Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Bystander interventions for sexual assault promote third-party interference. People who endorse rape myths blame victims more and perpetrators less; consequently, rape myth acceptance (RMA) can impede helping behaviors toward sexual assault victims. Acute alcohol intoxication may exacerbate the effects of RMA on bystander intervention. In this study, we examined the influence of RMA—and potential moderating effect of acute alcohol intoxication—on predictors of bystander intervention. Young adults (N = 128) completed a survey in a lab setting, then consumed either an alcoholic or control beverage, read and listened to a fictional sexual assault scenario, and finally completed a semi-structured interview and postexperiment survey assessing their perceptions of the scenario. Using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA), we found people with higher RMA blamed the victim more and perpetrator less; they were also less likely to perceive responsibility to intervene for a sexual assault victim. Alcohol intoxication did not exacerbate these effects. That is, alcohol intoxication was not a context in which RMA was expressed more strongly. We recommend bystander programs continue to address RMA, specifically as a barrier to intervening.

Keywords

bystander intervention rape myths alcohol intoxication sexual assault rape

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armstrong

E. A.

Hamilton

Sweeney

(2006). Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape. Social Problems, 53, 483-499. doi:10.1525/sp.2006.53.4.483

Banyard

V. L.

Moynihan

M. M.

(2011). Variation in bystander behavior related to sexual and intimate partner violence prevention: Correlates in a sample of college students. Psychology of Violence, 1, 287-301. doi:10.1037/a0023544

Banyard

V. L.

Moynihan

M. M.

Crossman

M. T.

(2009). Reducing sexual violence on campus: The role of student leaders as empowered bystanders. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 446-457. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0083

Bennett

Banyard

V. L.

(2016). Do friends really help friends? The effect of relational factors and perceived severity on bystander perception of sexual violence. Psychology of Violence, 6, 64-72. doi:10.1037/a0037708

Bohner

Eyssel

Pina

Siebler

Viki

G. T.

(2009). Rape myth acceptance: Cognitive, affective and behavioural effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator. In Horvath

M. A. H.

Brown

J. M.

(Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 17-45). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.

Campus SaVE Act. (2011, May). H.R.2016—112th United States Congress. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/2016/text

Canan

S. N.

Jozkowski

K. N.

Crawford

(2016). Sexual assault in Greek fraternity and sorority life: An analysis of rape myth acceptance and token resistance in Greek and non-Greek college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 3502-3530. doi:10.1177/0886260516636064

Davis

K. C.

(2010). The influence of alcohol expectancies and intoxication on men’s aggressive unprotected sexual intentions. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 18, 418–428. doi:10.1037/a0020510

Davis

K. C.

Hendershot

C. S.

George

W. H.

Norris

Heiman

J. R.

(2007). Alcohol’s effect on sexual decision making: An integration of alcohol myopia and individual differences. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68, 843-851. doi:10.15288/jsad.2007.68.843

10.

Drouin

Jozkowski

K. N.

Davis

Newsham

(2018). How does alcohol consumption affect perceptions of one’s own and a drinking partner’s ability to consent to sexual activity? The Journal of Sex Research, 56, 740-753. Online Advance of Print. doi:10.1080/00224499.2018.1509290

11.

Fleming

W. M.

Wiersma-Mosley

(2015). The role of alcohol consumption patterns and pro-social bystander interventions in contexts of gender violence. Violence Against Women, 21, 1259-1283. doi:10.1177/1077801215592721

12.

Ham

L.S.

Wiersma-Mosley

J.D.

Wolkowicz

N.R.

Jozkowski

K.N.

Bridges

A.J.

Melkonian

A.J.

(2019). Effect of Alcohol Intoxication on Bystander Intervention in a Vignette Depiction of Sexual Assault. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 80(2), 252-260. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2019.80.252

13.

Holmila

Raitasalo

(2005). Gender differences in drinking: Why do they still exist? Addiction, 100, 1763-1769. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01249.x

14.

Jozkowski

K. N.

(2015). Beyond the dyad: An assessment of sexual assault prevention education focused on social determinants of sexual assault among college students. Violence Against Women, 21, 848-874. doi:10.1177/1077801215584069

15.

Jozkowski

K. N.

Sanders

S. A.

Peterson

Z. D.

Dennis

Reece

(2014). Consenting to sexual activity: The development and psychometric assessment of dual measures of consent. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 437-450. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0225-7

16.

Latané

Darley

(1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

17.

McMahon

(2010). Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health, 59, 3-11. doi:10.1080/07448481.2010.483715

18.

McMahon

Banyard

V. L.

(2012). When can I help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13, 3-14. doi:10.1177/1524838011426015

19.

Muehlenhard

C. L.

Peterson

Z. D.

Humphreys

T. P.

Jozkowski

K. N.

(2017). Evaluating the one in five statistic: Women’s risk of sexual assault while in college. The Journal of Sex Research, 54, 549-576. doi:10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014

20.

Navarro

J. C.

Tewksbury

(2017). Mythbusters: Examining rape myth acceptance among US university students. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 54, 343-356. doi:10.1080/19496591.2017.1289094

21.

Orchowski

L. M.

Berkowitz

Boggis

Oesterle

(2016). Bystander intervention among college men: The role of alcohol and correlates of sexual aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 2824-2846. doi:10.1177/0886260515581904

22.

Payne

D. L.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238

23.

Pituch

K. A.

Stevens

J. P.

(2015). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS. London, England: Routledge.

24.

Steele

C. M.

Josephs

R. A.

(1990). Alcohol myopia: Its prized and dangerous effects. American Psychologist, 45, 921-933. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.8.921

25.

Wilsnack

R. W.

Vogeltanz

N. D.

Wilsnack

S. C.

Harris

T. R.

(2000). Gender differences in alcohol consumption and adverse drinking consequences: Cross-cultural patterns. Addiction, 95, 251-265.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

The Interaction of Rape Myth Acceptance and Alcohol Intoxication on Bystander Intervention

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material