All states issue criminal protection orders (POs) with the intention of improving the lives of victims of domestic violence (DV); however, there is a dearth of research examining their impact. This study aims to examine the impact of criminal POs with different levels of restrictions on victims’ revictimization, mental health, and well-being. A cross-sectional design was used to collect data regarding two time points during one interview among a sample of 298 victims in a criminal DV case. Across the three levels of PO restrictions (limited, residential stay-away, and full no-contact), participants reported significantly reduced physical, sexual, and psychological DV; unwanted pursuit behavior; post-traumatic stress and depression symptom severity; and perceived stress and fear of revictimization. The amount of change varied between groups for revictimization variables. Full no-contact restrictions were associated with the greatest decreases in revictimization. However, findings must be interpreted with caution given the heterogeneity in victims’ experiences; some victims experienced an increase in revictimization and mental health problems and a decrease in well-being. Findings suggest that the court, through criminal POs, may be a system through which to reach victims who might not otherwise connect with services to promote safety and resilience.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
2.
BellM. E.PerezS.GoodmanL. A.DuttonM. A. (2010). Battered women’s perceptions of civil and criminal court helpfulness: The role of court outcome and process. Violence Against Women, 17, 71-88. Retrieved from http://vaw.sagepub.com/content/17/1/71.abstract
3.
BenitezC. T.McNielD. E.BinderR. L. (2010). Do protection orders protect?The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38, 376-385. Retrieved from http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/content/abstract/38/3/376
4.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 57, 289-300. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101
5.
BrameR.KaukinenC.GoverA. R.LattimoreP. K. (2015). No-contact orders, victim safety, and offender recidivism in cases of misdemeanor criminal domestic violence: A randomized experiment. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 225-249. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12103-014-9242-x.pdf
BrislinR. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
8.
CampbellJ. C.WebsterD.Koziol-McLainJ.BlockC.CampbellD.CurryM. A.. . . LaughonK. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089-1097. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447915/pdf/0931089.pdf
9.
CastilloR. (2015). Safety strategy use among women seeking temporary protective orders: The relationship between violence experienced, strategy effectiveness, and risk perception. Violence and Victims, 30, 614-635.
10.
CattaneoL. B.GoodmanL. A.EpsteinD.KohnL. S.ZanvilleH. A. (2009). The victim-informed prosecution project: A quasi-experimental test of a collaborative model for cases of intimate partner violence. Violence against Women, 15, 1227-1247. Retrieved from http://vaw.sagepub.com/content/15/10/1227.abstract
11.
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 386-396.
12.
Connecticut Statistical Analysis Center. (2007, June). Family violence case flow analysis. New Britain: Author.
13.
DurfeeA.MessingJ. T. (2012). Characteristics related to protection order use among victims of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 18, 701-710. doi:10.1177/1077801212454256
14.
FelsonR. B.MessnerS. F.HoskinA. W.DeaneG. (2002). Reasons for reporting and not reporting domestic violence to the police. Criminology, 40, 617-648. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00968.x
15.
FoaE. B.CashmanL.JaycoxL.PerryK. (1997). The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: The Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale. Psychological Assessment, 9, 445-451.
16.
FugateM.LandisL.RiordanK.NaureckasS.EngelB. (2005). Barriers to domestic violence help seeking: Implications for intervention. Violence Against Women, 11, 290-310. Retrieved from http://vaw.sagepub.com/content/11/3/290.full.pdf
17.
GoldingJ. M. (1999). Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 99-132.
18.
HartleyC. C. (2003). A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to the trial process in domestic violence felony trials. Violence Against Women, 9, 410-437. doi:10.1177/1077801202250954
19.
HermanJ. L. (2003). The mental health of crime victims: Impact of legal intervention. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 159-166. doi:10.1023/A:1022847223135
20.
HoltV. L.KernicM. A.LumleyT.WolfM. E.RivaraF. P. (2002). Civil protection orders and risk of subsequent police-reported violence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 589-594. Retrieved from https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/195163/JOC10429.pdf
21.
HoltV. L.KernicM. A.WolfM. E.RivaraF. P. (2003). Do protection orders affect the likelihood of future partner violence and injury?American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24, 16-21. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00576-7
22.
KeilitzS.HannafordP.EfkemanH. (1996). Civil protection orders: The benefits and limitations for victims of domestic violence. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Justice.
23.
KethineniS.BeichnerD. (2009). A comparison of civil and criminal orders of protection as remedies for domestic violence victims in a Midwestern county. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 311-321. doi:10.1007/s10896-009-9231-x
24.
KossM. P.OrosC. J. (1982). Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455-457. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.50.3.455
LoganT. K.WalkerR.HoytW. (2012). The economic costs of partner violence and the cost-benefit of civil protective orders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 1137-1154. doi:10.1177/0886260511424500
McFarlaneJ.MalechaA.GistJ.WatsonK.BattenE.HallI.SmithS. (2004). Protection orders and intimate partner violence: An 18-month study of 150 Black, Hispanic, and White women. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 613-618. Retrieved from http://ajph.aphapublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/94/4/613
32.
McFarlaneJ.SymesL.MaddouxJ.GilroyH.KociA. (2014). Is length of shelter stay and receipt of a protection order associated with less violence and better functioning for abused women? Outcome data 4 months after receiving services. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2748-2774. doi:10.1177/0886260514526060
33.
Office on Violence Against Women. (2019, May31). Department of Justice, Personal Communication.
34.
MillerG. A.ChapmanJ. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(1), 40.
35.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
36.
RussellB.RagatzL.KrausS. W. (2012). Expert testimony of the battered person syndrome, defendant gender, and sexual orientation in a case of duress: Evaluating legal decisions. Journal of Family Violence, 27, 659-670.
37.
SmithA. (2000). It’s my decision, isn’t it? A research note on battered women’s perceptions of mandatory intervention laws. Violence Against Women, 6, 1384-1402.
38.
SpencerC. M.MalloryA. B.CafferkyB. M.KimmesJ. G.BeckA. R.StithS. M. (2019). Mental health factors and intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Violence, 9(1), 1-17. doi:10.1037/vio0000156
39.
SpencerC. M.StithS. M. (2020). Risk factors for male perpetration and female victimization of intimate partner homicide: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(3), 527-540. doi:10.1177/1524838018781101
40.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.WarrenW. L. (2003). The conflict tactics scales handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
41.
SullivanT. P.WeissN. H.PriceC.PughN. E. (2021). Criminal protection orders for women victims of domestic violence: Explicating predictors of level of restrictions among orders issued. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1-2), NP643-NP662. doi:10.1177/0886260517736274
42.
SwanS. C. (2002). Fear of partner scale. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
43.
TolmanR. M. (1999). The validation of the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory. Violence and Victims, 14, 25-37.
44.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2002). Legal series bulletin. In Office for Victims of Crime (Ed.), Enforcement of protective orders (Vol. 4, pp. 1-7). Washington, DC: Author.
45.
WexlerD. B.WinickB. J. (1991). Essays in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
