrossJ. (2012). Do gender and relationship composition affect college students’ perceptions of intimate partner violence severity? [Senior Theses]. Trinity College, Hartford, CT.
RobertsJ.YayaL.ManolisC. (2014). The invisible addiction: Cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3(4), 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.3.2014.015
35.
SargentK. S.KraussA.JourilesE. N.McDonaldR. (2016). Cyber victimization, psychological intimate partner violence, and problematic mental health outcomes among first-year college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(9), 545–550. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0115
36.
SorensonS. B.TaylorC. A. (2005). Female aggression toward male intimate partners: An examination of social norms in a community-based sample. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00170.x
37.
SouthworthC.FinnJ.DawsonS.FraserC.TuckerS. (2007). Intimate partner violence, technology, and stalking. Violence Against Women, 13, 842–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207302045
38.
SylaskaK. M.WaltersA. S. (2014). Testing the extent of the gender trap: College students’ perceptions of and reactions to intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 70, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0344-1
39.
TaylorC. A.SorensonS. B. (2005). Community-based norms about intimate partner violence: Putting attributions of fault and responsibility into context. Sex Roles, 53, 573–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-7143-7
40.
ThompsonR. S.BonomiA. E.AndersonM.ReidR. J.DimerJ. A.CarrellD.RivaraF. P. (2006). Intimate partner violence: Prevalence, types, and chronicity in adult women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30, 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.01.016
41.
YbarraM. L.EspelageD. L.MitchellK. J. (2007). The co-occurrence of online verbal aggression and sexual solicitation victimization and perpetration: Association with psychosocial indicators. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S31–S41. http://doi.org.library.emmanuel.edu:2048/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.010
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
